Bug#972540: python3-torch: Depends on not-existing packages "3.8"

2020-10-19 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi > python3-torch requests a package > 3.8 Comes from this line (the remove done) --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ Architecture: any Depends: libtorch1.6 (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${python3:Depends}, -

Processed: Re: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#972524: monitoring-plugins: FTBFS on buster (dh_compress)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible Bug #972524 [src:monitoring-plugins] monitoring-plugins: FTBFS on buster (dh_compress) Added tag(s) unreproducible. > severity -1 important Bug #972524 [src:monitoring-plugins] monitoring-plugins: FTBFS on buster (dh_compress) Severity set

Bug#972524: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#972524: monitoring-plugins: FTBFS on buster (dh_compress)

2020-10-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 unreproducible Control: severity -1 important Hi Jakob, Thanks for reporting this issue, but unfortunately I cannot reproduce it. Building 2.2-6 in a buster chroot works as expected: gbp clone \ https://salsa.debian.org/nagios-team/pkg-monitoring-plugins.git git

Bug#972540: python3-torch: Depends on not-existing packages "3.8"

2020-10-19 Thread Norbert Preining
Package: python3-torch Version: 1.6.0-3 Severity: grave Hi, it seems that something went havoc in the depends field and python3-torch requests a package 3.8 which probably should have been a version number. Best Norbert -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers

Processed: Re: zfsutils-linux: No NMU binary compliant

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #972327 [zfsutils-linux] zfsutils-linux: No NMU binary compliant Added tag(s) patch. -- 972327: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972327 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#971214: elpy: FTBFS: tests failed

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 unreproducible Bug #971214 [src:elpy] elpy: FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 971214: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971214 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#971214: elpy: FTBFS: tests failed

2020-10-19 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Control: tag -1 unreproducible Justification: fixed via black-20.8b1-2 Hi Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: elpy > Version: 1.34.0-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs > Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye > I believe this was due to

Bug#969648: BD-Uninstallable Re: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
A bot wrote: Dependency installability problem for dask on all: dask build-depends on: - python3-pandas:amd64 (>= 0.19.0) dask build-depends on: - python3-distributed:amd64 python3-distributed depends on: - python3-dask:amd64 (>= 2.9.0) python3-pandas conflicts with: - python3-dask:amd64 (<

Bug#972205: arm-compute-library binary-all FTBFS: This package can only be built for armhf and arm64

2020-10-19 Thread Wookey
yes, the attempt in the package rules to avoid build failures on unsupported architectures actually was null in the debian context and just broke the ability to build the arch-all binaries on any architecture (needed for source-only uploads). Fixed in 19.11-3, just uploaded. Wookey --

Processed: closing 972205

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 972205 Bug #972205 [src:arm-compute-library] arm-compute-library binary-all FTBFS: This package can only be built for armhf and arm64 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#972524: monitoring-plugins: FTBFS on buster (dh_compress)

2020-10-19 Thread Jakob Bohm
Source: monitoring-plugins Version: 2.2-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, When trying to locally rebuild monitoring-plugins on a Buster system with the build-depends installed, the build actually fails during dh_compress. This was tried

Bug#972024: marked as done (python-geotiepoints ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:13:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972024: fixed in python-geotiepoints 1.2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972024, regarding python-geotiepoints ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#924937: marked as done (libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:58:39 +0200 with message-id <2d1b0add-9a63-9ca4-f11d-8d89fed22...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#924937: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies has caused the Debian Bug report #924937, regarding libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination

Processed: Re: Bug#972404: transition: KDEPIM 20.08 and Frameworks 5.74.0

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 972224 serious Bug #972224 [zanshin] zanshin: FTBFS against KDEPIM 20.08 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > severity 972226 serious Bug #972226 [kjots] kjots: FTBFS with KDEPIM 20.08 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 972224:

Bug#924937: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies

2020-10-19 Thread Bastian Germann
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:04:30 +0100 Christoph Berg wrote:> Re: Ansgar Burchardt 2019-03-20 <751a89074fcaa393f2cc26ff676e9e3434ecd706.ca...@43-1.org> > > the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger > > than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of >

Bug#972207: marked as done (pymongo ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:19:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972207: fixed in pymongo 3.11.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972207, regarding pymongo ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 19/10/2020 20:07, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Rebecca (2020.10.19_11:51:33_-0700) Or maybe not an actual regression...it's a ~5e-7 difference and one of the things the patch does (at around dask/dataframe/tests/test_rolling.py:270) is _tighten_ the tolerance on that test. Hrm, I didn't see

Bug#969648: marked as pending in dask

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
sorry, not any more. On 19/10/2020 19:57, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: That looks like my earlier version, which fails with NameError.

