Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
asterisk crashes when placing a call after a update to recent versions with
apt-get
Upgrade: asterisk:i386 (1.6.2.9-2+squeeze8, 1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9),
asterisk-sounds-main:i386
Package: dicom3tools,dcap
Version: dicom3tools/1.0~20121227-1
Version: dcap/2.47.7-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2013-01-14
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same
Hi,
This problem seems related to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597294. For oracle jdk 1.6
2 digits update numbers are supported, but for 1.7 only 1 digits is
supported.
/usr/share/java-package/oracle-j2sdk.sh contains
'jdk-7u[0-9]-linux-i586.tar.gz' instead of
On 13/01/13 00:25, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 21:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
This sounds very familiar. I considered this approach for
Telepathy, but rejected it because of problems like this.
BTW, Debian strongly discourages embedded code copies:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:38:35AM +0100, Dennis Rech wrote:
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
asterisk crashes when placing a call after a update to recent versions with
apt-get
Upgrade: asterisk:i386
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have a production, fully working asterisk server.
I use many Siemens C470IP cordless phones on the office, they are SIP peers in
my asterisk installation.
I had asterisk and asterisk-config
I've tried it on another system. Heres the output:
Core was generated by `asterisk -U asterisk -g -c'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0xb74e8b77 in strchrnul () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb74e8b77 in strchrnul () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#1
Package: asterisk
Severity: normal
Got more details with gdb, using asterisk debugging procedure (bt, bt full, and
thread apply all bt):
#0 0xb74fbb77 in strchrnul () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#1 0xb74c2d78 in vfprintf () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb74e5e30 in vsnprintf () from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
affects 698118 + security.debian.org release.debian.org
Bug #698118 [asterisk] asterisk: version 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9 crashes on SIP
call, +squeeze6 does not
Added indication that 698118 affects security.debian.org and release.debian.org
thanks
Hi,
I can confirm this on i386 virtual machine:
Jan 14 09:13:28 ipbx kernel: [8686326.314568] asterisk[21321]: segfault at 1 ip
b7501b77 sp b53dd684 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b748c000+14]
Jan 14 09:29:12 ipbx kernel: [ 167.335659] asterisk[1181]: segfault at 1 ip
b751ab77 sp b53ba684 error
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 697150 + sid
Bug #697150 [mtpfs] mtpfs should not depends on fuse-utils but on fuse
Added tag(s) sid.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
697150:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 697150 serious
Bug #697150 [mtpfs] mtpfs should not depends on fuse-utils but on fuse
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
697150:
Hello.
Same thing here. When I make a call from my SIP phone (UDP) asterisk
(1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9, arch amd64) crashes and segfaults :
Jan 13 23:18:23 hestia kernel: [42381160.134024] asterisk[2811]:
segfault at 0 ip 7fdaa3213f2a sp 7fda7bbf4968 error 4 in
Hi
This now implies that mtpfs is not installable anymore in sid, as
fuse-utils transitional package was droppen in unstable. I have
increased thus the severity.
Regards,
Salvatore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Dear Mr. Cohen,
after the update to squeeze9, the asterisk process restarts fine. When
someone does a SIP call, the asterisk process immediately terminates
with the described segmentation fault (according to dmesg). As the
software is running on our production server infrastructure, I have
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 694987 serious
Bug #694987 [obexfs] obexfs: depends on transitional package fuse-utils
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
694987:
Package: djmount
Version: 0.71-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
djmount 0.71-5 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils
was dropped. This makes djmount uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is not
directly affected as the transitional
Package: acetoneiso
Version: 2.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
acetoneiso 2.3-2 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils
was dropped. This makes acetoneiso uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is
not directly affected as the
Package: fuseext2
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
fuseext2 0.4-1 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils
was dropped. This makes fuseext2 uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is not
directly affected as the transitional
Package: fusefat
Version: 0.1a-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
fusefat 0.1a-1 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils
was dropped. This makes fusefat uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is not
directly affected as the transitional
Package: fuseiso9660
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
fuseiso9660 0.3-1 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils
was dropped. This makes fuseiso9660 uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is
not directly affected as the
Package: glusterfs-client
Version: 3.2.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
glusterfs-client 3.2.7-3 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable
fuse-utils was dropped. This makes glusterfs-client uninstallable in
sid. Wheezy is not directly
Package: ifuse
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
ifuse 1.0.0-1 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils was
dropped. This makes ifuse uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is not
directly affected as the transitional package
Package: ltspfs
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
ltspfs 1.1-2 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils was
dropped. This makes ltspfs uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is not
directly affected as the transitional package
Package: mhddfs
Version: 0.1.39
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
mhddfs 0.1.39 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable fuse-utils was
dropped. This makes mhddfs uninstallable in sid. Wheezy is not
directly affected as the transitional
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.24-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
unionfs-fuse 0.24-2.1 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable
fuse-utils was dropped. This makes unionfs-fuse uninstallable in sid.
