Dear Maintainer,
here is a patch for your 2.8-2 package fixing this bug.
Sorry for #856198, I thought it would help.
Regards,
Fabrice Dagorn
Index: entropybroker-2.8/handle_client.cpp
===
--- entropybroker-2.8.orig/handle_client.c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 852623 0.1.7
Bug #852623 {Done: Holger Levsen } [sitesummary]
sitesummary-client fails to submit data
Marked as found in versions sitesummary/0.1.7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
852623: h
[Holger Levsen
> I've decided to just go the simple route as shown above. The fix will
> hit us in jessie with the next apache2 security update, so??? meh.
The apache update hit a few hours ago, and block all jessie clients from
reporting to their sitesummary collector running Jessie.
This is qui
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 856259 2.5-2+v2.4-3
Bug #856259 [wpasupplicant] wpasupplicant: missing dependency on ifupdown
Marked as found in versions wpa/2.5-2+v2.4-3.
> found 856259 2:2.4-1
Bug #856259 [wpasupplicant] wpasupplicant: missing dependency on ifupdown
Mark
package: wpasupplicant
severity: serious
justification: policy 3.5
version: 2.5-2+v2.4-3, 2:2.4-1
wpasupplicant relies on ifupdown, but there is no relationship to it
declared in the packaging.
For example, without ifupdown installed running these commands:
# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev iwn0
#
Steven Chamberlain (2017-02-26):
> To date, anna still only implements MD5 verification of .udeb files,
> despite its formal deprecation as a digital signature algorithm by
> RFC6151 (2011) and recommendations of academic literature years prior.
>
> The files are typically downloaded via insecure
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:02:21 +1300
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #855928,
regarding golang-1.6: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:00:33 +1300
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #855926,
regarding golang: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2017 01:50:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#855451: fixed in inn2 2.6.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #855451,
regarding inn2: FTBFS: objdump: … passwd/auth_krb5': No such file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:18:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#851852: fixed in netdata 1.5.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #851852,
regarding netdata: postfix/postdrop Read-only filesystem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
> > So lulaatex seems to really use the HOME directory.
PS @Tomasz, that was my question concerning /var writable!
I used a cowbuilder where the building user is root, thus the
font database is built in /var/lib/texmf (TEXMFSYSVAR), while
when run as other user it is ~/.texlive2016/... (TEXMFVAR)
> > So lulaatex seems to really use the HOME directory.
Yes, of course, because it has to update the font database.
Complain to the author of the whole setup about extra
font database in lua format (Hans Hagen of ConTeXt) for
that requirement, but that is the way it is.
Lualatex maintains a data
On 26/02/17 23:49, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> [...]
>
> And, for more info:
> $ mkdir p
> $ HOME=p lualatex lualatex-example.tex
> This is LuaTeX, Version 0.95.0 (TeX Live 2016/Debian)
> [...]
> luaotfload | db : Font names database not found, generating new one.
> luaotfload | db : This can take sev
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> This change breaks the existing ABI and therefor needs an ABI bump, but
> it is missing from the patch.
I agree, that should be done. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
El 26/02/17 a las 18:05, James Cowgill escribió:
Well now that I've collected all the fixes together and tested it, I'm
going to do the NMU anyway :)
Good to read that! Now i will try to contact Vassillis. if he is MIA,
then i incorporate libnids to pkg-security team.
Cheers,
Marcos
Co
Le 26/02/2017 à 23:37, Vincent Danjean a écrit :
> I eventually succeeded in reproducing the bug: lualatex needs a
> writable HOME directory. On my plain (sid) system:
> $ cat lualatex-example.tex
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{luacode}
> \begin{document}
> A random number:
> \begin{luacod
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> I was not able to provide a real fix as I'm rather time constrained.
Don't worry, I'm prepared to write patches. But I wonder:
* is it okay to drop MD5 support, when implementing SHA256?
* must we fix this before the stretch release? or otherwise, would it
be
Le 26/02/2017 à 22:37, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> On 26/02/17 at 21:41 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> Can you elaborate? I cannot reproduce this failure. It works
>> in my sbuild environment.