Bug#969648: marked as pending in dask

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
That looks like my earlier version, which fails with NameError.

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Or maybe not an actual regression...it's a ~5e-7 difference and one of the things the patch does (at around dask/dataframe/tests/test_rolling.py:270) is _tighten_ the tolerance on that test. I have filed a separate bug (#972516) for the fsspec issues.

Processed: 967909

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 967909 RM: editline; better options, no reverse dependencies Bug #967909 [ftp.debian.org] RM: editline; better options; no reverse dependencies Changed Bug title to 'RM: editline; better options, no reverse dependencies' from 'RM:

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I have now tested it. (The dask tests are run in autopkgtest, not build.) The attached is what I have so far, but it had these failures. The first two happen with or without 969648.patch and (from debci results) appear to be triggered by the new fsspec, but the last is a *regression* caused

Processed: reassign 967909; better options exist; no reverse dependencies

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 967909 RM: editline; better options; no reverse dependencies Bug #967909 [src:editline] editline: Please remove in favour of libedit Changed Bug title to 'RM: editline; better options; no reverse dependencies' from 'editline: Please

Bug#970111: enigmail: Upgrade to migration version 2.2.x for Thunderbird 78

2020-10-19 Thread Bastian Germann
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:04:24 +0200 Gregor Riepl wrote: > Thunderbird 78.3.1 is now in unstable, and without Enigmail 2.2, > existing users may lose their existing configuration. > > Please consider uploading the migration wizard (i.e. Enigmail 2.2) as > soon as possible. enigmail seems to be the

Bug#951389: marked as done (akonadi-backend-postgresql: Initialisation of database fail if locale en_US.UTF8 is not avalaible systemwide)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:42:09 +0200 with message-id <2805746.mKCIRZJcHu@tuxin> and subject line Re: Bug#951389: akonadi-backend-postgresql: Initialisation of database fail if locale en_US.UTF8 is not avalaible systemwide has caused the Debian Bug report #951389, regarding

Bug#907496: marked as done (libcurlpp0: Always fails with "No URL set!")

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:49:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#907496: fixed in curlpp 0.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #907496, regarding libcurlpp0: Always fails with "No URL set!" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#951388: marked as done ([akonadi-backend-postgresql] apparmor profile unsuitable)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:38:57 +0200 with message-id <2301010.GHar0l7m0l@tuxin> and subject line Re: Bug#951388: [akonadi-backend-postgresql] apparmor profile unsuitable has caused the Debian Bug report #951388, regarding [akonadi-backend-postgresql] apparmor profile unsuitable to

Bug#972394: likely cause: Python.h not found because of version mismatch 3.8 vs 3.9

2020-10-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.10.20 um 23:33 schrieb Joachim Wuttke: > Markus: > > Further investigation shows that the problem is not with NumPy. > CMake not even finds Python.h. > > The problem is most likely a mixture of Python 3.8 and 3.9 files on your > system. > > Try to uninstall libpython3-dev, which still

Bug#971274: marked as done (webext-compactheader: not compatible with thunderbird 78)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:34:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972413: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #971274, regarding webext-compactheader: not compatible with thunderbird 78 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#947113: marked as done (lout: CVE-2019-19917 CVE-2019-19918)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:33:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972182: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #947113, regarding lout: CVE-2019-19917 CVE-2019-19918 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#972394: likely cause: Python.h not found because of version mismatch 3.8 vs 3.9

2020-10-19 Thread Joachim Wuttke
Markus: Further investigation shows that the problem is not with NumPy. CMake not even finds Python.h. The problem is most likely a mixture of Python 3.8 and 3.9 files on your system. Try to uninstall libpython3-dev, which still depends on 3.8. Good luck, Joachim smime.p7s Description:

Bug#957121: marked as done (dbacl: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:33:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972117: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #957121, regarding dbacl: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#953006: marked as done (Switch to current libreadline)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:33:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972117: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #953006, regarding Switch to current libreadline to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#947805: marked as done (Please port to gupnp/gssdp 1.2)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:31:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#970846: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #947805, regarding Please port to gupnp/gssdp 1.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#971957: marked as done (libxs FTBFS with libpgm 5.3)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:32:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971968: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #971957, regarding libxs FTBFS with libpgm 5.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#972394: got same error in other project

