Bug#982381: Workaround to get s3ql functional again

2021-06-03 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: s3ql Version: 3.7.0+dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #982381 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A workaround, at least if (like me) you've got S3QL running as a dedicated user: As the s3ql-user, run: pip3 install --user trio==0.18.0 This will install a newer version of trio

Bug#989406: wireguard-dkms makes little sense with the bullseye kernel

2021-06-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2021-06-03 01:37:25 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Overall it feels like a package with high CVE risk and 0 users > in bullseye. I agree with Jason that some people may use non-standard, older kernels with bullseye, so there is some value in continuing to provide wireguard-dkms in bullseye to

Bug#989434: libsepol 3.2: cherry-pick fix for role attributes

2021-06-03 Thread Christian Göttsche
Source: libsepol Version: 3.2-1 Severity: serious Please cherry-pick commit f7431d0e0ed9 ("libsepol: Expand role attributes in constraint expressions") [1], as it fixes a regression using role attributes in constraints reported at [2]. Otherwise role attributes in constraints are not validated,

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

2021-06-03 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: severity -1 important Greetings everyone, focusing on the baseline violation aspect… Helmut Grohne, on 2021-06-02: > The check does not want to know whether the compiler supports > popcnt (which could be determined using AC_LINK_IFELSE), but whether the > CPU does and AC_LINK_IFELSE

Processed: Re: Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #989399 [nauty] nauty: i386 baseline violation by using popcnt Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 989399: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989399 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#986647: marked as done (apt-transport-s3: Running "apt update" on an Ubuntu 20.04 end up in a python exception)

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:33:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#986647: fixed in apt-transport-s3 2.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #986647, regarding apt-transport-s3: Running "apt update" on an Ubuntu 20.04 end up in a python exception to be marked as done. This

Bug#988214: fixed in rails 2:6.0.3.7+dfsg-1

2021-06-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Utkarsh, On 27-05-2021 21:51, Paul Gevers wrote: > You haven't answered my question: "does rails still work with the old > version of ruby-marcel and can the version bump be reverted" Ping. Without a proper answer, I can't decide. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#987504: marked as done (imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS')

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:54:14 +0200 with message-id <1f823946-984b-3be8-005d-12e4b5b33...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#987504: imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS' has caused the Debian Bug report #987504, regarding

Processed: Re: Bug#987504: imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS'

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 987504 wontfix Bug #987504 [imagemagick] imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS' Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 987504:

Processed: found 989429 in 0.118-2

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 989429 0.118-2 Bug #989429 {Done: Simon McVittie } [src:policykit-1] policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync() Marked as found in versions policykit-1/0.118-2 and reopened. >

Processed: found 989438 in 4:20.08.3-4, tagging 989438, found 989437 in 1.9.11-3, tagging 989437, tagging 989439

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 989438 4:20.08.3-4 Bug #989438 [src:kf5-messagelib] CVE-2021-31855 Marked as found in versions kf5-messagelib/4:20.08.3-4. > tags 989438 + upstream Bug #989438 [src:kf5-messagelib] CVE-2021-31855 Added tag(s) upstream. > found 989437

Bug#987504: imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS'

2021-06-03 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:49:01PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Hi, > > First off, thanks Adrian for raising the concern. In general, at this > stage we don't like packages breaking other packages. This should have been fixed in unstable for a long time, I pinged the maintainer multiple times

Bug#989438: CVE-2021-31855

2021-06-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: kf5-messagelib Severity: grave Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team https://kde.org/info/security/advisory-20210429-1.txt Patch: https://commits.kde.org/messagelib/3b5b171e91ce78b966c98b1292a1bcbc8d984799 Cheers, Moritz

Bug#989429: marked as done (policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync())

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jun 2021 17:33:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#989429: fixed in policykit-1 0.105-31 has caused the Debian Bug report #989429, regarding policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync() to be marked as

Processed: Re: Bug#989429: policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync()

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #989429 [src:policykit-1] policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync() Added tag(s) patch. -- 989429: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989429 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#989429: policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync()

2021-06-03 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags -1 + patch On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 03:49:02PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: policykit-1 > Version: 0.105-30 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream > Justification: user security hole > Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit/-/issues/140 >

Processed: policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync()

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 0.105-26 Bug #989429 [src:policykit-1] policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync() Marked as found in versions policykit-1/0.105-26. -- 989429:

Bug#989429: policykit-1: CVE-2021-3560: local privilege escalation using polkit_system_bus_name_get_creds_sync()

2021-06-03 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: policykit-1 Version: 0.105-30 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit/-/issues/140 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Control: found -1 0.105-26 Hi, The following vulnerability

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

2021-06-03 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Nilesh, On 2021-06-03 13:05, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Andrius Merkys > wrote: > On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot

Processed: severity of 983583 is serious

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 983583 serious Bug #983583 [src:golang-github-sylabs-sif] FTBFS on mips64el and mipsel Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 983583:

