Package: ejabberd
Version: 2.1.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After an apt-get upgrade, no one except admin can connect to the ejabberd
server.
All users except admin get Fehler beim Einlesen von XML-Dateien.
-- System Information:
Debian
2014-04-26 20:36 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Mathieu Parent math.par...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is anybody working on this bug? As ckeditor is marked for autoremoval
from testing on 2014-05-13.
NB: I have already uploaded the
Processing control commands:
severity -1 important
Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:15:43PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 30/03/14 20:28, Tim Retout wrote:
Right, but this does not comply with the Java policy, which requires
default-jdk as the build dependency
Thanks for pointing this out. I hadn't
Package: systemd
Version: 204-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Trying systemd for the frst time this moring and it breaks. It boots, mount
the filesystem and then hang for 2or 3 mins and then I have the rescue prompt.
I looked at the log as per indicated in the help
Am 27.04.2014 10:40, schrieb Eric Valette:
Package: systemd
Version: 204-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Trying systemd for the frst time this moring and it breaks. It boots, mount
the filesystem and then hang for 2or 3 mins and then I have the rescue prompt.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 714045 0.8.5-2.1
Bug #714045 [blcr-dkms] blcr-dkms: blcr module is not built on kernel 3.9.1
Marked as found in versions blcr/0.8.5-2.1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
714045:
On 27/04/2014 10:54, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 27.04.2014 10:40, schrieb Eric Valette:
Package: systemd
Version: 204-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Trying systemd for the frst time this moring and it breaks. It boots, mount
the filesystem and then hang for 2or 3 mins
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 714045 https://upc-bugs.lbl.gov/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3199
Bug #714045 [blcr-dkms] blcr-dkms: blcr module is not built on kernel 3.9.1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://upc-bugs.lbl.gov/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3199'.
thanks
On 27/04/2014 11:05, Eric Valette wrote:
Do keep in mind that the no-auto fstab parameter is unknown to systemd,
you should use noauto or nofail for devices which shouldn't block the
boot process.
Ok will replace no-auto with noauto and restart. BTW I created the
/var/log/journald directory
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:23:01 +
with message-id e1welib-00048e...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#745956: fixed in net-snmp 5.7.2.1~dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #745956,
regarding snmpd: new version of startup script fails on VPS which obviously do
not have
Package: chromium
Version: 33.0.1750.152-1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
I cannot install the update 34.0.1847.116-1~deb7u1 because
it depends on libudev0 and libudev0 is no longer in the Debian testing
archive. I have marked the bug as grave
Le 2014-04-20 13:13, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Source: dose3
Version: 3.1.3-7
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
dose3 fails to build with the latest version of ocamlgraph (1.8.4).
It seems that ocamlgraph's upstream reverted the specific part that
changed its API. Thus, dose3 should build
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:35:41 +0200
with message-id 535ccf6d.2090...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#746032: [Pkg-systemd-maintainers] Bug#746032: systemd:
Prevent system to boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #746032,
regarding systemd: Prevent system to boot
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 746032 missing filesystems with no-auto option block boot, systemd
only understands noauto or nofail
Bug #746032 {Done: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org} [systemd] systemd: Prevent
system to boot
Changed Bug title to 'missing filesystems
Package: systemd
Version: 204-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After the boot, the shutdown/restart. I just get a blinking cursor forever
and I shall press the reset button. Bad for disks as I have no clue where
it fails as nothing is printed on console.
--
Package: iceowl-extension
Version: 24.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Using the default local calendar (home), I create an event and save it. It is
shown in the Week view. If I switch
tabs, synchronise, switch views, and the return to the view, it has
disappeared.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 744921 normal
Bug #744921 [spamassassin] spamassassin: Daily cron script wants to set a
shared library world writable
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Looking at the log I just found theses messages. As I created
/var/log/journal to be able to read the log after failing boot I may
understand for /var but I have no clue if it will be sufficient to
remove it.
On the other hand if I have to remove persistent log how to debug shutdown?
-- eric
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 746020 + pending
Bug #746020 [gmp] gmp: FTBFS on hppa: incorrect symbols
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
746020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746020
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:20:28 +
with message-id e1wemcc-0004as...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#745895: fixed in nagios-plugins-contrib 10.20140427
has caused the Debian Bug report #745895,
regarding does not compile against Varnish 4.0.0
to be marked as done.
This
tags 742515 + patch
tags 742515 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for blktap-dkms (versioned as 2.0.93-0.2) and
uploaded it directly to the archive as discussed on IRC.
