Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 08:50:53 +0200
with message-id <5207344d.3030...@noteng.no>
and subject line Re: Bug#712871: Acknowledgement (checkinstall: fails to create
checkinstall file)
has caused the Debian Bug report #712871,
regarding checkinstall: fails to create checkinstall file
to
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:48:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#707836: fixed in italc 1:2.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #707836,
regarding italc-client: fails to install: italc-client.postinst: addgroup: not
found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:48:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#718745: fixed in italc 1:2.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #718745,
regarding italc: FTBFS on arm* & more
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
(Did not notice this bug until now, due to the way it was
reassigned to debhelper w/o ccing me.)
I don't think I can revert the change that broke this.
There are no other good approaches for fixing #713257.
To fix this in debhelper, it would need to somehow detect that this
Makefile uses a differ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 719065 python-matplotlib 1.3.0-1
Bug #719065 [mnemosyne] mnemosyne: Fails at startup (possibly due to error in
python-matplotlib).
Bug reassigned from package 'mnemosyne' to 'python-matplotlib'.
No longer marked as found in versions mnem
Dear Maintainer,
I just checked and found that mnemosyne works just fine with
python-matplotlib version 1.1.1~rc2 but fails at startup with version
1.3.0-1.
--
darkestkhan
--
Feel free to CC me.
jid: darkestk...@gmail.com
May The Source be with You.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 719065 +mnemosyne
Bug #719065 [python-matplotlib] mnemosyne: Fails at startup (possibly due to
error in python-matplotlib).
Added indication that 719065 affects mnemosyne
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 694564 719306
Bug #694564 [pep8] pep8: Support Python 3
Bug #719306 [pep8] Please add support for python3
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important'
719231 was blocked by: 694564
719231 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s)
Control: fixed -1 3.10.5-1
Control: found -1 3.11~rc4-1~exp1
Upstream changes in 3.10.4 and 3.10.5 have slightly reduced the image
size. However, 3.11 again fails. It hasn't been auto-built yet, but a
cross-build here results in this for iop32x:
> Image too large (1462144 > 1441784)! Refusing
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 3.10.5-1
Bug #718222 [src:linux] FTBFS on armel: iop32x kernel image is too large
Marked as fixed in versions linux/3.10.5-1.
> found -1 3.11~rc4-1~exp1
Bug #718222 [src:linux] FTBFS on armel: iop32x kernel image is too large
Marked as found in versions linu
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 13:52 +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> I just updated the package in git with this new dependency for snack2:
> "libsnack2 | tcl-snack | tcl-snack-alsa".
Looks like you missed the change in the snack dev package name.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.a
most likely it can be fixed by deleting ~/.matplotlib/fontList.cache
but before you do so please make a backup and mail it to the bug, because I
can't reproduce the issue locally.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM, darkestkhan wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> I just checked and found that mnemosyne w
Copying Loïc Minier.
* Erik Speckman [2013-08-04 23:45]:
> 8. Read through mkinitramfs scripts and found that a hook installed by the
> flash-kernel package was responsible for the hook script that was setting
> "root=/dev/root" in conf/param.con.
> If flash-kernel isn't necessary/required on
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:16:49PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> I believe I was bitten by the same bug. At least I have the same symptoms:
> grub in rescue mode, unable to load even the normal module.
>
> I tried grub-install and upgrade-grub, but they did *not* resolve the issue
> for me. I now
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:39:36PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> I encountered this bug, though the system still booted successfully with
> some error messages.
>
> "grub-install /dev/sda" and "update-grub" fixed the problem.
>
> 'dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc' was NOT useful.
>
> I think grub-pc.posti
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 12:25:11 +0100
with message-id <2013082511.gk27...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#707653: grub2-common: After Grub 2.00-14 upgrade,
system failed to boot (rescue, old grub 1.99 still in mbr)
has caused the Debian Bug report #707653,
regarding grub2-
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:33:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#715042: fixed in php-horde-webmail 5.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #715042,
regarding php-horde-webmail: directory vs. symlink conflict:
/usr/share/horde/gollem/config/backends.d/10-webmail.php
to be
Processing control commands:
> found -1 5.1.1+debian0-1
Bug #711591 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [php-horde] php-horde:
fails to install: post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Marked as found in versions php-horde/5.1.1+debian0-1 and reopened.
--
711591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:48:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#719302: fixed in flask-autoindex 0.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #719302,
regarding flask-autoindex: FTBFS with flask 0.10.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Control: found -1 5.1.1+debian0-1
2013/8/5 Dr. Peter J. Bauer :
>
> Hello!
>
> The reported error still exists:
>
> ***
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> php-horde
> php-horde-imp
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> A package failed to install. Trying to reco
Attached to this mail is content of ~/.matplotlib. Also I have (almost
- one exception) all fonts installed.
