Bug#906679: marked as done (pam-p11 FTBFS on 32bit: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2018 05:19:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#906679: fixed in pam-p11 0.2.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #906679, regarding pam-p11 FTBFS on 32bit: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions to be marked as done. This means

Bug#912709: Max. recursion depth with nested structures exceeded

2018-11-02 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
Package: apt-show-versions Version: 0.22.8 Severity: grave # apt-show-versions Max. recursion depth with nested structures exceeded at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28/Storable.pm line 278, at /usr/bin/apt-show-versions line 271. Works fine when non-root though. P.S., # apt-show-versions

Bug#912370: marked as done (xapian-core: shlibs automatic update rule missing dependency)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2018 03:04:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912370: fixed in xapian-core 1.4.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912370, regarding xapian-core: shlibs automatic update rule missing dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#912343: marked as done (libxapian30: New term position bugs in 1.4.8)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2018 03:04:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912343: fixed in xapian-core 1.4.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912343, regarding libxapian30: New term position bugs in 1.4.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#912684: perl-modules-5.28 needs versioned Provides for modules it bundles

2018-11-02 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 22:03:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: perl-modules-5.28 > Version: 5.28.0-3 > Severity: serious > > perl-modules-5.28 has > Replaces+Breaks: libextutils-parsexs-perl (<< 3.39) > > This makes libextutils-parsexs-perl in unstable not installable. Right, thanks

Bug#912030: marked as done (vim-youcompleteme depends on ycmd (< 0+20161219+git486b809.1) but 0+20180708+git600f54d-1 is to be installed)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2018 01:19:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912030: fixed in vim-youcompleteme 0+20181101+gitfaa019a-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912030, regarding vim-youcompleteme depends on ycmd (< 0+20161219+git486b809.1) but 0+20180708+git600f54d-1 is

Bug#912642: marked as done (activemq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2018 00:04:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912642: fixed in activemq 5.15.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912642, regarding activemq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Bug #912642 in activemq marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912642 [src:activemq] activemq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal Added tag(s) pending. -- 912642: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912642 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#912642: Bug #912642 in activemq marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912642 in activemq reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#912547: marked as done (libpicocontainer-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 23:05:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912547: fixed in libpicocontainer-java 2.15-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #912547, regarding libpicocontainer-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal to be marked as done. This means

Bug#910485: marked as done (libpsm2-2: times out on /dev/hfi1_0 device and causes test errors)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 22:50:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910485: fixed in libpsm2 11.2.68-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #910485, regarding libpsm2-2: times out on /dev/hfi1_0 device and causes test errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#909442: outguess: patch for #909442

2018-11-02 Thread Eriberto
Em qua, 31 de out de 2018 às 06:33, Frédéric Bonnard escreveu: > > Hi Eriberto, > > the errors you see in the builds of 2018-10-29 are the same issues : I > initially tried to reproduce the bug but failed, so I asked a give back. > The new errors you see just occurred during that rebuild but are

Processed: affects 912423

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 912423 codelite maitreya Bug #912423 [libwxsqlite3-3.0-0] libwxsqlite3-3.0-0: switch to gtk3 breaks the ABI Added indication that 912423 affects codelite and maitreya > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#908275: marked as done (dbus-test-runner FTBFS with glib 2.58)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 22:04:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#908275: fixed in dbus-test-runner 16.10.0~bzr100+repack1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #908275, regarding dbus-test-runner FTBFS with glib 2.58 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#902755: marked as done (Python 3 version broken, throws exception immediately after connecting)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 22:02:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#902755: fixed in python-imaplib2 2.55-1+deb9u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #902755, regarding Python 3 version broken, throws exception immediately after connecting to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#864800: marked as done (Mail::DeliveryStatus::BounceParser contains a live virus and some real spam/phishing mails)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 22:02:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#864800: fixed in libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl 1.542+repacked-1~deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #864800, regarding Mail::DeliveryStatus::BounceParser contains a live virus and some real

Bug#912695: apt-show-versions: breaks "apt-get update" and uninstallable after Perl 5.28 upgrade

