Control: block 987441 by 926539
Control: block 987441 by 987788
Hi Valentin,
Thanks for your suggestions.
Valentin Vidic (2021-05-02):
> Probably not critical, but maybe these installation bugs on s390x
> could be fixed for the release?
>
> rootskel: steal-ctty no longer works on at least spar
Processing control commands:
> block 987441 by 926539
Bug #987441 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: D-I must get ready for
Bullseye
987441 was blocked by: 987368 987788 961056 987449 987568 987377 987587 926539
987441 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bu
Processing control commands:
> block 987441 by 926539
Bug #987441 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: D-I must get ready for
Bullseye
987441 was blocked by: 987587 987377 987568 987449 987368
987441 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 987441: 926539 and 961056
> block 987441
Luna Jernberg (2021-05-03):
> Yeah, did not think about changing it to English, but yeah looks like
> it can be that, works in the text mode installer however
That's quite normal, libpango1.0-udeb (#987587) is only used in the
graphical installer. You could confirm that it's likely the very same
X-MIA-Summary; - ; acks inactivity/key issue in scrollz bug.
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 09:58:30PM -0600, Mike Markley wrote:
Hi Mike,
many thanks for your reply!
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:02:13AM -0600, Mike Markley
> wrote:
> > I do see that there's a recent PR upstream to fix this CVE:
>
Yeah, did not think about changing it to English, but yeah looks like it
can be that, works in the text mode installer however
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:55 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Luna Jernberg (2021-05-03):
> > Gets stuck before it tries to download package from the mirrors
>
> Thanks, Luna
Luna Jernberg (2021-05-03):
> Gets stuck before it tries to download package from the mirrors
Thanks, Luna.
This is Swedish, right?
It seems very likely to be yet another occurrence of this bug, that
usually triggers a title getting displayed but nothing else:
https://bugs.debian.org/987587
Gets stuck before it tries to download package from the mirrors
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:40 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Luna Jernberg (2021-05-03):
> > i found a bug when using the graphical installer in Virtualbox under
> > Ubuntu, and the step to show to package mirrors, don't show u
-- Forwarded message -
From: Luna Jernberg
Date: Mon, May 3, 2021 at 4:25 AM
Subject: bug in Debian 11 RC Installer
To: , , Martin Jernberg <
droidbit...@gmail.com>
Hello!
i found a bug when using the graphical installer in Virtualbox under
Ubuntu, and the step to show to packa
Has anyone been able to reproduce this? Attempting to build Sage in a
fresh unstable environment succeeds for me; perhaps the build failure
was spurious.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sunday, May 02 2021, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
>
> [ 79%] Building CXX object
> src/fdb5/CMakeFiles/fdb-hammer.dir/tools/fdb-hammer.cc.o
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #987934 [src:fdb] fdb: fails to build from the source
Added tag(s) patch.
--
987934: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987934
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: found -1 balsa/2.6.1-1
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:27:32PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> The bug happens because when xdg-desktop-portal-gtk is installed
> Balsa takes a very long time to start so those two seconds are not
> enough.
>
> g_application_register() calls g_dbus_proxy_new_syn
Processing control commands:
> found -1 balsa/2.6.1-1
Bug #987686 [src:balsa] webkit2gtk breaks balsa autopkgtest: xwd: error: No
window with name Balsa exists!
Marked as found in versions balsa/2.6.1-1.
--
987686: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987686
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Package: node-jade
Version: 1.11.0+~cs4.1.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
https://www.npmjs.com/package/jade says last release was 6 years ago and
it got replaced by pug.
Also it doesn't work anymore in bullseye for two reasons:
1. CLI tool broken due to "--name" conflicting with existing property:
--
Hi,
Probably not critical, but maybe these installation bugs on s390x could
be fixed for the release?
rootskel: steal-ctty no longer works on at least sparc64
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926539
debian-installer: qemu-system-s390x installation fails due to segfault in
main-
Source: pymol
Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, because of the failure
"caused" by glbic, I looked into the histo
Package: pev
Version: 0.81-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch security
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: benoit.sev...@gmail.com, Debian Security Team
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #987956 [libgcrypt20] libgcrypt20: ECDH decryption fails with "gpg: public
key decryption failed: Invalid object" error message
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
987956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987956
D
Hi,
* Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich [210502 17:17]:
> Sorry, forgot to say that I intend to do this NMU in 5 days in DELAYED/10.
Might make sense to just go ahead.
