Processing control commands:
> tags 687862 + patch
Bug #687862 [libspf2-dev] libspf2-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #687862 to the same tags previously set
> tags 687863 + patch
Bug #687863 [libspf2-2-dbg] libspf2-2-dbg: copyright fil
Processing control commands:
> tags 687862 + patch
Bug #687862 [libspf2-dev] libspf2-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #687862 to the same tags previously set
> tags 687863 + patch
Bug #687863 [libspf2-2-dbg] libspf2-2-dbg: copyright fil
Control: tags 687862 + patch
Control: tags 687863 + patch
Control: tags 687864 + patch
Hi Magnus
I had a look at these policy violation bugs. I have attached a debdiff
patch which should solve the issue. Hope it can help.
Do you have time to prepare the upload?
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru libs
Processing control commands:
> tags 687862 + patch
Bug #687862 [libspf2-dev] libspf2-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 687863 + patch
Bug #687863 [libspf2-2-dbg] libspf2-2-dbg: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) patch.
Here's another example of crosslinked entries:
╭[virtual]─[-]─╮
│╭╮│
││Bind devices to the new aggregate. To be eligible, a device must either be ││
││unpart
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:47:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#680467: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-46
has caused the Debian Bug report #680467,
regarding Versioned Breaks (and Recommends) on lilo is missing epoch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Hi Guido and Christoph,
On Sat, 22. Sep 19:19 Guido Günther wrote:
> > 2. Removing MV completely from wheezy and uploading 3.0.0 to
> > unstable.
>
> I'd go for this one. Everything besides 3.0 doesn't seem to work that
> well ant I tthnk it's hard to maintain 2.6 for the next years. We c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 688441 important
Bug #688441 [linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64] 3.2.0 ext3 and ext4 failing in Xen VM
domU
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
688441: http
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Bug #612918 involves a violation of the FHS (using a file in /etc as a
>> state file), thus violating debian policy. Apparently there was going
>> to be some involved upstream work to correct the
I just wanted to mention that I was also having problems with failed
fai-setup and the patches resolved the problem for me, but I then I
got the dracut nfs error when attempting to boot a client.
Chrooting into nfsroot and trying to regenerate the initrd with the
nfs module fails for me because it
Hi Markus,
Am 11.09.2012 13:28, schrieb Markus Koschany:
> On 23.08.2012 19:08, Christoph Martin wrote:
>> I could successfully build 2.6.1. I will test it soon.
>>
>> Christoph
>
> Hi Christoph
>
> i've slightly updated Mediathekview-3.0.0. I removed Anleitung.pdf
> (included it twice) and swit
Package: ampache
Version: 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #688436
Andreas,
Thanks for the bug report.
I have a fixed version of ampache on m.d.n, it can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/ampache/ampache_3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.dsc
Best regards
Charlie Smotherman
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > This patch fixes an issue introduced after commit 4ea5454203d991ec
> >
> > After that commit, hid-core silently discards any incoming packet
> > that arrives while any hid driver's probe function is being executed.
> >
> > This broke the enumeration pr
Andreas Beckmann dixit:
>The first problem was that the database was not reachable, but that
>didn't cause the postinst to abort ...
Oh well, that too. Roland fixed that upstream yesterday,
I’ll make a new upload soon then. (To get into non-RC-buggy
shape for jessie ;)
But really, your piuparts
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:32:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#650454: fixed in checkgmail 1.13+svn43-2+squeeze0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #650454,
regarding checkgmail: keeps popping up login window but fails to log in
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:18:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688268: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #688268,
regarding Kernel Panic -- how to continue
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 688151 2.0.0rc2-2
Bug #688151 [fwknop] [CVE 2012-4434, 4435, 4436] fwknop: Multiple security
issues
There is no source info for the package 'fwknop' at version '2.0.0rc2-2' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 687818 + pending
Bug #687818 [tomcat6] tomcat6: postinst modifies conffile
/etc/logrotate.d/tomcat6
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
687818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Dick Thomas wrote:
> still a noob to debian so daren't do that yet as I don't want to get flamed
> but thank you for the suggestions :)
Flaming is somewhat less prevalent in debian nowadays, so please try
to not worry about that.
Would you mind at least trying the
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64
Version: 3.2.21-3
Severity: serious
Leaves root filesystem in read-only state, some users have reported root
filesystem corruption (see below), so I have marked this as serious
I have a dom0 running Xen (standard squeeze installation) and several
domU VM instanc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de).
