Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:47:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626106: fixed in cvs 2:1.12.13+real-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #626106,
regarding cvs: no NEWS.Debian file after intrusive changes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 03:29:12AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> wait until -3 is built
OK, thanks for the quick response!
BTW, I notice that gdc ships with D version 1 support by default. Is
there any plan to release a build with D version 2 support anytime soon?
Thanks!
--T
--
To UNSUBSC
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 629679 + pending
Bug #629679 [src:zthreads] zthreads: FTBFS: conftest.c:33: undefined reference
to `_ftime'
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
629679: http://bugs.debian.o
tags 629679 + pending
thanks.
I have rebuild configure files using libtool and autotools. I have
tested it in amd64 and i386.
Cheers,
Cleto.
On 06/08/2011 04:23 PM, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Source: zthreads
> Version: 2.3.2-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.o
On 06/10/2011 10:26 PM, Jay Payne wrote:
> How about something like "swiftcli"?
>
> --J
That sounds nice to me.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:47:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630100: fixed in libfann 2.1.0~beta~dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #630100,
regarding libfann: FTBFS: cp: cannot create directory
`debian/libfann-doc/usr/share/doc/libfann-doc/examples/python': No suc
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:47:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621970: fixed in linphone 3.3.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #621970,
regarding linphone: FTBFS: msv4l.c:33:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No
such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means
On 06/11/2011 12:04 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> If you have further questions please mail debian-...@lists.debian.org
yes, please attach a patch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
wait until -3 is built
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #linphone (3.3.2-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix "FTBFS: msv4l.c:33:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such
> #file or directory" - unbuntu fix (Closes: #621970)
> #
> limit source linphone
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' con
Package: libgeom0
Version: 8.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: cannot install grub-pc
Affects: grub-common
Hi,
Typical kfreebsd-amd64 experimental system (running through qemu).
Was upgrading today for the first time since 2011-05-06. Previously I
had grub-pc 1.99~rc1-13 installed. When it cam
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:17:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629954: fixed in dbus 1.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #629954,
regarding Wrong path in /etc/init.d/dbus
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: src:gdc-4.4
Version: 1.063-4.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package fails to build on the kfreebsd-amd64 buildd:
/build/buildd-gdc-4.4_1.063-4.4.6-3-kfreebsd-amd64-0PaC1x/gdc-4.4-1.063-4.4.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 625544 by 630014
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick4
Was blocked by: 625553 625579 625550 625576 625578 625552 625554 625602 625582
625561 625592 625585 625580 625573 625597 628254 625583 625557 625574 625546
625595 6
Package: src:libfann
Version: 2.1.0~beta~dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
your package fails to build on the buildds:
dh_installexamples
# Copy python examples to a subdir in examples/
cp -r python/exampl
Package: src:libvirt
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Your package fails to build on kfreebsd buildds:
checking for iptables... /sbin/iptables
checking for ip6tables... /sbin/ip6tables
checking for e
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:47:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618243: fixed in libopkele 2.0.4-5.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #618243,
regarding libopkele: FTBFS: dh_makeshlibs: dpkg-gensymbols -plibopkele3
-Idebian/libopkele3.symbols -Pdebian/libopkele3 returned e
tags 618243 + patch
tags 618243 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libopkele (versioned as 2.0.4-5.2) and
uploaded it.
Cheers
Luk
diff -Nru libopkele-2.0.4/debian/changelog libopkele-2.0.4/debian/changelog
--- libopkele-2.0.4/debian/changelog 2011-06-05 17:56:52.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 618243 + patch
Bug #618243 {Done: Luk Claes } [src:libopkele] libopkele:
FTBFS: dh_makeshlibs: dpkg-gensymbols -plibopkele3 -Idebian/libopkele3.symbols
-Pdebian/libopkele3 returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 618243 + pending
Bug
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:49:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628355: fixed in pygrace 0.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #628355,
regarding pygrace: FTBFS: rmdir: failed to remove
`debian/python-pygrace/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pygrace':
Directory not
tag 625581 +patch
thanks
Hi again,
I finally got around packaging the newest version of pythonmagick,
which turned out to be a great deal simpler than patching the old
code. However, I don't have any means to test the package, as I'm
unable to find proper examples of pythonmagick use in real
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fri Jun 10 20:03:40 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: wireshark
> tags 627146 + pending
Bug #627146 [libwsutil0] libwsutil0: broke ABI
Package: gnucash
Version: 1:2.4.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
$ gnucash
gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure
time.
