Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #796422 [src:libopengl-image-perl] libopengl-image-perl: FTBFS:
perl5/5.20/auto/OpenGL/OpenGL.so: undefined symbol: glResizeBuffersMESA
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> block -1 with 795741
Bug #796422 [src:libopengl-image-perl] libopengl-image-perl:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 795028 796900
Bug #795028 [aptitude] aptitude: junk in package names with dependency resolver
Bug #795150 [aptitude] aptitude: Aptitude displays garbage on screen during
resolving
Bug #796090 [aptitude] screen garbage on Resolve Depend
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7-1+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: unusable
Dear aptitude maintainers,
since the update to the +b1 version and a general libstdc++
upgrade orgy, the aptitude on my computer is now more or
less broken. When ever there is a conflict/problem (red status line,
sugge
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:28:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#795972: fixed in python-oslotest 1.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #795972,
regarding python-oslotest: FTBFS: AttributeError: assert_any_calls
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:28:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796889: fixed in python-xlib 0.14+20091101-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #796889,
regarding python-xlib: UnicodeDecodeError on instantiating Xlib.xauth.Xauthority
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:27:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#795128: fixed in python-barbicanclient 3.0.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #795128,
regarding python-barbicanclient: FTBFS: test_delete_checks_status_code:
AttributeError: assert_called
to be marked as do
Source: python-pykmip
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
python-pykmip currently includes Depends and Build-Depends on
python3-enum34. This package is incompatible with Python 3.5 and
unnecessary for Python 3.4 since the stdlib already contains th
I think the second option should be better.
Anton
2015-08-25 16:49 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman :
> So does that mean that libvtk6-dev should depend on libvtk6-qt-dev or perhaps
> /usr/include/vtk-6.2/QVTKWidget.h should move there as well?
>
> Scott K
>
> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 04:26:23 PM An
I have the same problem, trying to install jitsi from sid, using
apt-pinning, the system is jessie otherwise.
My /etc/apt/preferences.d/98jitsi file is as follows:
```
Package: jitsi
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 1000
Package: *
Pin: release a=jessie
Pin-Priority: 500
Package: *
Pin:
So does that mean that libvtk6-dev should depend on libvtk6-qt-dev or perhaps
/usr/include/vtk-6.2/QVTKWidget.h should move there as well?
Scott K
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 04:26:23 PM Anton Gladky wrote:
> It is in libvtk6-qt-dev [1].
>
> [1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libvtk6-qt-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package apt-cacher
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'apt-cacher'
Limit currently set to 'package':'apt-cacher'
> tags 792206 - unreproducible
Bug #792206 {Done: Mark Hindley } [apt-cacher] apt-cacher:
modifies con
It is in libvtk6-qt-dev [1].
[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libvtk6-qt-dev/filelist
Anton
2015-08-25 15:44 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman :
> Package: libvtk6-dev
> Version: 6.2.0+dfsg1-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I was trying to buil
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 792053 0.15.1+ds-1
Bug #792053 {Done: Martín Ferrari } [src:prometheus]
prometheus: FTBFS w/ test suite errors
Marked as found in versions prometheus/0.15.1+ds-1; no longer marked as fixed
in versions prometheus/0.15.1+ds-1 and reopened.
>
found 792053 0.15.1+ds-1
notfixed 792053 0.15.1+ds-1
thanks
"Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
> Builds of prometheus on those architectures on which its build
> dependencies are available (so far just armel, armhf, and i386, aside
> from amd64) have been failing with assorted test suite errors:
I'm happy
package apt-cacher
notfound 792206 1.7.11
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package apt-cacher
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'apt-cacher'
Limit currently set to 'package':'apt-cacher'
> notfound 792206 1.7.11
Bug #792206 {Done: Mark Hindley } [apt-cacher] apt-cacher:
modifies conffiles
Package: cpuset
Version: 1.5.6-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I was looking into setting up a cset shield in order to move kernel
threads off of an isolated CPU when I ran into this:
```
$ sudo cset shield -v
cset: **> [Errno 2] No such file or directo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package apt-cacher
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'apt-cacher'
Limit currently set to 'package':'apt-cacher'
> unarchive 688890
Bug #688890 {Done: Mark Hindley } [apt-cacher] apt-cacher:
modifies conffiles (poli
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 790532 libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes perl
Bug #790532 [libgtk2-perl] libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes per
Changed Bug title to 'libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes perl' from
'libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: t/GdkWindow
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 790532 libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes per
Bug #790532 [libgtk2-perl] FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes perl
Changed Bug title to 'libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes per' from
'FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes perl'
> thanks
Sto
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 790532 2:1.2496-1
Bug #790532 [libgtk2-perl] FTBFS: t/GdkWindow.t crashes perl
Marked as fixed in versions libgtk2-perl/2:1.2496-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
790532: http://bugs.debian.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: grave
tracker.debian.org has been failing to import new source packages for
4 days. I have such failures during "apt-get update":
[...]
