Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-12-22 12:20:13)
> Releasing a new major release of mistune has caused several packages
> to no longer be usable at all.
>
> I consider this a serious issue, and have raised severity accordingly.
Whoops - the above was intended for the underlying bug#1001591.
- Jo
On 21/12/2021 17.49, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[ /polytope/objects/Polytope/properties/Geometry/SLACK_IDEAL ] 1 ? cannot
open `standard.lib`
// ** Could not get 'Singular'.
// ** Either set environment variable 'SINGULAR_EXECUTABLE' to 'Singular',
// ** or make sure that 'Singular' is at "/usr/S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1001592 bullseye
Bug #1001592 {Done: Victor Seva } [prosody] prosody: changes
certs/localhost.{crt,key} back to snakeoil on upgrade
Added tag(s) bullseye.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1001592: fixed in prosody 0.11.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001592,
regarding prosody: changes certs/localhost.{crt,key} back to snakeoil on upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:35:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991939: fixed in twitter-bootstrap4 4.6.0+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #991939,
regarding libjs-bootstrap4: broken symlinks:
/usr/share/javascript/bootstrap4/css/bootstrap*.css.map ->
../../../nod
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1001591 [python3-mistune] drops attributes used by reverse dependencies
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1001591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1002380 [src:python-matrix-nio] python-matrix-nio: FTBFS: AttributeError:
module 'mistune' has no attribute 'BlockGrammar'
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 1002380 to the same value.
--
1002380: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Control: severity -1 serious
Releasing a new major release of mistune has caused several packages to
no longer be usable at all.
I consider this a serious issue, and have raised severity accordingly.
At least python-m2r have no support for mistune v2 in sight (and its
newer fork - python-m2r2
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream
Bug #1002355 [src:hdmf] hdmf: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i
python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/issues/687
Bug #1002355 [src:hdmf] hdmf: FTBFS: dh
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/issues/687
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1002163 with 1001591
Bug #1002163 [src:python-m2r] python-m2r: FTBFS: AttributeError: module
'mistune' has no attribute 'BlockGrammar'
1002163 was not blocked by any bugs.
1002163 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1002163:
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:49:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002240: fixed in node-regexpu-core 4.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002240,
regarding node-regexpu-core: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex
debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 15
to be
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:48:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002236: fixed in conda-package-handling 1.7.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002236,
regarding conda-package-handling: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:49:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002134: fixed in odil 0.12.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002134,
regarding odil: FTBFS: Value.cpp:269:69: error: wrong number of template
arguments (4, should be at least 5)
to be marked as done.
Th
❦ 14 December 2021 09:13 GMT, Jeff Blake:
> Unless there are licensing or technical objections, I would suggest building
> with upstream
> bundled clang to avoid all sorts of incompatibilities and obviate the need
> for extra patching
> (stable's clang is often too old and upstream currently
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002388 [src:mistral] mistral: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'collections'
has no attribute 'Iterable'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002388 in mistral reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/mistral/-/commit/e3366aee46a1ca11
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002240 in node-regexpu-core reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-regexpu-core/-/commit/24f7c65fda57
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002240 [src:node-regexpu-core] node-regexpu-core: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 15
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002240: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002240
Debian Bug Tra
Le 21/12/2021 à 17:03, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Source: odil
Version: 0.12.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
I'v
Package: telegram-desktop
Followup-For: Bug #1001016
Hi,
+1 to not shipping a incompatible version by default.
This also applies to ubuntu-lts and probably other downstream distros.
Any idea why the version got that outdated in the firstplace?
cheers
Felix
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:03:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002217: fixed in gatb-core 1.4.2+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002217,
regarding gatb-core: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output
Hi,
is there someone with Python skills to fix that ?
I think that this package should really own to Python Team, not JS Team.
Cheers,
Yadd
On 21/12/2021 16:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: gyp
Version: 0.1+20210831gitd6c5dd5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:49:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002322: fixed in python-panwid 0.3.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002322,
regarding python-panwid: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned ex
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:49:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002230: fixed in pplacer 1.1~alpha19-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002230,
regarding Ocaml build error: expression was expected of type
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:49:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002112: fixed in node-chart.js 3.6.2+~0.1.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002112,
regarding node-chart.js: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150
minutes of inactivity
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1002199 + upstream
Bug #1002199 [src:python-memoize] python-memoize: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002433: fixed in python-sure 2.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002433,
regarding python-sure: FTBFS: AssertionError: 'john' should have 'john', but
have not
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002321: fixed in python-sure 2.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002321,
regarding TypeError: 'bytes' object cannot be interpreted as int
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002433 in python-sure reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-sure/-/commit/61df547b0a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002433 [src:python-sure] python-sure: FTBFS: AssertionError: 'john'
should have 'john', but have not
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002433: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002433
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002321 [python3-sure] TypeError: 'bytes' object cannot be interpreted as
int
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002321: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002321 in python-sure reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-sure/-/commit/71d8fc4708
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1002199 https://github.com/DreamLab/memoize/issues/15
Bug #1002199 [src:python-memoize] python-memoize: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'h
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002412 [src:cinnamon] cinnamon: FTBFS: ../src/st/meson.build:204:0:
ERROR: "install_dir" must be specified when installing a target
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002412: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002412
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002412 in cinnamon reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/cinnamon-team/cinnamon/-/commit/6efa9b76ce2cf3e9049c4587
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1001527 + ftbfs
Bug #1001527 [src:vast] FTBFS with fmtlib 8
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001527
Debian Bug Tr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1002321 python3-sure
Bug #1002321 [src:python-httpretty] python-httpretty: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned
exit code 13
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-httpretty'
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:03:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#965746: fixed in newlib 3.3.0-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #965746,
