Bug#652320: marked as done (altree FTBFS, /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:17:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652320: fixed in latex-make 2.1.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #652320, regarding altree FTBFS, /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Processed: Re: Bug#652320: altree FTBFS, /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 652320 latex-make 2.1.16-1 Bug #652320 [altree] altree FTBFS, /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'altree' to 'latex-make'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions altree/1.0.1-5. Bug #652320 [la

Bug#652320: altree FTBFS, /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory

reassign 652320 latex-make 2.1.16-1 thanks Le 16/12/2011 04:11, peter green a écrit : package: altree version: 1.0.1-5 severity: serious altree failed to build on the armhf and s390x buildds with the following error make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-altree_1.0.1-5-armhf-eEc5cu/altree

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Fri Dec 16 07:03:10 UTC 2011 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: libio-file-withpath-perl > tags 646947 + pending Bug #646947 [wnpp] ITP: libio-f

Bug#651933: I can reproduce this

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:08:02 -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:58:03PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > > Answering your questions: > > > > a) wicd is running > > Correction. Wicd is /not/ running: That's why DBus can't see it, now it makes a bit more sense :) > sudo s

Bug#650709: marked as done (murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:17:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#650709: fixed in murrine-themes 0.98.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #650709, regarding murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#650709: murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0

On 16.12.2011 06:39, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On ven., 2011-12-16 at 06:31 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> On 16.12.2011 06:05, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote >>> >>> You could have saved yourself some time with >>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/murrine-themes.git;a=summary >> >> Weird

Processed: bug 650709 is not forwarded

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notforwarded 650709 Bug #650709 [murrine-themes] murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0 Unset Bug forwarded-to-address > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 650709: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Bug#650709: murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0

On ven., 2011-12-16 at 06:31 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 16.12.2011 06:05, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote > > > > You could have saved yourself some time with > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/murrine-themes.git;a=summary > > Weird, if apparently you had updated the git repo alre

Bug#650709: murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0

On 16.12.2011 06:05, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote > > You could have saved yourself some time with > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/murrine-themes.git;a=summary Weird, if apparently you had updated the git repo already on 23 Nov 2011, why did you write in the bug report, that no fix

Bug#642709: ctsim: diff for NMU version 5.2.0-1.1

On Dec 15, 2011, at 12:01 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > tags 642709 + patch > tags 642709 + pending > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for ctsim (versioned as 5.2.0-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. I suspect I'll

Bug#650709: murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0

On ven., 2011-12-16 at 02:18 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > tags 650709 + patch > thanks > > The Greybird upstream git respository has been updated to work with gtk > 3.2. I've picked the v0.3.0 release [1] and updated the murrine-themes > package accordingly. I've also added a Recommends on gtk3-e

Processed: Re: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#652186: Reopening and closing correct bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 652186 0.6.0-3 Bug #652186 [src:hyphen-kn] hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #652186 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processi

Bug#652202: marked as done (hyphen-hi: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:02:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652202: fixed in hyphen-hi 0.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652202, regarding hyphen-hi: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#652243: marked as done (hyphen-gu: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:27:21 +0530 with message-id and subject line Reopening and closing correct bug has caused the Debian Bug report #652243, regarding hyphen-gu: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Processed: Reopening and closing correct bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 652186 Bug #652186 {Done: Debian-IN Team } [src:hyphen-kn] hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found

Bug#652186: Reopening and closing correct bug

reopen 652186 thanks Sorry. Closed wrong bug in changelog! Closing 652243 too. -- Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_ {0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#652186: marked as done (hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:47:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652186: fixed in hyphen-gu 0.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652186, regarding hyphen-kn: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#652321: evolution-data-server3: FTBFS: 'G_UNICODE_COMBINING_MARK' undeclared

Source: evolution-data-server3 Version: 3.0.3-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DPANGO_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DG_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES - DGTK_DI

Processed: jarjar misbuilding bug is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 646600 serious Bug #646600 [jarjar] jarjar: Jarjar jar file must include contents from asm3-commons.jar Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646600: ht

Bug#652320: altree FTBFS, /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory

package: altree version: 1.0.1-5 severity: serious altree failed to build on the armhf and s390x buildds with the following error make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-altree_1.0.1-5-armhf-eEc5cu/altree-1.0.1/Documentation' ==> building fig/option_b.subfig.mk <== /usr/bi