>
> if you have a successful build with sbuild, please provide the build
> log: it's usually useful to j
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # testing is also affected
> found 855434 55.0.2883.75-6
Bug #855434 [chromium] chromium: builds with experimental features enabled
Marked as found in versions chromium-browser/55.0.2883.75-6.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 04:32:43PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> To date, cdebootstrap still only implements MD5 verification of .deb
> files, despite its formal deprecation as a digital signature algorithm
> by RFC6151 (2011) and recommendations of academic literature years
> prior.
I was no
On 26/02/17 at 21:41 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Lucas: can you tell us how more on how the build environment
> is generated ?
Hi,
I used sbuild-createchroot, then manually cleaned it with debfoster. But
there should be nothing special about it, except the removal of lsb-base
and tzdata whi
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:49:44PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > So from my point of view, as it is two days until the 1st of March right
> > now (at least in my timezone) we need to get a fixed version of
> > libdbd-mysql-perl in unstable by tomorrow at the latest. Is this going
> > to be
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:13:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#854740: fixed in slixmpp 1.2.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #854740,
regarding CVE-2017-5591
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:12:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#808463: fixed in ntfs-3g 1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #808463,
regarding ntfs-3g: non-free code in boot.c
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:08:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856064: fixed in libdbd-mysql-perl 4.041-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #856064,
regarding libdbd-mysql-perl: reads of floats currupted as 0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:08:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#779990: fixed in gwave 20090213-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #779990,
regarding gwave: Segmentation fault on startup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hi Steven
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 06:30:31PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I've attached only the most minimal patch to allow reverse-depends do
> implement SHA256. They must adapt to the new names of struct members
> *and* remember that the hash length is now different. (The hash data is
>
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:37:53 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May writes:
> > amavisd-new has already been removed from testing. I think the chances
> > of getting it back in are remote - however I have asked the release team
> > - see #856067.
>
> The release gods^h^h^h^h^h team has spoken. They
Le 26/02/2017 à 15:29, Tomasz Buchert a écrit :
> On 26/02/17 10:25, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Norbert Preining wrote:
>>> I will try to run it in a clean cowbuilder with only the build-deps
>>> installed and see what might be the reason.
>
> Thanks for looking into it.
> Let
With that patch, reverse-deps anna and cdebootstrap shall FTBFS with:
| gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/home/steven/git/anna=.
-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/pie-compile.specs -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -Wall -W -ggdb -Wdate-ti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 665334 - pending
Bug #665334 [fontforge] non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge (currently
August 2014
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
665334: http://bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #779990 [gwave] gwave: Segmentation fault on startup
Added tag(s) pending.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #779990 [gwave] gwave: Segmentation fault on startup
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
779990: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Brian May writes:
> amavisd-new has already been removed from testing. I think the chances
> of getting it back in are remote - however I have asked the release team
> - see #856067.
The release gods^h^h^h^h^h team has spoken. They say they will accept
amavisd-new back in the archive:
"Not in a
Control: tags -1 + patch
Attached proposed debdiff (not yet uploaded, neither to a delayed
queue).
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.20~dfsg/debian/changelog
ghostscript-9.20~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- ghostscript-9.20~dfsg/debian/changelog 2017-01-25 05:26:10.0
+0100
+++ g
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #856142 [ghostscript] ghostscript: CVE-2017-6196
Added tag(s) patch.
--
856142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi all,
first of all, apologies for the late reply. I moved in February, and I'm
still in the process of settling in. I have still to unpack my
development machine...
On 2017-02-14 09:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2017, Sophie Brun wrote:
>> AttributeError: 'BitEnumField' object has
On 2017-02-26 20:31:23 [+0100], Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data domenica 26 febbraio 2017 20:15:25 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha
> scritto:
> > On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on
> > > libssl a
Hello Pirate Praveen,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 07:31:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> package: vino
> version: 3.22.0-1
> severity: grave
> justification: makes the package unuseable
>
> I'm not able to share desktop using vino (5900 socket is not open) and
> when I manually start vino-server I
Control: tags 854740 + patch
Control: tags 854740 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for slixmpp (versioned as 1.2.2-1.1) and
uploaded it to unstable. Please find attached the debdiff.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru slixmpp-1.2.2/debian/changelog slixmpp-1.2.2/debian/changelog
--- slixm
Processing control commands:
> tags 854740 + patch
Bug #854740 [src:slixmpp] CVE-2017-5591
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 854740 + pending
Bug #854740 [src:slixmpp] CVE-2017-5591
Added tag(s) pending.
--
854740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Morten,
On 02/26/2017 08:19 PM, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> Having installed and reinstalled both of the packages routino
> and routino-www, I notice that the data files
>
> nodes.mem, relations.mem, segments.mem and ways.mem
>
> tha
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #856232 [routino-www] routino-www: Data files in /var/lib/routino/data not
created
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #856232 [routino-www] routino-www: Data files in /var/lib/routino/data not
created
Added tag
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:33:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856218: fixed in yade 2017.01a-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #856218,
regarding FTBFS during documentation build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
On February 26, 2017 2:15:25 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not
>depend on
>> libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
>
>Interesting. So, I guess the
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2017 20:15:25 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha
scritto:
> On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on
> > libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
That is because
Source: edtsurf
Version: 0.2009-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
From an armhf build:
...
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/debian/edtsurf-0.2009'
g++ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/home/debian/edtsurf-0.2009=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-s
Source: qpxtool
Version: 0.7.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
From an armhf build:
...
g++ -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/debian/qpxtool-0.7.2=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -O2 -fPIC
-DOFFT_64BIT -DHAVE_FOPEN64 -DHAVE_FSEEKO -DUSE_LIBPNG -I. -I./inc
Package: routino-www
Version: 3.1.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Having installed and reinstalled both of the packages routino
and routino-www, I notice that the data files
nodes.mem, relations.mem, segments.mem and ways.mem
that, according to the
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #851196 [src:libplist] libplist: CVE-2017-5209
Added tag(s) pending.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #852385 [src:libplist] libplist: CVE-2017-5545
Added tag(s) pending.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
control: tag -1 pending
control: user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
control: usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
control: usertag 856226 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
I have (hopefully) fixed these bugs by uploading a new upstream snapshot
to DELAYED/15, see #856226.
Cheers,
-Hilko
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #854000 [src:libplist] CVE-2017-5834 CVE-2017-5835 CVE-2017-5836
Added tag(s) pending.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Unknown command or malformed argume
On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on
> libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
Interesting. So, I guess the best option would actually to drop the B-D on
libssl-dev completely. I have chec
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:43:29AM +0100, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> On Feb/16, Henri Salo wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be closed AFTER the fix is available? Especially since this
> > is a
> > security issue.
>
> Yes. Bastien, can you please reopen this ?
AFAICS, pdfsandwich uses OCaml's t
tags 852929 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 852929 + bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
thanks
Hi all,
[…]
> touch latex_mtx
> tex --ini '\input hugelatex.ini \dump'
> This is TeX, Version 3.14159265 (TeX Live 2016/Debian) (INITEX)
> (./hugelatex.ini
> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/l
Source: ufraw
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: serious
From an armhf build:
...
make[4]: Entering directory '/home/debian/ufraw-0.22'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/
-I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/includ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 852929 patch
Bug #852929 [src:scalable-cyrfonts] scalable-cyrfonts: FTBFS: LaTeX requires
e-TeX.
Added tag(s) patch.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was sa...@debian.org).
> usertags 85
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:51:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856182: fixed in netdata 1.5.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #856182,
regarding Package does not include node.d directory required by nodejs plugins
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On 2017-02-26 01:03:23 [+0100], John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> But the question is whether SSL support is actually relevant in khtml at all.
If it is not exported or mixed with QT's SSL then it is not relevant.
> As you can see from the list of reverse dependencies, there's actually not
> muc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # The bug has been fixed in release 1.5
> close 851852
Bug #851852 [netdata] netdata: postfix/postdrop Read-only filesystem
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
851852: http://bugs.de
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
The regression in Bug#856215 in cdebootstrap:
"since SHA1 removal from Release file, only MD5sums are used"
could only be fixed by adding support for the SHA256 fields.
An open question is whether to preserve any support for MD5.
Keeping it would:
+ reduce potenti
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #856210 [src:libdebian-installer] libdebian-installer: please parse SHA256
field and add it to di_* structs
Added tag(s) patch.
--
856210: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856210
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 856199 stretch sid
Bug #856199 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:vbrfix] vbrfix FTBFS on
armhf
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
856199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:16:14 +0100
with message-id <6bfa4d7e-334a-10ac-0d19-8764c2c0b...@physik.fu-berlin.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#838303: kde-plasma-desktop: KDE does not start after
log in
has caused the Debian Bug report #838303,
regarding kde-plasma-desktop: KDE does not st
My mistake again! I included a wrong e-mail in the last upload
changelog. Here is the right debdiff. Will upload to DELAYED/3
as soon as dcut does its job.diff -Nru sugar-irc-activity-8/debian/changelog sugar-irc-activity-8/debian/changelog
--- sugar-irc-activity-8/debian/changelog 2013-07-09 20:0
Processing control commands:
> tags 854738 + patch
Bug #854738 {Done: Markus Koschany } [mcabber] CVE-2017-5604
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 854738 + pending
Bug #854738 {Done: Markus Koschany } [mcabber] CVE-2017-5604
Added tag(s) pending.
--
854738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Control: tags 854738 + patch
Control: tags 854738 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mcabber (versioned as 1.0.4-1.1) and
uploaded it to unstable. Please find attached the debdiff.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru mcabber-1.0.4/debian/changelog mcabber-1.0.4/debian/changelog
--- mcabb
I no longer have the issue.
Feel free to close the bug.
Cheers, Gabor
On 26 Feb 2017 16:50, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
Hi Gabor!
Is there any update on this bug report from your side? Does this
problem still persist? If not, we should close this bug repor
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:04:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#854738: fixed in mcabber 1.0.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #854738,
regarding CVE-2017-5604
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 750895 patch
Bug #750895 [python3-tempita] python3-tempita: doesn't work
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
750895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750895
Deb
Control: reopen -1
On 02/26/2017 05:37 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Thanks for the offer, I had already prepared the fix. I uploaded it and
> have raised the unblock request.
That didn't work, unfortunately. Several architectures are still failing [1].
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/stat
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #856162 {Done: Vasudev Kamath } [src:ctpp2] ctpp2
FTBFS on !i386/amd64: missing symbols
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer
Hi all,
> 2. This issue is already fixed in the upstream in this commit:
>
> https://github.com/gjhiggins/tempita/commit/ce87d4c0f057880c5b0dc77e83e3eecad7f355a7
> (The previous commit of this, 75064399e7e72fd67e2a0c21c675d6289e7d1ec9,
> suffers from the same error.)
Here’s a small patch that
Processing control commands:
> tags 855925 + patch
Bug #855925 [src:sugar-irc-activity] sugar-irc-activity: FTBFS: unsatisfiable
build-dependencies: python-sugar-0.88, python-sugar-toolkit-0.88
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 855925 + pending
Bug #855925 [src:sugar-irc-activity] sugar-irc-activity: FT
Control: tags 855925 + patch
Control: tags 855925 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sugar-irc-activity (versioned as 8-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
For the context of the fix, please see https://bugs.debian.org/8559
Package: yade
Version: 2017.01a-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Yade fails to build from scratch during documentation generation [1].
Relevant lines in the build log:
==
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/needspace/needspace.sty)
** (sphinx) defining (legacy) text style mac
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#855602: fixed in libnids 1.23-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #855602,
regarding libnids: undefined reference to `before' after being rebuilt / on
mips64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#851060: fixed in libnids 1.23-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #851060,
regarding libnids1.21: can't assemble TCP streams on armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 26/02/17 at 17:02 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
> > sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
> […]
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > sbuild-build-depends-sugar-physics-acti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 854587 + pending
Bug #854587 [icedove] icedove: incorrect start-version in
{icedove,thunderbird}.maintscript
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
854587: http://bugs.debian.o
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #855602 [src:libnids] libnids: undefined reference to `before' after being
rebuilt / on mips64el
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
855602: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #851060 [libnids1.21] libnids1.21: can't assemble TCP streams on armhf
Added tag(s) pending.