2020-10-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Joachim, Am 19.10.20 um 23:15 schrieb Joachim Wuttke: > Hi Markus, > > I confirm that this is a serious issue. > > I got the same error message > >    Could NOT find Python3 (missing: Python3_INCLUDE_DIRS Python3_LIBRARIES >    Development NumPy Development.Module Development.Embed) (found

Bug#942148: marked as done (ndiswrapper-dkms: ndiswrapper 1.60 module fails to compile for kernel 5.3)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:27:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965949: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #942148, regarding ndiswrapper-dkms: ndiswrapper 1.60 module fails to compile for kernel 5.3 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#937960: marked as done (python-numpy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:26:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963669: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #937960, regarding python-numpy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#972394: got same error in other project

2020-10-19 Thread Joachim Wuttke
Hi Markus, I confirm that this is a serious issue. I got the same error message Could NOT find Python3 (missing: Python3_INCLUDE_DIRS Python3_LIBRARIES Development NumPy Development.Module Development.Embed) (found version "3.9.0") in a completely different software project after I

Bug#967095: marked as done (rome: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:3.5.1:bundle (bundle) on project rome: Execution bundle of goal org.apache.felix:maven-bund

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:07:55 +0100 with message-id <20201019210755.3ku2tpnqwhnvktzc@debian> and subject line Re: rome: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:3.5.1:bundle (bundle) on project rome: Execution bundle of goal

Bug#969648: marked as done (dask: autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.1 - datetime issues)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:03:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969648: fixed in dask 2.11.0+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #969648, regarding dask: autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.1 - datetime issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#952058: marked as done (jfractionlab: FTBFS: src/jfractionlab/officeMachine/OfficeMachine.java:12: error: package com.sun.star.awt does not exist)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:53:25 +0100 with message-id <20201019205325.uxypiyvgocqn76oa@debian> and subject line Re: jfractionlab: FTBFS: src/jfractionlab/officeMachine/OfficeMachine.java:12: error: package com.sun.star.awt does not exist has caused the Debian Bug report #952058,

Processed: closing 959136

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 959136 Bug #959136 [src:dask] numpy breaks dask autopkgtest: E assert 10 == 11 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 959136:

Bug#951854: fixed in muchsync 5-2

2020-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:09:01 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: > muchsync (5-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Links with wolfssl instead of libcrypto, fix: > "OpenSSL linking without license exception", thanks to Bastian Germann > (Closes: #951854). This patch is not needed

Bug#951854: fixed in muchsync 5-2

2020-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 19.10.20 um 22:40 schrieb Michael Biebl: > See > http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ftp/2020/debian-ftp.2020-03-13-20.02.html See also https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/website/-/merge_requests/6 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#952868: OpenSSL linking without license exception

2020-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 19.10.20 um 22:42 schrieb Michael Biebl: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 13:14:49 +0100 Bastian Germann > wrote: >> Package: wesnoth >> Severity: serious >> >> This GPL2 package links with OpenSSL. The OpenSSL license is >> incompatible with the GPL (see >> https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html).

Bug#952868: OpenSSL linking without license exception

2020-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 13:14:49 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: > Package: wesnoth > Severity: serious > > This GPL2 package links with OpenSSL. The OpenSSL license is > incompatible with the GPL (see > https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html). This can be solved by > asking upstream to add a

Bug#972519: black: autopkgtest regression

2020-10-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: black Version: 20.8b1-2 Severity: serious black currently fails its autopkgtests on amd64 and is thus unable to migrate to testing: | test_async_main (tests.test_primer.PrimerCLITests) ... Can not find 'black' executable in PATH. No point in running | FAIL | test_handle_debug

Bug#951730: marked as done (OpenSSL linking without license exception)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:29:08 +0200 with message-id <61e76839-c802-55d3-a40f-1da7919b3...@fishpost.de> and subject line OpenSSL is considered a system library has caused the Debian Bug report #951730, regarding OpenSSL linking without license exception to be marked as done. This

Bug#951780: marked as done (OpenSSL linking without license exception)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:29:08 +0200 with message-id <61e76839-c802-55d3-a40f-1da7919b3...@fishpost.de> and subject line OpenSSL is considered a system library has caused the Debian Bug report #951780, regarding OpenSSL linking without license exception to be marked as done. This

