Source: monodevelop-python
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: mono-addins
Version: 0.4-6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: db4o
Version: 7.4.121.14026+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3
Source: mono-debugger
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: gnome-rdp
Version: 0.2.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: monodevelop-boo
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: gshare
Version: 0.94-10
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: dfo
Version: 0.8+svn52-5
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian
Source: mono-tools
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: monodevelop-debugger-mdb
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3
Source: graphmonkey
Version: 1.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: bless
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: monodevelop-java
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: avahi-sharp
Version: 0.6.19-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: gsf-sharp
Version: 0.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: mistelix
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: monodevelop-debugger-gdb
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3
Source: docky
Version: 2.0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: ipod-sharp
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: hipo
Version: 0.6.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: nant
Version: 0.85.dfsg1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
hey,
On 27/05/2010 Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:00:59PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
cryptsetup staticly links against libdevmapper,
This is not allowed under normal circumstances. Does the security team
know about?
as
Source: drapes
Version: 0.5.2-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: gdata-sharp
Version: 1.4.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: libmoose-policy-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: libnet-https-any-perl
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: libjboss-cache1-java
Version: 1.4.1.SP13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: libmoosex-types-structured-perl
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libmoosex-types-varianttable-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gmorgan
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: clutter-1.0
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[5]: Entering
Source: libdist-zilla-perl
Version: 2.101040-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: cia-clients
Version: 20100513
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: amule
Version: 2.2.6+debian0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.1.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot
Source: enna
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: cecil-flowanalysis
Version: 0.1~svn.128879-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 572466 serious
Bug #572466 [eiciel] eiciel: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572466:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 572465 serious
Bug #572465 [e16] e16: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572465:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 572470 serious
Bug #572470 [gregorio] gregorio: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572470:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 572468 serious
Bug #572468 [flex] flex: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572468:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 572464 serious
Bug #572464 [ceferino] ceferino: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572464:
Package: libllvm-ocaml-dev
Version: 2.6-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The META file for the llvm package does not work. It does not appear
when I type ocamlfind list. However, if I do:
/usr/lib/ocaml/METAS# cp libllvm-ocaml-dev.META META.llvm
Then it appears. It
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 22:03 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Thanks, now it is bulding without problems, it is uploaded at mentors
[1]
[1]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-dl2/gnustep-dl2_0.12.0-3.dsc
(The GSMethodList FTBFS is gnustep-base/1.20.x-specific so you can't
notice
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 582612 + pending
Bug #582612 [wdm] prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified
by the user
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
582612:
Adam
could you petsc3.1 with a Depends on libhdf5-openmpi-dev
for libpetsc3.1-dev ?
Thanks a lot
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.orgwrote:
Funny, the two Adams confused me for a moment...
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 06:24 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org wrote:
Package: mancala
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: grave
Hello,
There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
only one development version. So please rebuild mancala against
libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable.
Hello Nico,
First of all, let me add a disclaimer: I am *not* the maintainer of
libnss-ldap nor do I have much clue about LDAP auth and even that
package.
I am indeed working on it as part as a genral action wrt rotting bugs
reports related to localization.
Still, I went on your bug report and
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 20:03:30 +0200
with message-id aanlktil59kcn7j16kb4bipfjnc8xvu3c9nmoqnqhh...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#583014: vtk: FTBFS:
vtkBoostBiconnectedComponents.cxx:35:41: error: boost/vector_property_map.hpp:
No such file or directory
has caused the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 583097 spring: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*, triggers internal error in gcj
Bug #583097 [spring] spring: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* (libjna-java unavailable)
Changed Bug title to 'spring: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*, triggers internal error in
gcj' from 'spring:
same build failure on kfreebsd-386 buildd
- Forwarded message from Debian buildds nore...@buildd.debian.org -
From: Debian buildds nore...@buildd.debian.org
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 03:30:04 +
To: spr...@packages.qa.debian.org
Subject: failed kfreebsd-i386 build of spring
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:13:01PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
but still the most recent update of libdevmapper broke cryptsetup build.
see the build logs at https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=cryptsetup:
make[3]: Entering directory
Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org wrote:
Package: predict-gsat
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: grave
Hello,
There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
only one development version. So please rebuild predict-gsat against
libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:10:21PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
Hi!