Regards.
diff -Nru blktap-dkms-2.0.93/debian/changelog blktap-dkms-2.0.93/debian/changelog
---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 742515 + patch
Bug #742515 [blktap-dkms] blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to
build
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 742515 + pending
Bug #742515 [blktap-dkms] blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to
build
Added tag(s)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 746035 moreinfo
Bug #746035 [systemd] systemd: Systemd prevents to reboot
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
746035: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746035
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:33:37 +
with message-id e1wemov-0008m6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#742515: fixed in blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #742515,
regarding blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build
to be marked as done.
tags 746035 moreinfo
thanks
Am 27.04.2014 11:42, schrieb Eric Valette:
Package: systemd
Version: 204-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After the boot, the shutdown/restart. I just get a blinking cursor forever
and I shall press the reset button. Bad for disks
Package: xul-ext-sieve
Version: 0.1.14-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
With the latest security update for for icedove, the user interface items for
managing sieve scripts aren't there, even though the extension is installed.
On jessie
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Le 2014-04-20 13:13, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Source: dose3
Version: 3.1.3-7
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
dose3 fails to build with the latest version of ocamlgraph (1.8.4).
It seems that ocamlgraph's upstream
Le 2014-04-27 12:41, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Le 2014-04-20 13:13, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Source: dose3
Version: 3.1.3-7
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
dose3 fails to build with the latest version of ocamlgraph (1.8.4).
It
On 27/04/2014 12:43, Michael Biebl wrote:
Please remove the quite kernel command line to get a more verbose log.
I'd also suggest to enable the debug-shell.service.
You can then switch to vt9 on shutdown and examine where the system
hangs with systemctl list-jobs.
The upstream wiki [0] has a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 721108 + patch
Bug #721108 [tribler] tribler: depends on ffmpeg which is going away
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 721108 + pending
Bug #721108 [tribler] tribler: depends on ffmpeg which is going away
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping
tags 721108 + patch
tags 721108 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for tribler (versioned as 6.2.0+git20130731.149555fa-1.1)
and
will ask some DD to upload it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru
control: tags -1 +patch
Hi,
gem2deb has already drop ruby1.9.1 and it causes this FTBFS.
Attached patch would fix this, could you check and apply it, please?
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
diff -Nru
Processing control commands:
tags -1 +patch
Bug #746025 [src:libsemanage] libsemanage: FTBFS: ruby.h: No such file or
directory
Added tag(s) patch.
--
746025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746025
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Am 27.04.2014 13:12, schrieb Eric Valette:
Actually its samba. I have a message that says something along a LSB
startup job is running and it points to smbd and nmbd. Actually even
with sysv init system there is a problem on shutdown as samba stop
script seems to be called twice. Its a bug in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 745598 + patch
Bug #745598 [src:libkolab] src:libkolab: FTBFS in dh_python2 (missing
Build-Conflicts?)
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 745598 + pending
Bug #745598 [src:libkolab] src:libkolab: FTBFS in dh_python2 (missing
Build-Conflicts?)
Added
tags 745598 + patch
tags 745598 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
The problem is that cmake finds Python 3 and prefers that over
Python 2 when building the extension. Build-Conflicting python3-dev
would be a solution. Or we could tell cmake to use Python 2.7, which I
prefer, as Build-Conflics
Processing control commands:
tags -1 +patch
Bug #746024 [src:libselinux] libselinux: FTBFS: ruby.h: No such file or
directory
Added tag(s) patch.
--
746024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
control: tags -1 +patch
Hi,
As same as Bug#746025, gem2deb has already drop ruby1.9.1 and it causes
this FTBFS. Attached patch would fix this (and also deal with ruby2.1).
Could you check and apply it, please?
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
I forgot to add bug number to changelog, patch updated.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
diff -Nru libsemanage-2.2/debian/changelog libsemanage-2.2/debian/changelog
--- libsemanage-2.2/debian/changelog 2013-11-02 07:24:45.0
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:53:19 +0200
with message-id 535cefaf.9050...@googlemail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#746034: chromium 34.0.1847.116-1~deb7u1 depends on
libudev0 which is no longer in the testing archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #746034,
regarding chromium
On 04/25/2014 09:42 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
As the Makefile defines LDCONFIG=ldconfig, and not
LDCONFIG?=ldconfig, I can not :/
We could add the PATH in debian/rules instead.
Shall we cancel the NMU for this fix?