regarding newlib: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:03:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002436: fixed in ros-geometry 1.13.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002436,
regarding ros-geometry: FTBFS: Summary: 141 tests, 3 errors, 0 failures, 0
skipped
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
I've just fixed that bug in NMU. Since I had no permissions to
push my commits to the Git repository I'm attaching the commits
I did locally as format-patch. Feel free to `git am` them.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
git_format-patch_commits.tar.gz
Description: applic
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:48:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002362: fixed in ros-geometry2 0.7.5-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002362,
regarding ros-geometry2: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose
-i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" --before-test
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:49:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002073: fixed in tryton-modules-country 6.0.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002073,
regarding src:tryton-modules-country: Tests fail with new iso-codes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:49:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002226: fixed in uwsgi-apparmor
0.0.0+git.2014.09.15.7d6d7bd7eb-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002226,
regarding uwsgi-apparmor: FTBFS: make[1]: pyversions: No such file or directory
to be marked as don
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002073 {Done: Mathias Behrle }
[src:tryton-modules-country] src:tryton-modules-country: Tests fail with new
iso-codes
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1002073 to the same tags previously set
--
1002073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002073 in tryton-modules-country reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/tryton-team/tryton-modules-country/-/commi
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:39:26 +
with message-id <61c2e43e65660_3e32ab9fe5765c444...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1002073 fixed in tryton-modules-country
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002073,
regarding src:tryton-modules-country: Tests fail with new iso-codes
to be marke
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002073 in tryton-modules-country reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/tryton-team/tryton-modules-country/-/commi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002073 {Done: Mathias Behrle }
[src:tryton-modules-country] src:tryton-modules-country: Tests fail with new
iso-codes
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Hi,
Le 22/12/2021 à 09:32, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> there is a new build error that is possibly caused by some change in the
> ocaml build system (since the source of the pplacer package did not
> changed):
>
>> + ocamlfind ocamlopt -c -annot -w Z -package batteries -package csv -package
>> xml
Just as a follow up:
I could imagine adopting the package (possibly within the VoIP team)
in case the maintainer is willing to part with it. I don't want to be
stepping on any toes, which is why I'm cautiously putting that option
on the table :)
Cheers
--
Evangelos
PGP: B938 6554 B7DD 266B CB8E
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 965829 patch
Bug #965829 [src:sofia-sip] sofia-sip: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5
and 6 in bookworm
Added tag(s) patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
965829: https://bugs.debian.org/
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Ocaml build error: expression was expected of type
Bug #1002230 [src:pplacer] pplacer: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: git: not found
Changed Bug title to 'Ocaml build error: expression was expected of type' from
'pplacer: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: git: not found'.
> tags -1
Control: retitle -1 Ocaml build error: expression was expected of type
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
there is a new build error that is possibly caused by some change in the
ocaml build system (since the source of the pplacer package did not
changed):
> + ocamlfind ocamlopt -c -annot -w Z -package b
Source: python-semver
Version: 2.10.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: sphinx-click
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-setuptools
Version: 44.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: shortuuid
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rul
Source: python-setuptools-rust
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian
Source: python-pycdlib
Version: 1.12.0+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ==
Source: solo-python
Version: 0.0.31-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: python-testtools
Version: 2.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: python-os-collect-config
Version: 12.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: python-pytest-xprocess
Version: 0.18.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1
Source: ros-geometry
Version: 1.13.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enterin
Source: sphinx-gallery
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-sure
Version: 1.2.5-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: sympy
Version: 1.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: python-zunclient
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> =
control: -1 tags patch
quit
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:35:35 + Niels Thykier
wrote:
> Source: sofia-sip
> Version: 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.1
> Severity: normal
> Usertags: compat-5-6-removal
>
> Hi,
>
> The package sofia-sip uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6,
> which is deprecated
Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:24:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#984389: fixed in vdr-plugin-mp3 0.10.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #984389,
regarding vdr-plugin-mp3: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1002241 fixed-in-experimental
Bug #1002241 [src:chatty] chatty: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd _build &&
LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 meson test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) fixed-in-experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Source: python-gear
Version: 0.5.8-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ==
forwarded 1002346 https://github.com/pytransitions/transitions/issues/559
tags 1001479 + confirmed upstream pending fixed-upstream
tags 1002346 + confirmed upstream pending fixed-upstream
thanks
This is a duplicate of #1001479, which I have forwarded upstream and
which was fixed there already, I'
Source: openems
Version: 0.0.35+git20190103.6a75e98+dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefull
Source: neutron-taas
Version: 7.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-escript
Version: 5.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: nova
Version: 2:24.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ==
Source: python-autobahn
Version: 17.10.1+dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1
Source: pikepdf
Version: 3.2.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: kicad
Version: 5.99.0+really5.1.12+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: python-dcos
Version: 0.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: montage-wrapper
Version: 0.9.9-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: mat2
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1002346 https://github.com/pytransitions/transitions/issues/559
Bug #1002346 [src:python-transitions] python-transitions: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned
exit code 13
S
Source: braceexpand
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: keystone
Version: 2:20.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ==
Source: brebis
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: cinnamon
Version: 5.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: gcovr
Version: 5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering director
Source: astroplan
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: backupchecker
Version: 1.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules buil
Source: certipy
Version: 0.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: ironic
Version: 1:18.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: cxxtest
Version: 4.4+git171022-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: khal
Version: 1:0.10.4~ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: dput-ng
Version: 1.33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directo
Source: umap-learn
Version: 0.4.5+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: germinate
Version: 2.37
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: openstructure
Version: 2.2.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enterin
101 - 200 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