Chris
Your message dated Sun, 02 May 2021 17:04:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987908: fixed in pypy3 7.3.3+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #987908,
regarding pypy3: ${shlibs:Depends} must move to Pre-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 02 May 2021 17:03:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987454: fixed in emscripten 2.0.12~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987454,
regarding emscripten-doc: Package is empty
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sun, 02 May 2021 16:48:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987908: fixed in pypy3 7.3.4+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987908,
regarding pypy3: ${shlibs:Depends} must move to Pre-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 07:29:56AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> 1) The exception is being thrown in the mina library (source package
> mina2: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mina2), so we will likely end up
> reassigning the bug to that package.
I have reassigned the bug to mina2.
> 2) Because mi
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #986866 in mina2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/mina2/-/commit/eab3e3cfeff66c694fc9bf7c7047f13f258
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #986866 [mina2] apacheds: ApacheDS fails to start after clean install
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #986866 to the same tags previously set
--
986866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Con
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 986866 mina2
Bug #986866 [apacheds] apacheds: ApacheDS fails to start after clean install
Bug reassigned from package 'apacheds' to 'mina2'.
No longer marked as found in versions apache-directory-server/2.0.0~M24-4.
Ignoring request to al
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 986866 apacheds
Bug #986866 [mina2] apacheds: ApacheDS fails to start after clean install
Added indication that 986866 affects apacheds
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
986866: https://bugs.
Your message dated Sun, 02 May 2021 15:03:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987213: fixed in pypy 7.3.4+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987213,
regarding pypy: ${shlibs:Depends} must move to Pre-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 02 May 2021 15:03:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987213: fixed in pypy 7.3.3+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987213,
regarding pypy: ${shlibs:Depends} must move to Pre-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hello Carlos,
Thank you for reporting this bug and to others for confirming it.
Several comments below:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:09:58PM -0600, Carlos Ramos wrote:
> Package: apacheds
> Version: 2.0.0~M24-4
> Severity: important
>
> [2021-52-12T21:52:39.039-0600] WARN
> [org.apache.directory.
Hi Chris,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 01:18:58PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 05:52:04PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> [...]
> > > Yes I submitted release.debian.org bug #987859 last night and did the
> >
Salvatore Bonaccorso:
Hi Chris,
On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 05:52:04PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
Salvatore Bonaccorso:
[...]
Yes I submitted release.debian.org bug #987859 last night and did the upload
(and was "accepted"), which I think fits almost all of the criteria in the
link above except t
Sorry, forgot to say that I intend to do this NMU in 5 days in DELAYED/10.
Em 02/05/2021 09:56, Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich escreveu:
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sshcommand (versioned as 0~20160110.1~2795f65-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should
Processing control commands:
> tags 952298 + pending
Bug #952298 [src:sshcommand] sshcommand: FTBFS: shellcheck fails
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952298: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952298
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 952298 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sshcommand (versioned as 0~20160110.1~2795f65-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683
⢿⡄⠘⠷
On Mon, 08 Mar 2021 at 14:23:37 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Mo 08 Mär 2021 14:01:41 CET, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I notice that Ubuntu hirsute has a somewhat larger diff, including the two
> > patches that you applied, plus some more. It might be safer to go with the
> > same patchset they ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 987879 -2
Bug #987879 [libwaffle-dev] libwaffle-dev: Missing dependency on libwayland-dev
Bug 987879 cloned as bug 987940
> reassign -2 src:piglit
Bug #987940 [libwaffle-dev] libwaffle-dev: Missing dependency on libwayland-dev
Bug reassigned
Source: cgminer
Version: 4.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: andre...@debian.org
Usertags: rebuild-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
gcc -g -O2 -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 984923 + pending
Bug #984923 [matlab-iso2mesh] matlab-iso2mesh: move to contrib
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
984923: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Qianqian, is there any update on this, or anything where I might be
able to help?
cu
Adrian
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:58:51PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le vendredi 02 avril 2021 à 14:56 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit :
> > On 4/2/21 9:26 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > Thanks for loo
Source: mialmpick
Version: 0.2.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: andre...@debian.org
Usertags: rebuild-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
gcc -g -O
Source: libstorj
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: andre...@debian.org
Usertags: rebuild-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
libtool: com
Source: gfsview
Version: 20121130+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: andre...@debian.org
Usertags: rebuild-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
libto
Source: fdb
Version: 5.7.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: andre...@debian.org
Usertags: rebuild-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
[ 79%] Building C
Source: deepin-terminal
Version: 5.0.0+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: andre...@debian.org
Usertags: rebuild-ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
While rebuilding your package from the source, I received this error:
/<>/lib/xutils.vala:99.9-99.26: error: The name `data' does
not exist in the co
46 matches
Mail list logo