Bug#617613: FreeCAD not in Testing

Hi Francesco, On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 19:30 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:49:10 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > Yes, but I think freecad should not be released in a stable version > > > (again) with t

Bug#617613: "FreeCAD not in Testing"

On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 18:15 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi > > as we have been asked about this license problem and not yet provided an > answer: > > Either the licensing is changed so that the incompatibility no longer > is there (by either getting the license changed, or exceptions in the >

Bug#652309: marked as done (Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:47:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652309: fixed in spooles 2.2-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #652309, regarding Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#650709: murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0

tags 650709 + patch thanks The Greybird upstream git respository has been updated to work with gtk 3.2. I've picked the v0.3.0 release [1] and updated the murrine-themes package accordingly. I've also added a Recommends on gtk3-engines-unico, which is required by this theme. The resulting package

Processed: murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 650709 + patch Bug #650709 [murrine-themes] murrine-themes broken by libgtk-3-0 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #650709 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 65

Bug#640683: marked as done (slcurl: FTBFS: configure: error: unable to find the slang library and header file slang.h)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:02:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#640683: fixed in slcurl 0.2.1-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640683, regarding slcurl: FTBFS: configure: error: unable to find the slang library and header file slang.h to be marked as done. This means

Bug#651969: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] request for upload / XOTcl 1.6.7 upstream release

Sven, I refrain from uploading that right now, in case you can come up with something more appropriate. Sven, I refrain from uploading that right now, in case you can come up with something more appropriate. I was desperately looking for the quirk in the source package, only to find out in th

Processed: Re: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 651452 -1 Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') Bug 651452 cloned as bug 652307. > reassign -1 src:petsc Bug #652307 [src:illuminator] illuminator: F

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

clone 651452 -1 reassign -1 src:petsc retitle -1 Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0 found -1 3.1.dfsg-11.1 block 651452 by -1 clone 651452 -2 reassign -2 src:suitesparse retitle -2 Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0 found -2 3.4.0-2 block -1 by -2 clone 651452 -3 reassign -3 src:spooles retitle -3 Rebu

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:35:55AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/16/2011 01:24 AM, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Hi Riku, > > > > I think an important point to consider is that /usr would not > > disappear. It could be replaced by a symlink for new installs. > > This would permit older installs to

Bug#652306: pulseaudio: cannot select different master channel

Package: pulseaudio Version: 1.0-4 Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After I install Debian testing with a KDE environment, my volume is too loud. When I try to turn it down, the screen tells me that the level is going down, but the sound doesn't ch

Bug#644974: marked as done (swipl.pc links with -lncurses, but doesn't have a dependency on libncurses5-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:03:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#644974: fixed in swi-prolog 5.10.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #644974, regarding swipl.pc links with -lncurses, but doesn't have a dependency on libncurses5-dev to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#644593: marked as done (swi-prolog: FTBFS: No rule to make target `install'. Stop.)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:03:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#644593: fixed in swi-prolog 5.10.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #644593, regarding swi-prolog: FTBFS: No rule to make target `install'. Stop. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#652302: python-rhash: cannot be imported

Package: python-rhash Version: 1.2.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ python -c 'import rhash' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: No module named rhash -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.

Bug#652229: tagging 652229

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:45:05 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > # looks fixed in 0.103 but that needs other packages (updated and new) before > it can be uploaded 0.105, actually. And the new packages are in the process of being uploaded. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenP

Bug#652299: python-ucltip: missing dependency on python

Package: python-ucltip Version: 0.6+git08dec97-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 python-ucltip doesn't depend on python. There is "Depends: ${python:Depends}, ..." in debian/control, but debian/rules doesn't call any helper to populate this variable. From the build log: |dh_ge

Bug#652176: marked as done (cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:17:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652176: fixed in cqrlog 1.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #652176, regarding cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#652294: python-unbound: missing dependency on python

Package: python-unbound Version: 1.4.13-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 python-unbound doesn't depend on python. There is "Depends: ${python:Depends}" is debian/control, but debian/rules doesn't call any helper to populate this substitution variable. From the build log: | dh_gen

Bug#651933: I can reproduce this

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:58:03PM -0800, Peter Eckersley wrote: > Answering your questions: > > a) wicd is running Correction. Wicd is /not/ running: sudo service wicd restart Restarting Network connection manager: wicd. pde@xylophone:~$ ps aux | grep -v grep | grep wicd pde@xylophone:~$ sudo

