Bug#924856: wxpython4.0: FTBFS: sip: /<>/wxpython4.0-4.0.4+dfsg/src/wacky_ints.sip:20: Invalid type for %MappedType

2019-03-24 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: wxpython4.0 Followup-For: Bug #924856 Indeed, the changelog for sip4 4.19.14+dfsg-1 itself says: Bump API version to 12.6. Dimitry, if you know you are uploading an incompatible release, then for goodness' sake use the Transitions procedure, https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Tra

Bug#924013: marked as done (unmotivated b-d on libubsan0 (GCC 7))

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:35:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924013: fixed in ricochet-im 1.1.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #924013, regarding unmotivated b-d on libubsan0 (GCC 7) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#925431: openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java: fails to install in sid

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java Severity: serious Tags: sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: found -1 12.0.0-2 Control: found -1 20190214 Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release te

Processed: openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java: fails to install in sid

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 12.0.0-2 Bug #925431 [openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java] openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java: fails to install in sid There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version '12.0.0-2' with architecture '' Marked as fo

Processed: Re: Bug#925411: kernel-package: Not suitable for release

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #925411 [kernel-package] kernel-package: Not suitable for release Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 925411: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925411 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr

Bug#925427: python3-monascaclient: fails to install: update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/python3-monasca doesn't exist

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python3-monascaclient Version: 1.14.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the severity.

Bug#925426: python3-muranoclient: fails to install: update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/python3-murano doesn't exist

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python3-muranoclient Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the severity.

Bug#925425: python3-zunclient: fails to install: update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/python3-zun doesn't exist

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python3-zunclient Version: 3.3.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the severity. >Fr

Processed: Re: Bug#925411: kernel-package: Not suitable for release

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #925411 [kernel-package] kernel-package: Not suitable for release Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 925411: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925411 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#925411: kernel-package: Not suitable for release

2019-03-24 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Control: severity -1 important Justification: essential package that works flawlessly for me Hi, First, I'd like to thank whoever has been maintaining kernel-package. I depend on it, and the functionality enabled by this package is one of the primary reasons I chose Debian over other alternatives

Bug#924452: closed by Camm Maguire (Bug#924452: fixed in lam 7.1.4-4)

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2019-03-24 16:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >* debhelper compat level 9 >* standard debian build flags These are bad changes to do during the deep freeze and will probably be rejected by the release team. Andreas

Processed: Re: Bug#925374: dns-root-data: ships an obsolete root zone signing key

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 2014060201+2 Bug #925374 [dns-root-data] dns-root-data: ships an obsolete root zone signing key Marked as found in versions dns-root-data/2014060201+2. > found -1 2017072601~deb8u1 Bug #925374 [dns-root-data] dns-root-data: ships an obsolete root zone signi

Bug#925374: dns-root-data: ships an obsolete root zone signing key

2019-03-24 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Control: found -1 2014060201+2 Control: found -1 2017072601~deb8u1 Control: found -1 2017072601~deb8u2 Control: found -1 2017072601~deb9u1 Control: found -1 2017072601~deb9u1 I think BTS complained because it doesn't take more than one version per found entry. Cheers, -- Santiago El 23/03/19 a

Bug#923330: jajuk: Fails to start with Java Runtime Environment 1.7 minimum required. You use a JVM ext.JVM@23fc625e

2019-03-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 24.03.19 um 20:41 schrieb Bertrand Florat: > Hi, > > FYI, the develop branch of jajuk works with the revival of substance > (radiance), it works for instance with radiance-substance 2.0.1. > > See https://github.com/kirill-grouchnikov/radiance Thanks for the hint. Unfortunately developme

Bug#923330: jajuk: Fails to start with Java Runtime Environment 1.7 minimum required. You use a JVM ext.JVM@23fc625e

2019-03-24 Thread Bertrand Florat
Hi, FYI, the develop branch of jajuk works with the revival of substance (radiance), it works for instance with radiance-substance 2.0.1. See https://github.com/kirill-grouchnikov/radiance Regards, Bertrand On 24/03/2019 18:14, Markus Koschany wrote: Hi Andreas, Am 24.03.19 um 18:09 schrie

Processed: severity of 924183 is serious

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 924183 serious Bug #924183 [postfix] postfix: Trust anchor files (tafile=) in TLS policy break secure level email delivery Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#924813: [Debichem-devel] Bug#924813: the error is in the libmpich-dev package