Bug#969362: python-flask-cors: CVE-2020-25032

2020-10-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Bastian, On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 05:39:00PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Bastian, > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:36:40PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Hi Salvatore, > > > > Thanks for your hints. > > > > Am 10.10.20 um 23:02 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > > > Hi Bastian, > >

Bug#951877: marked as done (OpenSSL linking without license exception)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:26:29 +0200 with message-id and subject line OpenSSL is considered a system library has caused the Debian Bug report #951877, regarding OpenSSL linking without license exception to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Rebecca (2020.10.19_12:07:08_-0700) > > Or maybe not an actual regression...it's a ~5e-7 difference and one of the > > things the patch does (at around dask/dataframe/tests/test_rolling.py:270) > > is _tighten_ the tolerance on that test. > > Hrm, I didn't see that failure. Testing again on a

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Rebecca (2020.10.19_11:51:33_-0700) > Or maybe not an actual regression...it's a ~5e-7 difference and one of the > things the patch does (at around dask/dataframe/tests/test_rolling.py:270) > is _tighten_ the tolerance on that test. Hrm, I didn't see that failure. Testing again on a 32bit

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Rebecca (2020.10.19_11:26:19_-0700) > I have now tested it. (The dask tests are run in autopkgtest, not build.) Thanks. I took your untested patch and tested it, too. It needed some tweaking, which it looks like you've also done. > The attached is what I have so far, but it had these

Bug#952399: marked as done (OpenSSL linking without license exception)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:04:36 +0200 with message-id <650272e2-fd4f-d1b1-1e02-6d3f2cba3...@fishpost.de> and subject line kmod: OpenSSL is considered a system library has caused the Debian Bug report #952399, regarding OpenSSL linking without license exception to be marked as done.

Bug#969648: marked as pending in dask

2020-10-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #969648 in dask reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#969648 marked as pending in dask

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #969648 [python3-dask] dask: autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.1 - datetime issues Added tag(s) pending. -- 969648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969648 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#972515: src:csvkit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest failure

2020-10-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: csvkit Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.0.5-1 Tags: sid bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 969550 Control: affects -1 src:python-agate-sql src:python-agate Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1],

Processed: src:csvkit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest failure

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.0.5-1 Bug #972515 [src:csvkit] src:csvkit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest failure Marked as fixed in versions csvkit/1.0.5-1. Bug #972515 [src:csvkit] src:csvkit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest failure

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:pyxdg

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:pyxdg > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Processed: [bts-link] source package malcontent

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package malcontent > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:git-remote-hg

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:git-remote-hg > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user

Processed: gadmin-rsync: diff for NMU version 0.1.7-1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 957250 + patch Bug #957250 [src:gadmin-rsync] gadmin-rsync: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 957250 + pending Bug #957250 [src:gadmin-rsync] gadmin-rsync: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957250:

Bug#957250: gadmin-rsync: diff for NMU version 0.1.7-1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags 957250 + patch Control: tags 957250 + pending -- Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gadmin-rsync (versioned as 0.1.7-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru gadmin-rsync-0.1.7/debian/changelog

Bug#937184: Python 3 port of offlineimap underway

2020-10-19 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 12:46 AM Brett Gilio wrote: > > Sudip Mukherjee writes: > > > > upstream is asking to treat offlineimap and offlineimap3 as separate > > package. https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap3/issues/10 > > I think we should preserve offlineimap until offlineimap3 is

Bug#972500: marked as done (hamster-time-tracker does not launch on Buster using the backported package)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:29:14 +0200 with message-id and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #972500, regarding hamster-time-tracker does not launch on Buster using the backported package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#972500: hamster-time-tracker does not launch on Buster using the backported package

2020-10-19 Thread Ulrike Uhlig
Hi! thank you for the quick reply. On 19.10.20 17:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Ulrike, did you restart your computer after the upgrade just to make sure > that the dbus service was properly using the new code ? I totally never reboot after installing packages, except for kernel updates :) But

Bug#972500: hamster-time-tracker does not launch on Buster using the backported package

2020-10-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, Philipp, you uploaded the backport. Can you have a look at this report? Ulrike, did you restart your computer after the upgrade just to make sure that the dbus service was properly using the new code ? Thank you in advance. On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: > Package:

Bug#972500: hamster-time-tracker does not launch on Buster using the backported package

