Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:35:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992799: fixed in kdump-tools 1:1.6.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #992799,
regarding kdump-tools: please drop shellcheck autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:35:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992752: fixed in gnome-tweaks 40.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #992752,
regarding gnome-tweaks: Missing dependency: gir1.2-handy-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #992752 in gnome-tweaks reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #992752 [gnome-tweaks] gnome-tweaks: Missing dependency: gir1.2-handy-1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
992752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 992799 + pending
Bug #992799 [src:kdump-tools] kdump-tools: please drop shellcheck autopkgtest
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
992799:
Hi,
On 2021-08-23 18:49, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 01:05:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno
> wrote:
> > control: tag -1 patch
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2021-08-21 21:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Source: glibc, openconnect
> > > Control: found -1 glibc/2.31-16
> > > Control: found -1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 992779 1:7.2.0~rc1-1
Bug #992779 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-gnome]
libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with libreoffice-gtk3
Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:7.2.0~rc1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 992779 1:7.2.0~rc1
Bug #992779 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-gnome]
libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with libreoffice-gtk3
There is no source info for the package 'libreoffice-gnome' at version
'1:7.2.0~rc1' with architecture ''
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 992779 1:7.2.0~rc1
Bug #992779 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-gnome]
libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with libreoffice-gtk3
There is no source info for the package 'libreoffice-gnome' at version
'1:7.2.0~rc1' with architecture ''
Unable
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:19:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992246: fixed in gxtuner 3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #992246,
regarding gxtuner FTBFS with glib 2.68.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.6.9+ds-1
Bug #992817 [src:ledgersmb] ledgersmb: CVE-2021-3693 CVE-2021-3694 CVE-2021-3731
Marked as found in versions ledgersmb/1.6.9+ds-1.
> fixed -1 1.6.9+ds-1+deb10u2
Bug #992817 [src:ledgersmb] ledgersmb: CVE-2021-3693 CVE-2021-3694 CVE-2021-3731
Source: ledgersmb
Version: 1.6.9+ds-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 1.6.9+ds-1
Control: fixed -1 1.6.9+ds-1+deb10u2
Control: fixed -1 1.6.9+ds-2+deb11u2
Hi,
The following
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:50:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992653: fixed in glibc 2.31-17
has caused the Debian Bug report #992653,
regarding glibc breaks openconnect autopkgtest: FAIL: auth-nonascii
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Control: reassign -1 src:glibc 2.31-16
Hi Aurelien,
On 23-08-2021 21:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Bug #992653 in glibc reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
>
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:glibc 2.31-16
Bug #992653 [src:glibc, src:openconnect] glibc breaks openconnect autopkgtest:
FAIL: auth-nonascii
Bug reassigned from package 'src:glibc, src:openconnect' to 'src:glibc'.
No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.31-16 and
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #992653 in glibc reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #992653 [src:glibc, src:openconnect] glibc breaks openconnect autopkgtest:
FAIL: auth-nonascii
Added tag(s) pending.
--
992653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992653
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
> > ii libkf5plasma5 5.78.0-3
>
> The problem is that this packages (and several others) from the
> frameworks are not updated.
>
> I guess we have to introduce a breaks somewhere ... this incompatibility
> is somehow surprising, because it is not documented
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:07:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992779: fixed in libreoffice 1:7.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #992779,
regarding libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with libreoffice-gtk3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #992779 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #992779 [libreoffice-gnome] libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with
libreoffice-gtk3
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #992779 to the same tags previously set
--
992779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992779
Debian Bug Tracking
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 01:05:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> control: tag -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-21 21:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Source: glibc, openconnect
> > Control: found -1 glibc/2.31-16
> > Control: found -1 openconnect/8.10-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid bookworm
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package opentmpfiles
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 12:53 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Source: dask
> Followup-For: Bug #992672
> Control: reassign 992672 src:dash 2021.01.0+dfsg-1
>
> This bug is addressed in https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/7841
>
> A version upgrade should fix it.
>
Ok thanks for checking.
I have a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #992779 [libreoffice-gnome] libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with
libreoffice-gtk3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
992779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #992779 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
severity 992779 serious
found 992779 1:7.2.0-2
notfound 992779 1:7.1.5-2
tag 992779 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Am 23.08.21 um 12:31 schrieb Nicolas Patrois:
> Package: libreoffice-gnome
> Version: 1:7.1.5-2
Oh, my. obviously not. If at all the bug is in the new package not
declaring the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 992779 serious
Bug #992779 [libreoffice-gnome] libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with
libreoffice-gtk3
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 992779 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 992779 serious
Bug #992779 [libreoffice-gnome] libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with
libreoffice-gtk3
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> found 992779 1:7.2.0-2
Bug #992779 [libreoffice-gnome] libreoffice-gnome: conflicts with
Package: knot
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
knot fails to build from source on armel due to outdated symbols file,
the following patch fixes it:
Regards,
Daniel
commit dcf7551cc9a05833089352aa852c280b77207646
Author: Daniel Baumann
Date: Mon Aug 23 18:07:40 2021 +0200
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 992799 + confirmed
Bug #992799 [src:kdump-tools] kdump-tools: please drop shellcheck autopkgtest
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
992799:
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:shellcheck
Bug #992799 [src:kdump-tools] kdump-tools: please drop shellcheck autopkgtest
Added indication that 992799 affects src:shellcheck
--
992799: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: kdump-tools
Version: 1:1.6.8.4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, shellch...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:shellcheck
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of shellcheck
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:shellcheck
Bug #992798 [src:initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: please drop shellcheck
autopkgtest
Added indication that 992798 affects src:shellcheck
--
992798: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992798
Debian Bug Tracking System
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.140
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, shellch...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:shellcheck
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of shellcheck
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 please backport to bullseye
Bug #992360 [xfce4-notes] xfce4-notes missing from bullseye
Changed Bug title to 'please backport to bullseye' from 'xfce4-notes missing
from bullseye'.