Wheezy is not directly affected as
Package: icinga-common
Version: 1.7.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
icinga-common's postinst has the following construct:
| cp -a -f $conffile $conffile.tmp
| sed -e ... $conffile $conffile.tmp
In my case, $conffile is a symlink:
} lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 1 15:11
tag 698112 pending
thanks
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:03:55AM +0100, Dennis Rech wrote:
I've tried it on another system. Heres the output:
Thanks. Issue traced to a typo (of my part) in one of the two patches:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-voip?view=revisionrevision=10073
I uploaded
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 698112 pending
Bug #698112 [asterisk] asterisk: Segfault when making a call after update to
1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698112:
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:34:13 +
with message-id e1tuiiv-0004fo...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#696169: fixed in texlive-base 2012.20130111-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #696169,
regarding texlive-base: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite
Control: reopen 697677
Control: found 697677 1.1-3
Control: tags 697677 + sid
Control: forcemerge 697677 697150
Hi Chris
Thanks for your quick reply :-)
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:11:10AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
This was fixed in 1.1-3. Thanks for your work on this.
Hmm, apt-cache show mtpfs
Processing control commands:
reopen 697677
Bug #697677 {Done: Chris Lamb la...@debian.org} [mtpfs] mtpfs: Missing
fuse-utils dependency
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No
Le lundi 14 janvier 2013 à 13:29 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
tag 698112 pending
thanks
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:03:55AM +0100, Dennis Rech wrote:
I've tried it on another system. Heres the output:
Thanks. Issue traced to a typo (of my part) in one of the two patches:
tag 697931 patch
thanks
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Saturday, den 12. January 2013:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: icinga
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
This was assigned CVE-2012-6096:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 697931 patch
Bug #697931 {Done: Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org} [icinga] icinga:
CVE-2012-6096
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
697931:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:18:46AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I am far from confident enough in this patch to apply it so late in the
freeze. So I reported the bug upstream: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4140
As you have a working test-case, could you possibly:
- test cups from
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:38:37AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
None of these are merged into 0.5.x, has the code diverged so much?
I arrived only today from my two week trip and will work on backports
for 0.7-0.5
Source: libguestfs
Version: 1:1.18.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: FTBFS
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
libguestfs has a Build-Depends on fuse-utils. But fuse-utils was
dropped (it was a transitional
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
merge 698112 698118
Bug #698112 [asterisk] asterisk: Segfault when making a call after update to
1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9
Unable to merge bugs because:
affects of #698118 is 'security.debian.org,release.debian.org' not ''
Failed to merge 698112: Did
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
merge 698112 698118
Bug #698112 [asterisk] asterisk: Segfault when making a call after update to
1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9
Unable to merge bugs because:
affects of #698118 is 'security.debian.org,release.debian.org' not ''
Failed to merge 698112: Did
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#asterisk (1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze10) stable-security; urgency=high
