Bug#637425: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue

2011-08-12 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, On 08/12/2011 01:18 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so the R constraint will always be able to avoid choosing eax, and eax will be free for the

Bug#637425: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue

2011-08-12 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so the R constraint will always be able to avoid choosing eax, and eax will be free for the muxcode, so

Processed: Re: Bug#622363: transition: libnotify 0.7

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622363 with 637067 Bug #622363 [release.debian.org] transition: libnotify 0.7 Was blocked by: 636297 630300 636344 630281 630266 636397 630294 630265 633973 630302 630312 630283 619874 630307 630277 630295 630279 630298 630264 630289

Bug#628919: Packages for Squeeze

2011-08-12 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi, I needed to have a working chrony in a couple of Squeeze servers. I am linking here the packages in case they are useful to somebody else: http://people.debian.org/~ana/chrony-squeeze/chrony_1.24-4~ana_amd64.deb http://people.debian.org/~ana/chrony-squeeze/chrony_1.24-4~ana_i386.deb (also

Bug#553725: marked as done (replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:17:15 + with message-id e1qrnrf-0006ac...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#553725: fixed in apcalc 2.12.4.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #553725, regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev to be marked as done.

Bug#637501: dtc-common: modifies config files of other packages

2011-08-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/12/2011 02:27 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote: Package: dtc-common Version: 0.32.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.4 It seems to me that the package tries to subvert policy 10.7.4 here. Other bugs have been opened against this source package in the past (for example

Bug#637435: ifupdown: interfaces are not brought up anymore

2011-08-12 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:41 +0300, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: Sorry, can't reproduce. I've just installed a clean unstable system, and it just doesn't happen. Please provide more details. Well during ifupdown-clean on boot i get a cannot remove /etc/network/run/ifstate ... ro filesystem

Bug#637520: gnutls26: wrong breaks on sipsak [sparc]

2011-08-12 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: gnutls26 Version: 2.12.7-4 Severity: serious new gnutls has Breaks on sipsak (= 0.9.6-2.1), but sparc has 0.9.6-2.1+b1. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#637418: marked as done (gnat-4.6 ftbfs with eglibc-2.13-16)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:48:02 + with message-id e1qrols-0001rb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637418: fixed in gnat-4.6 4.6.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #637418, regarding gnat-4.6 ftbfs with eglibc-2.13-16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#637521: Linked against libgnutls-openssl.so.26 but doesn't depend on its package

2011-08-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: gkrellm Version: 2.3.5-1 Severity: grave $ gkrellm gkrellm: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls-openssl.so.26: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory $ ldd -r /usr/bin/gkrellm|fgrep 'not f' libgnutls-openssl.so.26 = not found undefined symbol:

Bug#637521: marked as done (Linked against libgnutls-openssl.so.26 but doesn't depend on its package)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:59:09 +0200 with message-id 20110812095909.ga23...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#637521: Linked against libgnutls-openssl.so.26 but doesn't depend on its package has caused the Debian Bug report #637521, regarding Linked against

Bug#637501: Quite verbose indeed

2011-08-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
And thus telling the user to run a script which modifies the configuration files of a dozen other packages without warning, and often without a way back, is violating the spirit of the policy. When I'm at it, I just ran wc -l on the output of the script. It's exactly 200 lines long. How can

Bug#637464: python-btsutils: should this package be removed?

2011-08-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2011-08-11, 20:23: - Multiple bugs renders the package mostly usable That should be of course: Multiple bugs render the package mostly unusable. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#637505: dtc: minimized js files without source

2011-08-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/12/2011 02:56 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote: Source: dtc Version: missing source for shared/gfx/skin/grayboard/js/DD_roundies-min.js Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 shared/gfx/skin/grayboard/js/DD_roundies-min.js is minimized javascript without included source. Upstream

Bug#637526: incorrect copyright file

2011-08-12 Thread Ana Guerrero
Package: chrony Version: 1.24-3+b1 Severity: serious Hi, chrony's copyright file says: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your