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
?: 0* [primitive-load-path "slib/
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:55:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#624287: fixed in tiff 3.9.4-5+squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #624287,
regarding CVE-2009-5022
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Quoting Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org):
> Hi Christian,
>
> I'm just mailing to confirm that we did record the issue in our tracker and
> to
> point out that this issue is currently also discueed on oss-security:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/5172
Thanks, Thijs,
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Package: gdc-4.4
Version: 1.063-4.4.6-2
Severity: serious
$ gdc hash.d
gdc: error trying to exec 'cc1d': execvp: No such file or directory
$ strace gdc hash.d
execve("/usr/bin/gdc", ["gdc", "hash.d"], [/* 21 vars */]) = 0
[... snipped ...]
stat("/mnt/1/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.6/cc
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Hello,
I've dug with more details into the pythonmagick FTBS. It turns out
that it's (at least partly) due to rather trivial upstream type
changes, such as unsigned int to size_t and int to ssiez_t...
I'm underway to fix that for now, if I don't hit more complex
problems. I've written a scr
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
On Thursday 09 June 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > select(3147, [1024 1223 1224 1227 1230 1231 1235 1241 1242 1243
> Hah, I found the apparent problem. The number of fds in those
> select() calls tipped me off to reexamine a change I recently did
> as part of the squeeze upgrade - I enabled a large
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking fo
Source: pd-beatpipe
Version: 0.1-2
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on th
Source: pd-bassemu
Version: 0.3-2
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on thi
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:32:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630087: fixed in javatools 0.36.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630087,
regarding java-propose-classpath depends on gcj, which isn't available anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 629954 + pending
Bug #629954 [dbus] Wrong path in /etc/init.d/dbus
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 630011 + pending
Bug #630011 [dbus] gdm3 fails start with dbus_1.5.1-2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
tags 629954 + pending
tags 630011 + pending
thanks
That's what I get for trying to merge from Ubuntu with not enough caffeine...
I'll upload a fixed version when I've had a chance to test it properly;
I'd recommend downgrading to the version in unstable for now.
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Package: java-propose-classpath
Version: 0.36
Severity: serious
java-propose-classpath depends on gcj, which isn't available anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:17:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#555287: fixed in libppd 2:0.10-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #555287,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 615692 patch
Bug #615692 [argyll] argyll: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
615692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615
tags 615692 patch
thanks
Description: Add libargyll.la as a linked library where it is needed. Closes #615692.
Author: Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Last-Update: 2011-06-10
Index: argyll-1.1.1/target/Makefile.am
===
--- argyll-1.1.1.orig/tar
Package: oprofile
Version: 0.9.6-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were
published for oprofile.
CVE-2011-2473[0]:
| The do_dump_data function in utils/opcontrol in OProfile 0.9.6 and
| earlier might allow local users to create or o
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:02:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618243: fixed in libopkele 2.0.4-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #618243,
regarding libopkele: FTBFS: dh_makeshlibs: dpkg-gensymbols -plibopkele3
-Idebian/libopkele3.symbols -Pdebian/libopkele3 returned e
On 06/10/2011 12:41 AM, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 06:10 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> The code generated for python modules fails to compile with gcc 4.6. This is
>> due to a missing "#include". Upstream fixed this issue in [1].
