This turned out to be a problem with a hard-dependency on Python 3.7 (not Ruby)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 951735 FTBFS because of Python 3.7 hard-dependency
Bug #951735 {Done: Ruben Undheim } [klayout] klayout:
FTBFS against Ruby2.7 on different $arch
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS because of Python 3.7 hard-dependency' from
'klayout: FTBFS aga
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 953137 grave
Bug #953137 [wine-development] wine-development: wine fails to start, probably
due to missing nls files
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: opensc
Version: 0.20.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags: ftbfs
Trying to build fails. I've tried following two ways.
I've tried
apt-get source opensc ; debuild -b -uc -us
and
apt-get --build source ope
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 949194 1.2.2-1
Bug #949194 {Done: Hilko Bengen } [src:libnbd] libnbd:
FTBFS: dh: unable to load addon python3
Marked as fixed in versions libnbd/1.2.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
9491
package: src:onionbalance
version: 0.1.8-5
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of onionbalance to unstable fails on all:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onionbalance
Cheers,
Ivo
Hello,
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 23:01:41 +0200 Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:27 PM Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>
> > lets see the sum of the issues without the stderr change
> >
> > amd64:
> > crossbuild FAIL stderr: dpkg-architecture: warning: specified GNU
> > syst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 953372 + sid bullseye
Bug #953372 [src:hash-slinger] src:hash-slinger: Depends on cruft package
python-dnspython
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 953375 + sid bullseye
Bug #953375 [src:linkchecker] src:linkchecker: Depends on cruft pack
Package: src:python-udatetime
Version: 0.0.16-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
test fails in current unstable:
dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild
I: pybuild base:217: cd
/packages/tmp/p/python-udatetime-0.0.16/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_udatetime/build;
python3.7 -m unittest discover -v tes
Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 12:47:24AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
Thanks for your feedback.
> > I guess we could lower the severity?
>
> Yes.
>
> > What do you suggest to fix this bug?
>
> Can I preseed the debconf question to 'continue'?
> I do this in piuparts for some questi
package: src:aspectc++
version: 1:2.2+git20200229-1
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of aspectc++ to unstable fails on armel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aspectc%2B%2B
Cheers,
Ivo
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:19:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#945486: fixed in pwman3 0.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #945486,
regarding pwman3: fails to upgrade from 'buster': new pwman3 package
pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
t
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:19:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937381: fixed in pwman3 0.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #937381,
regarding pwman3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 07:54:59AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
...
> > test _assemble_with_fermilite ... FAIL
I stumbled upon several failures with fermilite in the name of the
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:09:32PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > In short, OASIS Open is a DFSG compliant license or not?
>
> Thanks. It looks like the license which does not permit modification
> applies to the specification, so the specification is not DFSG-free.
>
> As for pkcs11.h, I can't
Package: cclive
Version: 0.9.3-0.1+b2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following NEW packages will be installed:
cclive{b} libquvi-0.9-0.9.3{a} libquvi-scripts-0.9{a} lua-bitop{a}
lua-expat{a} lua-json{a} lua-socket{a}
0 packages upgraded, 7 newly installed, 0 to re
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #953404 [debootstrap] debootstrapping testing and stable results in exit 100
Added tag(s) pending.
--
953404: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953404
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953404 in debootstrap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/5874bb9894b72ccf89
Package: linux-image
Version: 4.19.0-8-amd64
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
Please see debian-bugs mailing list thread below, but please be aware
that the threading of the messages could be improved upon.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-use
Source: kawari8
Version: 8.2.8-9
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
Hi Maintainer
kawari8 FTBFS when rebuilt with Python 3.8 [1].
I've copied what I hope is a relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kawari8
g++ -o../mach/linu
Source: mailutils
Version: 1:3.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
Hi Maintainer
mailutils FTBFS when rebuilt with Python 3.8 [1].
I've copied what I hope is a relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mailutils
/bin/bash ..
