Bug#825845: mrpt: FTBFS on big-endian systems, with test suite errors

Hi again Gianfranco, I think I've (properly) fixed the issues in big-endian architectures for one set of tests. It would be great if you could launch a build in a test machine to confirm it... The patch is in [1]. You could test it over release 1.4.0 (*without* the latest patch which, if you reca

Bug#830178: mako: FTBFS: ValueError: too many values to unpack

Source: mako Version: 1.0.4+ds1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, mako fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Bug#826901: Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:25:50AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > >Please note that the pristine-tar branch had a wrong hash sum - I have > >fixed this. > > How did this happen, I have no idea. > and why didn't it cause problems when Mike uploaded? My bet is that Mike caused this by up

Bug#826901: Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

Hi, >Please note that the pristine-tar branch had a wrong hash sum - I have >fixed this. How did this happen, and why didn't it cause problems when Mike uploaded? -nik -- PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 Dominik George · Mobil: +49-1520-1981389 Teckids e.V. ·

Bug#828945: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#828945: Bug#828945: strongswan: FTBFS in testing (configure fails)

control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo On mer., 2016-06-29 at 11:44 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2016-06-29 at 09:00 +, Santiago Vila wrote: > > This package currently fails to build in stretch: > > Did you try a manual build? It builds fine in sid, and the log shows: > > check

Processed: Re: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#828945: Bug#828945: strongswan: FTBFS in testing (configure fails)

Processing control commands: > tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #828945 [src:strongswan] strongswan: FTBFS in testing (configure fails) Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 828945: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828945 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.deb

Bug#826901: Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

Hi again, Domonik confirmed that the package is ready for sponsoring and so I did. Please note that the pristine-tar branch had a wrong hash sum - I have fixed this. I also commited a small fix for lintian info xrdp source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright (but not in the current up

Bug#826901: marked as done (xrdp: use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile)

Your message dated Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:20:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826901: fixed in xrdp 0.9.0~20160601+git703fedd-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #826901, regarding xrdp: use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#811618: FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y

Adding -std=gnu++98 to CXXFLAGS will make it compile

Bug#829254: asset:precompile error when updating diaspora to 0.5.9.1

On 2016, ജൂലൈ 7 1:38:54 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:18:09PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> So I replaced ruby-handlebars-assets deb package with >handlebars_assets >> gem and it is also working. > >This is a very shitty way of making things work. So your approac

Bug#829254: asset:precompile error when updating diaspora to 0.5.9.1

On 2016, ജൂലൈ 7 1:38:54 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >This is a very shitty way of making things work. So your approach is, >instead of fixing the Debian package, adding an embedded copy of the >upstream sources? No, you are just shouting baseless things that does not help at all. First, if

Processed: mozjs24: diff for NMU version 24.2.0-3.1

Processing control commands: > tags 813749 + pending Bug #813749 [src:mozjs24] mozjs24: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends and Build-Conflicts Added tag(s) pending. -- 813749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813749 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#813749: mozjs24: diff for NMU version 24.2.0-3.1

Control: tags 813749 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for mozjs24 (versioned as 24.2.0-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18

Bug#828985: marked as done (golang-github-gosimple-slug: FTBFS: FAIL: TestSubstituteLang (0.00s) slug_test.go:155: 1. Substitute("o a o", map[string]string{"o":"no", "a":"or"}) = "no nor no"; want

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 22:15:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828985: fixed in golang-github-gosimple-slug 1.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #828985, regarding golang-github-gosimple-slug: FTBFS: FAIL: TestSubstituteLang (0.00s) slug_test.go:155: 1. Substitute(

Bug#830170: dnspython: accesses the internet during build

Source: dnspython Version: 1.14.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.9 User: la...@debian.org Usertags: network-access Dear Maintainer, Whilst dnspython builds successfully on unstable/amd64, according to Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not attempt network access during the build: 00:0

Bug#830168: marked as done (python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Could not lex literal_block as "python"))

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 23:28:31 +0200 with message-id <1467840511.20672.11.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#830168: python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Could not lex literal_block as "python") has caused the Debian Bug report #830168, regarding python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Coul

Bug#830168: python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Could not lex literal_block as "python")

fixed 830168 2.2~git20150611.196c88+dfsg-3 thanks Sorry, forgot to check unstable.

