Bug#638271: marked as done (rlvm: FTBFS on powerpc)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 14:45:58 +0800 with message-id <4fb34d26.30...@debian.org> and subject line Re: rlvm: FTBFS on powerpc has caused the Debian Bug report #638271, regarding rlvm: FTBFS on powerpc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: closing 672851

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 672851 Bug #672851 [netbase] netbase 5.0: network connection does not come up upon reboot Bug #672862 [netbase] Package is not installable in unstable since depends on experimental ifupdown Marked Bug as done Marked Bug as done > thanks St

Bug#662702: marked as done (libqglviewer: FTBFS against Qt 4.8)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 06:33:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662702: fixed in libqglviewer 2.3.4-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #662702, regarding libqglviewer: FTBFS against Qt 4.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#672415: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#672415: virtual memory allocation problem on kfreebsd-i386 (solved in wine 1.4)

2012-05-15 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/13 Hilko Bengen : > Am I guessing correctly that this is the relevant upstream commit? It's probably needed. And at least 535a55ec9eff83ac1cdf58a6514f4a76cab46a57 is needed too. But please don't guess, one would have to test it. If you intend to aim for 1.2 I'll be glad to help, just let

Bug#671785: segfaults when running reportbug

2012-05-15 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/13 Steven Chamberlain : > I couldn't reproduce this yet on either of two boxes: > > production server, up-to-date wheezy: > kfreebsd-amd64 9.0-1-amd64 9.0-3 > python2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2.1 > eglibc 2.13-32 > > development VM, loosely following wheezy + some sid/experimental: > kfreebsd-i386 8.3-1-

Bug#665910: marked as done (scidavis: FTBFS with Qt 4.8 in Experimental)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 06:22:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665910: fixed in scidavis 0.2.4-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #665910, regarding scidavis: FTBFS with Qt 4.8 in Experimental to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#664220: marked as done (torcs-data-cars 1.3.3 contains the same file as torcs-data 1.3.1 making upgrades fail)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 03:43:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664220: fixed in torcs 1.3.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #664220, regarding torcs-data-cars 1.3.3 contains the same file as torcs-data 1.3.1 making upgrades fail to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#672528: marked as done (tuxfootball: FTBFS: configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old.)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 03:21:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672528: fixed in tuxfootball 0.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #672528, regarding tuxfootball: FTBFS: configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. to be marked as done. Thi

Processed: Re: Bug#673102: gdm3 greeter shows ALL users with non-/bin/false shells

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 673102 accountsservice Bug #673102 [gdm3] gdm3 greeter shows ALL users with non-/bin/false shells Bug reassigned from package 'gdm3' to 'accountsservice'. No longer marked as found in versions gdm3/3.0.4-4. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Bug#672896: marked as done (legit: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 03:10:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672896: fixed in legit 0.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #672896, regarding legit: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed (with 1 errors): merging 672969 672613

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 672969 672613 Bug #672969 [python-kde4] autokey-qt: segfaults on startup Unable to merge bugs because: affects of #672613 is '' not 'printer-applet,kde-config-touchpad' Failed to merge 672969: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Contr

Processed: severity of 672613 is grave

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 672613 grave Bug #672613 [python-kde4] Python Exception There is no member named ma_mask Severity set to 'grave' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672613: http://bugs.debia

Bug#673016: API breakage, dropped header file cnf.h

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On 16.05.2012 03:40, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Di, 15 Mai 2012, Karl Berry wrote: >> np> somewhere between 20120410 and20120510 it seems that >> cnf.h >> is not installed anymore. >> >> Peter changed kpathsea/Makefile.am not to install cnf.h and several >> other .h's.

