They won't crash, because the CPU features are tested before any call
to the optimized code is made.
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/blob/10.6/mysys/crc32/crc32c.cc#L542-L564
As the Debian CI undoubtedly runs the basic unit tests that cover
crc32 on the minimum hardware, and succeeds, it proves
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2022 06:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#984053: fixed in etl 1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #984053,
regarding synfigstudio: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2022 06:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#984053: fixed in etl 1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #984053,
regarding synfig: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2022 06:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#984053: fixed in etl 1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #984053,
regarding etl: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #984053 [src:etl] etl: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984355 [src:etl] synfig: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984357 [src:etl] synfigstudio: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
984053: https://bugs.debian.org/cg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #984053 in etl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/etl/-/commit/0ac78f830d9f19d89f597a9903e4a93d1
Control: tags -1 + patch pending
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 23:02:53 +0100 Sven Hartge wrote:
> The subject says it all: The package is missing the binary:
This is caused by the install target in debian/rules doing things
manually instead of leaving everything to dh_* scripts and
configuration files fo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch pending
Bug #1000229 [memlockd] binary package is missing /usr/sbin/memlockd
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1000229: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000229
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 22:47:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966647: fixed in libetpan 1.9.3-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #966647,
regarding libetpan: CVE-2020-15953
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Hi,
I had some time to work on this and worked around the test case that
was failing, since it was failing because it was assuming it was
running in a 64-bit environment.
I submitted my comments to upstream here
https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/8169#issuecomment-1059839906
I tested in a 32-bi
Source: cryfs
Version: 0.10.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Criti
Hi Lev,
On 04-03-2022 11:42, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse
build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with
removing the block. But I'm afraid (without checking from my side)
that the other package don't have
I noticed this bug while working on a derivative and decided to take a look.
Note though that I am NOT a ruby guy.
Upstream hasn't fixed the underlying issue, but has suggested it can be
worked around by reordering
requires/imports and has closed the bug.
I took upstreams suggestion and turned
Source: eye
Version: 19.0221.2026~ds-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on all
architectures but amd64. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it?
I copied some of
Source: python-anyio
Version: 3.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Hello, in Ubuntu (where internet is really disabled your package FTBFS.
Looks like some ipv6 translation is not really working, but what worries me
more is:
tests/test_sockets.py:1144: in test_getaddrinfo
correct = await getaddrinfo('f
Source: xmoto
Version: 0.6.1+repack-7
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
The superficial autopkgtest for xmoto seems to be failing intermittently,
especially on ppc64el (for whatever reason), which is likely to block
other p
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 18:02:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994451: fixed in golang-github-opencontainers-specs
1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994451,
regarding golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer
syscall
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 18:02:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994451: fixed in golang-github-containers-common
0.33.4+ds1-1+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994451,
regarding golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer
syscall used by st
Hi Stephen,
19.4 is out and I am preparing the release.
This might take some time because I left all my infrastructure in Kharkiv,
Ukraine
and relevant Debian RT ticket is not yet processed. Once I get access to
the beefy build machine I will upload everything.
--
Vasyl Gello
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:waylandpp 0.2.9-1
Bug #1006812 [kodi] kodi: Kodi Fails to Start
Bug reassigned from package 'kodi' to 'src:waylandpp'.
No longer marked as found in versions kodi/2:19.3+dfsg1-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1006812 to the same valu
Control: reassign -1 src:waylandpp 0.2.9-1
Control: affects -1 kodi
On 2022-03-05 11:50:48 -0500, SDA wrote:
> Package: kodi
> Version: 2:19.3+dfsg1-1+b1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> X-Debbugs-Cc: marathon.duran...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Since system
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 16:52:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1006667: fixed in python-biopython 1.79+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006667,
regarding python-biopython - build-dependencies unsatisfiable on most
architectures.
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: kodi
Version: 2:19.3+dfsg1-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: marathon.duran...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Since system update on Thursday or Friday. Starting from the command line
throughs this output:
failed to open zone.tab
/usr/lib/x86_64-lin
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 16:01:20 +0100
with message-id <83fa7e62ee5218107c3995016adb0...@phys.ethz.ch>
and subject line the bug is not valid anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006081,
regarding fonts-arapey: FTBFS: pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The
'unicodedata2>=14.0.0'
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 13:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991040: fixed in varnish 6.1.1-1+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #991040,
regarding varnish: CVE-2021-36740: VSV7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 13:47:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1004433: fixed in varnish 6.1.1-1+deb10u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004433,
regarding CVE-2022-23959: VSV8 Varnish HTTP/1 Request Smuggling
Vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 13:17:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1004433: fixed in varnish 6.5.1-1+deb11u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004433,
regarding CVE-2022-23959: VSV8 Varnish HTTP/1 Request Smuggling
Vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2022 13:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991040: fixed in varnish 6.5.1-1+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991040,
regarding varnish: CVE-2021-36740: VSV7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On 04/03/2022 13.15, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
This package has indeed been broken for a long time already. Upstream is
inactive since 2015 and I'm not willing to do all the fixes it would
need. Therefore I requested its removal from Debian archive.
Then we should probably get it removed from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1006763 + sid bookworm
Bug #1006763 [python-reportlab] python-reportlab: fails to build with python3.10
Added tag(s) sid and bookworm.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1006763: https://bugs.deb
30 matches
Mail list logo