As Alexander Sack hasn't even answered any public request to do an
enigmail upload, I've prepared an NMU based in asac's Ubuntu package. It
is available from:
http://wserver.wm1.at/~willi/debian/various/pool/main/e/enigmail/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pkg-config should not escape : in calls to --libs either. It's broken
building basically every Mono app or lib in the archive.
r...@osc-franzibald:/# pkg-config --libs monodoc
/r\:/usr/lib/mono/monodoc/monodoc.dll
r...@osc-franzibald:/# pkg-config
Hi Laurent,
2010/5/26 Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org:
Package: amsn
Version: 0.98.3-1
Severity: Serious
Hi,
aMSN shouldn't compile with v4l support on non linux archs.
This prevents building on kfreebsd-*
Thanks for reporting, I am working on that from the message sent by
Peter
Hi,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Alexander Sack a...@jwsdot.com wrote:
Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;)
I am willing to sponsor uploads of enigmail.
@Willi: may you provide a debdiff file, please?
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 05/27/2010 02:25 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;) ...
Why is the sponsoring a blocker for you, Alexander?
You appear to be a debian developer, according to
https://db.debian.org/search.cgi
What kind of sponsorship do you need?
--dkg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 552873
http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbugbug_id=17192group_id=12
Bug #552873 [src:sformat] sformat: FTBFS: ../include/mconfig.h:44:70: error:
xconfig.h: No such file or directory
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 18:47:13 +
with message-id e1ohi6r-0003bs...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#581215: fixed in shiboken 0.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #581215,
regarding [shiboken] shiboken just segfaults or does nothing
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:39:57PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/27/2010 02:25 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;) ...
Why is the sponsoring a blocker for you, Alexander?
You appear to be a debian developer, according to
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:32:00PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Alexander Sack a...@jwsdot.com wrote:
Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;)
I am willing to sponsor uploads of enigmail.
@Willi: may you provide a debdiff file, please?
severity 583175 normal
reassign 583175 release.debian.org
retitle 583175 nmu: mancala
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 583175 + binnmu
thanks
Hi,
Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes:
libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to
rebuild
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 583175 normal
Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
reassign 583175 release.debian.org
Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new
severity 583174 normal
reassign 583174 release.debian.org
retitle 583174 nmu: predict
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 583174 + binnmu
thanks
Hi,
Peter S Galbraith p...@debian.org writes:
libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to
rebuild
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 583174 normal
Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
reassign 583174 release.debian.org
Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.48-1.2
Hi Alexander!
On Wed, 05 May 2010 11:07:25 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for clisp (versioned as 1:2.48-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Thank you for the fix, but I
Package: live-initramfs
Version: 1.236.2-1
Severity: grave
When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
doesn’t populate the debconf database in /root/var/cache/debconf at all.
Therefore user-setup
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:20 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
First of all, let me add a disclaimer: I am *not* the maintainer of
libnss-ldap nor do I have much clue about LDAP auth and even that
package.
Let me then also add my comments (I'm also not the maintainer of
libnss-ldap but I'm the
Hello!
I've tried and I've got the following backtrace. Please look at it and
tell if more detailed info is needed. If so, which package should I
rebuild with debug DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
p...@neo:~$ SANE_DEBUG_HPAIO=255 gdb flegita
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software
Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
Thanks, now it is bulding without problems, it is uploaded at
mentors
IMHO it is useless to make an upload to sid fixing the current RC bug
now, because you'd need a sourceful upload for the transition anyway,
and the GNUstep stack (including gnustep-dl2) is not
Hi,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:24:54AM +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
thank you for your report. Do you really think, removing the manpage
in one package might be clever? As both packages are using the same
function under the hood, both packages need to have an appropriate
manpage for this. Both
Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 à 23:25 +0400, Андрей Парамонов a écrit :
Hello!
I've tried and I've got the following backtrace. Please look at it and
tell if more detailed info is needed. If so, which package should I
rebuild with debug DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
Program received signal SIGSEGV,
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:06:13 +0200, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org
wrote:
When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
doesn’t populate the debconf database in /root/var/cache/debconf at all.
