Source: canna
Version: 3.7p3-8
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: python-mecab
Version: 0.98-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: ruby-mecab
Version: 0.98-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: darnwdl
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: gurlchecker
Version: 0.13.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: mendexk
Version: 2.6e-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: loadlin
Version: 1.6e-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: qmk-groundstation
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: openexr
Version: 1.6.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: scmxx
Version: 0.9.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: scotch
Version: 5.1.12b.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: octave-miscellaneous
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This
Source: dvi2ps
Version: 4.1j-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: libmecab-perl
Version: 0.98-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: infon
Version: 0~r198-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: xml2
Version: 0.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: espeakedit
Version: 1.46.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: uw-imap
Version: 8:2007e~dfsg-3.3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: vdr-plugin-infosatepg
Version: 0.0.11-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This
Source: yasr
Version: 0.6.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: garlic
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: avbin
Version: 7-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: proftpd-mod-msg
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: pentobi
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: unison2.32.52
Version: 2.32.52-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: jlint
Version: 3.0-4.4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: ulogd
Version: 1.24-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by
Source: polybori
Version: 0.5~rc1-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Source: openblas
Version: 0.1alpha2.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was
Package: librsvg2-bin
Version: 2.36.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
$ convert iceweasel/debian/branding/iceweasel_logo.svg /tmp/test.png
sh: 1: rsvg: not found
convert: delegate failed `"rsvg" "%i" "%o"' @
error/delegate.c/InvokeDelegate/1058.
convert: unable to op
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:44:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:50:14 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > Maybe a simple rebuild attempt would fix it (CC'ing the wb-team)?
> >
> > gb cctools_3.4.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
> >
> Done.
Error remains the same -- n
Author: tg
Date: 2012-03-30 08:43:27 + (Fri, 30 Mar 2012)
New Revision: 310
Added:
mediawiki/sid-sec/debian/patches/CVE-2012-1582.patch
Modified:
mediawiki/sid-sec/debian/changelog
mediawiki/sid-sec/debian/patches/series
Log:
first cut at #666269 for sid-security:
?\226?\128?\162 thr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 665673 fixed-upstream
Bug #665673 [src:qof] qof: FTBFS with glib 2.32 due to
-Werror=deprecated-declarations
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
665673: http://bugs.debi
tag 665673 fixed-upstream
quit
Just to make it clear in the bug report for people reviewing RC bugs, I
do have a fix for this in upstream SVN:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qof/trunk/qof/qof/qofutil.c?r1=1328&r2=1327&pathrev=1328
A new upstream release will be made this weekend with a corresp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 665677 serious
Bug #665677 [src:gsmartcontrol] gsmartcontrol: FTBFS with glib 2.32
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 665679 serious
Bug #665679 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS with glib 2.32
Severity set to 'serious' fr
* Ryan Tandy [2012-03-29 22:50]:
> Your patch is correct but insufficient. Apparently in the 3.4 release
> upstream worked around the bashisms in /usr/sbin/micro-evtd.event and
> /usr/sbin/microapl by changing the shebang to /bin/bash; it was
> /bin/sh in both in 3.3.3. I feel pretty stupid for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 666144 + mecab mecab-utils libmecab-dev
Bug #666144 [libmecab1,libmecab2] libmecab2 and libmecab1: error when trying to
install together
Added indication that 666144 affects mecab, mecab-utils, and libmecab-dev
> thanks
Stopping processin
I've contributed a patch upstream for a gtk/nautilus3 port of the
extension, and they've pushed it into the mercurial repository
(https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/thg/changeset/7017a49b612b).
Could this be reopened now that there's a chance of a real fix?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Your message dated Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:35:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#666188: fixed in gnome-themes-standard 3.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666188,
regarding Ships the icon cache, package now 83M installed-size
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 666237 important
Bug #666237 [typo3-dummy] typo3-dummy: prompting due to modified conffiles
which where not modified by the user
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
severity 666237 important
thanks
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your bugreport, as usual! :-) Much appreciated!
On Donnerstag, 29. März 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
> upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 649068 rgmanager/3.0.12-3.1
Bug #649068 [resource-agents,rgmanager] rgmanager and resource-agents: error
when trying to install together
The source rgmanager and version 3.0.12-3.1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as found
Package: mediawiki
Version: 1.18.1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Release announcement:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-March/059230.html
Requested CVE-identifiers in here: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q1/728
CVE-identifiers assigned in here: http://seclists.org/oss-
Package: calendar-timezones
Version: 10.0.3-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
After bump to version 10.x a link provided to iceowl is lost in which
case iceowl is broken. A quick fix is to reintroduce a link similar to
the link for icedove and thunderbi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 662227 665067
Bug #662227 [src:live-manual] src:live-manual: FTBFS in non-UTF-8 locales (such
as C)
Bug #665067 [src:live-manual] live-manual: FTBFS: wc: live-manual.ssm.sst: No
such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
Bug #662227 [
forcemerge 662227 665067
retitle 662227 FTBFS in non-UTF-8 locales (such as C)
retitle 665067 FTBFS in non-UTF-8 locales (such as C)
tag 662227 pending
tag 665067 pending
thanks
On 03/30/2012 01:21 AM, Ralph Amissah wrote:
> I Hope I claimed this bug too quickly.
thanks, however, like said earlie
201 - 246 of 246 matches
Mail list logo