Processed (with 1 errors): merging 672969 672613

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 672969 672613 Bug #672969 [python-kde4] autokey-qt: segfaults on startup Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #672613 is 'critical' not 'grave' affects of #672613 is '' not 'printer-applet,kde-config-touchpad' Failed to merge 672969: Di

Processed: severity of 672613 is critical

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 672613 critical Bug #672613 [python-kde4] Python Exception There is no member named ma_mask Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 672613 to the same value. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#663896: marked as done (src:rmpi: FTBFS (configure: error: "Cannot find mpi.h header file"))

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 21:05:06 -0500 with message-id <20403.2898.643818.370...@max.nulle.part> and subject line Bug#663896: src:rmpi: FTBFS (configure: error: "Cannot find mpi.h header file") has caused the Debian Bug report #663896, regarding src:rmpi: FTBFS (configure: error: "Cann

Bug#663896: src:rmpi: FTBFS (configure: error: "Cannot find mpi.h header file")

2012-05-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 March 2012 at 21:32, Julien Cristau wrote: | Source: rmpi | Version: 0.5-9-2 | Severity: serious | Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) | | See the build logs at | https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rmpi The issue was that MPICH2 suppor

Processed (with 1 errors): merging 672969 672613

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 672969 672613 Bug #672969 [python-kde4] autokey-qt: segfaults on startup Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #672613 is 'critical' not 'grave' affects of #672613 is '' not 'printer-applet,kde-config-touchpad' Failed to merge 672969: Di

Bug#672749: rquantlib: ftbfs on armel/armhf

2012-05-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 16 May 2012 at 00:18, Julien Cristau wrote: | On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:16:29 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > The shell issue may be the best bet, but I see dash and bash. Dash wins, so | > it would have been that. We don't have something smaller than dash which | > would go into the

Bug#673016: API breakage, dropped header file cnf.h

2012-05-15 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Karl, hi Peter, On Di, 15 Mai 2012, Karl Berry wrote: > np> somewhere between 20120410 and20120510 it seems that > cnf.h > is not installed anymore. > > Peter changed kpathsea/Makefile.am not to install cnf.h and several > other .h's. I'm not sure why, or if he and I disc

Bug#672915: marked as done (slimit: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 01:23:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672915: fixed in slimit 0.7.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #672915, regarding slimit: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#673095: Acknowledgement (shows system users in gdm and gnome-control-center)

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Biebl
On 16.05.2012 01:40, Michael Biebl wrote: > Users that are now listed on my system: > > libuuid:x:100:101::/var/lib/libuuid:/bin/sh > backup:x:34:34:backup:/var/backups:/bin/sh > gnats:x:41:41:Gnats Bug-Reporting System (admin):/var/lib/gnats:/bin/sh > irc:x:39:39:ircd:/var/run/ircd:/bin/sh > list

Bug#673095: Acknowledgement (shows system users in gdm and gnome-control-center)

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Biebl
On 16.05.2012 01:34, Michael Biebl wrote: > I suspect it is this commit: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/commit/?id=552a0c856a6e3a7c2e6450ab80e79f4204062281 > > We previously filtered out users below > UID_MIN 1000 (as defined in /etc/login.defs) > > Now users with /usr/sbin/nologi

Bug#673095: Acknowledgement (shows system users in gdm and gnome-control-center)

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Biebl
I suspect it is this commit: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/commit/?id=552a0c856a6e3a7c2e6450ab80e79f4204062281 We previously filtered out users below UID_MIN 1000 (as defined in /etc/login.defs) Now users with /usr/sbin/nologin as login shell are filtered out. I don't agree with t

Bug#673095: shows system users in gdm and gnome-control-center

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: accountsservice Version: 0.6.18-2 Severity: serious Since the latest upgrade, the user chooser in gdm shows all available user accounts including system users. Same in gnome-control-center → User accounts. Marking as RC to prevent migration to testing. -- System Information: Debian Re

Bug#673016: API breakage, dropped header file cnf.h

2012-05-15 Thread Norbert Preining
On Di, 15 Mai 2012, Karl Berry wrote: > np> somewhere between 20120410 and20120510 it seems that > cnf.h > is not installed anymore. > > Peter changed kpathsea/Makefile.am not to install cnf.h and several > other .h's. I'm not sure why, or if he and I discussed it. Peter? O

