Bug#604840: syncevolution: Build failure on s390

2010-11-26 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:22:18 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mi, 2010-11-24 at 18:48 +, David Bremner wrote: > > Building syncevolution on s390 fails with an illegal pointer > > conversion. I haven't had a chance to poke at this yet, but I'm > > reporting it here in case Patrick has any cleve

Bug#594615: Testing a patch to fix the 525

2010-11-26 Thread Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:41:52AM -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > Can you guys test the following patch? (it's from the concordance > mailing list) > > -- > > diff -u -p -r1.12 remote_info.h > --- libconcord/remote_info.h1 Aug 2010 14:35:52 - 1.12 > +++ libconcord/r

Bug#584653: ghostscript: does not honor -P- option

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Gilbert
If I'm reading this discussion right, you expect someone else to apply the attached patches and then assume responsibility for the entire package since you're unwilling maintain it if it has any more patches? That seems a bit extreme, but I will take a look at doing so when I find some time. It l

Processed: Re: Bug#604712: qemu-user-static: binfmts/qemu-x86_64 breaks debootstrap

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 604712 serious Bug #604712 [qemu-user-static] qemu-user-static: binfmts/qemu-x86_64 breaks debootstrap Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > found 604712 0.12.5+dfsg-2 Bug #604712 [qemu-user-static] qemu-user-static: binfmts/qemu-x8

Processed: Re: Bug#605003: loss of data

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 605003 xchat Bug #605003 [xchat] loss of data Ignoring request to reassign bug #605003 to the same package > severity 605003 grave Bug #605003 [xchat] loss of data Severity set to 'grave' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#605003: loss of data

2010-11-26 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 605003 xchat severity 605003 grave thanks On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:36:07PM -0500, jamesb wrote: > Package: kernel > Severity: critical > It appears that after doing some heavy compiling and filling up the entire > filesystem, my xchat settings completely vanished when i decided to reus

Bug#548383: marked as done (qpopper: The PAM configuration file does not fit to the latest libpam-modules package)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:33:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#548383: fixed in qpopper 4.0.9.dfsg-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #548383, regarding qpopper: The PAM configuration file does not fit to the latest libpam-modules package to be marked as done. This me

Bug#605065: kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-amd64: Delete key does not delete the character to the right of the cursor

2010-11-26 Thread Modestas
Package: kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-amd64 Version: 8.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: violates MUST directive of Debian Policy 9.8 Hello, it seems that roles of <-- and Delete keys are somewhat reversed in the VTs of kFreeBSD. I was not able to get "Delete" key to "delete the character to the righ

Bug#604212: capi4hylafax: installation fails

2010-11-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/11/10 at 17:46 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot reproduce it with piuparts. > > > >> Setting up hylafax-server (2:6.0.5-3) ... > > >> invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of stop. > > >> awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `/etc/mtab' for reading (No > > >> such f

Bug#602257: marked as done (gnumeric crashes constantly)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:35:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#602257: fixed in gnumeric 1.10.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #602257, regarding gnumeric crashes constantly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#566143: Embedded copy of libasyncns0

2010-11-26 Thread brian m. carlson
This is to let the secure-testing team know that libloudmouth1-0 embeds a copy of libasyncns0 and this should therefore be listed in the embedded code copies file. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only

Bug#605042: marked as done (opennebula: FTBFS when only architecture-dependent packages requested)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:47:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605042: fixed in opennebula 2.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #605042, regarding opennebula: FTBFS when only architecture-dependent packages requested to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#572982: marked as done (azureus: Multiple license issues.)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:32:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#572982: fixed in azureus 4.3.0.6-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #572982, regarding azureus: Multiple license issues. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#592677: marked as done (jspwiki: invalid user: `tomcat55')

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:02:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#592677: fixed in jspwiki 2.8.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #592677, regarding jspwiki: invalid user: `tomcat55' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#605042: opennebula: FTBFS when only architecture-dependent packages requested

2010-11-26 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: opennebula Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of just opennebula's architecture-dependent packages are failing: dh_auto_install dh_install -p opennebula-node debian/opennebula-node.sudoers /etc/sudoers.d dh_install: No packages to b

Bug#564425: Fixed 0.62+nmu1 and cleaned-up some lintian warnings in 0.62+nmu2

2010-11-26 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Alexander, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > * Benoît Knecht [101125 20:23]: > > > [..] and while I was at it, I fixed some basic lintian warnings in > > version 0.62+nmu2. > > Thanks for your work, however I found some of your changes to intrusive > for an NMU (e.g. change to source format

Bug#564425: Fixed 0.62+nmu1 and cleaned-up some lintian warnings in 0.62+nmu2

2010-11-26 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Benoît Knecht [101125 20:23]: > [..] and while I was at it, I fixed some basic lintian warnings in > version 0.62+nmu2. Thanks for your work, however I found some of your changes to intrusive for an NMU (e.g. change to source format 3) especially that late in the freeze cycle. However, y