2019-03-24 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, thanks for looking into this. On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 07:48:19PM +0100, Paul Dreik wrote: > It bugs out on the following file > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/mpich/mpicxx.h which is supplied by the > libmpich-dev package. > > // Check for incompatible GCC versions > > // GCC (specifically) g+

Bug#924894: marked as done (human-icon-theme: Installs translation files in /usr/locale)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:19:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924894: fixed in human-icon-theme 0.28.debian-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #924894, regarding human-icon-theme: Installs translation files in /usr/locale to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#924813: the error is in the libmpich-dev package

2019-03-24 Thread Paul Dreik
Hi, It bugs out on the following file /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/mpich/mpicxx.h which is supplied by the libmpich-dev package. // Check for incompatible GCC versions // GCC (specifically) g++ changed the calling convention // between 3.2.3 and 3.4.3 (!!) Normally such changes // should only

Bug#905178: apt-cacher: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/apt-cacher

2019-03-24 Thread Mark Hindley
control: tags -1 pending

Processed: Re: Bug#905178: apt-cacher: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/apt-cacher

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #905178 [apt-cacher] apt-cacher: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/apt-cacher Added tag(s) pending. -- 905178: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905178 Debian Bug Tracking Syst

Bug#924374: marked as done (busybox ip -oneline link show displays nothing)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:19:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924374: fixed in busybox 1:1.30.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #924374, regarding busybox ip -oneline link show displays nothing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#923330: jajuk: Fails to start with Java Runtime Environment 1.7 minimum required. You use a JVM ext.JVM@23fc625e

2019-03-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Andreas, Am 24.03.19 um 18:09 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Markus, > > you have set this bug pending but the fix seems not to be uploaded until > now. The package would have been removed from testing without my ping > of the bug (which is the only thing I intend to do here. > > Kind regards >

Bug#923330: jajuk: Fails to start with Java Runtime Environment 1.7 minimum required. You use a JVM ext.JVM@23fc625e

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Markus, you have set this bug pending but the fix seems not to be uploaded until now. The package would have been removed from testing without my ping of the bug (which is the only thing I intend to do here. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#864827: Whither Zotero 5?

2019-03-24 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le dimanche 24 mars 2019 à 05:52 -0400, Borden Rhodes a écrit : > For the benefit of those of us less technically astute, what exactly > is preventing Zotero 5 from being packaged and loaded into unstable > or > experimental? The main reason is lack of manpower (a lot of work in the Javascript pac

Bug#924452: marked as done (lam4-dev: mpi alternative incompatible with current openmpi, mpich)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:49:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924452: fixed in lam 7.1.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #924452, regarding lam4-dev: mpi alternative incompatible with current openmpi, mpich to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#925411: kernel-package: Not suitable for release

2019-03-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: kernel-package Version: 13.018+nmu1 Severity: serious I discussed the state of kernel-package with Manoj and we agreed (see below) that it is not currently in a state suitable for release. Ben. --- From: Manoj Srivastava Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 23:15:30 -0800 Message-ID: To: Masahiro Ya

Bug#924125: marked as done (ruby-chromedriver-helper: attempt an internet communication?)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:21:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924125: fixed in ruby-chromedriver-helper 2.1.0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #924125, regarding ruby-chromedriver-helper: attempt an internet communication? to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#924830: marked as done (ruby-carrierwave: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-fog (>= 1.42~))

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:20:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924830: fixed in ruby-carrierwave 1.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #924830, regarding ruby-carrierwave: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-fog (>= 1.42~) to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#924594: marked as done (Build-depend on icedtea-netx instead of icedtea-netx-common)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:53:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924594: fixed in sweethome3d 6.1.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #924594, regarding Build-depend on icedtea-netx instead of icedtea-netx-common to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Processed: Bug #924594 in sweethome3d marked as pending

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #924594 [src:sweethome3d] Build-depend on icedtea-netx instead of icedtea-netx-common Added tag(s) pending. -- 924594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924594 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#924594: Bug #924594 in sweethome3d marked as pending

2019-03-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #924594 in sweethome3d reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/sweethome3d/commit/1781da681a7e5e7e53ca1a690