Processed: Re: Bug#830168: python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Could not lex literal_block as "python")

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 830168 2.2~git20150611.196c88+dfsg-3 Bug #830168 [src:python-sfml] python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Could not lex literal_block as "python") Marked as fixed in versions python-sfml/2.2~git20150611.196c88+dfsg-3. > thanks Stopping processing h

Bug#830168: python-sfml: FTBFS in testing (Could not lex literal_block as "python")

Package: src:python-sfml Version: 2.2~git20150611.196c88+dfsg-2 User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs Severity: serious Dear maintainer: This package currently fails to build in stretch:

Processed (with 14 errors): severity of 821961 is serious, tagging 821961, severity of 821962 is serious, tagging 821962 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 821961 serious Bug #821961 {Done: Fabian Wolff } [aiksaurus] aiksaurus: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 821961 to the same value. > tags 821961 + sid stretch Bu

Processed (with 14 errors): severity of 821961 is serious, tagging 821961, severity of 821962 is serious, tagging 821962 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 821961 serious Bug #821961 {Done: Fabian Wolff } [aiksaurus] aiksaurus: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags 821961 + sid stretch Bug #821961 {Done: Fabian Wolff

Processed: musl: diff for NMU version 1.1.9-1.2

Processing control commands: > tags 812278 + patch Bug #812278 [musl] musl: FTBFS with GCC 6: musl-tools missing files Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #812278 to the same tags previously set > tags 812278 + pending Bug #812278 [musl] musl: FTBFS with GCC 6: musl-tools missing files Added tag

Bug#812278: musl: diff for NMU version 1.1.9-1.2

Control: tags 812278 + patch Control: tags 812278 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for musl (versioned as 1.1.9-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. Reiner diff -Nru musl-1.1.9/debian/changelog musl-1.1.9/debian/chan

Bug#830164: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: FTBFS on buildds, FAIL: TestDisk_partitions

See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19108

Bug#812054: lzop: diff for NMU version 1.03-3.3

Control: tags 812054 + patch Control: tags 812054 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for lzop (versioned as 1.03-3.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. Reiner diff -Nru lzop-1.03/debian/changelog lzop-1.03/debian/changel

Processed: lzop: diff for NMU version 1.03-3.3

Processing control commands: > tags 812054 + patch Bug #812054 [lzop] lzop: FTBFS with GCC 6: failed the ACC conformance test Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #812054 to the same tags previously set > tags 812054 + pending Bug #812054 [lzop] lzop: FTBFS with GCC 6: failed the ACC conformance

Bug#830164: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: FTBFS on buildds, FAIL: TestDisk_partitions

Source: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil Version: 2.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds at lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds at lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, I noticed that golang-github-shirou-gopsutil canno

Bug#829254: asset:precompile error when updating diaspora to 0.5.9.1

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:18:09PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [will drop debian-ruby from further updates] > > On Wednesday 06 July 2016 09:07 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > I was able to successfully install 0.5.5.1 in unstable but 0.5.7.1 in > > experimental is failing with same error. So it

Bug#829254: seems the older version is broken too

I thought of using 0.21 as a workaround, but that is also failing with diaspora 0.5.7.1 from experimental. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#830155: marked as done (flask-restful: accesses the internet during build)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 21:18:04 +0200 with message-id <1467832684.2072356.658771777.3f464...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830155: Acknowledgement (flask-restful: accesses the internet during build) has caused the Debian Bug report #830155, regarding flask-res

Bug#830156: marked as done (flask-restful: accesses the internet during build)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 21:17:46 +0200 with message-id <1467832666.2072359.658771497.55eb4...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830156: Acknowledgement (flask-restful: accesses the internet during build) has caused the Debian Bug report #830156, regarding flask-res