Bug#564425: cowdancer: diff for NMU version 0.62+nmu1

2010-11-26 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
tags 564425 + patch tags 564425 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for cowdancer (versioned as 0.62+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru cowdancer-0.62/debian/changelog cowdancer-0.62+nmu1/debian/chang

Processed: qgis crashes on startup on PowerPC

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 603986 qgis crashes on startup on PowerPC Bug #603986 [qgis] qgis crashes on startup Changed Bug title to 'qgis crashes on startup on PowerPC' from 'qgis crashes on startup' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: cowdancer: diff for NMU version 0.62+nmu1

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 564425 + patch Bug #564425 [qemubuilder] qemubuilder --create fails to start qemu - umount problem Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #564425 to the same tags previously set > tags 564425 + pending Bug #564425 [qemubuilder] qemubuilder --

Bug#603986: qgis crashes on startup on PowerPC

2010-11-26 Thread Hideki Yamane
retitle 603986 qgis crashes on startup on PowerPC thanks Hi, I can confirm it with PowerMac G4 Cube, however, it works fine with i386 and amd64 PC. I know its quite annoying problem for bug submitter, but if it's difficult to solve this issue, I suggest to down severity because other PC

Bug#604209: marked as done (ident2: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604209: fixed in ident2 1.07-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604209, regarding ident2: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#605025: Segmentation fault of corosync running without pacemaker

2010-11-26 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Package: corosync Version: 1.2.1-1~bpo50+1 Severity: serious Justification: 4 Starting corosync without pacemaker in the service section results in a segmentation fault corosync on my system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Archite

Processed: Re: Bug#605024: coq: coq.el requires nonexistent hilit19

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 605014 coq Bug #605014 [proofgeneral-coq] proofgeneral-coq: PG for coq unusable because hilit19 is missing Bug reassigned from package 'proofgeneral-coq' to 'coq'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions proofgeneral/3.7-4. > reassign

Bug#603561: latex209-bin: fails to upgrade from lenny, probably a dependency cycle with latex209-base

2010-11-26 Thread Hideki Yamane
tags 603561 patch thanks Hi, I introduced regression in previous update, so I'd fix this as below. Pre-Depends is too much, Depends is enough. Please check whether it's okay or not. --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/changelog 2010-05-14 03:27:38.0 +0900 +++ latex209-25.mar.199

Processed: Re: latex209-bin: fails to upgrade from lenny, probably a dependency cycle with latex209-base

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 603561 patch Bug #603561 [latex209-bin] latex209-bin: fails to upgrade from lenny, probably a dependency cycle with latex209-base Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 603561: h

Bug#597926: isdnutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1

2010-11-26 Thread Rolf Leggewie
On 26.11.2010 14:21, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > In case "more time" means more than a few days, could we have a fixed > version in sid please? Besides, maybe you might want to test -x instead of -e > when looking for MAKEDEV? Guys, I appreciate you taking isdnutils seriously. I'm happy to see the pack

Bug#601690: marked as done (CVE-2010-3493: smtpd module)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:41:17 +0100 with message-id <4cefb8fd.5020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#601690: CVE-2010-3493: smtpd module has caused the Debian Bug report #601690, regarding CVE-2010-3493: smtpd module to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#597926: isdnutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1

2010-11-26 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 26/11/2010 14:08, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Thanks guys, for your input. There are many minefields with isdnutils. I appreciate you pointing them out. FWIW, my Ubuntu system does not have /dev/MAKEDEV and I want to make sure that eventually Ubuntu can drop it's delta. As such, I will need a bit

Bug#605003: loss of data

2010-11-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 23:36 -0500, jamesb wrote: > Package: kernel > Severity: critical > > It appears that after doing some heavy compiling and filling up the entire > filesystem, my xchat > settings completely vanished when i decided to reuse it. (decided to clear > out all the made up object

Processed: reassign 605003 to xchat

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 605003 xchat Bug #605003 [linux-2.6] loss of data Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'xchat'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-26 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Jonathan Yu [101125 14:31]: > Your advice would be greatly appreciated. I'm not sure, if I'm the best to ask for advice for this matter, as I'm just an "RC bug hunter", neither a perl nor a swf developer. But in general I tend to think, that a libmojomojo-perl with limited functionality

Bug#563474: fix uploaded to DELAYED/7

2010-11-26 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Hey, the fix was tested and was found to work on 2.6.32. The fix is uploaded to delayed/7. Thanks to Chad Wagner to provide the patch. Greetings Winnie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#597926: isdnutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1

2010-11-26 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Thanks guys, for your input. There are many minefields with isdnutils. I appreciate you pointing them out. FWIW, my Ubuntu system does not have /dev/MAKEDEV and I want to make sure that eventually Ubuntu can drop it's delta. As such, I will need a bit more time to look into this issue. -- T