2018-11-02 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Package: apt-show-versions Version: apt-show-versions Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Dear Maintainer, after the Perl 5.28 upgrade, if apt-show-versions (0.22.8) is installed, "apt- get update" fails with: # apt-get update Hit:1 https://repo.skype.com/deb stable

Bug#912423: codelite: fails to start: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process is not supported

2018-11-02 Thread James Cowgill
Control: reassign -1 libwxsqlite3-3.0-0 3.4.1~dfsg-2 Control: tags -1 - confirmed Control: retitle -1 libwxsqlite3-3.0-0: switch to gtk3 breaks the ABI Control: affects -1 src:codelite src:maitreya Hi, On 31/10/2018 13:15, James Cowgill wrote: > Control: severity -1 grave > Control: tags -1

Processed: Re: Bug#912423: codelite: fails to start: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process is not supported

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libwxsqlite3-3.0-0 3.4.1~dfsg-2 Bug #912423 [codelite] codelite: fails to start: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process is not supported Bug reassigned from package 'codelite' to 'libwxsqlite3-3.0-0'. No longer marked

Processed: fixed 912187 in 20170929

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 912187 20170929 Bug #912187 [ca-certificates-java] Wrong jvm options for armhf Marked as fixed in versions ca-certificates-java/20170929. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 912187:

Bug#912685: debian/rules is not binNMU safe

2018-11-02 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Source: net-snmp Version: 5.7.3+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Hi, In debian/rules you have the following: UPSTREAM_VERSION = $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | egrep '^Version:' | cut -f 2 -d ':' | sed 's/ //' | sed 's/~dfsg.*$$//') COMPAT_VERSION = $(UPSTREAM_VERSION)~dfsg [...] override_dh_makeshlibs:

Bug#912684: perl-modules-5.28 needs versioned Provides for modules it bundles

2018-11-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: perl-modules-5.28 Version: 5.28.0-3 Severity: serious perl-modules-5.28 has Replaces+Breaks: libextutils-parsexs-perl (<< 3.39) This makes libextutils-parsexs-perl in unstable not installable. libextutils-parsexs-perl does have reverse dependencies in unstable, including revers

Bug#912682: libextutils-parsexs-perl: version is older than Replaces+Breaks in perl-modules-5.28

2018-11-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: libextutils-parsexs-perl Version: 3.35-1 Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies: perl-modules-5.28 : Breaks: libextutils-parsexs-perl (< 3.39)

Bug#911697: at-spi2-core: causes SIGSEGV because of improper quoting of G_LOG_DOMAIN

2018-11-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Jussi Pakkanen, le ven. 02 nov. 2018 21:38:01 +0200, a ecrit: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:32 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > So the issue is in meson itself: it seems one can't get > > > > compile_args: [ '-DG_LOG_DOMAIN="dbind"' ], > > > > to be correctly interpreted as making

Bug#910128: bash-completion: diff for NMU version 1:2.8-1.1

2018-11-02 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
On 02 Nov 2018, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >On 28 Oct 2018, Emmanouil Kampitakis wrote: > >>I've prepared an NMU for bash-completion (versioned as 1:2.8-1.1) and >>uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >>should delay it longer. > >Thanks for doing this, and sorry for taking

Bug#912346: marked as done (starjava-votable FTBFS with OpenJDK 11)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 19:39:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912346: fixed in starjava-votable 2.0+2018.10.31-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912346, regarding starjava-votable FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: sane-backends: diff for NMU version 1.0.27-3.1

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 908681 + patch Bug #908681 [libsane1] libsane1: pointless package rename Added tag(s) patch. > tags 908681 + pending Bug #908681 [libsane1] libsane1: pointless package rename Added tag(s) pending. -- 908681:

Bug#911697: at-spi2-core: causes SIGSEGV because of improper quoting of G_LOG_DOMAIN

2018-11-02 Thread Jussi Pakkanen
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:32 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > So the issue is in meson itself: it seems one can't get > > compile_args: [ '-DG_LOG_DOMAIN="dbind"' ], > > to be correctly interpreted as making G_LOG_DOMAIN #defined to "dbind" > both for the binary compilation and for the documentation