FetchFailedException: W:Failed to fetch
file:/srv/mirrors/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/source/Sources Hash Sum
mismatch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is fixed in experimental. In order that it shows up as a perl
> # 5.22 blocker, reopen the bugreport
> reopen 790532
Bug #790532 {Done: intrigeri } [libgtk2-perl] FTBFS:
t/GdkWindow.t crashes perl
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug h
Package: libvtk6-dev
Version: 6.2.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
I was trying to build a newer version of gammaray locally to see if it would
build with vtk6 and the build failed with this error:
In file included from
/tmp/buildd/gammaray-2.3.0/p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 796345 with 790532
Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22
796345 was blocked by: 787468 788073 787493 787499 787500 787912 787450 787453
787446
796345 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 796345: 790532
> than
Package: python-xlib
Version: 0.14+20091101-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading python-xlib (or python3-xlib) to 0.14+20091101-3 (or -4),
attempting to instantiate an Xauthority instance (eg. via attempting to get a
Display()) fails with a Un
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:26:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796073: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #747688,
regarding FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.1" failed. Exiting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:35:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796837: fixed in softhsm2 2.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #796837,
regarding libsofthsm2-dev and libsofthsm-dev: error when trying to install
together
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 792407 0.28-1
Bug #792407 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [src:spice-gtk]
spice-gtk: please drop unneeded libspice-server-dev dependencies from
libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev
Marked as found in versions spice-gtk/0.28-1.
> thanks
Stopping proces
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:03:38PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> thanks for the patch. I do not see any reasons to
> rename -dbg binaries.
Yeah, maybe. I wasn't sure either but when renaming them it stays
consistent wrt the package names...
Regards,
Rene
how long you want to keep it in unstable?
Hi Rene,
thanks for the patch. I do not see any reasons to
rename -dbg binaries.
Regards
Anton
2015-08-25 12:56 GMT+02:00 Rene Engelhard :
> Hi again,
>
> the third time is a charm; I forgot to change -dbg, too...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene
>
> --
> debian-science-maintainers mailing list
> debian
Hi again,
the third time is a charm; I forgot to change -dbg, too...
Regards,
Rene
diff -Nru coinor-osi-0.106.9/debian/changelog coinor-osi-0.106.9/debian/changelog
--- coinor-osi-0.106.9/debian/changelog 2014-09-04 13:54:26.0 +0200
+++ coinor-osi-0.106.9/debian/changelog 2015-08-25 12:5
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:02:35 +0200
with message-id <87zj1fd6tg@anonymous.siccegge.de>
and subject line Not a bug in pdfgrep
has caused the Debian Bug report #795850,
regarding pdfgrep: FTBFS: pdfgrep.cc:429: undefined reference to
`poppler::version_string[abi:cxx11]()'
to be ma
Hi again,
> I looked at this one given it's a r-dep of coinmp and thus other coin-* stuff,
> which in turn is one of LibreOffice Calc :) and prepared the following patch.
>
> Unfortunately, this then fails its tests.
> (I guess that's why you tagged the bug help? There's no explanation, so..)
> [.
Control: tags 796715 + patch
Dear maintainer,
Hi,
I looked at this one given it's a r-dep of coinmp and thus other coin-* stuff,
which in turn is one of LibreOffice Calc :) and prepared the following patch.
Unfortunately, this then fails its tests.
(I guess that's why you tagged the bug help? T
Processing control commands:
> tags 796715 + patch
Bug #796715 [src:coinor-osi] coinor-osi: library transition needed with GCC 5
as default
Added tag(s) patch.
--
796715: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:23:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#792407: fixed in spice-gtk 0.28-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #792407,
regarding spice-gtk: please drop unneeded libspice-server-dev dependencies from
libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:23:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796753: fixed in python-django-pyscss 1.0.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #796753,
regarding FTBFS: tries to download from PyPI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:23:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796405: fixed in unattended-upgrades 0.86.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #796405,
regarding unattended-upgrades: FTBFS: test_pep8_clean: AssertionError: 1 != 0
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796803: fixed in dh-lua 23
has caused the Debian Bug report #796803,
regarding dh-lua: Missing Build-Depends on txt2man
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Source: gtkspellmm
Version: 3.0.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: ABI break
Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one
from testing
This is listed in the FTP master's cruft report, so if I'm correct, it
shouldn't be necessary to request a removal from unstable.
pgpKtU0FUkC7M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 714686 llvm-toolchain-snapshot/1:3.8~svn245286-1
Bug #714686 [src:llvm-toolchain-snapshot] llvm-toolchain-snapshot should stay
in unstable
No longer marked as found in versions llvm-toolchain-snapshot/1:3.8~svn245286-1.
> tags 714686 -je
Hello Remi,
HM
You are completely right.
And I have no real excuse
Maybe except that IMHO synchronization of two different
configuration files (slurm.conf and slurm(ctl)d.service)
might be not a good idea.
Thanks for your reply. From my point of view the bug can be closed.
Sorr
On Aug/21, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Should I prepare a security upload for Jessie, or do it through the
> release team oversight?
Hi Thomas,
CVE-2015-5695 is not that severe, so this should go through a PU
request. I'll mark the issue as no-dsa in the tracker.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Jacobs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Michael Stapelberg
>> Could the timing requirements be relaxed to make it less flaky?
>
> Sure. Are you able to modify the test before running it on the relevant system
> and find a timing that works reliably?
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