Source: kopanocore
Version: 8.7.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid
Hi Maintainer
kopanocore FTBFS when rebuilt with Python 3.8 [1]
I hope the following is the relevant part of the log:
checking for PYTHON... yes
configure: error: python requested but not satisfiable
cd debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 950147 + ftbfs
Bug #950147 [src:sagemath] sagemath ftbfs with python 3.8
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> tags 949835 + ftbfs
Bug #949835 [src:lirc] lirc ftbfs with python 3.8
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 952161 https://github.com/pimutils/todoman/issues/379
Bug #952161 [src:todoman] todoman: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.7" returned exit code 13
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'ht
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:49:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953404: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.121
has caused the Debian Bug report #953404,
regarding debootstrapping testing and stable results in exit 100
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
在 2020-03-09一的 17:12 -0400，Sergio Durigan Junior写道：
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On Thursday, March 05 2020, I wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, January 29 2020, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> >
> > > Dear source-highlight maintainer,
> > >
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952081 in ruby-awesome-print reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-awesome-print/-/commit/6bf60448f
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952081 [src:ruby-awesome-print] ruby-awesome-print: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby2.7" failed: [31mFailure/Error: expect(out).to eq("[\n[0] none()
Hello\n [1] one() Hello\n]")[0m
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #950177 [src:source-highlight] "make check" fails non-deterministically
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
950177: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950177
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch +pending
Bug #942618 [vilistextum] vilistextum: Maintainer email address not working
Added tag(s) patch.
Bug #942618 [vilistextum] vilistextum: Maintainer email address not working
Added tag(s) pending.
--
942618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Control: tags -1 +patch +pending
X-Debbugs-CC: sgevat...@debian.org
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for vilistextum (versioned as 2.6.9-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Boyuan Yang
diff -u vilistextum-2.6.9/debian/copyri
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:43:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952081: fixed in ruby-awesome-print 1.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952081,
regarding ruby-awesome-print: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
[31mFailure/Error: expect(out).to eq("[\n[0] none()
Source: otb
Severity: serious
Manpages for otbcli_* are not available anymore from otb 7.0 onwards.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #953560 [src:otb] Missing manpages in otb-cli 7.0
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
953560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953560
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 normal
On 3/10/20 4:58 PM, guillaume pernot wrote:
> Manpages for otbcli_* are not available anymore from otb 7.0 onwards.
That's not a reason for an RC severity.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10
Package: mupdf
Version: 1.16.1+ds1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
mupdf only displays the first page of any PDF now, despite
showing 1/2 in the title bar.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (50
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 953561 1.15.0+ds1-1
Bug #953561 [mupdf] mupdf: only displays first page of a PDF
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #953561 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
notfound 953561 1.15.0+ds1-1
thanks
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: mupdf
> Version: 1.16.1+ds1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> mupdf only displays the first page of any PDF now, despite
> showing 1/2 in the title bar.
Downgrading to 1.15
Package: libcrypt1
Severity: serious
libcrypt1 currently ships the file in /usr/lib, whereas libc6
shipped it in /lib, meaning that the Replaces relationship to
libc6 is not doing anything on usrmerged systems.
Please move it back to /lib until after bullseye, so that
the Replaces actually work,
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:53:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952231: fixed in splash 2.10.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952231,
regarding splash: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `letltxmacro.sty' not found.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Mar 10, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> It likely works out fine in practice in most cases, but
> let's be safe, k?
Do you care enough to test a patch?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: retitle -1 libcrypt1 should ship file in /usr, Replaces is useless
sigh, sorry. subject said breaks instead of replaces.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: libcrypt1
> Severity: serious
>
> libcrypt1 currently ships the file in /usr/lib, wher
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 libcrypt1 should ship file in /usr, Replaces is useless
Bug #953562 [libcrypt1] libcrypt1 should ship file in /usr, breaks is useless
Changed Bug title to 'libcrypt1 should ship file in /usr, Replaces is useless'
from 'libcrypt1 should ship file in /usr,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:58:04PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 10, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
> > It likely works out fine in practice in most cases, but
> > let's be safe, k?
> Do you care enough to test a patch?
We're going to roll out the change in Ubuntu shortly, so there'll
be a t
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:20:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950063: fixed in influxdb-python 5.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950063,
regarding influxdb-python FTBFS with pandas 0.25.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:27 PM Jack Lloyd wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:09:32PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > > In short, OASIS Open is a DFSG compliant license or not?
> >
> > Thanks. It looks like the license which does not permit modification
> > applies to the specification, so the sp
Package: alsa-lib
Version: 1.2.2-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye, patch
I just ran into the following build failure in raspbian bullseye, checking on
reproducible builds confirmed that the failure is not raspbian specific.
http://buildd.raspbian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=alsa-lib&arch=armhf
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953535: fixed in onionbalance 0.1.8-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #953535,
regarding onionbalance: FTBFS on all
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
tag 952359 + patch
thanks
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:58:00 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: strophejs
> Version: 1.2.14+dfsg-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages i
Source: dovecot
Version: 1:2.3.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of gcc-10 to unstable, the autopkgtest of dovecot
failed on arm64 in testing when that autop
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 952500 by 927100 936216 938522
Bug #952500 [ftp.debian.org] RM: python-dns -- ROM; Obsolete, python2 only,
python3 port is in py3dns package
952500 was not blocked by any bugs.