Bug#908681: sane-backends: diff for NMU version 1.0.27-3.1

2018-11-02 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Control: tags 908681 + patch Control: tags 908681 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for sane-backends (versioned as 1.0.27-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. The diff is too big to be included here, diffstat bellow: $

Bug#912371: marked as done (java-common breaks starjava-votable autopkgtest)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 19:39:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912346: fixed in starjava-votable 2.0+2018.10.31-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912346, regarding java-common breaks starjava-votable autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: libmagickcore-6.q16-dev missing Depends: libmagickcore-6-arch-config

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:gem Bug #912679 [libmagickcore-6.q16-dev] libmagickcore-6.q16-dev missing Depends: libmagickcore-6-arch-config Added indication that 912679 affects src:gem -- 912679: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912679 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#912679: libmagickcore-6.q16-dev missing Depends: libmagickcore-6-arch-config

2018-11-02 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: libmagickcore-6.q16-dev Version: 8:6.9.10.14+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Justification: missing dependency Control: affects -1 + src:gem libmagickcore-6.q16-dev does not depend on libmagickcore-6-arch-config. It does depend on libmagickcore-6-headers, which depends on

Bug#912547: Bug #912547 in libpicocontainer-java marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912547 in libpicocontainer-java reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug #912547 in libpicocontainer-java marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912547 [src:libpicocontainer-java] libpicocontainer-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal Added tag(s) pending. -- 912547: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912547 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: tagging 912633

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 912633 + buster sid Bug #912633 [courier-imap] courier-imap-ssl: No supported cipher suite with the recent switch to TLS 1.3 in OpenSSL 1.1.1. Added tag(s) buster and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#912599: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#912599: icinga2-common: incinga2-common fails to install cleanly (hidden dep on icinga2)

2018-11-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 11/2/18 6:58 PM, Lee Garrett wrote: > On 01/11/2018 20:15, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:> Hi Lee, >> >> On 11/1/18 6:41 PM, Lee Garrett wrote: >>> installing icinga2-common on a system that does not have icinga2 installed >>> fails as follows: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Installing icinga2 directly,

Bug#910128: bash-completion: diff for NMU version 1:2.8-1.1

2018-11-02 Thread Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Hi, Emmanouil, On 28 Oct 2018, Emmanouil Kampitakis wrote: >I've prepared an NMU for bash-completion (versioned as 1:2.8-1.1) and >uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >should delay it longer. > >Previous diff was against stable. Attached diff is agains sid Thanks for

Bug#912599: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#912599: icinga2-common: incinga2-common fails to install cleanly (hidden dep on icinga2)

2018-11-02 Thread Lee Garrett
Hi Sebastiaan, On 01/11/2018 20:15, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:> Hi Lee, > > On 11/1/18 6:41 PM, Lee Garrett wrote: >> installing icinga2-common on a system that does not have icinga2 installed fails >> as follows: >> >> [...] >> >> Installing icinga2 directly, which pulls in icinga2-common,

Bug#912384: marked as done (obantoo: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:57:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912384: fixed in obantoo 2.1.12+ds1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #912384, regarding obantoo: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#912543: marked as done (libnetx-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to SecurityManager.checkTopLevelWindow() removal)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:55:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912543: fixed in libnetx-java 0.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #912543, regarding libnetx-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to SecurityManager.checkTopLevelWindow() removal to be marked as done. This means

Bug#912539: marked as done (libjdom1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:55:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912539: fixed in libjdom1-java 1.1.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #912539, regarding libjdom1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#912548: marked as done (jameica FTBFS with OpenJDK 11)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:53:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912548: fixed in jameica 2.8.2+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #912548, regarding jameica FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#910128: marked as done (bash-completion parallel FTBFS)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:49:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#910128: fixed in bash-completion 1:2.8-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #910128, regarding bash-completion parallel FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#912548: Bug #912548 in jameica marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912548 in jameica reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug #912548 in jameica marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912548 [src:jameica] jameica FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Added tag(s) pending. -- 912548: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912548 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug #912543 in libnetx-java marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912543 [src:libnetx-java] libnetx-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to SecurityManager.checkTopLevelWindow() removal Added tag(s) pending. -- 912543: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912543 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#912543: Bug #912543 in libnetx-java marked as pending

2018-11-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912543 in libnetx-java reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: retitle 912391 to segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912391 segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912391 [src:segment] segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Ignoring request to change the title of bug#912391 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: retitle 912477 to libcommons-collections4-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912477 libcommons-collections4-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > ambiguous Collection.toArray() method Bug #912477 [src:libcommons-collections4-java] libcommons-collections4-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray()

Processed: retitle 912359 to msv: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912359 msv: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal Bug #912359 [src:msv] msv: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal Ignoring request to change the title of bug#912359 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: retitle 912373 to libswingx1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912373 libswingx1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous > Collection.toArray() method Bug #912373 [src:libswingx1-java] libswingx1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method Ignoring request to change the

Processed: retitle 912351 to stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912351 stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912351 [src:stax-ex] stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Ignoring request to change the title of bug#912351 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: retitle 912386 to rdp-readseq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912386 rdp-readseq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912386 [src:rdp-readseq] rdp-readseq FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'rdp-readseq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'rdp-readseq FTBFS with OpenJDK

Processed: retitle 912388 to rdp-alignment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912388 rdp-alignment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912388 [src:rdp-alignment] rdp-alignment FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'rdp-alignment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'rdp-alignment FTBFS with

Processed: retitle 912373 to libswingx1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912373 libswingx1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous > Collection.toArray() method Bug #912373 [src:libswingx1-java] libswingx1-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libswingx1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous

Processed: retitle 912385 to rdp-classifier: FTBFS with Java 11 due to java.se.ee module removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912385 rdp-classifier: FTBFS with Java 11 due to java.se.ee module > removal Bug #912385 [src:rdp-classifier] rdp-classifier FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'rdp-classifier: FTBFS with Java 11 due to java.se.ee module

Processed: retitle 912231 to bnd: FTBFS with Java 11 due to conflict with OutputStream.nullOutputStream()

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912231 bnd: FTBFS with Java 11 due to conflict with > OutputStream.nullOutputStream() Bug #912231 [src:bnd] bnd FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'bnd: FTBFS with Java 11 due to conflict with OutputStream.nullOutputStream()'

Processed: retitle 912235 to figtree: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation and CORBA removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912235 figtree: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation and CORBA > removal Bug #912235 [src:figtree] figtree FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'figtree: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation and CORBA removal' from

Bug#911436: marked as done (prometheus-haproxy-exporter: FTBFS undefined: prometheus.NewProcessCollectorPIDFn)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:02:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#911436: fixed in prometheus-haproxy-exporter 0.9.0+git20180917+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #911436, regarding prometheus-haproxy-exporter: FTBFS undefined: prometheus.NewProcessCollectorPIDFn to be

Processed: retitle 912240 to gentlyweb-utils: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912240 gentlyweb-utils: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation > removal Bug #912240 [src:gentlyweb-utils] gentlyweb-utils FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'gentlyweb-utils: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation

Processed: retitle 912384 to obantoo: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912384 obantoo: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912384 [src:obantoo] obantoo FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'obantoo: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'obantoo FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping

Processed: retitle 912261 to clojure: FTBFS with Java 11 due to overloaded Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912261 clojure: FTBFS with Java 11 due to overloaded > Collection.toArray() method Bug #912261 [src:clojure] clojure FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'clojure: FTBFS with Java 11 due to overloaded Collection.toArray() method'

Processed: retitle 912270 to writer2latex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912270 writer2latex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912270 [src:writer2latex] writer2latex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'writer2latex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'writer2latex FTBFS with

Processed: retitle 912273 to unsafe-mock: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.reflect.Reflection removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912273 unsafe-mock: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.reflect.Reflection > removal Bug #912273 [src:unsafe-mock] unsafe-mock FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'unsafe-mock: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.reflect.Reflection removal'

Processed: retitle 912395 to resteasy3.0: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912395 resteasy3.0: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912395 [src:resteasy3.0] resteasy3.0 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'resteasy3.0: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'resteasy3.0 FTBFS with OpenJDK

