Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:14:27 +0200
with message-id 20110926231427.ga2...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#555065: FTBFS with binutils-gold
has caused the Debian Bug report #555065,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
tags 554058 - patch
thanks
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* src/Makefile.am/in: Fix order of arguments to fix FTBFS (LP: #765907)
Thanks for considering the patch.
You can't fix a FTBFS with binutils gold bug with reordering linker
arguments. In fact,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 554058 - patch
Bug #554058 [src:brightside] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
554058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554058
Debian
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:11:02 +0200
with message-id 20110926231102.ga7...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#554758: FTBFS with binutils-gold [gupnp-tools]
has caused the Debian Bug report #554758,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 642672 + pending
Bug #642672 [src:oss-libsalsa] oss-libsalsa: FTBFS: local.h:8:28: fatal error:
alsa/asoundlib.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:20:47 +0200
with message-id 20110926232047.ga5...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#83: FTBFS with binutils-gold
has caused the Debian Bug report #83,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
* Sebastian Carneiro scarne...@fibertel.com.ar, 2011-07-30, 20:00:
The following changes has been made:
* reordered libs parameters passed to ld to build with --no-add-needed in
src/Makefile.am and src/Makefile.in
You can't fix a FTBFS with gold by reordering linker arguments. In
fact,
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:56:01 +0200
with message-id 20110926225601.ga9...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#553964: FTBFS with binutils-gold
has caused the Debian Bug report #553964,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
tag 642752 + wontfix
tag 642764 + wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:36:26PM +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
make: *** [testsanity] Error 1
OK, and this bugreport shows you didn't even remotely follow Debian changes
in the last
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 642752 + wontfix
Bug #642752 [src:liblayout-openoffice.org] liblayout-openoffice.org: FTBFS: You
must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD
Added tag(s) wontfix.
tag 642764 + wontfix
Bug #642764
tags 615783 - patch
thanks
* Ilya Barygin bary...@gmail.com, 2011-08-23, 21:58:
Attached patch was used to fix this problem in Ubuntu.
Thanks, but no, it was used to fix a different problem. In fact, even
with your patch applied, the package still FTBFS with binutils-gold:
| cc `pkg-config
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 615783 - patch
Bug #615783 [t38modem] t38modem: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed
Removed tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
615783:
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:45:43 +0200
with message-id 20110926234543.ga8...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#555873: FTBFS with binutils-gold
has caused the Debian Bug report #555873,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# 0004-add-missing-zlib.patch
fixed 556501 2.03-2.1
Bug #556501 {Done: Leo Costela cost...@debian.org} [src:transmission] FTBFS
with binutils-gold
Bug Marked as fixed in versions transmission/2.03-2.1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:59:23 +0200
with message-id 20110926235922.ga...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#555788: FTBFS with binutils-gold
has caused the Debian Bug report #555788,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:18:09 +
with message-id e1r8lnb-0001dj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#643001: fixed in gource 0.37-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #643001,
regarding gource: cannot be installed on amd64: versioned depends on libglew1.5
to be marked as done.
tags 637936 +patch
thanks
patch is attatched, just add it to the dpatch list.
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 040-libcurl-fix.dpatch by plugw...@p10link.net
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: Remove obsolete libcurl include
@DPATCH@
diff
Me too, what a mess.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reopen 641240
found 641240 6b23~pre9-2
thanks
Hi Damien,
I think you may have typed the wrong bug number when closing my bug:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:06:12PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
which was filed against the openjdk-6-jre-lib package:
#641240: Incomplete changelog if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 641240
Bug #641240 {Done: Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org}
[openjdk-6-jre-lib] Incomplete changelog if version is ahead of
openjdk-6-jre-headless
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 641240 openjdk-6/6b23~pre9-2
Bug #641240 [openjdk-6-jre-lib] Incomplete changelog if version is ahead of
openjdk-6-jre-headless
Bug Marked as found in versions openjdk-6/6b23~pre9-2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
tags 625376 +patch
thanks
patch attatched just drop it in debian/patches
diff -Nur -x '*.orig' -x '*~' libunique-1.1.6//tests/test-unique.c libunique-1.1.6.new//tests/test-unique.c
--- libunique-1.1.6//tests/test-unique.c 2009-09-21 12:31:14.0 +
+++
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 625376 +patch
Bug #625376 [libunique] libunique: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
625376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625376
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# proposed methods for handling /bin/sh seem to involve
# changes in other packages (e.g., introduction of a new
# DEBIAN/bootstrap script)
tags 538822 - patch
Bug #538822 [dash] dash fails to upgrade if /bin/sh is locally diverted
Removed
On 26/09/11 21:41, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unless you can provide further information regarding this issue, I don't see
another way but closing the bug report.
I reported this to Trinity
Trinity networking breaks with network-manager 0.9
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=521
It's a
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:56:23 +
with message-id e1r8muf-000442...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#641683: fixed in typo3-src 4.3.9+dfsg1-1+squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #641683,
regarding TYPO3 Security Bulletin TYPO3-CORE-SA-2011-003: Improper error
handling
reassign 642972 openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre9-2
affects 642972 + icedtea6-plugin
tags 642972 + patch
tags 641240 + patch
quit
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
How about this patch (untested)?
... which is against openjdk-6, so reassigning.
The patch below tightens dependencies a little to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 642972 openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre9-2
Bug #642972 [icedtea6-plugin] IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc:1506: Error: Failed to spawn
applet viewer: Failed to execute child process
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/../../bin/java (No such
On 09/26/2011 10:57 AM, Harshula wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 00:08 +0800, Asias He wrote:
I have packaged the 1.3.3 upstream version. However, it does not quite work.
It seems the 1.3.3 upstream version has some bugs. I've filed a bug against
it.
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:29 +0800, Asias He wrote:
Yes. You are right. I should use Chinese - py (m17n) to inpurt Han
characters. I have uploaded ibus-m17n 1.3.3-1. Can you try it when the
upload goes to the archive?
Did a quick test and ibus-m17n 1.3.3-1 you uploaded works fine. The
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Harshula harsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:29 +0800, Asias He wrote:
Yes. You are right. I should use Chinese - py (m17n) to inpurt Han
characters. I have uploaded ibus-m17n 1.3.3-1. Can you try it when the
upload goes to the archive?
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:50:30 +
with message-id e1r8nkc-0007w3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640345: fixed in python-jpype 0.5.4.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640345,
regarding python-jpype: FTBFS: src/native/common/include/jpype.h:45:17: fatal
error: jni.h:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:46 +0800, Asias He wrote:
You are welcome to co-maintain ibus-m17n since you are the
maintainer of m17n-lib and other ibus-* package if you are interested.
The upstream maintainer Daiki (CC'd) might be interested. ;-)
cya,
#
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 614129 + wheezy sid
Bug #614129 {Done: Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org} [gbirthday] gbirthday
tries to open addressbook directly and fails with evolution 2.32
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:47:46 +
with message-id e1r8pa6-0004wx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#629206: fixed in lynkeos.app 1.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #629206,
regarding lynkeos.app: FTBFS with gnustep-base/1.22: LynkeosCommon.h:33:14:
error: two or more
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:47:46 +
with message-id e1r8pa6-0004wa...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#638535: fixed in lynkeos.app 1.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #638535,
regarding Needs to be adapted for libav/0.7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