Bug#637529: debconf foo doesn't respect local configuration

2011-08-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Package: gitaliast Severity: serious Hi, installing gitalist, the default directory is /srv/git (which is fine). if i then manually change it to something else in /etc/gitalist.conf, and then running dpkg-reconfigure gitalist, then gitalist would set it back to /srv/git, rather the manually

Bug#628919: chrony: diff for NMU version 1.24-3.1

2011-08-12 Thread Ana Guerrero
tags 628919 + patch tags 628919 + pending tags 634447 + patch tags 634447 + pending tags 637526 + patch tags 637526 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for chrony (versioned as 1.24-3.1) and uploaded it directly to the archive. I know I said in the bug #628919 that I would

Processed: chrony: diff for NMU version 1.24-3.1

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 628919 + patch Bug #628919 [chrony] /usr/sbin/chronyd: Starting with kernel v3.0, chronyd will refuse to start Added tag(s) patch. tags 628919 + pending Bug #628919 [chrony] /usr/sbin/chronyd: Starting with kernel v3.0, chronyd will refuse

Bug#553835: marked as done (replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:17:51 + with message-id e1qrpkn-0001dg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#553835: fixed in rc 1.7.1-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #553835, regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev to be marked as done. This

Bug#635326: marked as done (FTBFS with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode architectures)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:48:13 + with message-id e1qrqdl-00069u...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#635326: fixed in liquidsoap 1.0.0~beta3+repack1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #635326, regarding FTBFS with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode architectures to be marked as

Bug#631040: ruby-gnome2: diff for NMU version 0.19.3-2.2

2011-08-12 Thread Julien Cristau
tags 631040 + patch tags 631040 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, As the sid version of ruby-gnome2 is held back by ruby1.8 and ruby1.9.1 build failures, I've prepared an NMU for ruby-gnome2 (versioned as 0.19.3-2.2) for wheezy, and will upload it in a minute. Please find the diff attached.

Bug#637529: Acknowledgement (debconf foo doesn't respect local configuration)

2011-08-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
reassign 637529 gitalist thanks -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: ruby-gnome2: diff for NMU version 0.19.3-2.2

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 631040 + patch Bug #631040 {Done: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org} [src:ruby-gnome2] ruby-gnome2: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0 Added tag(s) patch. tags 631040 + pending Bug #631040 {Done: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org}

Bug#628919: marked as done (/usr/sbin/chronyd: Starting with kernel v3.0, chronyd will refuse to start)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:02:39 + with message-id e1qrqrj-000849...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#628919: fixed in chrony 1.24-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #628919, regarding /usr/sbin/chronyd: Starting with kernel v3.0, chronyd will refuse to start to be marked

Bug#634447: marked as done (chrony: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libreadline5-dev)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:02:39 + with message-id e1qrqrj-00084f...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#634447: fixed in chrony 1.24-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634447, regarding chrony: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libreadline5-dev to be marked as done.

Bug#637526: marked as done (incorrect copyright file)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:02:39 + with message-id e1qrqrj-00084j...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637526: fixed in chrony 1.24-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #637526, regarding incorrect copyright file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#637529: debconf foo doesn't respect local configuration

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 637529 gitalist Bug #637529 [gitaliast] debconf foo doesn't respect local configuration Warning: Unknown package 'gitaliast' Bug reassigned from package 'gitaliast' to 'gitalist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#637555: File conflict with liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: liblockfile1-bin Version: 1.09-2 Severity: serious liblockfile1 fails to upgrade, as the binary /usr/bin/dotlockfile was moved from liblockfile1 to liblockfile-bin without declaring the necessary Breaks/Replaces [1], see 7.6.1 Michael [1]

Bug#637059: cheesetracker: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?

2011-08-12 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Monday, August 08, 2011 01:50:46 Niels Thykier wrote: Package: cheesetracker Severity: serious I noticed this package have two RC bugs that appears to have gotten no attention since April and June (repsectively). Furthermore it was removed from testing on the 3rd of July due to #620573.