#
# * Fix typo in patch AST-2012-015 (Closes: #698112, #698118).
#
limit source asterisk
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'asterisk'
Limit
Same thing here, started segfaulting after an upgrade this morning:
2013-01-14 10:32:13 upgrade asterisk 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze8 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze9
[783312.661049] asterisk[27654]: segfault at 1 ip b748db77 sp b5319684 error 4
in libc-2.11.3.so[b7418000+14]
[783442.211589] asterisk[13070]:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 698121 + pending
Bug #698121 [djmount] djmount: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698121:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 683312 patch
Bug #683312 [uif] [PATCH] uif uses depricated position of ! to negate rules
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683312:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 698140 serious
Bug #698140 [beanstalkd] Beanstalkd: OUT_OF_MEMORY after crash
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698140:
Control: reassign -1 kbuild 1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-0.1
Control: affects -1 src:virtualbox
Control: retitle -1 kmk_sed fails to parse character classes
Control: tag -1 + upstream - sid experimental
Control: forwarded -1 http://svn.netlabs.org/kbuild/ticket/112
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:26:53AM
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 kbuild 1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-0.1
Bug #697892 [src:virtualbox] src:virtualbox: FTBFS in sid and experimental:
/usr/bin/kmk_sed: file
/tmp/buildd/virtualbox-4.1.18-dfsg/src/VBox/Runtime/common/err/errmsg.sed line
31: Unmatched [ or [^
Bug reassigned
On 2012-09-24 21:55, Ulrich Van Den Hekke wrote:
Hi,
I have the same problem. I start eclipse configure some project, install ADT
plugin to work, after a few restart, i have this bug (splash screen hang on
Loading Workbench). Removing .eclipse resolve the problem, but i need to
reinstall
On 2013-01-02 18:13, Dave Tapesar wrote:
Hello there,
I had the same issue on a Debian SID x86_64.
As a sid, there was no eclipse update, only an install on July:
eclipse:amd64 (3.8.0~rc4-1)
The only openjdk update is from October 23rd
openjdk-6-jre:amd64 6b24-1.11.4-3 - 6b24-1.11.5-1
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:00:30PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:49:56PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 02:45:59AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:56:43PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Package:
On 2013-01-14 15:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-09-24 21:55, Ulrich Van Den Hekke wrote:
Hi,
I have the same problem. I start eclipse configure some project, install ADT
plugin to work, after a few restart, i have this bug (splash screen hang on
Loading Workbench). Removing .eclipse
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:17:45 +
with message-id e1tulnf-0002e8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#695275: fixed in dspam 3.10.2+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #695275,
regarding src:dspam: harmful actions in multiple postrm scripts of M-A:same
packages
to be
AST-2012-014: b/channels/chan_sip.c
@@ -3078,7 +3079,7 @@ static void *_sip_tcp_helper_thread(stru
req.socket.fd = tcptls_session-fd;
/* Read in headers one line at a time */
- while (req.len 4 ||
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:22PM +0100, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
AST-2012-014: b/channels/chan_sip.c
@@ -3078,7 +3079,7 @@ static void *_sip_tcp_helper_thread(stru
req.socket.fd = tcptls_session-fd;
/* Read in headers one line at a time */
Hi again,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:24:45PM +0200, Potamianos Gregory wrote:
[..]
If the server crashes with an empty binlog, on the next startup it
answers every submitted job with out of memory error and discards
it. So the service is rendered useless and requires manual
intervention.
Le lundi, 14 janvier 2013 14.36:31, Wolfgang Schweer a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:18:46AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I am far from confident enough in this patch to apply it so late in the
freeze. So I reported the bug upstream: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4140
As you
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 06:38:19PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le lundi, 14 janvier 2013 14.36:31, Wolfgang Schweer a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:18:46AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I am far from confident enough in this patch to apply it so late in the
freeze. So I
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:10:00 +, Alex Owen wrote:
I have regenerated the patch against uif- 1.0.6 to make it simple to
review and apply to the package currently in Wheezy.
Seems you didn't attach this new patch?
BTW: After looking at your original patch, I have the impression that
you
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:30:11AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the mysql-5.5 package:
#695001: mysql-5.5: New MySQL issues
It has been closed by Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk.
Their
On 14 January 2013 17:54, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:10:00 +, Alex Owen wrote:
I have regenerated the patch against uif- 1.0.6 to make it simple to
review and apply to the package currently in Wheezy.