Bug#924593: marked as done (Build-depend on icedtea-netx instead of icedtea-netx-common)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:16:12 +0100 with message-id and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #924593, regarding Build-depend on icedtea-netx instead of icedtea-netx-common to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#924291: marked as done (netrek-client-cow: build can loop indefinitely on failure)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:04:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924291: fixed in netrek-client-cow 3.3.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #924291, regarding netrek-client-cow: build can loop indefinitely on failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#925138: gosa: crypto-transition not possible if upgrading from stretch

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 925138 serious Bug #925138 [src:gosa] gosa: crypto-transition not possible if upgrading from stretch Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > # breaks upgrade from stretch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#924291: closed by Markus Koschany (Bug#924291: fixed in netrek-client-cow 3.3.1-2)

2019-03-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 24.03.19 um 07:33 schrieb Helmut Grohne: > Control: reopen -1 > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:54:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >>* Fix possible infinite loop. (Closes: #924291) > > Thank you for the timely fix. Unfortunately, it doesn't work as the > variables are improperl

Bug#924762: emacs -T

2019-03-24 Thread ziegler
On the other hand, also emacs -T ä foo crashes the C-server. Martin

Bug#924747: marked as done (ruby-doorkeeper-openid-connect: CVE-2019-9837)

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:05:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924747: fixed in ruby-doorkeeper-openid-connect 1.5.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #924747, regarding ruby-doorkeeper-openid-connect: CVE-2019-9837 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#911780: psk31lx: version monotony violation: lenny had 2.1+2.2beta1-8

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #911780 Hi, I've just filed a stretch-pu request to get this fixed in stretch, too: https://bugs.debian.org/925401 Andreas

Bug#924452: lam4-dev: mpi alternative incompatible with current openmpi, mpich

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi Camm, On 2019-03-13 22:44, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! I should have some time to look at this this week. If you > happen to develop a patch, that would of course speed things up > considerably. did you find some time to look at the patch I sent to the bug? Andreas

Processed: bug 922346 is forwarded to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/252

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 922346 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/252 Bug #922346 [libgl1-mesa-dri] eog: Opened an image and my display server crashed Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests

Bug#923711: squashfs-tools: Please apply frag_deflator_thread removal patch

2019-03-24 Thread GCS
Hi all, On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:33 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > Looks like a few other folks have hit this issue: > https://redmine.tails.boum.org/code/issues/16457 > This is also the case why not all CPU cores are used during the run of mksquashfs. Am I right that this isn't going to be fixed s

Bug#905178: apt-cacher: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/apt-cacher

2019-03-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi Mark, On 2019-03-24 10:31, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 07:00:53PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> you probably need to take care of the config files installed by older >> versions, here I could still trigger the bug on upgrades from squeeze to >> wheezy to jessie to stretch

Bug#864827: Whither Zotero 5?

2019-03-24 Thread Borden Rhodes
For the benefit of those of us less technically astute, what exactly is preventing Zotero 5 from being packaged and loaded into unstable or experimental?

Bug#905178: apt-cacher: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/apt-cacher

2019-03-24 Thread Mark Hindley
Andreas On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 07:00:53PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > you probably need to take care of the config files installed by older > versions, here I could still trigger the bug on upgrades from squeeze to > wheezy to jessie to stretch to buster. Thanks for pointing this out. Just

Processed: closing 895778

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 895778 9.1.17.0-1 Bug #895778 [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #895778 to the same values previously set Bug #895778 [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Marked Bug a

Processed: found 895778 in 1.7.26-1

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 895778 1.7.26-1 Bug #895778 [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Marked as found in versions jruby/1.7.26-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 895778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Processed: affects 895778

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 895778 - 9.1.13.0-1 9.1.13.0-1^ Bug #895778 [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Removed indication that 895778 affects 9.1.13.0-1 and 9.1.13.0-1^ > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: fixed 895778 in 9.1.17.0-1

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 895778 9.1.17.0-1 Bug #895778 [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Marked as fixed in versions jruby/9.1.17.0-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 895778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Processed: found 895778 in 9.1.13.0-1

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 895778 9.1.13.0-1 Bug #895778 {Done: Markus Koschany } [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Marked as found in versions jruby/9.1.13.0-1 and reopened. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: unarchiving 895778

2019-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 895778 Bug #895778 {Done: Markus Koschany } [jruby] jruby: Several security vulnerabilities Unarchived Bug 895778 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 895778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/