Processed: fixed 989251 in pmount/0.9.23-4

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 989251 pmount/0.9.23-4 Bug #989251 [src:pmount] pmount: Manpage lists maintainer with email address that is not reachable. Bug #989254 [src:pmount] project: Maintainer email of package `pmount` seems wrong. Marked as fixed in versions

Bug#989245: python3-django needs to depends on libjs-jquery, not only recommend this package

2021-06-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Carsten, > I'd say there is a gap which is difficult to handle in the end by only > pointing and strictly using our more technically packaging policy in > contrary to make the system much as possible user friendly. But o.k., I > see your point and will respect the decision of the package

Bug#986637: Advertisement Require https://planet.ubuntu.com/

2021-06-03 Thread Katie Maya
Hello, I am a professional blogger outreach service provider. I have several clients and their running orders. https://planet.ubuntu.com/ I am working for my several clients & outreach to get them quality guest post links. I would like to have your website list where you can provide guest

Processed: severity of 989251 is serious

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 989251 serious Bug #989251 [src:pmount] pmount: Manpage lists maintainer with email address that is not reachable. Bug #989254 [src:pmount] project: Maintainer email of package `pmount` seems wrong. Severity set to 'serious' from

Bug#984520: 'error: symbol "grub_register_command_lockdown" not found' and then lightdm fails to start

2021-06-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:07:27AM +0200, Jesús Ángel wrote: > I am also facing this error every now and then. Sometimes GRUB doesn't > boot and keeps showing "error: symbol `grub_register_command_lockdown' > not found.". > On pressing any key, GRUB restarts and I get the same error again. If

Bug#988722: postgresql-common: Upgrading cluster with postgis does not migrate tables using postgis

2021-06-03 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Andreas On 2021-06-03 01:41:37 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 02/06/2021 22.22, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > So, what if we use the free versions between 103 and 200 to transition > > to a Debian-specific version? Attached is a patch that does that. It's > > not an optimal solution as we

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

2021-06-03 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hello Andrius On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot heppen during cross build > >Simply replacing it by

Bug#989245: marked as done (python3-django needs to depends on libjs-jquery, not only recommend this package)

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:43:27 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#989245: python3-django needs to depends on libjs-jquery, not only recommend this package has caused the Debian Bug report #989245, regarding python3-django needs to depends on libjs-jquery, not only

Bug#989332: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37: May 30 upgrade for DSA-4923-1 broke the epiphany browser

2021-06-03 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:37:45AM +0200, Jose wrote: > > Can you install gstreamer1.0-plugins-good and try again? > > That was the issue. Thank you for helping. > > I don't understand why it was working before the libwebkit2gtk > update. Maybe this is a dependency that should be added to the >

Bug#984520: 'error: symbol "grub_register_command_lockdown" not found' and then lightdm fails to start

2021-06-03 Thread Jesús Ángel
Package: grub2 Version: 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u4 Followup-For: Bug #984520 Dear Maintainer, I am also facing this error every now and then. Sometimes GRUB doesn't boot and keeps showing "error: symbol `grub_register_command_lockdown' not found.". On pressing any key, GRUB restarts and I get the

Bug#989406:

2021-06-03 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Many people run Debian on different kernels. Therefore the dkms remains useful and should not be removed.

Bug#987482: marked as done (atlas-ecmwf FTBFS on 32bit)

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:33:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#987482: fixed in atlas-ecmwf 0.25.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #987482, regarding atlas-ecmwf FTBFS on 32bit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#989399: nauty FTCBFS -- multiple reasons

2021-06-03 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Nilesh, On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons: > > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot heppen during cross build >Simply replacing it by AC_LINK_IFELSE does the trick. Please find the >patch for this below, and consider

Bug#987310: marked as done (ifupdown-extra: Missing "]" in 20static-routes script)

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jun 2021 07:34:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#987310: fixed in ifupdown-extra 0.32 has caused the Debian Bug report #987310, regarding ifupdown-extra: Missing "]" in 20static-routes script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: nss breaks dogtag-pki autopkgtest on ppc64el: [SSL: LENGTH_MISMATCH] length mismatch (_ssl.c:1123)

2021-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 nss/2:3.66-1 Bug #989410 [src:nss, src:dogtag-pki] nss breaks dogtag-pki autopkgtest on ppc64el: [SSL: LENGTH_MISMATCH] length mismatch (_ssl.c:1123) Marked as found in versions nss/2:3.66-1. > found -1 dogtag-pki/10.10.2-3 Bug #989410 [src:nss,

Bug#989410: nss breaks dogtag-pki autopkgtest on ppc64el: [SSL: LENGTH_MISMATCH] length mismatch (_ssl.c:1123)

2021-06-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: nss, dogtag-pki Control: found -1 nss/2:3.66-1 Control: found -1 dogtag-pki/10.10.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of nss the

Bug#979614: seamly2d: virtually dead fork of valentina

2021-06-03 Thread dismine
Hi, My name is Roman, and I am the developer of the Valentina project. > Seamly2D is a fork of Valentina. Technically it is not true. I have left the original project. Thus, current Valentina is a fork of what is left of Valentina after rename. > well, compared to valentina it seems to have