Bug#651933: I can reproduce this

Answering your questions: a) wicd is running b) /etc/dbus-1/system.d/wicd.conf is present: sha1sum /etc/dbus-1/system.d/wicd.conf 8c9990b5d3fb4dfb06c242e69512d97cbb81ee79 /etc/dbus-1/system.d/wicd.conf c) DBus does not see wicd: dbus-send --system --dest=org.wicd.daemon --print-reply /org/wicd/

Processed: Re: Bug#652176: marked as done (cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 652176 Bug #652176 {Done: Kamal Mostafa } [src:cqrlog] cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652176: http://bugs.debian

Bug#652199: marked as done (obconf: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (obrender-3.0 >= 3.4.2 obparser-3.0 >= 3.4.2) were not met:)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652199: fixed in obconf 2.0.3+git20110808-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652199, regarding obconf: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (obrender-3.0 >= 3.4.2 obparser-3.0 >= 3.4.2) were not met:

Bug#652176: marked as done (cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30)

reopen 652176 thanks On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > cqrlog-1.2.1-1 builds fine in my amd64 sid pbuilder. > > > > Note that the package 'lazarus-0.9.30' has indeed been renamed > > 'lazarus-0.9.30.2' and likewise for 'lcl-0.9.30'. But cqrlog's > > build-d

Bug#652287: python-webcolors: missing dependency on python

Package: python-webcolors Version: 1.3.1+hg~2c8ac6e0a03d-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 python-webcolors doesn't depend on python. There is "Depends: ..., ${python:Depends}" in debian/control, but you didn't actually call anything in debian/rules that'd substitute this variable.

Processed: Re: Bug#633899: gally: missing build-dependency on python-support

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 633899 serious Bug #633899 [src:gally] gally: missing build-dependency on python-support Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633899: http://bugs.deb

Bug#649712: NMU is faulty

I'm afraid that the NMU does not do the right thing. The bug report stated Please replace the Build-Depends on gs-common to a Build-Depends on ghostscript. The NMU drops the build dependency. Cheers, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

Hi there! On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:19:54 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 15, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > You keep repeating arguments in favour of moving /{bin,sbin,lib}/ to >> > /usr/ :-) >> Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction >> to move the files. I still thi

Bug#651782: marked as done (Fails to build with newer xtables-addons-dkms)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:04:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651782: fixed in west-chamber 20100405+svn20110916.r119-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #651782, regarding Fails to build with newer xtables-addons-dkms to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#651612: marked as done (bitlbee-plugin-otr: uninstallable when binNMUed)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:02:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651612: fixed in bitlbee 3.0.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #651612, regarding bitlbee-plugin-otr: uninstallable when binNMUed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: tagging 652229

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # looks fixed in 0.103 but that needs other packages (updated and new) before > it can be uploaded > tags 652229 + confirmed fixed-upstream Bug #652229 [src:libhttp-lrdd-perl] libhttp-lrdd-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/2 test programs. 1/2 subtests fail

Processed: tagging 652229

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 652229 + confirmed Bug #652229 [src:libhttp-lrdd-perl] libhttp-lrdd-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/2 test programs. 1/2 subtests failed. Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652229:

Processed: bug 652216 is forwarded to http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=73293

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 652216 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=73293 Bug #652216 [src:libgssapi-perl] libgssapi-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/9 test programs. 1/152 subtests failed. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On 15.12.2011 20:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Also, I really fail to see how this would be an improvement for our users. > It's just an argument for making our lives of lazy library maintainer > more easy. The question is, if moving files around is a good way to spend maintainers time. I think n

Processed: tagging 652216

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 652216 + confirmed Bug #652216 [src:libgssapi-perl] libgssapi-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/9 test programs. 1/152 subtests failed. Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652216: htt

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

Thomas Goirand writes: > Oh, and when I'm at it, how do you implement /usr as read only, > (over nfs for example)? This is a quite common setup in large > organization / universities. I really don't believe this is true any more. We used to do stuff like this and stopped doing it a long time ag

Processed: bitlbee: diff for NMU version 3.0.3-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 651612 + patch Bug #651612 [bitlbee-plugin-otr] bitlbee-plugin-otr: uninstallable when binNMUed Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Bug#651612: bitlbee: diff for NMU version 3.0.3-1.1

tags 651612 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for bitlbee (versioned as 3.0.3-1.1) and will upload it shortly. Please find the diff attached. Cheers, Julien diff -u bitlbee-3.0.3/debian/changelog bitlbee-3.0.3/debian/changelog --- bitlbee-3.0.3/debian/changelog +++ bitlbee-3.