Bug#628350: marked as done (mysql-navigator: FTBFS: libtool: Version mismatch error)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:02:32 + with message-id e1qrubs-0002uk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#628350: fixed in mysql-navigator 1.4.2-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #628350, regarding mysql-navigator: FTBFS: libtool: Version mismatch error to be marked as done.

Bug#637565: postfix: FTBFS on Linux 3.0

2011-08-12 Thread Daniel Schepler
Source: postfix Version: 2.8.3-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /usr/bin/make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles make: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/postfix-2.8.3' (echo # Do not edit -- this file documents how Postfix was built for your machine.; /bin/sh makedefs)

Bug#625423: sitecopy: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-08-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
forwarded 625423 sitec...@lists.manyfish.co.uk thanks Hello, In Debian we have received this bug report: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings which will make the package fail to build.  Currently

Processed: Re: Bug#625423: sitecopy: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 625423 sitec...@lists.manyfish.co.uk Bug #625423 [sitecopy] sitecopy: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'sitec...@lists.manyfish.co.uk'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#618145: marked as done (itk3: FTBFS: configure: error: /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5 directory doesn't contain tclConfig.sh)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:32:27 + with message-id e1qruep-0005dn...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#618145: fixed in itk3 3.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #618145, regarding itk3: FTBFS: configure: error: /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5 directory doesn't contain tclConfig.sh

Bug#618220: marked as done (itcl3: FTBFS: configure: error: /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5 directory doesn't contain tclConfig.sh)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:32:15 + with message-id e1qrued-0005zf...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#618220: fixed in itcl3 3.4~b1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #618220, regarding itcl3: FTBFS: configure: error: /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5 directory doesn't contain

Processed: re: audtty: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625308 +patch Bug #625308 [audtty] audtty: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625308 Debian

Bug#612809: fsck failing because it can't find fsck.btrfs

2011-08-12 Thread iori yoneji
I have same trouble too. My work around was working on other systemthat: cp /path/to/root/sbin/btrfsck /path/to/root/sbin/fsck.btrfs But, it hasn't been a good hack. As you know, btrfsck's synopsis is very simple: btrfsck device But fsck.hoge did -a option. So, while boot, an error saying -a

Processed: patch for 625018

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 625018 patch Bug #625018 [src:coinor-ipopt] coinor-ipopt: FTBFS: IpSmartPtr.hpp:340:12: error: 'NULL' was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625018:

Bug#624516: patches against git

2011-08-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Thanks for your help and sorry that we didn't get around to processing this package earlier. NP. I have taken a look and the package looks fine. However, there are other open Cacti issues in Lenny aswell, and I don't think it would make sense to release an update that includes a fix for

Bug#637425: marked as done (xenomai can not be compiled with gcc-4.6 due to upstream bug)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:35:47 + with message-id e1qrxwf-0005f9...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637425: fixed in xenomai 2.5.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #637425, regarding xenomai can not be compiled with gcc-4.6 due to upstream bug to be marked as done. This

Bug#637584: HTML injection

2011-08-12 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: src:dtc Version: 0.32.10-2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream dtc does not escape variables in HTML output in many places. An example is the Domain root TXT record: field on the DNS and MX page where it is possible to enter values such as This is fun.strongIsn't it?/stronginput

Bug#633315: marked as done (libnxml: Emptying dependency_libs in .la files)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:48:05 + with message-id e1qrxi9-0007gu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#633315: fixed in libnxml 0.18.3-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #633315, regarding libnxml: Emptying dependency_libs in .la files to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#612034: marked as done (vulnerability: rewrite arbitrary user file)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:54:55 + with message-id e1qrxol-0007uu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#612034: fixed in aptitude 0.4.11.11-1~lenny2 has caused the Debian Bug report #612034, regarding vulnerability: rewrite arbitrary user file to be marked as done. This means

Bug#612034: marked as done (vulnerability: rewrite arbitrary user file)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:54:59 + with message-id e1qrxop-0007wd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#612034: fixed in aptitude 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #612034, regarding vulnerability: rewrite arbitrary user file to be marked as done. This means