>>
>> Some packages FTBFS because of this (see #624
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 630017 important
Bug #630017 [alacarte] alacarte is full cleaning
~/.config/menus/gnome-applications.menu
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
630017:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dererk wrote:
> On 10/06/11 06:28, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> tag 625597 + pending patch
>> tag 629788 + pending patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have just prepared a NMU for libfprint FTBS/imagemagick
>> transition, which I uploaded to a 5-days delayed que
On 10/06/11 06:28, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> tag 625597 + pending patch
> tag 629788 + pending patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> I have just prepared a NMU for libfprint FTBS/imagemagick
> transition, which I uploaded to a 5-days delayed queue. The diff for
> the NMU is attached.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:17:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628506: fixed in binutils-z80 2.21.52-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #628506,
regarding binutils-z80 needs an update to updated binutils-source package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:17:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629755: fixed in binutils-z80 2.21.52-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #629755,
regarding binutils-z80: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binutils-source
(< 2.21.1) but 2.21.52.20110606-1 is to be insta
In the build log we see:
Merged Build-Depends: ..., python-gtk2 (<< 2.10) | python-gobject, ...
Filtered Build-Depends: ..., python-gtk2 (<< 2.10), ...
So before it even tried to install dependencies, it pruned out all the
alternatives. When the first alternative failed, it didn't go back and tr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 629656 2.2.25-3
Bug #629656 {Done: u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)} [ncbi-blast+] ncbi-blast+:
FTBFS everywhere for assorted reasons
Bug Marked as found in versions ncbi-blast+/2.2.25-3; no longer marked as fixed
in versions ncbi-blast+/2.
found 629656 2.2.25-3
thanks
Hurd builds are still failing. :-/ The immediate cause is that
configure's test for select's behavior times out(!), but further manual
testing reveals at least one file that expects PATH_MAX to be defined.
In principle, it should be possible to work around both issues
Package: alacarte
Version: 0.13.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
When I tried to click uninstalled, but visible program (wine *.exe) in alacarte
it clean ~/.config/menus/gnome-applications.menu file. Then it impossible to
run alacarte again:
--
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:17:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629726: fixed in kismet 2008-05-R1-4.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629726,
regarding kismet: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 556770 + patch
Bug #556770 [src:zabbix] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
556770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556770
Debian Bug
Hello,
Attached is a new version of the NMU patch for kismet FTBS that
disable -rpath on /usr/lib/wireshark. For one, it seems completely
useless (that directory doesn't contain share libraries) and it
prevents the package from being uploaded.
The package has been uploaded to a 0-day NMU qu
Package: libvips-dev
Version: 7.24.5-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
I've just noticed that libvips-dev depends on libmagick9-dev |
libmagick-dev, which are both virtual packages. Please move to the
newer libmagickcore-dev and/or libmagickwand-dev dependencies.
This bug is the cause of bug #629
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625593: fixed in autotrace 0.31.1-15.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625593,
regarding autotrace: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625593: fixed in autotrace 0.31.1-15.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625593,
regarding transition: libmagick4 and old depend on libmagick9-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On 10/06/2011 11:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> They were a case of need ;-)... I've uploaded to the 5-days delay
> queue as the RC bugs are too recent.
>
There is no need to wait. The bug (#625548) was submitted on May 7th, and
there was no reaction from the maintainer. So, please res
Hello,
On penktadienis 10 Birželis 2011 12:39:42 Dirk Pankonin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the official debian squeeze site offers for digikam the package version
> digikam (2:1.2.0-7). I have also the same problem as described in the bug
> and I want to suggest to offer the version 2:1.9.0-3 as the officia
Hi,
the official debian squeeze site offers for digikam the package version digikam
(2:1.2.0-7). I have also the same problem as described in the bug and I want to
suggest to offer the version 2:1.9.0-3 as the official version for debian
squeeze (maybe in the backport path). I tried to install
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:38:10 +0200
with message-id <1307698690.2268.3.camel@alexander>
and subject line Re: Bug#624569: closed by Tzafrir Cohen
(Bug#624569: fixed in asterisk 1:1.8.4-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #624569,
regarding FTBFS because of missing build-dependencies
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >> The problem is that libdl.so has been moved to the multiarch paths in
>> >> libc6-dev 2.13-5. You must upgrade cmake to 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3, have you
>> >> done that already?
