"Grant H." writes:
> After reviewing the copyright file[1] for the package yforth[2] I
> thought that it did not qualify as free software.
Why do you say this? The intent of the author was clearly to be fully
permissive as long as attribution is retained.
For a fairly random piece of softwar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 646981 4.9.1-1
Bug #646981 [xfce4-panel] xfce4-panel: panel loses settings
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #646981 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
On mer., 2012-09-12 at 14:35 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Please excuse me for reopening but I've just noticed that Wheezy is
> still
> affected by this issue. I can't reproduce with version in
> "experimental" but
> xfce4-panel in "testing" is loosing settings like crazy.
>
> Also I raised se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 646981 xfce4-panel/4.9.1-1
Bug #646981 [xfce4-panel] xfce4-panel: panel loses settings
Marked as fixed in versions xfce4-panel/4.9.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
646981: http://bugs.deb
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:17:57PM +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:35:13PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > https://patches.ubuntu.com/w/wxwidgets2.8/wxwidgets2.8_2.8.12.1-11ubuntu2.patch
> >
> > + - Add conflict on python-wxgtk2.8 (<< 2.8.12.1-6ubuntu1~) to
> > +
Package: dbtoepub
Version: 0+svn9150-1
Severity: serious
Calling this program invariably results in
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': cannot load
such file -- dbtoepub/docbook (LoadError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require'
Is this still an issue with radeon?
For my nvidia system it disappeared several weeks ago with a nouveau update.
It's tagged RC, so we should be sure it's still a "grave" bug?!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: xfce4-panel
Version: 4.8.6-3
Hi,
Please excuse me for reopening but I've just noticed that Wheezy is still
affected by this issue. I can't reproduce with version in "experimental" but
xfce4-panel in "testing" is loosing settings like crazy.
Also I raised severity as this problem makes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 646981
Bug #646981 {Done: Lionel Le Folgoc } [xfce4-panel]
xfce4-panel: panel loses settings
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 646981 + wheezy
Bug #646981 {Done: Lionel Le Folgoc } [xfce4-panel]
xfce4-panel: panel loses settings
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
646981: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 646981 serious
Bug #646981 {Done: Lionel Le Folgoc } [xfce4-panel]
xfce4-panel: panel loses settings
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
646981: http:/
Package: yforth
Version: 0.1beta-23
Severity: serious
User: trisq...@trisquel.info
Usertags: trisquel, libreplanet
After reviewing the copyright file[1] for the package yforth[2] I
thought that it did not qualify as free software. I contacted the
debian legal list[3] and they informed me that the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:46:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
>
> It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction of
> CONFIG_HID_LOGITECH_DJ in 3.2+, because 3.1.0
At Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:43:07 +0100,
Martín Ferrari wrote:
> The package in svn does not look in very good shape ATM. That commit
> is from July, the pending tag was not added to the bug, and the
> control file has currently many commented-out lines that should be
> removed... Dunno if waiting for m
Package: krb5-sync-plugin
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
The hook is called on key changes with a NULL password, which results
in a strlen(NULL) in the plugin and a segfault in kadmind. Fix coming
shortly.
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
Control: retitle -1 AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux
3.2 (regression from 3.1)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction of
CONFIG_HID_
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux 3.2
> (regression from 3.1)
Bug #685360 [src:linux] AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with
Linux 3.2 (regression from 2.6.38)
Changed Bug title to 'AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard br
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 686255 minor
Bug #686255 [ppp] Please allow translation of all debconf templates
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
severity 686255 minor
thanks
On Sep 11, David Prévot wrote:
> Severity fixed given the lack of rationale, apologies if I misunderstood
> your point.
Not all policy violations are RC FFS.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:33:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#686362: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #680492,
regarding CVE-2011-4408
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:32:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#686697: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #651142,
regarding desktopcouch 1.0.8 won't start (stacktrace)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:31:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687042: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #685585,
regarding src:fex: GPL + additional restrictions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package src:ruby-mocha
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'src:ruby-mocha'
Limit currently set to 'package':'src:ruby-mocha'
> tag 684860 - unreproducible
Bug #684860 [src:ruby-mocha] ruby-mocha: FTBFS: tests failed
package ruby-mocha
tag 684860 - unreproducible
tag 684860 pending
thanks
Hi!
Here is a recipe to reproduce the bug:
force the order of the tests run so that
test/acceptance/minitest_test.rb appears first, by adding
require "test/acceptance/minitest_test"
at the top of the file debian/
On 09/11/2012 02:28 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> unblock 653744 by 658577
> thanks
>
> libevocosm is fixed, but acovea still ftbfs:
>
Correct; I'm still working through the problems here. It turns out
there was a major change in the ABIs being used but acovea was not
updated (and I haven't had a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 687335 ftp.debian.org
Bug #687335 [ftp-master.debian.org] Support armhf and s390x in the security
archive
Warning: Unknown package 'ftp-master.debian.org'
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp-master.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring
Am 07.09.2012 23:36, schrieb Nicholas Bamber:
> Peter,
> If noone else does I will certainly endeavour to get this into wheezy.
> I probably won't get round to until later next week which gives the
> others a chance if they have more time.
>
> By the way I didn't get the email which is I gue
Package: ftp-master.debian.org
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 security.debian.org
Hi,
This is just to keep a record of things that need to be done before the
release:
* Add support for the armhf architecture to the security archive
* Add support for the s390x architecture to the security a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 653744 by 658577
Bug #653744 [src:acovea] acovea FTBFS in unstable
653744 was blocked by: 658577
653744 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 653744: 658577
Failed to set blocking bugs of 653744: can't find location for 658
unblock 653744 by 658577
thanks
libevocosm is fixed, but acovea still ftbfs:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -I. -I. -I. -I. -I.. -DACOVEA_VERSION=\"5.1.1\"
-DACOVEA_CONFIG_DIR=\"/usr/share//libacovea/config/\"
-DACOVEA_BENCHMARK_DIR=\"/usr/share//libacovea/benchmarks/\" -g -O2 -MT
acovea.lo -MD -MP -MF .d
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 security.debian.org
Bug #687334 [buildd.debian.org] Please add security queues for armhf and s390x
Added indication that 687334 affects security.debian.org
--
687334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 security.debian.org
Bug #687335 [ftp-master.debian.org] Support armhf and s390x in the security
archive
Warning: Unknown package 'ftp-master.debian.org'
Added indication that 687335 affects security.debian.org
Warning: Unknown package 'ftp-master.debian.o
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 security.debian.org
Hi,
This is just to keep a record of things that need to be done before the
release:
* Add security queues for armhf
* Add security queues for s390x
Of course the sec archive first needs to know about them, so I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 687320 fixed-upstream
Bug #687320 [grub-efi-amd64] grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when
USB media reader attached
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
687
tag 687320 fixed-upstream
thanks
On 11.09.2012 19:14, Christian Jacobsen wrote:
> Package: grub-efi-amd64
> Version: 1.99-22.1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> With the recent hubbub about UEFI I thought I'd try getting my new system, an
> As
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peterm
So the bad news is that the build daemons got in a mess. The good
news is that at least one FTP person thinks this will clear in about
24 hours and then the build daemons will start building gforth.
If that fails I guess you'll have t
i not see in build log from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libsdl1.2&arch=i386&ver=1.2.14-6.1&stamp=1286726436
the lncursesw..
but seem theres another similar issues (so not directly related):
http://trac.rephial.org/ticket/1625
i dont nkow how appears the -lncursesw linker flag
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
>
> Are you building this package on a pristine squeeze system ?
>
of course.. i have two virtual machines that purge/reinstall in every
build of a delicate or very important package..
sdl its a very important package.. i build a special de
Le Tuesday 11 September 2012 06:40:22, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit :
> Package: libsdl1.2debian-all
> Version: 1.2.14-6.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: package uninstallable
>
> the build of package faild due missing build-depend on libncursesw, in
> this error:
>
> error : cannot find -ln
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #686255 [ppp] Please allow translation of all debconf templates
Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor'
--
686255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:49:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644691: fixed in postr 0.12.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #644691,
regarding postr: Please transition to nautilus 3 and GObject introspection
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 687238 + squeeze
Bug #687238 [libsdl1.2debian-all] missing libncursesw5-dev or equivalent in
sources, error : cannot find -lncursesw in path
Added tag(s) squeeze.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc & mips. Please go ahead with
> a release.
Done.
http://kr.github.com/beanstalkd/2012/09/11/1.7-release-notes.html
Thanks for all the help with this, and for your patience. :)
--
To
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:17:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687175: fixed in freeradius 2.1.12+dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687175,
regarding freeradius: CVE-2012-3547 stack-based buffer overflow in EAP-TLS
handling
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 680963 important
Bug #680963 [network-manager-gnome] network-manager-gnome: Cannot connect to
VPN with nm-applet
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#672616: fixed in gforth 0.7.0+ds1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #672616,
regarding FTBFS: Binary files - and ./test/coretest.out differ
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: grub-efi-amd64
Version: 1.99-22.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
With the recent hubbub about UEFI I thought I'd try getting my new system, an
Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM with Core i53450, booting using EFI instead of bios
compatibility mode.
At first
Doesn't seem to have a fix yet.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:18:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618569: fixed in avelsieve 1.9.9-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #618569,
regarding Failure of authentication on TLS connections
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: keystone
Version: 2012.1.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
The subject says it all. /etc/keystone/keystone.conf shouldn't be a conffiles
if we modify it in the postinst with sed.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:32:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#686346: fixed in apt 0.9.7.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #686346,
regarding apt: Should not arch-qualify arch-less packages on dpkg calls
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:32:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685192: fixed in apt 0.9.7.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #685192,
regarding apt: redirection handling changes in 0.9.4 may break aptitude
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:18:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#686833: fixed in git-extras 1.7.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686833,
regarding git-extras - git-gh-pages - removes all files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:18:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685653: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685653,
regarding mlterm,mlterm-tiny: missing copyright file after squeeze->wheezy
upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
I can reproduce this bug on my squeeze system with backports kernel
3.2.0-0.bpo.3-686-pae too.
Not with "-t auto" but if I use some filesystem (e.g. ext2/3/4, reiserfs) in
the mount command.
mount -t ext3 /dev/sdxy /mnt
With kernel 2.6.32-5-686 I get the ususal "mount: wrong fs type, bad superb
Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Amaya wrote:
>
> > Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > As a user, I don't really care that a package uses debhelper v5,
> > > that's an internal thing. I would much preferr to have it in wheezy
> > > even if the package is not perfect than not have it in wheezy at
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:12:07PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> and maybe recheck with 4.7.1-8 in unstable.
I rechecked, it doesn't make any difference.
Berto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On 2011-12-02 00:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yaroslav Halchenko writes:
>
>> I thought to ask since now testing carries 1.11.x series of xorg, so all
>> testing/unstable users of 96xx are stuck and there is no obvious
>> workaround any more.
>
>> I wonder if there was any motion upstream to provid
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:18:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#643584: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
96.43.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #643584,
regarding xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-96xx: video driver for nvidia legacy
96xx missing in wheezy
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:18:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#643584: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
96.43.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #643584,
regarding missing support for xorg-video-abi-11, does not install with Xorg
Xserver 1.11.0
to be marke
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:03:13 +0300
Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:19:50AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Package: perl
> > Version: 5.14.2-12
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > I kicked off an upgrade of a machine running stable (squeeze) to the
> > currently frozen testing (wheezy)
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:08:56PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > By the way, removing the __attribute__((optimize("O0"))) from
> > the function definition in inpttype.h also solves the problem. I
> > wonder what that is for.
>
> just to confirm, removing this workaround lets you successfully
>
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:17:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687275: fixed in argyll 1.4.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #687275,
regarding CVE-2012-4405 integer overflow leading to heap based buffer overflow
in embedded icclib
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 643584
Bug #643584 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-96xx] missing support for xorg-video-abi-11,
does not install with Xorg Xserver 1.11.0
Bug #660158 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-leg
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:19:50AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Package: perl
> Version: 5.14.2-12
> Severity: critical
>
> I kicked off an upgrade of a machine running stable (squeeze) to the
> currently frozen testing (wheezy). During the upgrade, I hit the
> following:
It looks to me more l
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:12:35AM +0300, Daniel Landau wrote:
> ** Tainted: O (4096)
> * Out-of-tree module has been loaded.