Bug#830156: flask-restful: accesses the internet during build

Source: flask-restful Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.9 User: la...@debian.org Usertags: network-access Dear Maintainer, Whilst flask-restful builds successfully on unstable/amd64, according to Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not attempt network access during the build:

Bug#830155: flask-restful: accesses the internet during build

Source: flask-restful Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.9 User: la...@debian.org Usertags: network-access Dear Maintainer, Whilst flask-restful builds successfully on unstable/amd64, according to Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not attempt network access during the build:

Bug#830154: flask-restful: accesses the internet during build

Source: flask-restful Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.9 User: la...@debian.org Usertags: network-access Dear Maintainer, Whilst flask-restful builds successfully on unstable/amd64, according to Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not attempt network access during the build:

Bug#812278: musl: FTBFS with GCC 6: musl-tools missing files

Control: tag -1 + patch Hi, the reason for this failure is not an incompatibility with gcc-6, but the build is currently failing because the musl-tools package includes the musl-gcc wrapper, which is no longer required, as gcc-6 has added support for musl [1]. The auto-detection detected that the

Processed: Re: musl: FTBFS with GCC 6: musl-tools missing files

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #812278 [musl] musl: FTBFS with GCC 6: musl-tools missing files Added tag(s) patch. -- 812278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812278 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#812054: lzop: FTBFS with GCC 6: failed the ACC conformance test

Control: tag -1 + patch Hi, I found the attached patch from the OpenEmbedded project, which fixes the FTBFS of lzop. I confirmed that it also still compiles with gcc5. Kind regards, Reiner diff --git a/debian/patches/lzop-1.03-gcc6.patch b/debian/patches/lzop-1.03-gcc6.patch new file mode 1006

Processed: Re: lzop: FTBFS with GCC 6: failed the ACC conformance test

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #812054 [lzop] lzop: FTBFS with GCC 6: failed the ACC conformance test Added tag(s) patch. -- 812054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812054 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#818258: marked as done (ruby-em-synchrony: FTBFS: undefined method `client=' for AMQP:Module (NoMethodError))

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:34:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818258: fixed in ruby-em-synchrony 1.0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818258, regarding ruby-em-synchrony: FTBFS: undefined method `client=' for AMQP:Module (NoMethodError) to be marked as done. This

Bug#830146: [pkg-fgfs-crew] Bug#830146: flightgear: Can't install due to broken dependencies

Hi Rebecca, Is there any ETA for flightgear 2016.2.1 ? I managed with testing, but would be nice to fix "sid" fg and fd-data mismatch, while waiting for experimental. Thanks, Mateusz On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > This is because the

Processed: Re: [pkg-fgfs-crew] Bug#830146: flightgear: Can't install due to broken dependencies

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #830146 [flightgear] flightgear: Can't install due to broken dependencies Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 830146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#826901: Any reason not to upload xrdp to fix bug #826901 and enable testing migration?

Hi Dominik, I think we should upload a fixed xrdp soon to enable its testing migration. Do you have any reasons not to upload? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Processed: found 829254 in 2:0.23.0-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 829254 2:0.23.0-1 Bug #829254 [ruby-handlebars-assets] rake assets:precompile failing with ExecJS::ProgramError: Unexpected token: name (base) when trying to update to 0.5.9.1 Marked as found in versions ruby-handlebars-assets/2:0.23.0-1.

Processed: reassign 829254 to ruby-handlebars-assets

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 829254 ruby-handlebars-assets Bug #829254 [diaspora] rake assets:precompile failing with ExecJS::ProgramError: Unexpected token: name (base) when trying to update to 0.5.9.1 Bug reassigned from package 'diaspora' to 'ruby-handlebars-ass

Processed: severity of 830143 is important, tagging 830143

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 830143 important Bug #830143 [mupdf] mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags 830143 = upstream Bug #830143 [mupdf] mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact Added tag

Bug#830143: mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 10:28 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kan-Ru Chen writes ("Re: Bug#830143: mupdf's libjs can talk to the > terminal and interact"): > > Thanks for the report. Why did you think this is Severity: serious and > > Tags: security? Is the js console vulnerable to arbitrary code > > exec

Bug#829254: asset:precompile error when updating diaspora to 0.5.9.1

[will drop debian-ruby from further updates] On Wednesday 06 July 2016 09:07 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I was able to successfully install 0.5.5.1 in unstable but 0.5.7.1 in > experimental is failing with same error. So it could be either new code > in diaspora or one of the changed dependencies

Bug#830151: xorgs: Do not have a human maintainer/uploader listed

On 2016-07-06 19:02 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: xorg > Version: 1:7.7+15 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 3.3 / 5.6.3 > > Dear Debian X Strike Force, > > I just saw that your package has only the Maintainer set, with the Team email. > This is a policy violation of a "must" cla

Bug#830151: xorgs: Do not have a human maintainer/uploader listed

Package: xorg Version: 1:7.7+15 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 / 5.6.3 Dear Debian X Strike Force, I just saw that your package has only the Maintainer set, with the Team email. This is a policy violation of a "must" clause: (3.3 The maintainer of a package) (...) If the maintainer

Bug#811787: On irrlicht and RC bug #811787

Hi, On 06/07/2016 17:46, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: control: tags -1 pending control: tags -1 patch Shall I turn it in a NMU or do you maintainers/uploaders have something ready to shoot? I guess a team upload is perfectly fine! I'll do it in a few hours if nobody objects, thanks a lot fo

Processed: Re: On irrlicht and RC bug #811787

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #811787 [irrlicht] irrlicht: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion Added tag(s) pending. > tags -1 patch Bug #811787 [irrlicht] irrlicht: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion Added tag(s) patch. -- 811787: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Bug#811787: On irrlicht and RC bug #811787

control: tags -1 pending control: tags -1 patch >>Shall I turn it in a NMU or do you maintainers/uploaders have something >>ready to shoot? > > >I guess a team upload is perfectly fine! >I'll do it in a few hours if nobody objects, thanks a lot for the fix! Added team upload, changed versioning

Processed: Re: asset:precompile error when updating diaspora to 0.5.9.1

Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #829254 [diaspora] rake assets:precompile failing with ExecJS::ProgramError: Unexpected token: name (base) when trying to update to 0.5.9.1 Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' -- 829254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829

Bug#830143: mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact

Kan-Ru Chen writes ("Re: Bug#830143: mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact"): > Thanks for the report. Why did you think this is Severity: serious and > Tags: security? Is the js console vulnerable to arbitrary code > execution? My initial report describes a denial of service on a w

Processed: severity of 830134 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 830134 important Bug #830134 [uwsgi-plugin-python] uwsgi-plugin-python: Segfault with Python 2.7.12 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 830134: http:/

Bug#830134: uwsgi-plugin-python: Segfault with Python 2.7.12

Hi Ishi-san (or is it Tatsuyuki-san?), Quoting Tatsuyuki Ishi (2016-07-06 11:47:45) > After updating to Python 2.7.12 (no RC), it's completely unable to > start showing a segfault. In my experience, it's likely to be a ABI > issue, which should be fixed by a rebuild. Please elaborate on that ex

Bug#817708: uml-utilities marked for removal

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > As per the tracker, uml-utilities is marked for removal from the archive on > the > 19th of July. > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uml-utilities > > > Are there an

Bug#830143: mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact

Thanks for the report. Why did you think this is Severity: serious and Tags: security? Is the js console vulnerable to arbitrary code execution? Kanru

Bug#828034: marked as done (gnss-sdr: FTBFS on i386 and amd64: cannot convert 'unsigned int*' to 'uint16_t*)

Your message dated Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:29:08 +0200 with message-id and subject line Bug fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #828034, regarding gnss-sdr: FTBFS on i386 and amd64: cannot convert 'unsigned int*' to 'uint16_t* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#752208: [unison-gtk] Doesn't synchronize windows fat subfolders

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: severity -1 important Control: retitle -1 unison fails to synchronize FS modified under Windows Hi, According to the documentation, only file timestamps are used, not directory timestamps, and fastchecks can be disabled: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce

Processed: Re: [unison-gtk] Doesn't synchronize windows fat subfolders

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #752208 [unison-gtk] [unison-gtk] Doesn't synchronize windows fat subfolders Added tag(s) moreinfo. > severity -1 important Bug #752208 [unison-gtk] [unison-gtk] Doesn't synchronize windows fat subfolders Severity set to 'important' from 'grave

Bug#830143: mupdf's libjs can talk to the terminal and interact

Package: mupdf Version: 1.5-1+b2 Severity: serious Tags: security To reproduce, mupdf breakout.pdf left click in the window Depending where you click, you will see: > [] printed on the terminal, and/or libjs: ReferenceError: global is not defined mupdf will then apparently wait for termi

Bug#830119: marked as done (akonadi-server: Akonadi fails to start after upgrade)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:42:48 -0300 with message-id <77256494.p81B4uPUjx@luna> and subject line Re: Bug#830119: akonadi-server: Akonadi fails to start after upgrade has caused the Debian Bug report #830119, regarding akonadi-server: Akonadi fails to start after upgrade to be marked

Bug#829657: marked as done (python-bioblend-doc: Typo in dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:34:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#829657: fixed in python-bioblend 0.7.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #829657, regarding python-bioblend-doc: Typo in dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#829555: marked as done (GMime GObject introspection packaging causes FTBFS)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:19:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#829555: fixed in gmime 2.6.20-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #829555, regarding GMime GObject introspection packaging causes FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: Bug#829555: marked as done (libgmime-2.6-dev: GMime-2.6.gir is not included)

Processing control commands: > reopen 829555 Bug #829555 {Done: Daniel Kahn Gillmor } [libgmime-2.6-dev] libgmime-2.6-dev: GMime-2.6.gir is not included 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bu

Bug#829642: marked as done (pulseaudio 9 breaks SPDIF/iec958 and Intel HDMI audio on ASUS B85-Pro motherboard)

On 6 Jul 2016 1:39 a.m., "Mike Hommey" wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:21:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 09:48 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 4 July 2016 at 22:38, Adam Warner wrote: > > > > The logs are attached. > > > > > > >

Processed: retitle 829557 to lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS unless dbus-user-session is installed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 829557 lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS unless dbus-user-session is > installed Bug #829557 [lightdm] lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS / gconf Bug #829348 [lightdm] lightdm: LightDM + MATE: switching users fails, unable to connect to D-Bus Cha

Bug#829557: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#829557: lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS

On 2016-07-06 13:33:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I thought the bug was already RC, unfortunately it wasn't and the package > migrated today. It seems that the forcemerge was done in the wrong direction (one bug was normal and mine was RC). -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web:

Bug#820190: libopenjpip-server: recommends package outside main

forwarded 820190 https://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2016/07/msg9.html tags 820190 help thanks This is non-trivial, as I do not know for sure the equivalent for FastCGIExternalServer

Processed: libopenjpip-server: recommends package outside main

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 820190 https://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2016/07/msg9.html Bug #820190 [libopenjpip-server] libopenjpip-server: recommends package outside main Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2016/07/ms

Bug#820190: libopenjpip-server: recommends package outside main

For references, here is what I found out: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_proxy_fcgi.html [...] > I wondered if there is a FastCgiExternalServer equivalent in mod_fcgid and no long-term solution for externally managed FastCGI applications is mod_proxy_fcgi in future Apache 2.4 [...]

Processed: bug 829557 is forwarded to https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1599478

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 829557 https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1599478 Bug #829557 [lightdm] lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS / gconf Bug #829348 [lightdm] lightdm: LightDM + MATE: switching users fails, unable to connect to D-Bus Set Bug forwarded-to-add

Bug#829666: dash: diff for NMU version 0.5.8-2.3

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:01:43PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for dash (versioned as 0.5.8-2.3) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Just fine. Thank you! Regards, Gerrit.

Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#829557: lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #829557 [lightdm] lightdm 1.18.2-1 breaks D-BUS / gconf Bug #829348 [lightdm] lightdm: LightDM + MATE: switching users fails, unable to connect to D-Bus Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 8293

Bug#797706: marked as done (debram: illegal date format in debian/changelog)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:33:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#797706: fixed in debram 2.0.0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #797706, regarding debram: illegal date format in debian/changelog to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#830134: uwsgi-plugin-python: Segfault with Python 2.7.12

Package: uwsgi-plugin-python Version: 2.0.12-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After updating to Python 2.7.12 (no RC), it's completely unable to start showing a segfault. In my experience, it's likely to be a ABI issue, which should be fixed by a rebuild. -- System Inf

Bug#828958: android-platform-dalvik: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llog

The package is out of sync with android-platform-system-core which is now at 1:6.0.1+r43. If incompatibilites are expected in such cases the dependencies should specify the version.

Bug#829701: mediawiki: nōn-DFSG-free files in package

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Kunal Mehta wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:58:49 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser > wrote: > > the newly uploaded Mediawiki package contains nÅ?n-free files under: > > mediawiki_1%%3a1.25.5-1_all.deb/deb://CONTENTS/usr/share/mediawiki/resources/assets/licenses/ > > > > See also: #

Bug#829255: oss4-dkms: Fails to build for 4.6.0-1-amd64

Package: oss4 Version: 4.2-build2010-5 Followup-For: Bug #829255 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu yakkety ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve allow this package to build with v4.6 based kernels: * d/p/osspci_remove-shoul

Bug#829666: marked as done (dash FTBFS: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-arch'. Stop.)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:41:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#829666: fixed in dash 0.5.8-2.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #829666, regarding dash FTBFS: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-arch'. Stop. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#829666: dash: diff for NMU version 0.5.8-2.3

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:24:04AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > Just fine. Thank you! Great, rescheduled to 0-day! Thanks for the ack! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org

Bug#830058: marked as done (Gem::LoadError: Could not find 'gettext_i18n_rails')

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:06:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#830058: fixed in ruby-activeldap 4.0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #830058, regarding Gem::LoadError: Could not find 'gettext_i18n_rails' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#829478: marked as done (shadowsocks-libev: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/shadowsocks-libev/config.json)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:06:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#829478: fixed in shadowsocks-libev 2.4.7+20160630+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #829478, regarding shadowsocks-libev: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/shadowsocks-libev/config.json to be marked

Bug#829701: mediawiki: nōn-DFSG-free files in package

Hi, On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:58:49 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser wrote: > the newly uploaded Mediawiki package contains nōn-free files under: > mediawiki_1%%3a1.25.5-1_all.deb/deb://CONTENTS/usr/share/mediawiki/resources/assets/licenses/ > > See also: #758030 Are there any other discussions about

Bug#824956: musescore: uninstallable in sid

Dear maintainer, can we please have this fixed? This is keeping my sid system rioting. Thanks, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführe

Processed: Patch: Remove failing test from test_plot_line

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #827938 [src:pandas] pandas: FTBFS in testing (test_plot fails) Added tag(s) patch. -- 827938: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827938 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#827938: Patch: Remove failing test from test_plot_line

Control: tags -1 patch Remove failing test from test_plot_line The "blarg" argument is propagated to matplotlib and there it raises an AttributeError (and not a TypeError). Since the test doesn't seem to have a rationale, it is removed in this patch. See the upstream discussion about whether this

Bug#830119: akonadi-server: Akonadi fails to start after upgrade

Package: akonadi-server Version: 4:16.04.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, after upgrading this morning, Kmail shows an empty window while being busy with something. $ akonadictl restart ... ProcessControl: Application '/usr/bin/akonadi_agent_launcher'

Bug#829192: marked as done (python-requests-toolbelt: FTBFS: sphinx_rtd_theme is no longer a hard dependency since version 1.4.0)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2016 07:34:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#829192: fixed in python-requests-toolbelt 0.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #829192, regarding python-requests-toolbelt: FTBFS: sphinx_rtd_theme is no longer a hard dependency since version 1.4.0 to be