Processed: closing 632491

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 632491 1:2.8.11-7 Bug#632491: ardour: FTBFS: undefined reference to `setup_enum_writer()' 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1:2.8.11-7, send any further explanations to

Bug#632491: closing 632491

2011-08-12 Thread Adrian Knoth
close 632491 1:2.8.11-7 thanks This bug was obviously not related to ardour, because I was able to compile the package on sparc without any changes. Likewise, the buildds were able to compile 1:2.8.11-7 without any problems (not talking about hurd-i386). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread jidanni
Package: liblockfile-bin Severity: grave Unpacking liblockfile-bin (from .../liblockfile-bin_1.09-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblockfile-bin_1.09-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dotlockfile', which is also in package liblockfile1 1.08-4

Bug#636802: fpc fails to link against libc on some architectures due to multiarch

2011-08-12 Thread peter green
reassign 636802 fpc thanks From my testing on armel I now belive that the issue causing the lazarus build failures is a problem with freepascal and multiarch. I haven't tried to troubleshoot the issue on powerpc or sparc as I don't have access to them but I presume it is the same issue. On

Processed: fpc fails to link against libc on some architectures due to multiarch

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 636802 fpc Bug #636802 [lazarus] Lazarus FTBFS on armel, sparc and powerpc with link failures of lazbuild Bug reassigned from package 'lazarus' to 'fpc'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions lazarus/0.9.30-3. thanks Stopping

Processed: Re: Bug#637041: [gimp] GIMP causes X to freeze

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 637041 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Bug #637041 [gimp] [gimp] GIMP causes X to freeze Bug reassigned from package 'gimp' to 'xserver-xorg-video-nouveau'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions gimp/2.6.11-3. thanks Stopping processing

Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread Sven Joachim
forcemerge 637555 637589 thanks On 2011-08-12 22:33 +0200, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Package: liblockfile-bin Severity: grave Unpacking liblockfile-bin (from .../liblockfile-bin_1.09-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblockfile-bin_1.09-2_i386.deb

Processed: Re: Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 637555 637589 Bug#637555: File conflict with liblockfile1 Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1 Bug#637567: liblockfile1: problem upgrading to 1.09-2 - man page issue Forcibly Merged 637555 637567

Processed: downgrading severity

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 637041 important Bug #637041 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] [gimp] GIMP causes X to freeze Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637041:

Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread jidanni
SJ == Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: SJ How about consulting the BTS before filing such bugs? I did. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=liblockfile1 However what I need is a single URL guaranteed to find the bug. Google no good... can't index that fast. Looking into the

Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-08-12 23:01 +0200, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: SJ == Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: SJ How about consulting the BTS before filing such bugs? I did. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=liblockfile1 That is not the package for which you reported the bug. However

Bug#637589: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1

2011-08-12 Thread jidanni
SJ == Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: SJ That is not the package for which you reported the bug. Well maybe I got distracted. Anyways whatever I did is 1000 times less worse than the person who caused the bug :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#612809: fsck failing because it can't find fsck.btrfs

2011-08-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jonathan Nieder wrote: Still, I believe it would be best to allow btrfsck to act as fsck when the filesystem is not broken. Would some script along these lines make sense? Alas, the answer appears to be no for now. warning: btrfsck cannot repair filesystem corruption - suppressing

Bug#636956: Fix for FTBFS with openssl 1.0.0

2011-08-12 Thread Mat Scales
The attached patch should fix the FTBFS when building against libopenssl-1.0.0. cryptonit.patch Description: Binary data

Bug#637067: notification-daemon: crashes on receiving notification

2011-08-12 Thread Robert Norris
Using awesome as window manager, no desktop environment as such (though I'm sure there's bits of KDE and GNOME libs floating around to support various apps). On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Which desktop environment / window manager do you use? -- Why

Bug#631040: marked as done (ruby-gnome2: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:18:48 + with message-id e1qs040-0004dg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#631040: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.19.3-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #631040, regarding ruby-gnome2: FTBFS against iceweasel 4.0 or 5.0 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#637067: notification-daemon: crashes on receiving notification

2011-08-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 13.08.2011 00:02, schrieb Robert Norris: Using awesome as window manager, no desktop environment as such (though I'm sure there's bits of KDE and GNOME libs floating around to support various apps). On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Which desktop

Bug#637465: marked as done (liblockfile: package liblockfile1 in control file but not in files list)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:39:38 +0200 with message-id 20110812223933.ga18...@xs4all.net and subject line bug fixed in liblockfile 1.09-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #637465, regarding liblockfile: package liblockfile1 in control file but not in files list to be marked as done.