Processed: retitle 912545 to jruby-openssl: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912545 jruby-openssl: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation > removal Bug #912545 [src:jruby-openssl] jruby-openssl FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'jruby-openssl: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal' from

Bug#891901: Info received (Progress on "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/slf4j/LoggerFactory")

2018-11-02 Thread Philipp Marek
Ah yes, and (following [1]) I also changed the .pom file in /usr/share/java/slf4j-simple.jar to remove the "test" scope: --- pom.xml 2018-11-02 16:50:02.705092444 +0100 +++ pom.xml.orig2018-11-02 16:50:17.793353153 +0100 @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@

Processed: retitle 912543 to libnetx-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to SecurityManager.checkTopLevelWindow() removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912543 libnetx-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > SecurityManager.checkTopLevelWindow() removal Bug #912543 [src:libnetx-java] libnetx-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libnetx-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to

Processed: your mail

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 908068 0.3.0~dev-1~exp4 Bug #908068 {Done: Roger Shimizu } [torbrowser-launcher] torbrowser-launcher fails with torbrowser 8.0 Marked as fixed in versions torbrowser-launcher/0.3.0~dev-1~exp4. > fixed 908463 0.3.0~dev-1~exp4 Bug #908463

Processed: retitle 912351 to stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912351 stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912351 [src:stax-ex] stax-ex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'stax-ex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping

Processed: retitle 912351 to stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912351 stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912351 [src:stax-ex] stax-ex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Ignoring request to change the title of bug#912351 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: retitle 912461 to jaxb: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912461 jaxb: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal Bug #912461 [src:jaxb] jaxb FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'jaxb: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal' from 'jaxb FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks

Processed: retitle 912391 to segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912391 segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912391 [src:segment] segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Ignoring request to change the title of bug#912391 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: retitle 912391 to segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912391 segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912391 [src:segment] segment FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'segment FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping

Bug#891901: Progress on "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/slf4j/LoggerFactory"

2018-11-02 Thread Philipp Marek
With libslf4j-java and libastylej-jni installed and using this diff I got a bit further: --- /usr/bin/arduino.orig 2018-11-02 16:15:19.374287467 +0100 +++ /usr/bin/arduino2018-11-02 16:14:29.159663536 +0100 @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ java/lib/rt.jar \ java/lib/tools.jar \

Bug#912458: marked as done (jftp: FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 due to Thread.destroy() removal)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:28:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912458: fixed in jftp 1.60+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #912458, regarding jftp: FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 due to Thread.destroy() removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#910852: libqt5webengine5: Akregator crashes very often, WebEngine related

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 akregator 4:18.08.1-1 Bug #910852 [libqt5webengine5] libqt5webengine5: Akregator crashes very often, WebEngine related Bug reassigned from package 'libqt5webengine5' to 'akregator'. No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#910852: libqt5webengine5: Akregator crashes very often, WebEngine related

2018-11-02 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: reassign -1 akregator 4:18.08.1-1 Control: retitle -1 Akregator crashes very often, WebEngine thread safety issue On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 06:48:37PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > I have reported this bug to Qt upstream, but they say it is not their bug, > but a thread safety issue in

Bug#910500: marked as done (libqt5quick5: Sefault in applications using QWebEngineView)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:19:53 +0300 with message-id <20181102151953.ga13...@mitya57.me> and subject line Re: Bug#910317: QtWebEngine in unstable is constantly crashing has caused the Debian Bug report #910317, regarding libqt5quick5: Sefault in applications using QWebEngineView to be

Bug#910317: marked as done (QtWebEngine in unstable is constantly crashing)

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:19:53 +0300 with message-id <20181102151953.ga13...@mitya57.me> and subject line Re: Bug#910317: QtWebEngine in unstable is constantly crashing has caused the Debian Bug report #910317, regarding QtWebEngine in unstable is constantly crashing to be marked as

Processed: retitle 912477 to libcommons-collections4-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912477 libcommons-collections4-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > ambiguous Collection.toArray() method Bug #912477 [src:libcommons-collections4-java] libcommons-collections4-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to