Bug#673016: API breakage, dropped header file cnf.h

2012-05-15 Thread Karl Berry
np> somewhere between 20120410 and20120510 it seems that cnf.h is not installed anymore. Peter changed kpathsea/Makefile.am not to install cnf.h and several other .h's. I'm not sure why, or if he and I discussed it. Peter? k On Di, 15 Mai 2012, Michael Biebl wrote: > Packa

Bug#672749: rquantlib: ftbfs on armel/armhf

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 17:16:29 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > The shell issue may be the best bet, but I see dash and bash. Dash wins, so > it would have been that. We don't have something smaller than dash which > would go into the chroot, do we? > (sid)jcristau@agricola:~$ ls -l /bin/sh

Bug#672991: marked as done (mupen64plus-core: FTBFS on any-i386)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 22:13:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672991: fixed in mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #672991, regarding mupen64plus-core: FTBFS on any-i386 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Pending upload

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 295334 + pending Bug #295334 [firestarter] firestarter: No way to see destination port of incoming traffic Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #295334 to the same tags previously set > tags 589449 + pending Bug #589449 [firestarter] firest

Processed: Re: [debian-mysql] Bug#672207: Processed: Reassign bug #672207 to mysql-server-core-5.5

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 672207 -moreinfo Bug #672207 [amarok] [amarok] Fails to open internal database after upgrade to mysql 5.5 from 5.1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #672207 to the same tags previously set > block 671115 by 672207 Bug #671115 [release.deb

Bug#672207: [debian-mysql] Bug#672207: Processed: Reassign bug #672207 to mysql-server-core-5.5

2012-05-15 Thread Nicholas Bamber
tag 672207 -moreinfo block 671115 by 672207 reassign 672207 amarok thanks Actually I see what the problem is. The change needs to happen on the amarok side. It is a mysql bug only in as much as you *should* have had more warning and the mysqlclient transition will not complete until this is

Bug#667379: marked as done (spring: ftbfs with GCC-4.7)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 21:43:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667379: fixed in spring 88.0+dfsg1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #667379, regarding spring: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#672904: marked as done (pgxnclient: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 21:35:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672904: fixed in pgxnclient 1.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #672904, regarding pgxnclient: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#672036: marked as done (pion-net: FTBFS: PluginManager.hpp:423:3: error: 'erase' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instant

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 21:37:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672036: fixed in pion-net 4.0.7+dfsg-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #672036, regarding pion-net: FTBFS: PluginManager.hpp:423:3: error: 'erase' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were fo

Bug#653653: marked as done (nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 21:34:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653653: fixed in nbd 1:3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #653653, regarding nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#672985: [Pkg-e-devel] Bug#672985: Bug#672985: FTBFS: test suite makes assumptions of signed char

2012-05-15 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > I didn't take a look with the patch before I replied, but I don't think I > agree > with your fix. The conversion is done for TYPE_CHAR, which for eina means > signed char (there's TYPE_UCHAR for unsigned). The eina code should rather be >

Bug#672928: marked as done (libdbi-drivers: FTBFS: MySQL multiarc libs)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 21:27:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672928: fixed in libdbi-drivers 0.8.3-1+s-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #672928, regarding libdbi-drivers: FTBFS: MySQL multiarc libs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: unreproducible

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 669161 = moreinfo unreproducible Bug #669161 [src:gle-graphics] gle-graphics: FTBFS on sparc (*** glibc detected *** ../../build/bin/gle: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x70468660 ***) Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo; removed ta

Processed: affects 672969, affects 672969

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 672969 kde-config-touchpad Bug #672969 [python-kde4] autokey-qt: segfaults on startup Added indication that 672969 affects kde-config-touchpad > affects 672969 printer-applet Bug #672969 [python-kde4] autokey-qt: segfaults on startup Added