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #992360 [xfce4-notes] please backport to
Control: retitle -1 please backport to bullseye
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi!
A package not making it to the stable release is by no means a RC bug,
merely a statement of the package's quality at a time in the past.
I'm adjusting severity accordingly.
On the other hand, this case (and
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:33:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991897: fixed in cross-toolchain-base 54
has caused the Debian Bug report #991897,
regarding removal of the any/local-rtlddir-cross.diff patch broke cross builds
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:33:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991897: fixed in cross-toolchain-base-ports 46
has caused the Debian Bug report #991897,
regarding removal of the any/local-rtlddir-cross.diff patch broke cross builds
to be marked as done.
This means that
I am new to this list and would like to get involved, but I am a relative
beginner in programming. I understand from looking at this CVE that it is
triggered by a particular type of API call, which is probably unlikely in
the wild, unless prior recon has been done and there is already a threat
Source: passenger
Severity: serious
passenger-5.0.30/src/cxx_supportlib/vendor-copy:
adhoc_lve.h libcurl libuv nghttp2 utf8 utf8.h
passenger-5.0.30/src/cxx_supportlib/vendor-modified:
SmallVector.h jsoncpp modp_b64.cpp modp_b64_data.h
boost libevmodp_b64.hpsg_sysqueue.h
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:19:33 +0200 Erwan David wrote:
Package: plasma-workspace
Version: 4:5.21.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
With new plasma 5.21, systemtray does not start with error :
kf.plasma.core:
Processing control commands:
> reassign 992674 src:lmfit-py 1.0.1-6
Bug #992674 [src:scipy, src:lmfit-py] scipy breaks lmfit-py autopkgtest
Bug reassigned from package 'src:scipy, src:lmfit-py' to 'src:lmfit-py'.
No longer marked as found in versions scipy/1.7.1-1 and lmfit-py/1.0.1-6.
Ignoring
Source: lmfit-py
Followup-For: Bug #992674
Control: reassign 992674 src:lmfit-py 1.0.1-6
This bug is fixed upstream at
https://github.com/lmfit/lmfit-py/commit/9cb4056bb661a1ed6fedfbbca2b124aba3dbc290
Processing control commands:
> reassign 992672 src:dash 2021.01.0+dfsg-1
Bug #992672 [src:scipy, src:dask] scipy breaks dask autopkgtest: 5 times FAILED
array/tests/test_stats.py::test_two
Bug reassigned from package 'src:scipy, src:dask' to 'src:dash'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Source: dask
Followup-For: Bug #992672
Control: reassign 992672 src:dash 2021.01.0+dfsg-1
This bug is addressed in https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/7841
A version upgrade should fix it.
De : Norbert Preining [mailto:norb...@preining.info]
Hi Erwan,
kf.plasma.core:
"/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/plasma/applets/org.kde.plasma.systemtray.so"
: this plugin is compiled against incompatible Plasma version 348928 This build is
compatible with 5 .0.0 ( 327680 ) to
Package: rust-thread-local
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Rust-thread-local's autopkgtests are failing and blocking it's migration to
testing.
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/rust-thread-local/14765623/log.gz
Running `CARGO=/usr/bin/cargo
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:09:32 +0200
with message-id <162971337269.2581943.6285810027839353...@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: [Design-devel] Bug#985494: design-desktop: uninstallable
in stretch due to dependency on uninstallable xul-ext-sieve
has caused the Debian Bug report
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:50:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992718: fixed in rust-sniffglue 0.12.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #992718,
regarding rust-sniffglue_0.12.1-1_amd64-buildd.changes REJECTED
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Erwan,
> kf.plasma.core:
> "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/plasma/applets/org.kde.plasma.systemtray.so"
> : this plugin is compiled against incompatible Plasma version 348928 This
> build is compatible with 5 .0.0 ( 327680 ) to 5.78.0 ( 347708 )
> kf.plasma.core: Applet
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:03:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971332: fixed in alsa-plugins 1.2.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #971332,
regarding alsa-plugins: uses deprecated libavresample
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Sebastian and Diederik,
Argh, I just noticed I was inconveniently unsubscribed from the alsa
mailing list.
El dg. 22 de 08 de 2021 a les 16:42 +0200, en/na Sebastian Ramacher va
escriure:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 ftbfs
>
> On 2021-08-21 14:30:43, Diederik de Haas
Package: plasma-workspace
Version: 4:5.21.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
With new plasma 5.21, systemtray does not start with error :
kf.plasma.core:
"/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/plugins/plasma/applets/org.kde.plasma.systemtray.so"
: this plugin is compiled
54 matches
Mail list logo