>>
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:31:38 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#629946: libmagickwand-dev: stopped providing
libmagick9-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #629946,
regarding libmagickwand-dev: stopped providing libmagick9-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 625597 + pending patch
Bug #625597 [src:libfprint] transition: libmagick4 and old depend on
libmagick9-dev
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> tag 629788 + pending patch
Bug #629788 [src:libfprint] libfprint: FTBFS: build-dependency not install
tag 625597 + pending patch
tag 629788 + pending patch
thanks
Hello,
I have just prepared a NMU for libfprint FTBS/imagemagick
transition, which I uploaded to a 5-days delayed queue. The diff for
the NMU is attached.
Cheers,
Vincent
diff -Nru libfprint-20110418git/debian/changelog
l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 625548 + pending patch
Bug #625548 [kismet] transition: libmagick4
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> tag 629726 + pending patch
Bug #629726 [src:kismet] kismet: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
libmagick9-dev
Added tag(s) pending and
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:04:06PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-geda-xgsch2pcb-dummy : Depends: python-gtk2 (< 2.10)
> > but 2.24.0-2 is to be installed
---end quoted text---
geda-xgsch2pcb Build-Deps on: python-gtk2 (<
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:44:00AM +0200, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> asterisk still can't be built on sparc (still missing libsrtp0-dev) and
> now also FTBFS on mips, powerpc and s390, see here:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=asterisk
This is basically fixed. Ther
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 626868 + pending
Bug #626868 [src:qwt] qwt: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`debian/tmp/usr/include/qwt-qt3': No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
626868: ht
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:26:39AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> I did a quick survey over all my Debian machines and found /lib/ld.so
> together with the "Mar 7 2001" timestamp, as already mentioned by Haegar
> and others, on all "older" systems, i.e. systems initially installed
> severa
Hello Steve,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:17:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The attached (untested) patch is based on an IRC conversation with Aurélien
> yesterday about this bug. If there are any other copies of ld-2.x.so in
> /lib that dpkg doesn't know about, we should abort the upgrade unt
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:18:32 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Reverse Build-depends of libmagick9-dev in main:
> --
>
> libtuxcap (warning given in #625599). Dealt with
> gnuift (warning given in #625546). Dealt with
> libfprint (warning given in #625597). Admitte
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 629946 8:6.6.9.7-3.1
Bug #629946 [libmagickwand-dev] libmagickwand-dev: stopped providing
libmagick9-dev
Bug No longer marked as found in versions imagemagick/8:6.6.9.7-3.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
notfound 629946 8:6.6.9.7-3.1
thanks
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Somehow the new libmagickwand-dev in sid doesn't provide libmagick9-dev
> anymore, with no explanation in the changelog. libmagick9-dev still has
> reverse (build) dependencies, so dropping it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 629984 fam
Bug #629984 [spamassassin] spamd: could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783
(listened by famd)
Bug reassigned from package 'spamassassin' to 'fam'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions spamassassin/3.3.1-2.
> retitle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 625484 db4.8/4.8.30-8
Bug #625484 [libdb4.8] libdb4.8: 'Build signature doesn't match environment' in
4.8.30-6
Bug No longer marked as found in versions db4.8/4.8.30-8.
> close 625484
Bug#625484: libdb4.8: 'Build signature doesn't match
Hi Joerg,
unfortunately that looks like a problem on your local system.
Did you by any chance used db-4.8 4.8.30-7 for some time?
The db signature is correct in 4.8.30-8:
This is squeeze:
root@howl:/tmp/buildd# ./db_signature
8ea84a14
root@howl:/tmp/buildd# dpkg -l libdb4.8
Desired=Unknown/Ins
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#615737: fixed in kraft 0.43-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #615737,
regarding kraft: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo