-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Guido,
I've uploaded the fix to Sid DELAYED/2. Knowing you a little bit, I do
believe you wont mind this upload. My patch just adds dh-python as
build-depends and nothing else, following the NMU rules. Diff attached.
Thanks for maintaining nosex
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:29:17AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Guido,
>
> I've uploaded the fix to Sid DELAYED/2. Knowing you a little bit, I do
> believe you wont mind this upload. My patch just adds dh-python as
> build-depends and not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 896315 https://github.com/lepture/python-livereload/issues/168
Bug #896315 [python3-livereload] python3-livereload: livereload fails to import
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/lepture/python-livereload/issues/168'.
>
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:34:02AM +0100, b...@hotsite.to wrote:
> Just install the package arduino-mk
Arduino-mk depends on arduino-core, which is provided by src:arduino. Due to
the severity of this bug, all of that is about to be removed from testing.
The justif
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #894770 [arduino] arduino: serial communication/uploader not working
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
894770: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #896296 [python3-django-haystack] python3-django-haystack: haystack fails
to import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #896296 in django-haystack reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/django-haystack/commit/dd41b3
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #896263 in django-haystack reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/django-haystack/commit/dd41b3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source symfony
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'symfony'
Limit currently set to 'source':'symfony'
> tags 896108 + pending
Bug #896108 [src:symfony] symfony FTBFS with phpunit 7.0.3-1
Added tag(s) pending.
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #896263 [python-django-haystack] python-django-haystack: haystack fails to
import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896263: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896263
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 896263
> https://github.com/django-haystack/django-haystack/issues/1604
Bug #896263 [python-django-haystack] python-django-haystack: haystack fails to
import
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/django-haystack/django-h
Le dimanche 29 avril 2018 à 12:00:35-0700, Joseph Herlant a écrit :
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I believe those 2 bugs would be fixed by
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/django-haystack/merge_requests/1
> Could you have a look please?
>
> I see in https://github.com/django-haystack/djan
Le vendredi 20 avril 2018 à 22:01:29+0200, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> Package: python3-livereload
> Version: 2.5.1-1
> Severity: serious
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: python-import
>
> After installing python3-livereload importing the module livereload
> into a python interpreter fails wit
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 09:14:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896742: fixed in whatmaps 0.0.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #896742,
regarding whatmaps: missing build dependency on dh-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2018 13:04:24 +0400
with message-id
and subject line FTBFS: coeffs_test fails on arm*, mips* and s390x
architecture: FIXED
has caused the Debian Bug report #894494,
regarding singular: FTBFS: coeffs_test fails on arm*, mips* and s390x
architecture
to be marked as do
Source: openmpi
Version: 2.1.1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
According to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openmpi&suite=sid ,
it fails to build on all release architectures except amd64 (I think it should
also FTBFS on amd64 if a source-only upload is mad
Hi Jörg,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:59:11PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>
> for the liboinig transition I testing the build of hhvm again libonig 6.8.1-1.
>
> The build fails with
>
> [quote]
> In file included from /build/hhvm-3.21.0+dfsg/hphp/runtime/base/program-
> functions.cpp:117:0:
>
From: Helmut Grohne
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 10:01 PM
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#896274: python3-segyio: segyio fails to import
Package: python3-segyio
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: python-import
After installing python3-segyio importing t
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2018 13:02:51 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: googletest: breakage due to files moved to other packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #897104,
regarding googletest: breakage due to files moved to other packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 11:09:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896998: fixed in python-pip 9.0.1-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #896998,
regarding python-pip: missing required _vendor module. Broken ${python:Depends}?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Diane
Am 02.05.2018 um 07:17 schrieb Diane Trout:
> Should I release this version or wait for what Michael did?
You don't have to wait for me. I provided a patch for the issue for the
maintainer to review and apply.
I did not / do not intend to NMU this package.
Regards,
Michael
--
Why is
Source: php-text-captcha
Version: 1.0.2-4
Tags: patch
Attached is a patch which makes php-text-captcha build with phpunit 7.0.3. Only
unit tests are affected.
--
Dr. Karsten Koop
Produktmanager Blended Learning
LD DIDACTIC GmbH
Leyboldstr. 1 D-50354 Hürth
Tel. +49 22 33 / 604-214
eMail: kk...@
On Tue, 1 May 2018, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Looks like that does the trick. Running make in src/dm/f90-mod, it
> successfully compiles and archives petscdmmod.o and petscdmplexmod.o
> inside build-arch/lib/libpetsc.a
Great! I've merged it to maint - so this change should be in petsc-3.9.2
BTW: the
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #896392 in goocalendar reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/tryton-team/goocalendar/commit/853901a6cbec7b67bcc717
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #896392 {Done: mathi...@m9s.biz} [python-goocalendar] python-goocalendar:
goocalendar fails to import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896392: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 14:04:33 +
with message-id <5ae9c571ba3fd_21532aaaf07e90d040...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #896392 in goocalendar fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #896392,
regarding python-goocalendar: goocalendar fails to import
to be marked as done.
This mean
Source: tclreadline
Version: 2.1.0-15
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Dear maintainer,
I just found that this package is not generating the shared object for
ppc64el platform, as showed below:
dpkg -c tcl-tclreadline_2.1.0-15_ppc64el.deb | grep lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu
drwxr-xr-x root/root
Package: nautilus-owncloud
Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
I can't pinpoint it to an exact update, but I noticed that the
owncloud/nextcloud nautilus integration no longer works.
When I start nautilus from the command line, I get:
$ nautilus
sys:1: PyGIWarning: Nautilus was imported witho
tags 897429 + stretch
fixed 897429 2.3.1+dfsg-1
thanks
Hi Breno,
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:12 PM Breno Leitao wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
> I just found that this package is not generating the shared object for
> ppc64el platform, as showed below:
>dpkg -c tcl-tclreadline_2.1.0-15_ppc64el.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 897429 + stretch
Bug #897429 [src:tclreadline] ppc64el: Shared Object not available in the
platform
Added tag(s) stretch.
> fixed 897429 2.3.1+dfsg-1
Bug #897429 [src:tclreadline] ppc64el: Shared Object not available in the
platform
Marked
Package: wayland
Severity: serious
x-debbugs-cc: p...@ninthfloor.org
hi,
on unstable/amd64 today:
schroot apt source flif
sudo pbuilder build flif_0.3-1.dsc
fails with
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libwayland-egl1 : Breaks: libwayland-egl1-mesa (< 18.0.0~rc5-1) but 17.3.9-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 896921 grave
Bug #896921 [salt-minion] salt-minion does not start: TypeError:
add_accept_handler() got an unexpected keyword argument 'io_loop'
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> severity 893817 grave
Bug #893817 [salt-minion] salt-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch
Bug #897436 [nautilus-owncloud] broken nautilus integration
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/owncloud/client/issues/6393
Bug #897436 [nautilus-owncloud] broken nautilus integration
Set Bug forward
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 15:10:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896392: fixed in goocalendar 0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #896392,
regarding python-goocalendar: goocalendar fails to import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/owncloud/client/issues/6393
Looks like this is known upstream and fixed by
https://github.com/owncloud/client/pull/6397
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed a
Hokay, so,
Both #893817 and #896921 fall into the category "Tornado 5
incompatibility". Thomas's #893817 is specifically a ZeroMQ/Tornado 5
incompatibility which has since been fixed, but doing so revealed my #896921.
To explain:
* February 10: ZeroMQ release pyzmq 17.0.0 to PyPI
* March 22: Thom
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2018 17:45:02 +0200
with message-id <208faef6-9556-9a6a-2346-493c3912e...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: libwayland-dev : Breaks: libegl1-mesa-dev (< 18.0.0-1) but
17.3.9-1 is to be installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #897437,
regarding libwayland-dev : Break
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 at 13:03:14 +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> Package: osc
> Version: 0.162.1-1
> Followup-For: Bug #895035
>
> I also see "double free or corruption" 100% reproducible when using osc on
> unstable
> for the past few weeks
I tried rebuilding older openssl versions, and the regress
Hi Jörg,
Am 01.05.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Jörg Delker:
> I'm suffering the same problem.
> In my case I can confirm that mod_php (libapache2-mod-php7.0) is in use
> and is linked against openssl 1.1:
>
in our experience it depends on the order of module loads. If
libapache2-mod-php7.0 is the last
> Is X started at all?
It seems that X is not started. Checked it using 'top' command and searching
'Xorg' process.
> What's the output of `` update-alternatives --query sddm-debian-theme `` ?
Name: sddm-debian-theme
Link: /usr/share/sddm/themes/debian-theme
Status: auto
Best: /usr/share/sddm/
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 16:27:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#897417: fixed in openmpi 3.0.1.real-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #897417,
regarding openmpi: v3.0.1.real-1 FTBFS on most architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:19:20PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> * https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5967
>
> """
> Commit d316cdc introduced some extra
> checks into the session-cache update procedure, intended to prevent
> the caching of sessions whose resumption would lead to a h
On 2018-05-02 18:34:35 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:19:20PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > * https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5967
> >
> > """
> > Commit d316cdc introduced some extra
> > checks into the session-cache update procedure, intended to prevent
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 07:26:02PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-05-02 18:34:35 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:19:20PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > * https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5967
> > >
> > > """
> > > Commit d316cdc introduc
Hi Bruno,
If you have access to the ppc64el hardware, could you test the fix (I've
attached a diff, which is to be applied to the 2.1.0-15 sources)? If it's
okay, I'll ask the release team about a stable update.
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
diff -Nru tclreadline-2.1.0/debian/changelog tclreadline-2
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #896261 in django-polymorphic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/django-polymorphic/commit/
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #896349 in django-polymorphic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/django-polymorphic/commit/
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #896349 [python-django-polymorphic] python-django-polymorphic: polymorphic
fails to import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896349: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #896261 [python3-django-polymorphic] python3-django-polymorphic:
polymorphic fails to import
Added tag(s) pending.
--
896261: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896261
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 19:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896261: fixed in django-polymorphic 2.0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #896261,
regarding python3-django-polymorphic: polymorphic fails to import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2018 19:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896349: fixed in django-polymorphic 2.0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #896349,
regarding python-django-polymorphic: polymorphic fails to import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
AssertionError: 'Unable to revert mtime: /usr/local/share/fonts\n' != ''
The test fails because there was an unexpected warning on stderr.
Apparently this one was generated by fontconfig:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/tree/src/fccache.c?h=2.13.0#n127
No idea why it was emitted, though.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 895235 src:libgnatcoll
Bug #895235 [libpango1.0-dev] "pkg-config --libs pango" incorrectly contains
-lfribidi
Added indication that 895235 affects src:libgnatcoll
> affects 895235 src:libgtkada
Bug #895235 [libpango1.0-dev] "pkg-config --
On Wed, 02 May 2018 at 18:34:35 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:19:20PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > * https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5967
>
> Is it urgunt to fix this in testing/unstable?
Probably not, unless it makes other packages regress? The upstream osc
bu
Source: mtbl
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking whet
Source: jmagick
Version: 6.6.9~20130201-svn99-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: openmpi
Version: 3.0.1.real-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: java-atk-wrapper
Version: 0.33.3-20
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: geos
Version: 3.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for s
Source: zabbix
Version: 1:3.0.12+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> e
Source: mongo-java-driver
Version: 3.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: apt
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc -g
Source: python-prov
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: bart-view
Version: 0.1.00-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g
Source: schleuder
Version: 3.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sagan
Version: 1.1.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc: fatal er
Source: ruby-cairo
Version: 1.15.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Er
Source: starjava-ttools
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: jzmq
Version: 3.1.0-12
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sunpy
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: derby
Version: 10.14.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: cofoja
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libappindicator
Version: 0.4.92-5
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: libhugetlbfs
Version: 2.20-4
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: appindicator3-sharp
Version: 12.10.0+git20151221-4
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libguestfs
Version: 1:1.38.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: brailleutils
Version: 1.2.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gimp-plugin-registry
Version: 7.20140602+nmu1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ubuntu-dev-tools
Version: 0.164
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> d
Source: kwalify
Version: 0.7.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: python-eventlet
Version: 0.20.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: sparql-wrapper-python
Version: 1.7.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: osm-gps-map
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g
Source: python-magic
Version: 2:0.4.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libhtmlparser-java
Version: 1.6.20060610.dfsg0-8
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: starjava-topcat
Version: 4.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gluegen2
Version: 2.3.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ditaa
Version: 0.10+ds1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: ust
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: paleomix
Version: 1.2.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sphinx-gallery
Version: 0.1.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: r-bioc-iranges
Version: 2.12.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: swish-e
Version: 2.4.7-5
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libjide-oss-java
Version: 3.7.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pcsxr
Version: 1.9.94-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-whoosh
Version: 2.7.4+git6-g9134ad92-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: molds
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sfcgal
Version: 1.3.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: roger-router
Version: 1.8.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: 2ping
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