Bug#672969: autokey-qt: segfaults on startup

2012-05-15 Thread Marcus Better
Likely related to #662898. See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pykde4/+bug/922721 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#673075: kmymoney: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-Wl'

2012-05-15 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: src:kmymoney Version: 4.6.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-

Processed: Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] [debian-mysql] Processed: Reassign bug #672207 to mysql-server-core-5.5

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 672207 amarok 2.5.0-1 Bug #672207 [mysql-server-core-5.5] [amarok] Fails to open internal database after upgrade to mysql 5.5 from 5.1 Bug reassigned from package 'mysql-server-core-5.5' to 'amarok'. Ignoring request to alter found versi

Bug#672928: [debian-mysql] libdbi-drivers FTBS against latest MySQL

2012-05-15 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: >> Are you sure this is right? >> Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically? >> >> Olaf > > > Normally yes, but I am pretty sure that the patch would not be backwards > compatible. What patch, exactly? -- Olaf -- To U

Bug#670066: Bug #670066 python-openturns is unusable

2012-05-15 Thread D. Barbier
On 2012/5/15 D. Barbier wrote: > On 2012/5/15 trophime wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:43 +0200, D. Barbier wrote: >>> On 2012/5/14 Aron Xu wrote: >>> > The test build failed on amd64 and i386, at the same place. Attached >>> > is my change to your git tree and the build log produced on amd64. >

Processed: shelxle: FTBFS: molecule.cpp:(.text+0x392): undefined reference to `gluNewQuadric'

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 672049 normal Bug #672049 [src:shelxle] shelxle: FTBFS: molecule.cpp:(.text+0x392): undefined reference to `gluNewQuadric' Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > tags 672049 + moreinfo Bug #672049 [src:shelxle] shelxle: FTBFS: molecul

Bug#672049: shelxle: FTBFS: molecule.cpp:(.text+0x392): undefined reference to `gluNewQuadric'

2012-05-15 Thread Daniel Leidert
severity 672049 normal tags 672049 + moreinfo forwarded 672049 Christian Huebschle thanks Hi, The issue you reported is weird, because the linking to libGLU.so is hardcoded in shelXle.pro. For some reason the LIBS variable for a mac or win32 environment seems to be used, not the one for unix. I'

Bug#659784: HELP needed for uploading a new version 6.1 of the Rheolef package

2012-05-15 Thread Saramito Pierre
Bonjour Sylvestre, Je viens de remonter sous svn une nouvelle version de la debianisation de rheolef : cela corrige le nouveau probleme a propos de gcc 4.7 sous sid (bug #671996 ). Cela correspond aussi a une nouvelle version 6.1 des sources : http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito/rhe

Bug#645998: freeradius crashes due to segmentation fault

2012-05-15 Thread Rafael Varela Pet
Hi, Are there any plans to fix this in a near future? Even though we have a fail over system with three servers, this bug is becoming very annoying... Best regards, -- Rafael Varela Pet Area de Tecnoloxías da Información e Comunicacións Universidade de Santiago de Compostela 15782 Santiago d

Processed: Re: Bug#672994: CVE-2012-0219: buffer overflow

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 672994 1.7.1.3-1 Bug #672994 [socat] CVE-2012-0219: buffer overflow Marked as found in versions socat/1.7.1.3-1. > fixed 672994 1.7.1.3-1.3 Bug #672994 [socat] CVE-2012-0219: buffer overflow Marked as fixed in versions socat/1.7.1.3-1.3. > f

Bug#672994: CVE-2012-0219: buffer overflow

2012-05-15 Thread Jakub Wilk
found 672994 1.7.1.3-1 fixed 672994 1.7.1.3-1.3 fixed 672994 2.0.0~beta4-1.1 thanks * Moritz Muehlenhoff , 2012-05-15, 12:31: Please see http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/contrib/socat-secadv3.html "A heap based buffer overflow vulnerability has been found with data that happens to be output

Bug#673064: gcc-defaults: don't migrate to wheezy

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cristau
Source: gcc-defaults Version: 1.118 Severity: serious gcc-defaults shouldn't migrate to wheezy until there's an agreement between the gcc maintainers and release team about the 4.7 situation. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#672989: Multiple security issues

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:44:17 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: connman > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > > CVE-2012-2320: Conman doesn't check for the origin of netlink messages (from > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715172#c4) > http://git.kernel.org/?p=network/

Bug#658738: marked as done (drupal6: Upstream version 6.23 - security update)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 19:17:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#658738: fixed in drupal6 6.26-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #658738, regarding drupal6: Upstream version 6.23 - security update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed: Re: Bug#668065: Remove drupal6 in favour of drupal7?

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 668065 important Bug #668065 [drupal6] Remove drupal6 in favour of drupal7? Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 668065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#668065: Remove drupal6 in favour of drupal7?

2012-05-15 Thread Luigi Gangitano
severity 668065 important thanks I'm temporarly downgrading this bug so that the just-uploaded 6.26 version can be transitioned to wheezy and backported to squeeze. Once this last version is available in both distribution (from backports), package removal will be requested. Regards, L -- Lui

Bug#667374: marked as done (sinfo: ftbfs with GCC-4.7)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 19:05:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667374: fixed in sinfo 0.0.42-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #667374, regarding sinfo: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#626019: libsane-perl: Proposal on how to track this down

2012-05-15 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 14 May 2012 22:48, Willi Mann wrote: >> I am in half a mind to disable the tests and then deal with any >> bug reports from the problematic archectures. At least there then >> might be a user on a suitable machine and motivated to help. > > At least for the wheezy release, this sounds like a sa

Bug#672928: [debian-mysql] libdbi-drivers FTBS against latest MySQL

2012-05-15 Thread Nicholas Bamber
On 15/05/12 09:49, Olaf van der Spek wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Thomas, I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest Are you sure this is right? Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically? Olaf Normally

Processed: rsakeyfind: diff for NMU version 1:1.0-2.1

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 667360 + pending Bug #667360 [rsakeyfind] rsakeyfind: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 667360: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667360 D

Processed: bug 658484 is forwarded to https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/999873, tagging 658484

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 658484 https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/999873 Bug #658484 [backintime-kde] backintime-kde: segfault while loading Bug #671737 [backintime-kde] backintime-kde: segfaults at startup Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs

Bug#667360: rsakeyfind: diff for NMU version 1:1.0-2.1

2012-05-15 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
tags 667360 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I'm not member of the Forensics Team, but going trough some RC bugs for wheezy. I noticed that rsakeyfind still FTBFS with gcc 4.7, and thus prepared the upload with the patch from Cyril Brulebois. I've prepared an NMU for rsakeyfind (versioned as 1:

Processed: severity of 658484 is grave, tagging 658484, merging 658484 671737

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 658484 grave Bug #658484 [backintime-kde] backintime-kde: segfault while loading Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > tags 658484 - unreproducible + confirmed Bug #658484 [backintime-kde] backintime-kde: segfault while loading Removed

Processed: Re: liblzma-dev: undeclared Breaks against binutils-gold (linker prefers unversioned symbol, causes rbuilddeps to FTBFS)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 649522 + patch Bug #649522 [liblzma-dev] liblzma-dev: undeclared Breaks against binutils-gold (linker prefers unversioned symbol, causes rbuilddeps to FTBFS) Added tag(s) patch. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#649522: liblzma-dev: undeclared Breaks against binutils-gold (linker prefers unversioned symbol, causes rbuilddeps to FTBFS)

2012-05-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 649522 + patch quit Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Eduard Bloch wrote: >> Now I have also tried a random >> package using liblzma* (fsarchiver) and it's FTBFSing too. >> >> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't parse dependency liblzma_private_symbols >> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: invalid dependency got gene