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011 à 03:35 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > Oh, and when I'm at it, how do you implement /usr as read only, > (over nfs for example)? This is a quite common setup in large > organization / universities. No, it is not. With a packaging system it is not suitable to have a

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > reopen 651452 > found 651452 0.11.0-12 > thanks > > > Hi! > > * Adam C Powell IV [111214 15:33]: > > > Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi. > > I'll test then upload -12 with this change and

Processed: Re: Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 652061 -1 Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy? Bug 652061 cloned as bug 652264. > reassign -1 libarpack2-dev Bug #652264 [src:elmerfem] elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy? Bug reassigned from package 'src:elmerfem'

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On 12/16/2011 01:24 AM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi Riku, > > I think an important point to consider is that /usr would not > disappear. It could be replaced by a symlink for new installs. > This would permit older installs to continue to use /usr, but > the files would end up on / for new installs.

Bug#652263: dozzaqueux: FTBFS: Fatal: Can't find unit Interfaces used by dozzzaqueux

Source: dozzaqueux Version: 3.20-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering directo

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On 12/15/2011 09:29 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction > to move the files. I still think that moving /usr to / is a better > strategy, albeit introducing some problems with users who would need > to resize the rootfs (but this has alway

Processed: block 651692 with 651333

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 651692 with 651333 Bug #651692 [libdb5.1] libdb5.1: needs Breaks on slapd Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 651692: 651333, 652262, and 651700 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: forcibly merging 651333 652262

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # why does nobody look at existing bug reports before filing new grave > reports? > forcemerge 651333 652262 Bug#651333: slapd: fails to start, requires exact version of Berkeley DB Bug#652262: slapd will not install due to db5.1 version mismatch

Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

FYI, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/810051 is marked as fix-released since 2011-09-16. I have the impression that they only fixed part of the problem, but I will let you analise that and tell so upstream if that's the case. -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-

Bug#652262: slapd will not install due to db5.1 version mismatch

Package: slapd Version: 2.4.25-4+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable on a current sid system: # apt-get install slapd Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following NEW packages will be installed: slapd Preconfiguring packa

Bug#652176: marked as done (cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:58:59 -0800 with message-id <1323975539.6652.8.camel@fourier> and subject line Re: Bug#652176: cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30 has caused the Debian Bug report #652176, regarding cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-d

Processed: ctsim: diff for NMU version 5.2.0-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 642709 + patch Bug #642709 [src:ctsim] ctsim: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 0: Can't open ./config.status Added tag(s) patch. > tags 642709 + pending Bug #642709 [src:ctsim] ctsim: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 0: Can't open ./config.status Added tag(s) pending. > thank

Bug#642709: ctsim: diff for NMU version 5.2.0-1.1

tags 642709 + patch tags 642709 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ctsim (versioned as 5.2.0-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA

Bug#652176: cqrlog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lazarus-0.9.30, lcl-0.9.30

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 12:14 +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: > Source: cqrlog > Version: 1.2.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid,

Processed: limit source to frama-c, tagging 652257

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #frama-c (20111001+nitrogen+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low > # > # * New upstream release (Closes: #652257). > # > limit source frama-c Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'frama-c' Limit currently set to 'source':'fram

Bug#652178: marked as done (bzr-git: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:32:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652178: fixed in bzr-git 0.6.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652178, regarding bzr-git: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#643415: marked as done (juman: FTBFS: iotool.c:448:6: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:18:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643415: fixed in juman 5.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #643415, regarding juman: FTBFS: iotool.c:448:6: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] to be marke

Bug#652236: marked as done ([pcscd] unusable due to typo in init.d-script)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:18:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652236: fixed in pcsc-lite 1.8.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #652236, regarding [pcscd] unusable due to typo in init.d-script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#652258: gerris: FTBFS: configure: error: *** Could not run GTS test program

Source: gerris Version: 20110329-dfsg.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering

Bug#652257: frama-c: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find OcamlGraph in the current directory.