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source on ia64 (at least)
Another one of these, which upstream will hopefully fix:
gcc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -ggdb -fomit-frame-pointer -Os
-DSendmail=\/usr/sbin/sendmail -t\
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 461643 grave
Bug #461643 [enigmail] please package version 1.0.1 for icedove 3 support
Severity set to 'grave' from 'wishlist'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
461643:
Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 à 21:43 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:06:13 +0200, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org
wrote:
When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
doesn’t
tag 583485 pending
thanks
On 05/27/2010 09:06 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
doesn’t populate the debconf database in /root/var/cache/debconf at all.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 583485 pending
Bug #583485 [live-initramfs] live-initramfs: debconf database is not filled
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583485:
On 05/27/2010 09:43 PM, Jiří Paleček wrote:
Welcome aboard... see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2010/05/msg00108.html
jup.. since your last mail, it's all waiting for ftp-masters. i
currently can't do more than upload the packages.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 583460 + confirmed upstream
Bug #583460 [src:libmoose-policy-perl] libmoose-policy-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
End of message,
Package: libllvm-ocaml-dev
Version: 2.6-9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The patch attached fix this bug.
Cheers
Sylvain Le Gall
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
forwarded 583460 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=57913
Bug #583460 [src:libmoose-policy-perl] libmoose-policy-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Set Bug
tag 583418 + pending
thanks
Some bugs are closed in revision 58566
by Gregor Herrmann (gregoa)
Commit message:
* Remove transitional dummy package libnet-z3950-zoom-perl now that lenny is
released.
* Change build dependency from old libyaz3-dev to new libyaz4-dev
(closes: #583418).
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 583418 + pending
Bug #583418 [src:libnet-z3950-zoom-perl] libnet-z3950-zoom-perl: FTBFS:
Nonexistent build-dependency: libyaz3-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583418:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 19:14:44 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/user-libdist-zilla-perl_2.101040-1-amd64-2OYRmd/libdist-zilla-perl-2.101040'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
]] Jo Shields
| pkg-config should not escape : in calls to --libs either. It's broken
| building basically every Mono app or lib in the archive.
I have a 0.25 in the pipeline which should be released either tonight or
tomorrow which fixes this.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's
tag 583462 + pending
thanks
Some bugs are closed in revision 58571
by Gregor Herrmann (gregoa)
Commit message:
Explicitly run only the non-network tests (closes: #583462).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 583462 + pending
Bug #583462 [src:libnet-https-any-perl] libnet-https-any-perl: FTBFS: tests
failed
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583462:
On 05/27/2010 09:52 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
So while there is a trivial fix - that is, reverting the 10adduser
script to the previous version, we will have to wait for an alpha
version that will be even more broken?
'alpha' doesn't mean 'experimental buggy software' here, but 'could
change
hey,
On 27/05/2010 Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:13:01PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
but still the most recent update of libdevmapper broke cryptsetup build.
see the build logs at https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=cryptsetup:
make[3]: Entering directory
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 23:17:21 +0200
with message-id 20100527211721.ga9...@jwilk.net
and subject line json-py removed from unstable and testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #580651,
regarding json-py: should not be released with squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Err, wrong version...
notfixed 580651 3.4-2+rm
Bug #580651 {Done: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org} [python-json] json-py: should
not be released with squeeze
There is no source info for the package 'python-json' at version '3.4-2+rm'
with
Good evening guys,
Christian PERRIER [Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:20:46PM +0200]:
Are you still experiencing that bug? From your description, this is a
very handicapping bug and you might either have found a
workaround...or something else fixed the problemor maybe you are
still experiencing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 583485 important
Bug #583485 [live-initramfs] live-initramfs: debconf database is not filled
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583485:
Hi Andreas,
Le Thursday 27 May 2010 12:22:37, vous avez écrit :
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to find and understand it!
Thank you for considering it!
Could you provide your /etc/ssh/ssh_config and ~/.ssh/config file that we
could try to reproduce it on our system.
My system
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/user-libnet-https-any
-z3950-zoom-perl
Version: 1.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies
Hi Christophe,
Sure, I can do that -- or rather, libhdf5-mpi-dev which depends on the
correct HDF5 libdev. Just pushed it to alioth.
-Adam
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:41 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Adam
could you petsc3.1 with a Depends on libhdf5-openmpi-dev
for libpetsc3.1-dev ?
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.7.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If I reboot my computer, the gdm login screen comes up eventually. I can
login to gdm and all the usual X things work fine.
If I logout of gdm, it starts off ok, I get a flicker of the f1 screen
101 - 200 of 213 matches
Mail list logo