> usertags 688351 piuparts
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> found 657146 7.2.6+dfsg-14
Bug #657146 [tango-common] tango-
Hi Markus,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:56:24AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> 647...@bugs.debian.org, b.tho...@fh-muenster.de,
> christoph.mar...@uni-mainz.de
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: Bug#681680: mediathekview: finds only 1376 out of 57537 movies
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <20120913211149.ga25...@bo
Hi Dai,
I had a short glance over your patch.
You probably should add to uim-data
Breaks: uim-MODULE (<< FIXEDVERSION~)
for all module packages that used the path /etc/uim
You need to "get rid of the conffiles" that are still known to dpkg after an
upgrade. dpkg-maintscript-helper may help y
Package: ampache
Version: 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed that your package deletes
conffiles and logfiles during postrm purge. This is a violation of
policy 10.7.3 and 10.8.
dpkg will take care
Package: dotlrn
Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-8
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3:
Package: biomaj
Version: 1.2.0-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3: "[..
Lee Garrett wrote:
> AFAICS stable is still affected by both CVEs. Can you confirm this?
> Patches are available in the Ubuntu natty version of libtiff4.
Yes, I can confirm. Sorry about that. I checked against the natty
package, and there are quite a few CVEs that we seem to have missed. I
th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 655804 + patch
Bug #655804 [src:update-manager] update-manager: FTBFS: Error:
`/usr/share/sphinx/themes/basic/static/jquery.js` and
`/build/update-manager-OCasPf/update-manager-0.200.5/doc/build/html/_static/jquery.js`
are the same file
Ad
X-Debbugs-CC: Jakub Wilk
Here's a patch that follows the first piece of Jakub's advice.
diff -u update-manager-0.200.5/debian/changelog
update-manager-0.200.5/debian/changelog
--- update-manager-0.200.5/debian/changelog
+++ update-manager-0.200.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+update-manage
Package: accountsservice
Version: 0.6.21-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Must be fixed for wheezy
Switching users makes gnome-shell crash with this error:
#0 0x7f70c5ea06c9 in g_cancellable_is_cancelled (
cancellable=0x7f70c4a30660)
at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.12+really2.32.3/./gi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 668757 + patch
Bug #668757 [netdisco-backend,netdisco-frontend] netdisco-{back,front}end:
creates system user in /home
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
668757: http://bugs.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 687857 + pending
Bug #687857 [libatm1-dev] libatm1-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
687857: http://bugs.debian.org
tags 687857 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for linux-atm (versioned as 1:2.5.1-1.5) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru linux-atm-2.5.1/debian/changelog linux-atm-2.5.1/debian/changelog
--- li
Package: nginx-extras
Version: 1.2.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: 6
Hi!
When installing nginx-{naxsi,light,full,extras} the postinst scripts
create a symlink in /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default from
/etc/nginx/sites-available/default if /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default
doesn'
Hi Sebastian
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 03:29:51PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:22:53AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > The attached patch should fix this issue. I'm only attaching the patch
> > but have not done any further action. Sebastian do you have time to
Hello,
I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug
#668026 there. However I've also discovered the bug is present in the
version currently in testing (2:0.1.12-20). I suppose the changes in -21
to -23 are not meant/eligible for inclusion in testing, so I'd like to
upload 2:0.1.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 688075 minor
Bug #688075 [mc] mc 3:4.8.3-8 broke `~' directory completition
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
688075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 688075 https://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/2898
Bug #688075 [mc] mc 3:4.8.3-8 broke `~' directory completition
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/2898'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:22:53AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The attached patch should fix this issue. I'm only attaching the patch
> but have not done any further action. Sebastian do you have time to do
> the upload?
Thanks for the patch. I just uploaded the change as 1.2.2-2.