Greets
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:32:19AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
while doing the package recompilation with PHP 5.6 your package failed
to build:
Linking CXX executable conversiontest
cd
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #745599 [src:libkolabxml] src:libkolabxml: FTBFS with undefined reference
to symbol '_ZTVN5boost6detail16thread_data_baseE'
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
745599:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 746034 33.0.1750.152-1
Bug #746034 {Done: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com}
[chromium] chromium 34.0.1847.116-1~deb7u1 depends on libudev0 which is no
longer in the testing archive
No longer marked as found in versions
On 27/04/2014 13:35, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 27.04.2014 13:12, schrieb Eric Valette:
This bug is known bug in samba, debugged and filed as [0]
Michael
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739887
I applied the suggested patch, rerun insserv -v but it is still called
Hi,
I had all build-deps for php5 rev-build-deps installed.
e.g. apt-get build-dep on all packages listed here:
https://bugs.debian.org/745603
O.
--
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
On 27. 4. 2014, at 14:17, Evgeni Golov
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:55:18PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Le 2014-04-27 12:41, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
OK, merci. The next upload of dose3 will exclude in its build-dependency
libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev 1.8.4-1 (since this will also be needed for dose
3.2).
Can you be more specific about
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2
Bug #746038 [linux-headers-amd64] linux-headers-amd64: configure error in
linux-headers
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-amd64' to 'blcr-dkms'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-latest/56.
Ignoring request to alter
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
This patch removes the bootstrapping of distribute, which fixes the
building the package.
Regards,
Johannes Brandstätter
Description: Remove bootstrapping of distribute.
Author: Johannes Brandstätter jbran...@2ds.eu
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/733435
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + patch
Bug #733435 [src:pyowncloud] pyowncloud: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error:
dpkg-source: error: unrepresentable changes to source
Added tag(s) patch.
--
733435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:00:06 +
with message-id e1weogg-0004bi...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#731156: fixed in nut 2.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731156,
regarding libupsclient3: Library is containing undefined references
to be marked as done.
This means
Source: gucharmap
Version: 1:3.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: macopix
Version: 1.7.4-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
gcc
Source: couchdb
Version: 1.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking
Source: pillow
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
byte-compiling
Source: libxfont
Version: 1:1.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
/bin/bash
Source: pycode-browser
Version: 20120614+git+b041dd2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ruby-fakeweb
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: frogr
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking for
Source: twinkle
Version: 1:1.4.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking for
Source: sqlite
Version: 2.8.17-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
ar cru
Source: ruby-oauth2
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: ruby-capybara
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
fakeroot
Source: keepalived
Version: 1:1.2.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking
Source: music123
Version: 16.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
fakeroot
Source: libplack-middleware-debug-perl
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: rgtk2
Version: 2.20.27-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
gcc -std=gnu99
Source: nagios-plugins-contrib
Version: 9.20140106
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libhtml-formfu-model-dbic-perl
Version: 1.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: lldpd
Version: 0.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking for
Source: python-steadymark
Version: 0.4.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: 389-admin
Version: 1.1.30-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
using system
Source: libtype-tiny-perl
Version: 0.022-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
ok
Source: ruby-kramdown
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]:
Source: transfig
Version: 1:3.2.5.e-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
LaTeX2e
Source: librg-blast-parser-perl
Version: 0.03-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: threadscope
Version: 0.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
[26 of 35]
Source: routino
Version: 2.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
gcc
Source: ejabberd
Version: 2.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: libdessert0.87
Version: 0.87.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
cc
Source: ruby-dbi
Version: 0.4.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Running tests
Source: ruby-excon
Version: 0.32.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
no
Source: erlang-cherly
Version: 0.12.8+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: httraqt
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
/usr/bin/c++
Source: tiemu
Version: 3.03-nogdb+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: frama-c
Version: 20130601+fluorine3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: elastix
Version: 4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: centerim
Version: 4.22.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: haskell-hsmagick
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: libalog
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[2]:
Source: libwx-scintilla-perl
Version: 0.38-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: ardesia
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
checking for
Source: rake-compiler
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: scilab-metanet
Version: 0.6-1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: eliom
Version: 3.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[5]: Entering
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 725070 serious
Bug #725070 [taglog] taglog: FTBFS after alternatives for /usr/bin/tclsh will
be dropped
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
725070:
Source: ruby-packetfu
Version: 1.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
fakeroot
Source: ibus-cangjie
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[8]:
Source: claws-mail
Version: 3.9.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[4]:
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