Processed: retitle 912515 to libcommons-collections3-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912515 libcommons-collections3-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > ambiguous Collection.toArray() method Bug #912515 [src:libcommons-collections3-java] libcommons-collections3-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray()

Processed: retitle 912515 to libcommons-collections3-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to ambiguous Collection.toArray() method

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912515 libcommons-collections3-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > ambiguous Collection.toArray() method Bug #912515 [src:libcommons-collections3-java] libcommons-collections3-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to

Processed: retitle 912359 to msv: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912359 msv: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal Bug #912359 [src:msv] msv FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'msv: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal' from 'msv FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: retitle 912538 to libjaba-client-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912538 libjaba-client-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912538 [src:libjaba-client-java] libjaba-client-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libjaba-client-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from

Processed: retitle 912539 to libjdom1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912539 libjdom1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal Bug #912539 [src:libjdom1-java] libjdom1-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libjdom1-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal' from 'libjdom1-java FTBFS

Processed: retitle 912267 to uddi4j: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXWS removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912267 uddi4j: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXWS removal Bug #912267 [src:uddi4j] uddi4j FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'uddi4j: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXWS removal' from 'uddi4j FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping

Processed: retitle 912473 to jython: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912473 jython: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912473 [src:jython] jython FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'jython: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'jython FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping

Processed: retitle 912377 to libxstream-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912377 libxstream-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation > removal Bug #912377 [src:libxstream-java] libxstream-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libxstream-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation

Processed: retitle 912390 to shiro: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912390 shiro: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal Bug #912390 [src:shiro] shiro FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'shiro: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal' from 'shiro FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. >

Processed: retitle 912467 to jasperreports: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.xml.soap removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912467 jasperreports: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.xml.soap removal Bug #912467 [src:jasperreports] jasperreports FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'jasperreports: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.xml.soap removal' from

Processed: retitle 912392 to scilab: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912392 scilab: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal Bug #912392 [src:scilab] scilab FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'scilab: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal' from 'scilab FTBFS with OpenJDK

Processed: retitle 912394 to rsyntaxtextarea: FTBFS with Java 11 due to SecurityManager.checkSystemClipboardAccess() removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912394 rsyntaxtextarea: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > SecurityManager.checkSystemClipboardAccess() removal Bug #912394 [src:rsyntaxtextarea] rsyntaxtextarea FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'rsyntaxtextarea: FTBFS with Java 11

Processed: retitle 912468 to java3d: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.applet.AppletAudioClip removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912468 java3d: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.applet.AppletAudioClip > removal Bug #912468 [src:java3d] java3d FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'java3d: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.applet.AppletAudioClip removal' from 'java3d

Processed: retitle 912546 to jackson-module-jaxb-annotations: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912546 jackson-module-jaxb-annotations: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > javax.activation removal Bug #912546 [src:jackson-module-jaxb-annotations] jackson-module-jaxb-annotations FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to

Processed: retitle 912476 to libapache-poi-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912476 libapache-poi-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912476 [src:libapache-poi-java] libapache-poi-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libapache-poi-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from

Processed: retitle 912541 to libjackson-json-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation and JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912541 libjackson-json-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > javax.activation and JAXB removal Bug #912541 [src:libjackson-json-java] libjackson-json-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libjackson-json-java: FTBFS with Java 11

Processed: retitle 912266 to tomcat7: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912266 tomcat7: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Bug #912266 [src:tomcat7] tomcat7 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'tomcat7: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal' from 'tomcat7 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'. > thanks Stopping

Processed: retitle 912642 to activemq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912642 activemq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal Bug #912642 [src:activemq] activemq FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'activemq: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal' from 'activemq FTBFS with

Processed: retitle 912547 to libpicocontainer-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.annotation removal

2018-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 912547 libpicocontainer-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due to > javax.annotation removal Bug #912547 [src:libpicocontainer-java] libpicocontainer-java FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 Changed Bug title to 'libpicocontainer-java: FTBFS with Java 11 due

  1   2   >