Seems you didn't attach this new patch?
Oops!
Am 14.01.2013 10:38, schrieb car...@debian.org:
Package: glusterfs-client
Version: 3.2.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
User: car...@debian.org
Usertags: depends-on-fuse-utils
Hi
glusterfs-client 3.2.7-3 has a Depends on fuse-utils. In unstable
fuse-utils was dropped. This makes
On 13/01/13 16:40, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi,
This is known to impact blogger.com and likely other sites
Upstream has release 0.8.3 which fixes the issue
Requires unblock approval for wheezy
Which will not happen if it's a new upstream version. Unblocks at this
time of the
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:36:05 +, Alex Owen wrote:
I have regenerated the patch against uif- 1.0.6 to make it simple to
review and apply to the package currently in Wheezy.
Seems you didn't attach this new patch?
Oops! Sorry!
No problem :)
BTW: After looking at your original patch, I
On 14 January 2013 19:04, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
I think I found another one ...
What I did was switching the (-)-$args and $nots with perl, and
comparing the result with your patch there's one difference:
#v+
-+ push (@source, $not -s $1 -m mac
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:47:48 +
with message-id e1tuq0a-0002rw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#698125: fixed in glusterfs 3.4.0~qa6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #698125,
regarding glusterfs-client: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid
to be marked as done.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:25:50 +, Alex Owen wrote:
What I did was switching the (-)-$args and $nots with perl, and
comparing the result with your patch there's one difference:
#v+
-+ push (@source, $not -s $1 -m mac --mac-source $not
$2);
++ push
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 683312 + pending
Bug #683312 [uif] [PATCH] uif uses depricated position of ! to negate rules
Added tag(s) pending.
tags 692838 + pending
Bug #692838 [uif] uif: [INTL:ja] New Japanese translation
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping
tags 683312 + pending
tags 692838 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for uif (versioned as 1.0.6-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key
Processing control commands:
block 685812 by -1
Bug #685812 [python-numpy] ABI change in 1.6.1 version
685812 was blocked by: 698042 698039
685812 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 685812: 698169
--
685812: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685812
698169:
Package: python-pygame
Version: 1.9.1release+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Control: block 685812 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
python-pygame uses the PyArray_CHAR enum which has been affected by an ABI
breakage in python-numpy (see #685812). Note that the version of python-pygame
currently in
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:13:31 +0100
with message-id 1358194411.6300.34.ca...@brouzouf.villemot.name
and subject line Re: Bug#697866: libgtk-3-bin fails to upgrade to 3.4.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #697866,
regarding libgtk-3-bin fails to upgrade to 3.4.2-5
to be marked as
Package: python-sidl
Version: 1.4.0.dfsg-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Control: block 685812 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
python-sidl uses the PyArray_CHAR enum which is affected by an ABI breakage in
python-numpy (see #685812). It must therefore be rebuilt.
Unfortunately a binNMU is not enough
Processing control commands:
block 685812 by -1
Bug #685812 [python-numpy] ABI change in 1.6.1 version
685812 was blocked by: 698042 698039 698169
685812 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 685812: 698175
--
685812: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685812
Note: adding debian-arm to cc for feedback from other porters.
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Peter,
peter green wrote:
Patch to make the package use bfd rather than gold on armel and armhf is
attached. I may or may not upload this as a NMU.
If you'll have time to continue working on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 618968 + patch
Bug #618968 [netgen] netgen: links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible
libraries
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618968:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Ob-content: this looks like a rerun of #644121.
That one got closed without ever getting resolved didn't it? I don't
think it is the same problem because all the configuration files are
protected by dpkg's upgrade mechanisms. The certificate stuff
Sorry for not responding sooner I was unexpectedly swamped during the new
year.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Dominik George wrote:
The breakage is even worse.
1. The code that causes the problem is intended to set the *new*
path to the certificates. Why the f*** does it print $OLD_SSL_CERT ??
No
It works when built with gold 2.23 on an armv6+ hardware host (bug 696284).