--
851060: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851060
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi,
On 25/02/17 18:00, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 23/02/17 22:44, Marcos Fouces wrote:
>> I am agree with you, when i fix these bugs i will create a separate git
>> branch, cherry-pick only freeze-allowed changes and try to get a package
>> ready for stretch.
>
> Ok
Oh my, actually due to me building the package in stretch sbuild, it
got rejected during the upload. So now I've uploaded it to the
unstable, DELAYED/3. \o/
Tomasz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:48:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856162: fixed in ctpp2 2.8.3-20
has caused the Debian Bug report #856162,
regarding ctpp2 FTBFS on !i386/amd64: missing symbols
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hi Adrian,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi!
>
> Attaching a debdiff for an NMU with the updated symbols for all architectures.
>
> I used the helper scripts from the pkg-kde-tools package to update the symbols
> file from the build logs from the buildds.
>
> I c
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.5.8
Severity: grave
Tags: security stretch sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Hi,
The current Debian 'testing' release - the upcoming 'stretch' release
candidate - removed the SHA1 sums from t
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.5.8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Control: block 856212 by -1
Hi,
cdebootstrap implemented in version 0.5.8 (2011) verification of the
Packages files using the
Processing control commands:
> block 856212 by -1
Bug #856212 [src:cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: please implement SHA256
verification of .deb files
856212 was blocked by: 856210
856212 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 856212: 856213
--
856212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Control: tags 855932 + patch
Control: tags 855932 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sugar-physics-activity (versioned as 7+dfsg-1.3) and
*wanted* to upload it to DELAYED/3, but since I've put it after the .changes
file,
it got uploaded immediately. Sorry for that...
I'll ask t
Processing control commands:
> tags 855932 + patch
Bug #855932 [src:sugar-physics-activity] sugar-physics-activity: FTBFS:
unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python-sugar-0.88, python-sugar-toolkit-0.88
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 855932 + pending
Bug #855932 [src:sugar-physics-activity] sugar-phys
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.7.6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Control: block -1 by 856210
Hi,
To date, cdebootstrap still only implements MD5 verification of .deb
files, despite its formal
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 856210
Bug #856211 [src:anna] anna: please implement SHA256 verification of .udeb files
856211 was not blocked by any bugs.
856211 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 856211: 856210
--
856211: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Source: anna
Version: 1.57
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Control: block -1 by 856210
Hi,
To date, anna still only implements MD5 verification of .udeb files,
despite its formal deprecation as
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 856210
Bug #856212 [src:cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: please implement SHA256
verification of .deb files
856212 was not blocked by any bugs.
856212 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 856212: 856210
--
856212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On 26/02/17 17:02, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> [...]
I can reproduce this with my sbuild config. Note that according to
"man sbuild" the default dep-resolver is "apt" which always takes the
first alternative. I can build successfully with
"--build-dep-resolver=aptitude", just like Sascha did.
The b
Source: libdebian-installer
Version: 0.108
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Hi,
The 'etch' release (2007) added to the Release file, a field for SHA256
sums to authenticate Packages files. But
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:20:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856146: fixed in webcamoid 7.2.1+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #856146,
regarding broken: missing dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Control: tags -1 +patch
Hi Michael, Berlin BSP here.
Given that it's too late now to get a mallard-rng package into Stretch,
I suggest to ship the mallard-1.0.rng file as part of the yelp-tools
package for now (e.g. as /usr/share/yelp-tools/mallard/mallard-1.0.rng)
and simply use that as relaxng
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #788769 [yelp-tools] yelp-check validate fails without networking:
relax-ng: failed to load external entity [..] mallard-1.0.rng
Added tag(s) patch.
--
788769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
