Le 30/11/2016 à 00:20, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> rm -rf /etc/tomcat8
>
> I mean purge means purge. Remove all files, don't leave anything behind.
That's tempting but I wonder if we aren't missing something.
Other packages are installing things under /etc/tomcat8, for example
solr-tomcat and j
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:12:23 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security upstream
> Control: clone -1 -2 -3
> Control: reassign -2 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx
> Control: reassign -3 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx
> Control: re
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:12:23 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security upstream
> Control: clone -1 -2 -3
> Control: reassign -2 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx
> Control: reassign -3 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx
> Control: re
Package: src:cross-toolchain-base
Version: 14
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
--
Package: src:cross-toolchain-base-ports
Version: 7
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
-
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Severity: serious
Tags: security upstream
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: reassign -2 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx
Control: reassign -3 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-304xx
Control: retitle -2 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx: CVE-2016-7382,
CVE-2016-73
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2 -3
Bug #846331 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers:
CVE-2016-7382, CVE-2016-7389: missing permissions check and improper validation
vulnerability
Bug 846331 cloned as bugs 846332-846333
> reassign -2 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340x
Source: pirs
Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
Hello!
pirs fails to build from source on all non-x86 architectures because it
hard-wires compiler flags and tries to build with -msse2 despite the
tag 845388 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #845388 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/wordpress.git;a=commitdiff;h=36f1043
---
commit 36f1043c67e1b1a9ccaf94f47aa9ed5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 845388 pending
Bug #845388 [src:wordpress] wordpress: FTBFS randomly (does not follow Policy
4.6)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
845388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 844813 + pending
Bug #844813 [src:freedict] freedict: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM
after 150 minutes of inactivity
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
844813: htt
Package: src:golang-google-cloud
Version: 0.0~git20160615-6
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #844942 [src:plastimatch] plastimatch: FTBFS: Tests failures
Added tag(s) pending.
--
844942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
control: tags -1 pending
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:03:46 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The following tests FAILED:
>421 - vf-invert-trans-1 (Failed)
>422 - vf-invert-trans-1-stats (Failed)
>423 - vf-invert-trans-1-check (Failed)
>426 - wed-c (Failed)
> Errors while running CTest
>
Package: letsencrypt.sh
Version: 0.2.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear maintainer,
Since openssl 1.1 has migrated to stretch I am unable to renew my Let's
Encrypt certificates using letsencrypt.sh. The symptoms are:
+ Challenge is valid!
+ Re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 768134
Bug #768134 {Done: Pietro Battiston }
[gedit-latex-plugin] Plugin does not work with gedit > 3.8
Unarchived Bug 768134
> unarchive 770153
> unblock 768134 by 770153
Bug #768134 {Done: Pietro Battiston }
[gedit-latex-plugin] Plug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 828414 + patch
Bug #828414 [src:libtorrent] libtorrent: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
828414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=82
severity 846272 important
severity 846273 important
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:56:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Severity: serious
It is my understanding that non-regression FTBFS errors are not RC,
hence important.
Thanks,
Michael
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 846272 important
Bug #846272 [src:ga] ga FTBFS on !x86 !ppc: error: unknown type name
'PAD_LOCK_T'
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> severity 846273 important
Bug #846273 [src:ga] ga FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures
Severity se
On Nov 29, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please find attached a patch against the package which includes the
> three three patches mentioned here and was sbuild tested.
> Should I NMU it?
NO! I have a new package ready, but it needs some mild testing.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descrip
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