Bug#579312: marked as done (package canna failed to purge: /usr/sbin/deluser: The user `canna' does not exist.)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:02:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#579312: fixed in canna 3.7p3-6.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #579312, regarding package canna failed to purge: /usr/sbin/deluser: The user `canna' does not exist. to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#597926: isdnutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1

2010-11-26 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-11-26 13:31 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Am 26.11.2010 12:44, schrieb Rolf Leggewie: > >>> I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1) >>> and >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9

Bug#604216: marked as done (ibod: installation fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604216: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #604216, regarding ibod: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#604219: marked as done (isdnvboxserver: installation fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604219: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #604219, regarding isdnvboxserver: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#604211: marked as done (ipppd: installation fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604216: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #604216, regarding ipppd: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#604216: marked as done (ibod: installation fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604211: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #604211, regarding ibod: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#604211: marked as done (ipppd: installation fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604211: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #604211, regarding ipppd: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#597926: marked as done (/var/lib/dpkg/info/isdnvboxserver.postinst: 21: MAKEDEV: not found)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#597926: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #597926, regarding /var/lib/dpkg/info/isdnvboxserver.postinst: 21: MAKEDEV: not found to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#597926: isdnutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1

2010-11-26 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Rolf! Am 26.11.2010 12:44, schrieb Rolf Leggewie: >> I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1) >> and >> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7.dsc > is what I would like to see uploa

Bug#602217: marked as done (salome-examples won't install)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:23:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#602217: fixed in salome 5.1.3-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #602217, regarding salome-examples won't install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#601712: marked as done (salome: FTBFS due to missing graphviz)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:23:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601712: fixed in salome 5.1.3-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #601712, regarding salome: FTBFS due to missing graphviz to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: tagging 584585

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 584585 + pending Bug #584585 [bind9] libisc* file conflicts with backports.org libisc50 Bug #589182 [bind9] Installing libisc52 tries to overwrite files in libisc50 Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here

Processed: fixed 599515 in 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 599515 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1 Bug #599515 [bind9] bind9: CVE-2010-3752 Bug Marked as fixed in versions bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 599515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#604235: marked as done (rinputd: hangs when preconfiguring package)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:02:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604235: fixed in rinputd 1.0.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #604235, regarding rinputd: hangs when preconfiguring package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#597926: isdnutils: diff for NMU version 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1

2010-11-26 Thread Rolf Leggewie
On 25.11.2010 12:09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1) > and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7.dsc is what I would like to see uploaded ins

Bug#605014: proofgeneral-coq: PG for coq unusable because hilit19 is missing

2010-11-26 Thread Hendrik Tews
Package: proofgeneral-coq Version: 3.7-4 Severity: grave Opening any .v file or starting coq-mode manually only gives the error File mode specification error: (file-error "Cannot open load file" "hilit19") and no proof-general functionality is available. The package is therefore completely un

Bug#604970: marked as done (coccinelle: Missing ocaml-findlib in Depends:)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604970: fixed in coccinelle 0.2.4.deb-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #604970, regarding coccinelle: Missing ocaml-findlib in Depends: to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#595927: closed by Guillem Jover (Bug#600075: fixed in dpkg 1.15.8.6)

2010-11-26 Thread stephen mulcahy
FYI - I just manually installed 1.15.8.6 on one of our systems that had been exhibiting this problem and then ran a significant aptitude update & upgrade and didn't see any occurences of the problem - so this looks positive. It would be good to see this update migrate into squeeze asap. Thank

Bug#604218: marked as done (gforge-shell-postgresql: installation fails)

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:32:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604218: fixed in fusionforge 5.0.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #604218, regarding gforge-shell-postgresql: installation fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed: limit source to coccinelle, tagging 604970

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #coccinelle (0.2.4.deb-2) experimental; urgency=low > # > # * Depend on ocaml-findlib, thanks to Cyril Brulebois for noticing > #(closes: #604970) > # > limit source coccinelle Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of '

Processed: Re: Bug#605003: loss of data

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 605003 linux-2.6 Bug #605003 [kernel] loss of data Warning: Unknown package 'kernel' Bug reassigned from package 'kernel' to 'linux-2.6'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605003: http://bugs.de

Processed: Re: libllvm-ocaml-2.7-dev: bad findlib package name

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 604933 important Bug #604933 [libllvm-ocaml-2.7-dev] libllvm-ocaml-2.7-dev: bad findlib package name Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604933: http

Bug#604933: libllvm-ocaml-2.7-dev: bad findlib package name

2010-11-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
severity 604933 important thanks Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, ygrek a écrit : > Justification: renders package unusable This is overly exaggerated. The findlib package and shared stublibs are not upstream features, and the package can still be used as a regular library with third-party programs. This

Processed: fixed 596796 in 1.2.6-1

2010-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 596796 1.2.6-1 Bug #596796 {Done: Andrew Pollock } [src:pacparser] pacparser: FTBFS: Test failed: got "", expected "END-OF-SCRIPT" Bug Marked as fixed in versions pacparser/1.2.6-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y