952500 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 9525
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:04:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943608: fixed in beancount 2.2.3+hg20200223.0.3af921a-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #943608,
regarding tests segfault when run with Python 3.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
package: src:libsbml
version: 5.18.0+dfsg-1
severity: serious
tags: ftbfs
Hi,
The latest upload of libsbml to unstable fails on mipsel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libsbml
Cheers,
Ivo
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:11:48AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:bley
> Version: 2.0.0-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
>
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from the distri
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:19:09AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:gnukhata-core-engine
> Version: 2.6.1-3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
>
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 878385 src:deluge 1.3.10-3+deb8u1
Bug #878385 {Done: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio } [deluge-torrent,
deluge-webui] please drop transitional packages deluge-torrent and deluge-webui
Bug reassigned from package 'deluge-torrent, deluge-webui' to
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 unreproducible
Bug #952355 [src:minlog] minlog: FTBFS: pdflatex error
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> close -1
Bug #952355 [src:minlog] minlog: FTBFS: pdflatex error
Marked Bug as done
--
952355: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952355
Debian
Control: tag -1 unreproducible
Control: close -1
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:21 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: minlog
> Version: 4.0.99.20100221-6
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
> > pdflatex mpcref.tex >> /dev/null
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:19: mpcref.pdf] Error 1
I cannot repr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fix typo in title
> retitle 953544 cclive: Uninstallable due to missing libboost packages
Bug #953544 [cclive] cclive: Uninstallable due to missing liboost packages
Changed Bug title to 'cclive: Uninstallable due to missing libboost packages'
f
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, at 1:18 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: mupdf
> Version: 1.16.1+ds1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> mupdf only displays the first page of any PDF now, despite
> showing 1/2 in the title bar.
>
I can partially reproduce this on my
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
python3-vtk7 : Depends: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.8.2-1 is to be installed
Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up...
...
This was a result of the python 3.8 transition, vtk7 has now been rebuilt on
most architectures (mips is still building)
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:34:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952613: fixed in nheko 0.6.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #952613,
regarding nheko: FTBFS: [01m[K/usr/include/spdlog/fmt/fmt.h:22:10:[m[K
[01;31m[Kfatal error: [m[Kspdlog/fmt/bundled/core.h: No s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 953550 + fixed-upstream
Bug #953550 [src:mailutils] mailutils: FTBFS with Python 3.8: undefined
reference
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #953550 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 953550 + fixed-upstream
Bug #953550 [src:mailutils] mailutils: FTBFS with Python 3.8: undefined
reference
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
953550: https://bugs.deb
Exactly the same issue. Had to apt-get download the samba packages and
--ignore-depends.
--
Matt Smith
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:20:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952133: fixed in search-ccsb 0.5-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #952133,
regarding search-ccsb: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: emacs25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Package: bley
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe bley should be removed from Debian:
* python2-only
* no reverse dependencies
* extremely low popcon
* 3 RC bugs already pending
* last upstream release in 2014 (ok, upstream and DD coincide)
if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to
Package: spambayes
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe spambayes should be removed from debian:
* python2-only and upstream shows no progress in porting to python3
* low popcon
* no reverse dependencies
* blocks python2 removal effort in Debian.
if i dont hear back within a week with a good reaso
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #922724 in zoneminder reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/zoneminder/-/commit/0cee6e0ebd6d9f856bba5ca0f2b1
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #922724 [src:zoneminder] Lots of security issues
Added tag(s) pending.
--
922724: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=922724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wednesday, 20 February 2019 8:28:26 AM AEDT Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> We should generally restrict the level of security support to something
> sensible. A video surveillance systems is obviously something
> that only should be exposed to trusted parties anyway, so I'd suggest
> we treat zonem
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:51:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952154: fixed in search-citeseer 0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #952154,
regarding search-citeseer: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: emacs25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:53:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951600: fixed in zoneminder 1.34.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #951600,
regarding "debian/rules build" fails to call defined build-indep target,
causing FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:52:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953137: fixed in wine-development 5.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #953137,
regarding wine-development: wine fails to start, probably due to missing nls
files
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
On 2020, മാർച്ച് 11 3:18:36 AM IST, "Moritz Mühlenhoff" wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:19:09AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: src:gnukhata-core-engine
>> Version: 2.6.1-3
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: sid bullseye
>> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: py2removal
>>
75 matches
Mail list logo