Bug#637067: notification-daemon: crashes on receiving notification

2011-08-12 Thread Robert Norris
Downgrade is reasonable, since its obviously not widespread. I'm running an awesome config that I assembled a long time ago, back when its notification daemon (naughty) was still new and rather buggy. I have it disabled. I run awesome from gdm. I've attached my .xsessionrc and my

Bug#615673: marked as done (fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:47:10 + with message-id e1qs0vs-0006aa...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#615673: fixed in fauhdlc 20110812-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615673, regarding fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#625333: marked as done (fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:47:10 + with message-id e1qs0vs-0006ag...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625333: fixed in fauhdlc 20110812-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #625333, regarding fauhdlc: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#637555: marked as done (File conflict with liblockfile1)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:47:29 + with message-id e1qs0vl-0006en...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637555: fixed in liblockfile 1.09-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #637555, regarding File conflict with liblockfile1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#637567: marked as done (liblockfile1: problem upgrading to 1.09-2 - man page issue)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:47:29 + with message-id e1qs0vl-0006en...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637555: fixed in liblockfile 1.09-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #637555, regarding liblockfile1: problem upgrading to 1.09-2 - man page issue to be marked as done. This

Bug#637589: marked as done (dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1)

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:47:29 + with message-id e1qs0vl-0006en...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637555: fixed in liblockfile 1.09-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #637555, regarding dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of liblockfile1 to be marked as done.

Processed: severity of 637067 is important

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 637067 important Bug #637067 [notification-daemon] notification-daemon: crashes on receiving notification Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637067:

Bug#636046: Removal of squishdot?

2011-08-12 Thread Luca Falavigna
tags 636046 - moreinfo thanks Il 16/07/2011 11:04, Luca Falavigna ha scritto: squishdot still requires zope-tinytableplus, I wonder whether we should remove squishdot as well: * Untouched since 2006 * Uninstallable (#566128) * Dead upstream I haven't heard anything back, so I plan to ask

Processed: Bug#636046: Removal of squishdot?

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 636046 - moreinfo Bug #636046 [src:squishdot] Should squishdot be removed? Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636046:

Processed: Merge

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 578975 src:wine Bug #578975 [wine] wine: build-depends-on-obsolete-package xlibmesa-gl-dev Bug reassigned from package 'wine' to 'src:wine'. forcemerge 623923 578975 Bug#623923: wine: FTBFS: Non-installable build-depends Bug#578975:

Processed: block 634559 with 624156

2011-08-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 634559 with 624156 Bug #634559 [src:inventor] inventor: FTBFS: g++: error: /usr/lib/libGLw.a: No such file or directory Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 634559: 624156 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#637435: ifupdown: interfaces are not brought up anymore

2011-08-12 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 16:42 +0300, O. Andrew wrote: Well, that's exactly what I suspected to happen. Tomorrow I will prepare a new release which should fix this issue. Thx in advance, Cheers, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Bug#637613: base: Terminal can't display Korean when the system locale is Korean.

2011-08-12 Thread Hughe Chung
Package: base Severity: grave Tags: d-i l10n Justification: renders package unusable When the user selects only Korean language from installer and install only standard system the console can't display Korean messages at all. This is very serious problem for Korean users. The installer must

Bug#637618: dtc-common: giving sudo access to chrootuid is giving access to root

2011-08-12 Thread Mike O'Connor
Package: dtc-common Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole the install script gives sudo access to the dtc user (the user that is running apache) unrestricted access to chrootuid, which essentially gives root access to the dtc account: root@testdtc:/var/lib/dtc/etc#