Bug#657276: xfonts-traditional: can't cope with xfonts-unifont

Aaron M. Ucko writes ("Bug#657276: xfonts-traditional: can't cope with xfonts-unifont"): > xfonts-traditional blows up when trying to process unifont.pcf.gz from > xfonts-unifont: Thanks, I will look into this. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Bug#653310: Fix

This bug is in versions 1.13 and 1.14. In the file /usr/share/pyshared/LiveMagic/views/wizard.py change row 199 # Boot parameters data['bootappend_live'] = "locale=%s keyb=%s" % (locale, keyb) to # Boot parameters data['bootappend_live'] = "locales=%s keyboard-layouts=%s" % (locale,keyb) --

Bug#657299: arpwatch: Dependency hell with local libpcap

Package: arpwatch Version: 2.1a15-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, I can't build arpwatch before I guessed to remove any of libnl-dev and libnl2-dev packages from the system. Also I have noticed this build need t

Bug#652482: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: No package 'libnm-glib' found)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:17:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652482: fixed in gnome-shell 3.2.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652482, regarding FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: No package 'libnm-glib' found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#656755: Help with architecture not supporting SSE (Was: Bug#656755: libhmsbeagle FTBFS on everything except amd64)

tags 656755 +patch thanks While I really agree to this statement I think there is few chance that somebody else will step in. We are just needing to maintain this as a predependency for two important packages of the Debian Med team. Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in th

Processed: tagging 657042

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 657042 + pending Bug #657042 [bind9] bind9: new installation fails because named.conf.options is not in /etc/bind Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657042: http://bugs.deb

Processed: reopen 599679 655789

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 599679 Bug #599679 {Done: Dmitry Smirnov } [wv] Wv has newer releases from abisource.com 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. > reopen 655789 Bug #65

Processed (with 1 errors): reopen 599679 655789

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 599679 655789 Failed to reopen 599679: New submitter address 655789 is not a valid e-mail address. > tags 599679 + fixed-in-experimental Bug #599679 {Done: Dmitry Smirnov } [wv] Wv has newer releases from abisource.com Added tag(s) fixed

Processed: Re: Bug#656771: Should this package be removed?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 656771 ftp.debian.org Bug #656771 [src:kazehakase] Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package 'src:kazehakase' to 'ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 656771 RM: kazehakase -- RoM; RC-buggy, unmaintained upstream, low > popcon, b

Bug#656771: Should this package be removed?

reassign 656771 ftp.debian.org retitle 656771 RM: kazehakase -- RoM; RC-buggy, unmaintained upstream, low popcon, better alternatives available thanks At Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:47:30 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > I propose to remove kazehakase from the archive: FWIW, I agree. I have a fixed p

Bug#657165: marked as done (gearmand: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: symbols file mismatch)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:47:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#657165: fixed in gearmand 0.27-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #657165, regarding gearmand: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: symbols file mismatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: Severity important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package resolvconf Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'resolvconf' Limit currently set to 'package':'resolvconf' > severity 657259 important Bug #657259 [resolvconf] resolvconf wipes out /run Severity set to 'importa

Processed: tagging 657165

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 657165 + pending Bug #657165 [src:gearmand] gearmand: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: symbols file mismatch Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657165: http://bugs.debian.org

Bug#646474: What to do if FTBFS bug is not reproducible?

Hi! Am 25.01.2012 08:58, schrieb Vasudev Kamath: > I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its > previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this > package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds > fine on the pbuilder clean chroot. I'v

Processed: Re: Bug#657244: batik bundles a non free colour profile in pdf-transcoder.jar

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 657244 -1 Bug#657244: batik bundles a non free colour profile in pdf-transcoder.jar Bug 657244 cloned as bug 657281. > reassign -1 fop Bug #657281 [batik] batik bundles a non free colour profile in pdf-transcoder.jar Bug reassigned from pa

Bug#657244: batik bundles a non free colour profile in pdf-transcoder.jar

clone 657244 -1 reassign -1 fop found -1 fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-6 retitle -1 src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is non-free thanks On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Karl Goetz wrote: > >From [1], it seems the pdf-transcoder.jar in batik contains a colour > profile with a crazy lic

<    1   2