-- Seb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 623953 cross-pcc needs cross-binutils
Bug #623953 [pcc-for-x86-64-linux-gnu] pcc-for-x86-64-linux-gnu: depends on an
unavailable package
Changed Bug title to 'cross-pcc needs cross-binutils' from
'pcc-for-x86-64-linux-gnu: depends on an
retitle 623953 cross-pcc needs cross-binutils
severity 623953 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
there still seems to be no consensus regarding this, but with
(only) my “pcc maintainer” hat on, by mentioning it in the
README.Debian file how to build those cross compilers, I think
my part is done, especially con
Hi,
I’m working on pcc (again) and will probably be able to take
care of these two issues soonish, too. (Not tagging as pending
because the current CVS commits aren’t yet sufficient.)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
In traditional syntax ' is ignored, but in c99 everything between two ' is
handled as charac
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:32:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687886: fixed in libgsm0710 1.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #687886,
regarding libgsm0710-dbg: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:32:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687869: fixed in libgsm0710 1.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #687869,
regarding libgsm0710-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:32:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#668026: fixed in libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #668026,
regarding libusb: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct usb_ctl_request' has no
member named 'request'
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:27:49 + (UTC)
with message-id
and subject line pcc needs multiarch aware dpkg
has caused the Debian Bug report #650742,
regarding dh_testdir: debian/control has a duplicate entry for pcc-for-
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 668026 2:0.1.12-20
Bug #668026 [src:libusb] libusb: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct
usb_ctl_request' has no member named 'request'
Marked as found in versions libusb/2:0.1.12-20.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
> should work as well.
That won't work, just tried it. The only package from gcc-defaults that
could be involved in the problematic upgrade paths is gcj-jre-headless
and that wi
The attached patch fixes the FTBFS.
--
Marcin Owsiany http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 2048R/02F946FC 35E9 1344 9F77 5F43 13DD 6423 DBF4 80C6 02F9 46FC
diff -Nru libusb-0.1.12/debian/changelog libusb-0.1.12/debian/changelog
--- libusb-0.1.12/debian/changelog 2012-06-03 17:31:3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 668026 + patch pending
Bug #668026 [src:libusb] libusb: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct
usb_ctl_request' has no member named 'request'
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:23:01PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 à 10:46 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > The default browser should be one that has at least vaguely credible
> > security support, IMO. epiphany doesn't qualify, chromium or iceweasel
> > pro
Hi,
Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 à 10:46 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> The default browser should be one that has at least vaguely credible
> security support, IMO. epiphany doesn't qualify, chromium or iceweasel
> probably would.
Since this is security related, I’d appreciate to have the input
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 688128 + patch
Bug #688128 [autokey-gtk] autokey-gtk: does not start
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
688128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688128
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677582 gcc-defaults
Bug #677582 [gcc-4.7-base] gcc-4.4-base: upgrade problems since removal of
gcj-4.4
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.7-base' to 'gcc-defaults'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.7/4.7.2-2.
Ignoring request
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#681757: fixed in meta-gnome3 1:3.4+2
has caused the Debian Bug report #681757,
regarding uninstallable meta-packages (prevents testing migration)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#645656: fixed in meta-gnome3 1:3.4+2
has caused the Debian Bug report #645656,
regarding gnome-core: please re-soften the network-manager-gnome dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On 21.09.2012 21:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Philipp Kern dixit:
>
>> I think you could work on your politeness and adjust the tone of your
>> mails.
>
> Right. I know that formulating is not one of my better skills.
>
>> I don't think Matthias had an malicious intent here, to hurt you and
>> i
I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
should work as well.
On 22.09.2012 09:23, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> reassign 677582 gcc-4.7-base 4.7.2-2
> reopen 677582
> thanks
>
> On 2012-09-21 14:22, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm now trying to add these Bre
Hi,
Paul Menzel wrote:
> $ dd if=/dev/sr1 bs=2048 skip=16 count=1 | od -c
> ...
> 000 > \0 0 034 001 \0 \0 001 034 0 F 034 + \0 \0 +
> 020 034 F p \t 023 022 1 ! \0 \0 \0 \0 001 \0 \0 001
> 040 034 \0 I \0 M \0 G \0 _ \0 2 \0 4 \0 2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 688250 + mono-apache-server1 mono-xsp1 gclcvs
Bug #688250 [piuparts] piuparts: bug for tracking "modifies conffiles" bugs for
packages in squeeze that have been removed afterwards
Added indication that 688250 affects mono-apache-server1,
Dear Thomas,
I am sorry for my late reply.
Also I am CCing just to be sure. If you get the message twice because
you subscribed to the report, please tell me.
Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2012, 22:51 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
> > brasero (libisofs)DEBUG : Processed 2119108 of 2119108
Package: nanourl
Version: 0.1-7.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
the postinst script of your package looks plainly wrong:
==> rm -f /etc/nanourl/*
this needs to be done during purge only and never when the package is
just removed
if /etc/nanourl/apache
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 688008 monkey: CVE-2012-4443: CGI scripts executed without dropping
> RUID/RGID root
Bug #688008 [monkey] monkey: CGI scripts executed without dropping RUID/RGID
root
Changed Bug title to 'monkey: CVE-2012-4443: CGI scripts executed with
Package: openvas-server
Version: 2.0.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 2.0.3-3
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/d
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2.0.3-3
Bug #688379 [openvas-server] openvas-server: modifies conffiles (policy
10.7.3): /etc/openvas/openvasd.conf
Marked as found in versions openvas-server/2.0.3-3.
--
688379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688379
Debian Bug Tracking
Package: gom
Version: 0.30.2-5.3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 0.30.2-5
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-p
Processing control commands:
> found -1 0.30.2-5
Bug #688378 [gom] gom: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/default/gom
Marked as found in versions gom/0.30.2-5.
--
688378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: ferm
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 2.0.7-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2.0.7-1
Bug #688377 [ferm] ferm: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/default/ferm
Marked as found in versions ferm/2.0.7-1.
--
688377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 687579 -1
Bug #687579 [abby] abby: neither works with current clive nor with current
cclive version
Bug 687579 cloned as bug 688376
> retitle 687579 cclive: upgrade breaks abby without declaring so
Bug #687579 [abby] abby: neither works wit
clone 687579 -1
retitle 687579 cclive: upgrade breaks abby without declaring so
# incomplete dependencies
severity 687579 serious
reassign 687579 cclive 0.7.9-1
#tags -1 +notsqueeze
tags -1 + wheezy sid experimental
quit
Axel Beckert wrote:
> starting up abby for the first time on Wheezy shows an
Package: ntlmaps
Version: 0.9.9.0.1-11.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html
Package: gforge-shell-postgresql
Version: 5.2~rc1+1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 688372 by 587749
Bug #688372 [wnpp] ITP: bzr-tweet -- Bazaar commit and push tweet plugin
688372 was not blocked by any bugs.
688372 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 688372: 613698, 609041, 617983, and 587749
> --
Stopping
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
> This patch fixes an issue introduced after commit 4ea5454203d991ec
>
> After that commit, hid-core silently discards any incoming packet
> that arrives while any hid driver's probe function is being executed.
>
> This broke the enumeration proces
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:47:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688210: fixed in condor 7.8.4~dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688210,
regarding condor: Multiple security issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677582 gcc-4.7-base 4.7.2-2
Bug #677582 {Done: Matthias Klose } [gcc-4.4-base]
gcc-4.4-base: upgrade problems since removal of gcj-4.4
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.4-base' to 'gcc-4.7-base'.
No longer marked as found in versions gc
It seems that the build failure boils down to:
configure:22252: checking if dev/usb/usb.h uses new naming convention
configure:22277: i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -c -g -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
conftest.cpp >&5
conftest.cpp: In function 'int main()':
conftest.cpp:43:46: error: invalid use of incomplete t
Processing control commands:
> tags 687869 + patch
Bug #687869 [libgsm0710-dev] libgsm0710-dev: copyright file missing after
upgrade (policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 687886 + patch
Bug #687886 [libgsm0710-dbg] libgsm0710-dbg: copyright file missing after
upgrade (policy 12.5)
Added tag(s
Processing control commands:
> tags 687869 + patch
Bug #687869 [libgsm0710-dev] libgsm0710-dev: copyright file missing after
upgrade (policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #687869 to the same tags previously set
> tags 687886 + patch
Bug #687886 [libgsm0710-dbg] libgsm0710-dbg: copyr
Control: tags 687869 + patch
Control: tags 687886 + patch
Hi
The attached patch should fix this issue. I'm only attaching the patch
but have not done any further action. Sebastian do you have time to do
the upload?
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru libgsm0710-1.2.2/debian/changelog libgsm0710-1.2.2/d
reassign 677582 gcc-4.7-base 4.7.2-2
reopen 677582
thanks
On 2012-09-21 14:22, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
> I'm now trying to add these Breaks to gcc-4.7-base, that can't be held
> back, hopefully.
Attached is a diff that finally fixes this upgrade issue, hopefully.
gcc-4.7-base isn't that "op
82 matches
Mail list logo