Source: frama-c Version: 20110201+carbon+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Ent

Bug#652256: javahelp2: FTBFS: BUILD FAILED

Source: javahelp2 Version: 2.0.05.ds1-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build

Bug#652255: cjk: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/public/thai/norasi*.afm': No such file or directory

Source: cjk Version: 4.8.2+git20090105-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > fakeroot debian/ru

Bug#652254: guile-pg: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libltdl.la' is not a valid libtool archive

Source: guile-pg Version: 0.16-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory

Bug#652253: glame: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libltdl.la' is not a valid libtool archive

Source: glame Version: 2.0.1-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ar cru .libs/normalize.a nor

Bug#652252: ust: FTBFS: tracepoint_benchmark.h:27: undefined reference to `unlikely'

Source: ust Version: 0.15-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../

Bug#648744: marked as done (prevent migration)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:16:45 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: zfsutils migration (Re: new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid) has caused the Debian Bug report #648744, regarding prevent migration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Processed: tagging 643406

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 643406 + pending Bug #643406 [src:hydrogen] hydrogen: FTBFS: libs/hydrogen/src/object.cpp:242:30: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#643415: NMU diff

Attached. Could really do with some cleanup still, *lots* of compiler warnings with newer gcc now... :-( Cheers, -- Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs diff -u juman-5.1/debian/changelog j

Bug#642163: libebook-tools-perl: FTBFS: test failures

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:35:42PM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote: >On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:01:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 08:10:01PM -0400, Zed Pobre wrote: >> >On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:11:48PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> >> This package FTBFS for me on a clea

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

Roger Leigh wrote: > I think an important point to consider is that /usr would not > disappear. It could be replaced by a symlink for new installs. > This would permit older installs to continue to use /usr, but > the files would end up on / for new installs. So no changes > to --prefix would be

Processed: Bug is in upstream Makefile

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 652243 +upstream Bug #652243 [src:hyphen-gu] hyphen-gu: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found Added tag(s) upstream. > tag 652243 +confirmed Bug #652243 [src:hyphen-gu] hyphen-gu: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/upda

Bug#652243: Bug is in upstream Makefile

tag 652243 +upstream tag 652243 +confirmed thanks This is an upstream bug because of use of update-openoffice-dict which is removed from debian we have notified the upstream. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#652035: wicd-curses: Crashs when running (Python UnicodeDecodeError)

Hello David, Le Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:53:26 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : > please remember to keep the bug CCed when replying :) Sorry! > > Le Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:55:39 +0100, > > David Paleino a écrit : > > > Do you have any unicode ESSID > > > in /etc/wicd/wireless-settings.conf? Is it the E

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:29:18PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction > > to move the files. I still think that moving /usr to / is a better > > strategy > > I think we

Bug#652238: wicd: Network settings lost after upgrade

Hello Florian, On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:53:21 +0100, Florian Birée wrote: > After the upgrade to the version 1:7:1~b*, all my configured network get lost, > with their keys and every other settings. That was already fixed with 1.7.1~b3-2, but if you upgrade to ~b3-1, the settings weren't recovered

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Dec 15, Roger Leigh wrote: > > You keep repeating arguments in favour of moving /{bin,sbin,lib}/ to > > /usr/ :-) > Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction > to move the files. I still think that moving /usr to / is a better > strategy, albeit introducing some p

Bug#652035: wicd-curses: Crashs when running (Python UnicodeDecodeError)

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:15:56 +0100, Florian Birée wrote: > [..] > > If you think I should try your patch, I can do it, but I think it is > not related to this bug... Please try it, it doesn't hurt for sure :) David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : L

Bug#652011: general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:29:18PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction > to move the files. I still think that moving /usr to / is a better > strategy I think we would need a very, very good reason to migrate away from /usr. Fedora al

Bug#641621: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-173xx: Dependency

On 2011-12-15 17:49, colliar wrote: > As the Xorg packages from testing is now 1.11, there is no possibility > to install the package with testing nor with unstable. > > Please, make a working 3D driver available ! There is nothing we can do about this. NVIDIA hasn't released an updated driver (a

Bug#652246: bashdb: FTBFS: /bin/bash: line 9: makeinfo: command not found

Source: bashdb Version: 4.2.0.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering director

Bug#652245: tomoe: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source --after-build tomoe-0.6.0 gave error exit status 1

Source: tomoe Version: 0.6.0-1.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory

Bug#652243: hyphen-gu: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/sbin/update-openoffice-dicts: Command not found

Source: hyphen-gu Version: 0.6.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering directo

  1   2   >