--
darkestkhan
--
Feel free to CC me.
jid: darkestk...@gmail.com
May The Source be with You.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@
Source: node-zlib
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as of
Source: node-raptor
Version: 0~0git20130108-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that
Source: lua-svn
Version: 0.4.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: shake
Version: 1.0.1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-mapnik
Version: 0.6.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as of
Source: node-cssom
Version: 0.2.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: haskell-yesod-test
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lua-cosmo
Version: 10.04.06-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-contextify
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as of
Source: xzgv
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: pandoc
Version: 1.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pkg-components
Version: 0.5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-stringprep
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as of
Source: lua-leg
Version: 0.1.2-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-eio
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as of
Source: node-zipfile
Version: 0.3.1+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as
Source: osgearth
Version: 2.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: cogl
Version: 1.10.2-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ./cogl-
Source: yade
Version: 0.97.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libwx-perl
Version: 1:0.9922-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: its
Version: 1.1.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: ktp-auth-handler
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: choreonoid
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-networkx
Version: 1.7~rc1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: basemap
Version: 1.0.3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Remov
Source: openwalnut
Version: 1.3.1+hg5849-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> [
Source: maven-scm
Version: 1.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Resu
Source: libcitygml
Version: 0.14+svn128-1+3p0p1+4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-srs
Version: 0.2.12+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as of
Source: libwww-search-perl
Version: 2.50.80-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: krename
Version: 4.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> [
Source: haskell-yesod-json
Version: 1.1.2.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: mercurial-buildpackage
Version: 0.10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-sqlite3
Version: 2.1.1+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as
Source: node-xmpp
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: libsql-abstract-more-perl
Version: 1.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: clojure1.2
Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-topcube
Version: 0.1.2+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe this is related to that as
Source: ghc-mod
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: fgrun
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DLOCALE
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 683450 serious
Bug #683450 [freecol] freecol: Please (Build-)Depend on default-jdk/-jre
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683450: http://bugs.debian.o
Source: mypaint
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> # Max-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 674930 serious
Bug #674930 [clojure1.4] clojure1.4: Build-Depend on default-jdk instead of a
specific JDK?
Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
674930: h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 711843 serious
Bug #711843 [libusb-java] libusb-java: Fix FTBFS for distro targets where
default-java != openjdk-6
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Source: libxmpcore-java
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-csa
Version: 0.1.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: statsmodels
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 719003 - d-i
Bug #719003 [upgrade-reports] upgrade-reports: impossible to mount any usb
device
Removed tag(s) d-i.
> severity 719003 normal
Bug #719003 [upgrade-reports] upgrade-reports: impossible to mount any usb
device
Severity set to 'n
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 12:16:02 +0200, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> most likely it can be fixed by deleting ~/.matplotlib/fontList.cache
> but before you do so please make a backup and mail it to the bug, because I
> can't reproduce the issue locally.
I deleted this file and tried running mnemosyne with
Package: pkg-components
Severity: serious
Version: 0.5
Tags: patch
Control: block 719392 by -1
Debian::Debhelper::Dh_components uses Debian::Control, but this
module's API got updated with regards to the ->binary method, which
now returns the actual tied hash instead of the Tie::IxHash object.
A n
Processing control commands:
> block 719392 by -1
Bug #719392 [src:libwww-search-perl] libwww-search-perl: FTBFS: Can't call
method "Values" on unblessed reference at
/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_components.pm line 141.
719392 was not blocked by any bugs.
719392 was not blocking any bugs
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:18:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#715041: fixed in php-horde-groupware 5.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #715041,
regarding php-horde-groupware: directory vs. symlink conflict:
/usr/share/horde/gollem/config/backends.d/10-groupware.php
On 2013-08-11 13:30 +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
This issue lies in pkg-components. Debian::Control recently changed
its interface slightly. I just opened #719414 about this. I don't know
what you usually do
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:18:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#713577: fixed in gpe-julia 0.0.6-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #713577,
regarding gpe-julia: FTBFS: ld: main.o: undefined reference to symbol
'pow@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:18:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#713607: fixed in gpe-bluetooth 0.56-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #713607,
regarding gpe-bluetooth: unresolvable R_X86_64_PC32 relocation on amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 11 August 2013 at 13:16, David Suárez wrote:
| Source: its
| Version: 1.1.8-3
| Severity: serious
| Tags: jessie sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
er: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130811 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules binary
> /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk:31: WARNING: si
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 misdetects FAT-overwritten-with-ext2 as FAT
Bug #709097 [grub-pc] grub-pc: Boot failure after updating to 2.00-14 - cannot
find normal.mod, grub-rescue reports /boot empty
Changed Bug title to 'misdetects FAT-overwritten-with-ext2 as FAT' from
'grub-pc:
Control: retitle -1 misdetects FAT-overwritten-with-ext2 as FAT
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 07:55:19PM +0100, Jim Hague wrote:
> Package: grub-pc
> Version: 2.00-14
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After update from 1.99-27 on my i386 la
Hi Aaron! When you see a new upstream release of our packages, there is no
need to fill bugs because it FTBFS because of symbols mismatches: we know of
them (and actually, we normally expect them in the first upload of a new
version).