Bug#665893: [Openstack-devel] Bug#665893: novnc: uninstallable on ia64

2012-05-15 Thread ghe. rivero
Got it. Will take a look this week. Thanks for the piggyback Ghe Rivero On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Anthony L. Awtrey wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Just wanted to piggyback on this report to ask why have novnc depend > on nova-common at all? This makes no sens

Bug#673047: marked as done (php5-geoip: geoip_region_by_name() requires nonexisting database: /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIPRegion.dat)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 22:36:39 +0400 with message-id <20120515183639.ga5...@darkstar.order.hcn-strela.ru> and subject line Re: Bug#673047: php5-geoip: geoip_region_by_name() requires nonexisting database: /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIPRegion.dat has caused the Debian Bug report #673047, rega

Bug#666107: marked as done (python-evas: not installable in sid)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:24:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672789: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666107, regarding python-evas: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#639035: marked as done (completely broken, doesn't run example)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:24:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672789: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #639035, regarding completely broken, doesn't run example to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#618062: marked as done (python-evas: FTBFS: evas/evas.c_evas.c:1:2: error: #error Do not use this file, it is the result of a failed Cython compilation.)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:24:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672789: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #618062, regarding python-evas: FTBFS: evas/evas.c_evas.c:1:2: error: #error Do not use this file, it is the result of a failed Cython

Bug#614820: marked as done (python-evas: FTBFS: __new__ method of extension type will change semantics in a future version of Pyrex and Cython. Use __cinit__ instead.)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:24:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672789: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #614820, regarding python-evas: FTBFS: __new__ method of extension type will change semantics in a future version of Pyrex and Cython.

Processed: tagging 672751, block 672751 with 666501, block 672751 with 666732, block 672751 with 666959 ...

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 672751 + moreinfo Bug #672751 [ftp.debian.org] RM: octave3.2 -- ROM; superseded by octave; RC buggy Added tag(s) moreinfo. > block 672751 with 666501 Bug #672751 [ftp.debian.org] RM: octave3.2 -- ROM; superseded by octave; RC buggy 672751 w

Bug#669110: marked as done (FTBFS error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:14:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672760: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #669110, regarding FTBFS error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] to be marked as done. Th

Bug#645751: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:14:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672760: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #645751, regarding Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#643437: marked as done (lusca: FTBFS: client_side_ranges.c:42:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:14:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672760: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #643437, regarding lusca: FTBFS: client_side_ranges.c:42:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-

Bug#666044: marked as done (python-ecore: not installable in sid (depends on libecore-evas-svn-06))

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:13:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672787: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666044, regarding python-ecore: not installable in sid (depends on libecore-evas-svn-06) to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Processed: Re: liblzma-dev contains wrong static library (liblzma.a)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 673001 xz-utils/5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 Bug #673001 [liblzma-dev] liblzma-dev contains wrong static library (liblzma.a) Marked as found in versions xz-utils/5.1.1alpha+20110809-3. > severity 673001 serious Bug #673001 [liblzma-dev] liblzma-dev

Bug#614463: marked as done (python-ecore: FTBFS: ecore/ecore.c_ecore.c:1:2: error: #error Do not use this file, it is the result of a failed Cython compilation.)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:13:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672787: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #614463, regarding python-ecore: FTBFS: ecore/ecore.c_ecore.c:1:2: error: #error Do not use this file, it is the result of a failed Cyt

Bug#666118: marked as done (zhone-illume-glue: not installable in sid)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:10:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672737: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666118, regarding zhone-illume-glue: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#666117: marked as done (zhone: not installable in sid)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:10:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672737: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666117, regarding zhone: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#654267: marked as done (ltp: FTBFS on armhf, reproduced on amd64, aio01.c:126:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672776: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #654267, regarding ltp: FTBFS on armhf, reproduced on amd64, aio01.c:126:3: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments

Bug#628269: marked as done (ltp: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lsctputil)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672776: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #628269, regarding ltp: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lsctputil to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#580540: marked as done (softgun: FTBFS in non-linux architectures: "config.mk:24: *** Unknown architecture. Stop.")