This bug is also a dup, and was njotriced shortely after chromium 22 was made
to build again on arm (ftbfs since chromium 18) due to my patches.
peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
Note: adding debian-arm to cc for
On 2012-11-24 13:46, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I think the patch for this issue is ready in GIT:
git://github.com/anbe42/sendmail.git branch salvage (or bug-681147)
I just didn't proceed to prepare a NMU and look for a sponsor since
there is another RC bug (#684645) that I don't know how to
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, Norbert Veber wrote:
While I'm not 100% clear on how dovecot handles permissions, would the
fix not be to set mail_access_groups=mail?
Per http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm
Otherwise your default mail_location can not work unless it writes the
files as root or
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...but something else must be going on as well: That change warned about
in that accidentally silenced NEWS entry is way old, and what I did
yesterday on multiple machines was update from 1:2.1.7-2.
Seems to me that if I chose in earlier updates to
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:32:30 +
with message-id e1tuszy-0008ss...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#676841: fixed in cairo-dock 3.0.0-2+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676841,
regarding cairo-dock-core: segfault in cairo_dock_new_dialog() from libgldi.so3
when
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 687947 1:4.04~dfsg-1
Bug #687947 [wims] wims: modifies shipped files:
/var/lib/wims/public_html/gifs/*, /var/lib/wims/public_html/themes/*
Marked as found in versions wims/1:4.04~dfsg-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#java-package (0.50+nmu2) unstable; urgency=high
#
# * Java 7 updates now get two digits. Closes: #698108
#
limit source java-package
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'java-package'
Limit currently set to
tags 698108 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for java-package (versioned as 0.50+nmu2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer (or even if I should dcut it to 0-day, given the
security matter).
If you prefer to fix it in another
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 698108 + patch
Bug #698108 [java-package] jdk7u11 not supported
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698108
Debian Bug
[re-sending to proper addresses]
Quoting Jaldhar H. Vyas (2013-01-14 21:34:10)
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...but something else must be going on as well: That change warned
about in that accidentally silenced NEWS entry is way old, and what
I did yesterday on multiple
shawnland...@gmail.com wrote:
It works when built with gold 2.23
Is anyone working on either getting that into wheezy (if it's a bugfix
release that is likely to pass the release teams requirements) or to
backport the required fixes?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
My current guess is that ecl seems to block some signals it shouldn't
be able to. However I'm somehow no longer able to run ecl_min in gdb in
a usefull way it seems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Followup-For: Bug #694376
Control: retitle -1 dovecot-core: missing Breaks+Replaces: mailavenger (
0.8.1-4)
The file conflict was fixed by renaming the file in mailavenger, but
dovecot-common still needs to ensure that it doesn't get installed along
a mailavenger that predates the rename.
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 dovecot-core: missing Breaks+Replaces: mailavenger ( 0.8.1-4)
Bug #694376 {Done: jald...@debian.org (Jaldhar H. Vyas)} [dovecot-common]
dovecot-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: mailavenger ( 0.8.1-4)
Changed Bug title to 'dovecot-core: missing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 694376 1:2.1.7-6
Bug #694376 {Done: jald...@debian.org (Jaldhar H. Vyas)} [dovecot-common]
dovecot-core: missing Breaks+Replaces: mailavenger ( 0.8.1-4)
Marked as found in versions dovecot/1:2.1.7-6; no longer marked as fixed in
versions
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:47:52 +
with message-id e1tuxva-w9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#698169: fixed in pygame 1.9.1release+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #698169,
regarding python-pygame: must add versioned dependency on python-numpy
following ABI
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Monday 21 January 19:03:11 UTC 2013
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: a
href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/jquery-goodies;jquery-goodies/a
tags
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 697901 scheme9/2013.01.09-1
Bug #697901 [scheme9,c2html] c2html and scheme9: error when trying to install
together
Marked as found in versions scheme9/2013.01.09-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On 2013-01-15 00:57, David Prévot wrote:
tags 698108 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for java-package (versioned as 0.50+nmu2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer (or even if I should dcut it to 0-day, given the
96 matches
Mail list logo