2020-10-19 Thread Philipp Huebner
Hi, Am 19.10.20 um 17:39 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Philipp, you uploaded the backport. Can you have a look at this report? sure, I will do that tomorrow. Since hamster was not part of buster I did not test an old hamster profile with the new hamster-time-tracker. @Ulrike: could you please

Bug#950677: marked as done (pglogical-ticker FTBFS with PostgreSQL 12)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:04:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950677: fixed in pglogical-ticker 1.4.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #950677, regarding pglogical-ticker FTBFS with PostgreSQL 12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#972465: marked as done (unpack error when installing together)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:42:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972465: fixed in onednn 2.0~beta8+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972465, regarding unpack error when installing together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#971609: marked as done (r-cran-sna: Not build in Debian, unsatisfiable build-deps)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:34:41 +0200 with message-id <8b34d88d-7b8a-fe1d-2e62-74388b572...@debian.org> and subject line Re: r-cran-sna: Not build in Debian, unsatisfiable build-deps has caused the Debian Bug report #971609, regarding r-cran-sna: Not build in Debian, unsatisfiable

Bug#972505: pgl-ddl-deploy needs porting to PostgreSQL 13

2020-10-19 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: postgresql-12-pgl-ddl-deploy Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://github.com/enova/pgl_ddl_deploy/issues/55 pgl-ddl-deploy needs porting to PostgreSQL 13. Please remove pgl-ddl-deploy from testing for the time being so pglogical and the other pglogical reverse-depends

Bug#972504: python-cogent ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version

2020-10-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:python-cogent Version: 2020.2.7a+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 python-cogent ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version: [...] == ERROR:

Bug#972430: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver: Fails to build with kernel 5.9

2020-10-19 Thread jim_p
Package: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver Version: 340.108-7 Followup-For: Bug #972430 I found these 2 patches from aur. In my eyes they seem identical https://github.com/warpme/minimyth2/blob/master/script/nvidia/nvidia-340.108/files/nvidia-340.108-fix-5.9-kernel- compile.patch http://ix.io/2Bbp

Bug#969648: dask, pandas 1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The upstream patch doesn't even apply as-is; this version does, but I don't have time right now to actually test it. There's also a circular dependency problem, as dask indirectly build-depends on itself and my new pandas makes it uninstallable. Description: pandas 1.1 compatibility Origin:

Bug#972500: hamster-time-tracker does not launch on Buster using the backported package

2020-10-19 Thread Ulrike Uhlig
Package: hamster-time-tracker Version: 3.0.2-3~bpo10+1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I'm trying to start hamster-time-tracker. I have

Bug#962194: marked as done (lintian-brush: autopkgtest failure on s390x)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:37:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#962194: fixed in ruamel.yaml 0.16.12-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #962194, regarding lintian-brush: autopkgtest failure on s390x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#962194: marked as pending in ruamel.yaml

2020-10-19 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #962194 in ruamel.yaml reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#962194 marked as pending in ruamel.yaml

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #962194 [ruamel.yaml] lintian-brush: autopkgtest failure on s390x Added tag(s) pending. -- 962194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#972469: marked as done (joblib: TerminatedWorkerError, AttributeError: '_SafeQueue' object has no attribute '_notempty' with Python 3.9)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:04:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972469: fixed in joblib 0.17.0-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972469, regarding joblib: TerminatedWorkerError, AttributeError: '_SafeQueue' object has no attribute '_notempty' with Python 3.9 to be

Bug#959639: marked as done (joblib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:04:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#959639: fixed in joblib 0.17.0-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #959639, regarding joblib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13 to be

Bug#972490: rubygems_3.2.0~rc.1-2_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2020-10-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Source: rubygems Version: 3.2.0~rc.1-2 Severity: serious - Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters - From: Debian FTP Masters To: all Build Daemon Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 03:49:20 + Subject: rubygems_3.2.0~rc.1-2_all-buildd.changes REJECTED Message-Id: Version check failed:

Bug#972451: marked as done (fckit: binary-all FTBFS)

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:18:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972451: fixed in fckit 0.9.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972451, regarding fckit: binary-all FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#966847: marked as done (wine-development: FTBFS: cpanelfolder.c:262:5: error: ‘strcpy’ offset 12 from the object at ‘pidl’ is out of the bounds of referenced subobject ‘szName’ with type ‘CHAR[1]’

2020-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:33:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966847: fixed in wine-development 5.5-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #966847, regarding wine-development: FTBFS: cpanelfolder.c:262:5: error: ‘strcpy’ offset 12 from the object at ‘pidl’ is out of the