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:09:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672622: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #580540, regarding softgun: FTBFS in non-linux architectures: "config.mk:24: *** Unknown architecture. Stop." to be marked as done. T

Bug#555566: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672776: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #66, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#546354: marked as done (ltp - FTBFS: error: static declaration of 'sched_setaffinity' follows non-static declaration)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:11:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672776: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #546354, regarding ltp - FTBFS: error: static declaration of 'sched_setaffinity' follows non-static declaration to be marked as done.

Bug#668802: marked as done (jtex-bin: fails to install: The format file of `jtex' is NOT built successfully.)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:04:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672762: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #668802, regarding jtex-bin: fails to install: The format file of `jtex' is NOT built successfully. to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#668791: marked as done (multex-bin: fails to install: The format file of `multex' is NOT built successfully.)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:04:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672762: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #668791, regarding multex-bin: fails to install: The format file of `multex' is NOT built successfully. to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#666171: marked as done (texfam: FTBFS ("undefined reference to `kpse_set_progname'"))

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:04:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672762: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666171, regarding texfam: FTBFS ("undefined reference to `kpse_set_progname'") to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#629789: marked as done (emile: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: gcc-3.4, gcc-3.4-m68k-linux-gnu)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:05:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672773: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #629789, regarding emile: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: gcc-3.4, gcc-3.4-m68k-linux-gnu to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#533800: marked as done (emile: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-3.4))

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:05:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672773: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #533800, regarding emile: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-3.4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#644432: marked as done ([python-pytrilinos] Depends on python2.6 but 2.7 is now in unstable)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672781: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #644432, regarding [python-pytrilinos] Depends on python2.6 but 2.7 is now in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#630936: marked as done (trilonis: FTBFS: build-depends on obsolete swig1.3)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672781: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #630936, regarding trilonis: FTBFS: build-depends on obsolete swig1.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#631538: marked as done (libtrilinos changed SONAME without package rename)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672781: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #631538, regarding libtrilinos changed SONAME without package rename to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#625027: marked as done (trilinos: FTBFS: Teuchos_ConfigDefs.hpp:128:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672781: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #625027, regarding trilinos: FTBFS: Teuchos_ConfigDefs.hpp:128:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type to be marked as done. This m

Bug#620802: marked as done (python-pytrilinos: fails to work)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672781: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #620802, regarding python-pytrilinos: fails to work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#565053: marked as done (trilinos: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:03:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672781: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #565053, regarding trilinos: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#673047: php5-geoip: geoip_region_by_name() requires nonexisting database: /usr/share/GeoIP/GeoIPRegion.dat

2012-05-15 Thread markus
Package: php5-geoip Version: 1.0.7-2 Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I installed php5-geoip on my squeeze server and tried to use it. The following error has been written into my error log: [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] PHP Warning: geoip_region_

Processed: severity of 673043 is wishlist

2012-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 673043 wishlist Bug #673043 {Done: Andrew Shadura } [ifupdown] new ifupdown does not understand comments in interfaces, breaking existing setups Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#673043: new ifupdown does not understand comments in interfaces, breaking existing setups

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 15.05.2012 21:32, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 15 May 2012 21:26:17 +0400 > Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> Interesting. The manpage actually says that in-line coments are >> NOT supported, but I've never actually noticed this till today. >> It has always worked, and I guess it was

Bug#673043: new ifupdown does not understand comments in interfaces, breaking existing setups

2012-05-15 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Tue, 15 May 2012 21:26:17 +0400 Michael Tokarev wrote: > Interesting. The manpage actually says that in-line coments are > NOT supported, but I've never actually noticed this till today. > It has always worked, and I guess it was more by incident not by > design. But I'd say it is a

  1   2   >