>
> ** Loaded modules:
> vboxpci(O)
> vboxnetadp(O)
> vboxnetflt(O)
> vboxdrv(O)
We don't support systems in this state. Please remove the
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #687254 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: Using i915, after login from
gdm, screen goes black, and only a reboot helps.
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
687254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687254
De
On 23.08.2012 19:08, Christoph Martin wrote:
> I could successfully build 2.6.1. I will test it soon.
>
> Christoph
Hi Christoph
i've slightly updated Mediathekview-3.0.0. I removed Anleitung.pdf
(included it twice) and switched to Debian's new copyright format.
To ease testing i have created a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 687274 -1
Bug #687274 [ghostscript] CVE-2012-4405 integer overflow leading to heap based
buffer overflow in embedded icclib
Bug 687274 cloned as bug 687275
> reassign -1 argyll
Bug #687275 [ghostscript] CVE-2012-4405 integer overflow leadin
Package: ghostscript
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for ghostscript.
Quoting from the original report, as the mitre entry does not exist so far..
CVE-2012-4405[0]:
| An array index error leading to heap-based buffer out-of-buffer bounds write
|
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Amaya wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > As a user, I don't really care that a package uses debhelper v5,
> > that's an internal thing. I would much preferr to have it in wheezy
> > even if the package is not perfect than not have it in wheezy at all.
>
> PLease, ask the releas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 666525 0.212
Bug #666525 [pbuilder] pbuilder fails to create directory under ccache when run
with sudo
Marked as fixed in versions 0.212/.
> forcemerge 666525 675691 675843 670651
Bug #666525 [pbuilder] pbuilder fails to create directory un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 675409 + confirmed experimental
Bug #675409 [puppetmaster-passenger] puppetmaster-passenger: fails to upgrade
from sid: mv: cannot stat `/etc/apache2/sites-available/puppetmaster.conf': No
such file or directory
Added tag(s) confirmed and e
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
My computer with an intel i7 cpu most times works properly, but sometimes it
gets stuck in a black screen after loggin in from gdm. The relevant lines, from
kern.log (I think) are:
Sep
Hi
Dne Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:37:01 +0200
Niels Thykier napsal(a):
> Source: colorhug-client
> Version: 0.1.11-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package FTBFS on ia64 and will therefore not migrate to testing
> (despite the unblock hint). The relevant part of the of the log
> appears to be:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685766 + patch
Bug #685766 [docbook-utils] docbook2man fails on ia64
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685766: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685766
Debian
Processing control commands:
> severity 679765 important
Bug #679765 [puppetmaster] puppetmaster - CA prone to MD5 collision attacks
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> retitle 679765 puppet ca uses weak cryptographic hashing algorithm
Bug #679765 [puppetmaster] puppetmaster - CA prone to M
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 685766 docbook-utils 0.6.14-2
Bug #685766 [src:colorhug-client] colorhug-client: FTBFS on ia64
Bug reassigned from package 'src:colorhug-client' to 'docbook-utils'.
No longer marked as found in versions colorhug-client/0.1.11-1.
Ignoring
Control: severity 679765 important
Control: retitle 679765 puppet ca uses weak cryptographic hashing algorithm
After some deliberations, I've decided to set the severity of this bug
to "important". It does not by itself, and not with any small amount of
work, fill the requirements for "grave" or "
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 666775 pending
Bug #666775 [beanstalkd] beanstalkd 1.5 tests are flaky in certain arches
(FTBFS)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
tag 666775 pending
thanks
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:22:45AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> Ok, I believe this is fixed now in
[..]
> If this looks good, I'm set to make a release.
Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc & mips. Please go ahead with
a release.
--
Every great idea is wor
81 matches
Mail list logo