In this case, it was the first upload to unstable, so the ab
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:07:37 +0100
with message-id <20130811140737.gm27...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#708084: grub2: GRUB >= 2.00 has been unpacked but not
yet configured grub-mkconfig will not work until the upgrade is complete.
has caused the Debian Bug report #70808
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 719415 + jessie sid
Bug #719415 [src:gradle] gradle: FTBFS: build hangs during codenarc steps
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> severity 719415 serious
Bug #719415 [src:gradle] gradle: FTBFS: build hangs during codenarc steps
Severity set to 'se
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #701289 [src:gltron] gltron: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
Bug #710642 [src:gltron] gltron: FTBFS: vector.c:244:2: error: passing argument
4 of '__assert_fail' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
[-Werror]
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) pat
Control: tags -1 patch
Hello,
so, I had a look through this build error. When you look at the gcc
invocation, you will see a "-Dconst=" in it. This causes all appearances
of "const" to be replaced with nothing - leading to the original error.
The reason why configure sets this macro is to be fou
Apologies for the incomplete debdiff, this one attached here has the
needed build-depend on autoconf to actually succeed.
diff -Nru gltron-0.70final/debian/changelog gltron-0.70final/debian/changelog
--- gltron-0.70final/debian/changelog 2011-12-15 22:45:04.0 +0100
+++ gltron-0.70final/de
Il 11/08/2013 12:05, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 13:52 +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
>
>> I just updated the package in git with this new dependency for snack2:
>> "libsnack2 | tcl-snack | tcl-snack-alsa".
>
> Looks like you missed the change in the snack dev package name.
Fixed b
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:55:24AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> warning: grub-probe can't find drive for /dev/xvda1.
> grub-probe: warning: disk does not exist, so falling back to partition device
> /dev/xvda1.
> grub-probe: error: cannot find a GRUB drive for /dev/xvda1. Check your
> device.map
Hi Miguel,
FTR, I'm working on git repository right now and I've create a new patch to
skip codeNarcMain task.
Chers,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:03:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#718123: fixed in aufs-tools 1:3.2+20130722-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #718123,
regarding aufs-tools: FTBFS: aufs-util for aufs3.0 and later, but aufs is
3.x-rcN-20130520.
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:07:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#713098: fixed in tdb 1.2.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #713098,
regarding tdb: FTBFS: ValueError: command execution failed: /usr/bin/python2.7
/usr/bin/python2.7-config --includes -> ''
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:07:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#710342: fixed in tdb 1.2.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #710342,
regarding tdb: FTBFS: python syntax error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 05:04:29PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> FTR, I'm working on git repository right now and I've create a new patch to
> skip codeNarcMain task.
Hi Damien,
Awesome. Don't worry about duplicating effort, I was just reviewing
the Gradle bugs before diving into the issue
tags 713171 + confirmed
thanks
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gradle
> Version: 1.4-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 713171 + confirmed
Bug #713171 [src:gradle] gradle: FTBFS:
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/subprojects/core-impl/src/main/groovy/org/gradle/api/internal/artifacts/ivyservice/ivyresolve/parser/IvyXmlModuleDescriptorParser.java:395:
cannot find symbol
Added t
Source: amarok
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
>From my pbuilder build log:
...
dh_auto_configure -Skde -- -DCMAKE_USE_RELATIVE_PATHS=ON
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.8.1
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.8.1
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
-- Check for worki
Hi Colin,
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:55:24AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > warning: grub-probe can't find drive for /dev/xvda1.
> > grub-probe: warning: disk does not exist, so falling back to partition
> > device /dev/xvda1.
> > grub-probe: error: cannot find a GRUB drive
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:33:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#713100: fixed in tevent 0.9.19-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #713100,
regarding tevent: FTBFS: ValueError: command execution failed: /usr/bin/python
/usr/bin/python2.7-config --includes -> ''
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:33:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#711678: fixed in tevent 0.9.19-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #711678,
regarding tevent: FTBFS: python syntax errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 701242 713196
Bug #701242 [src:ann] ann: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
Bug #713196 [src:ann] ann: FTBFS: dh_makeshlibs: dpkg-gensymbols -plibann0
-Idebian/libann0.symbols -Pdebian/libann0 returned exit code 1
Merged 701242 713196
> thanks
Stoppin
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo