Bug#1009599: marked as done (node-meow: FTBFS: ReferenceError: t is not defined)

Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary > dh binary >dh_update_autotoo

Bug#1009551: marked as done (node-csstype: FTBFS: src/utils/logger.ts(6,53): error TS2339: Property 'magenta' does not exist on type 'typeof import("/usr/share/nodejs/chalk/source/index")'.)

Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: node-csstype Version: 3.0.11-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pa

Bug#1009596: marked as done (node-ts-jest: FTBFS: @babel/helper-get-function-arity is required by debian/nodejs/./extlinks but not available)

 --- Source: node-ts-jest Version: 27.1.4+~cs0.2.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Processed: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

Processing control commands: > reassign 1009385 libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 Bug #1009385 [src:dns-root-data] dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ Bug reassigned from package 'src:dns-root-data' to 'libldns3'. No longer marked as found in versions dns-root-data/2021011101. Ignoring request

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

--dkg On Tue 2022-04-12 20:38:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: dns-root-data > Version: 2021011101 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > Durin

Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".

I will check. The mRMR issue has been addressed. I will target a new release (and change the build system to cmake, as autotools will be deprecated next release). On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> checking for python scr

Processed: Bug#1009599 marked as pending in node-meow

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009599 [src:node-meow] node-meow: FTBFS: ReferenceError: t is not defined Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009599: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009599 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1009599: marked as pending in node-meow

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009599 in node-meow reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-meow/-/commit/40a1a8668d5b95551727f9e0a24e

Processed: Bug#1009551 marked as pending in node-csstype

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009551 [src:node-csstype] node-csstype: FTBFS: src/utils/logger.ts(6,53): error TS2339: Property 'magenta' does not exist on type 'typeof import("/usr/share/nodejs/chalk/source/index")'. Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009551: https://bugs.debian.o

Bug#1009551: marked as pending in node-csstype

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009551 in node-csstype reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-csstype/-/commit/40d7b8baebea33ef8c19eb

Processed: Bug#1009596 marked as pending in node-ts-jest

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009596 [src:node-ts-jest] node-ts-jest: FTBFS: @babel/helper-get-function-arity is required by debian/nodejs/./extlinks but not available Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009596: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009596 Debian Bug T

Bug#1009596: marked as pending in node-ts-jest

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009596 in node-ts-jest reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-ts-jest/-/commit/ba7da0b59f214683f9b04a

Processed: block 900928 with 970104 987324 974117

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 900928 with 970104 987324 974117 Bug #900928 [wnpp] ITP: fractal -- Matrix.org messaging app for GNOME written in Rust Bug #959100 [wnpp] ITP: fractal -- Matrix.org messaging app for GNOME written in Rust Bug #963588 [wnpp] ITP: fractal --

Bug#1009167: xz-utils: diff for NMU version 5.2.5-2.1

Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:37:32PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > >> I've prepared an NMU for xz-utils (versioned as 5.2.5-2.1) and > >> uploaded it to DELAYE

Bug#1009550: marked as done (node-stable: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:8: override_dh_auto_build] Error 243)

Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary > dh binary --with

Bug#1009167: xz-utils: diff for NMU version 5.2.5-2.1

Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> I've prepared an NMU for xz-utils (versioned as 5.2.5-2.1) and >> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I >> should delay it longer. > > I noted that the last up

Bug#1009426: xkcdpass: FTBFS: test case raises “TypeError: … missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'”

Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/redacted/XKCD-password-generator/issues/138 Control: retitle -1 xkcdpass: FTBFS: test case raises “TypeError: … missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'” Control: summary -1 0 The upstream test suite has a buggy

Processed: Re: Bug#1009426: xkcdpass: FTBFS: test case raises “TypeError: … missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'”

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed upstream Bug #1009426 [src:xkcdpass] xkcdpass: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.10 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://github.com/redacted/XKCD-password-generator/iss

Bug#1009479: marked as done (mkvtoolnix: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting)

Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > rake install DESTDIR=/<

Bug#1009394: marked as done (volk: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting)

: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' > make[2]: Nothing to b

Processed: tagging 1009432

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1009432 + pending Bug #1009432 [src:unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: FTBFS: Config value: 'pages'. Error: The configuration option 'pages' was removed from MkDocs. Use 'nav' instead. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing h

Bug#1009322: marked as done (reportbug-gtk: sending bugreport via Debian mail fails)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:15:13 +0200 with message-id <1e456f02-ec97-f227-9513-1d5a89d86...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1009322: reportbug-gtk: sending bugreport via Debian mail fails has caused the Debian Bug report #1009322, regarding reportbug-gtk: sending bugreport via D

Bug#1005912: marked as done (hydrogen: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el: H2Core::Instrument::dequeue(): Assertion `__queued > 0' failed.)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005912: fixed in hydrogen 1.1.1+52.gb917e057-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005912, regarding hydrogen: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el: H2Core::Instrument::dequeue(): Assertion `__queued >

Bug#1005912: hydrogen: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el: H2Core::Instrument::dequeue(): Assertion `__queued > 0' failed.

Hi Paul, Thank you once again for taking the time to reply :-) Paul Gevers writes: > On 02-04-2022 00:13, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >>> On 24-02-2022 06:13, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: [snip] >> It's been a few months since I contacted the CI Team about >> isolation-machines, but they're not yet r

Bug#1009097: meson: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.10: MesonVersionMismatchException.__init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'current_version'

Hi Jussi (2022.04.09_07:18:01_-0400) > This is due to we having to poke distutils internals because Debian > patched distutils to produce different results for install directories > than sysconfig (the latter was incorrect). Is there now a guarantee > that starting with 3.10 sysconfig points to the

Bug#1009417: saga: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot import Python module "distutils".

On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: checking for python script directory (pythondir)... ${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)... ${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin

Bug#1009383: gromacs: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable'

tags 1009383 + pending thanks Fix pending in git, which is (preferably) waiting on upload until votca finally clears NEW -- Nicholas Breen nbr...@debian.org

Processed: Re: gromacs: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable'

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1009383 + pending Bug #1009383 [src:gromacs] gromacs: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Iterable' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1009383: ht

Bug#1009374: podman: fails to install: unable to open '/usr/lib/systemd/user/podman.socket.dpkg-new': No such file or directory

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 02:33:50PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Package: podman > Version: 4.0.1+ds1-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to install > > I wanted to try podman 4.0 from experimental, but I can't install it: > This is on a testing machine, with unstable and experimental

Processed: Bug#1009374 marked as pending in libpod

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1009374 [podman] podman: fails to install: unable to open '/usr/lib/systemd/user/podman.socket.dpkg-new': No such file or directory Bug #1006882 [podman] podman fails to install - unable to open podman.socket.dpkg-new Added tag(s) pending. Added

Bug#1009374: marked as pending in libpod

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009374 in libpod reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libpod/-/commit/699e6f68cd633dd6f19c0e04e037608856b

Bug#1009438: marked as done (mapnik: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections' (/usr/lib/python3.10/collections/__init__.py))

ms --- Begin Message --- Source: mapnik Version: 3.1.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#1009359: New security upgrade prevent Chromium from starting

On 4/12/22 08:02, Anthony Callegaro wrote: Hi guys, I tried a few additional things to try to sort it out : - downgraded to my latest upgrade date : cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/snapshot.list deb [check-valid-until=no] http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-security/20220404T151623Z/ sta

Bug#1009442: marked as done (mozjs78: FTBFS with python3.10 as default: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Sequence')

8 Version: 78.15.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory 

Processed: ruby-i18n breaks ruby-i18n-inflector autopkgtest: cannot load such file -- i18n/core_ext/hash

Processing control commands: > found -1 ruby-i18n/1.10.0-1 Bug #1009612 [src:ruby-i18n, src:ruby-i18n-inflector] ruby-i18n breaks ruby-i18n-inflector autopkgtest: cannot load such file -- i18n/core_ext/hash Marked as found in versions ruby-i18n/1.10.0-1. > found -1 ruby-i18n-inflector/2.6.7-1 Bug

Bug#1009612: ruby-i18n breaks ruby-i18n-inflector autopkgtest: cannot load such file -- i18n/core_ext/hash

Source: ruby-i18n, ruby-i18n-inflector Control: found -1 ruby-i18n/1.10.0-1 Control: found -1 ruby-i18n-inflector/2.6.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of ruby-i18n the autopkgtest of r

Bug#1009438: mapnik: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections' (/usr/lib/python3.10/collections/__init__.py)

Control: tags -1 pending On 4/12/22 20:17, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections' (/usr/lib/python3.10/collections/__init__.py) This was fixed in git some time ago. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41

Processed: Re: Bug#1009438: mapnik: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections' (/usr/lib/python3.10/collections/__init__.py)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #1009438 [src:mapnik] mapnik: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections' (/usr/lib/python3.10/collections/__init__.py) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1009438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009438 Debian

Bug#1009427: zchunk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test returned exit code 4

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 09:18:34PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 12.04.22 um 21:04 schrieb Peter Pentchev: > > Thanks for filing this. I fixed it yesterday in the salsa Git repo for > > zchunk packaging: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/zchunk/-/commit/79c480ffa9df4305c

Bug#1009610: node-querystring: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (89.09%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-querystring Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009607: node-readable-stream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (94.31%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-readable-stream Version: 3.6.0+~cs3.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009606: node-browserify-aes: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (97.19%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-browserify-aes Version: 1.2.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009605: node-browser-pack: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (94.36%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-browser-pack Version: 6.1.0+ds+~6.1.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009604: node-ieee754: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (77.96%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-ieee754 Version: 1.2.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009603: node-ripemd160: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for branches (91.66%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-ripemd160 Version: 2.0.2-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009602: node-optimist: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (77.24%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-optimist Version: 0.6.1+~0.0.30-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009601: node-serve-static: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-serve-static Version: 1.14.2+~1.13.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009600: node-safe-buffer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd ./safer-buffer && sh -ex ../debian/nodejs/safer-buffer/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-safe-buffer Version: 5.2.1+~cs2.1.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009599: node-meow: FTBFS: ReferenceError: t is not defined

Source: node-meow Version: 8.0.0+~cs3.21.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009598: node-katex: FTBFS: TypeError: this.getOptions is not a function

Source: node-katex Version: 0.13.11+~cs6.0.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009597: node-recast: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-recast Version: 0.21.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1009596: node-ts-jest: FTBFS: @babel/helper-get-function-arity is required by debian/nodejs/./extlinks but not available

Source: node-ts-jest Version: 27.1.4+~cs0.2.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009595: node-buffer-shims: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-buffer-shims Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009594: node-syntax-error: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (89.65%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-syntax-error Version: 1.4.0+~1.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009593: node-debbundle-es-to-primitive: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd ./node-is-callable && sh -ex ../debian/nodejs/node-is-callable/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-debbundle-es-to-primitive Version: 1.2.1+~cs9.7.15-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#1009592: node-process-nextick-args: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (10%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-process-nextick-args Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009591: node-output-file-sync: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-output-file-sync Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009590: node-npm-bundled: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (85.45%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-npm-bundled Version: 1.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009589: node-brfs: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (36.84%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-brfs Version: 2.0.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009588: node-config-chain: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-config-chain Version: 1.1.12-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009587: node-tape: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (48.12%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-tape Version: 5.5.2+~cs8.20.16-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009586: node-trysound-sax: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (79.38%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-trysound-sax Version: 0.2.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009585: node-fd-slicer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 3

Source: node-fd-slicer Version: 1.1.0+repack1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009584: node-extend: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-extend Version: 3.0.2+~3.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009583: node-difflet: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (74.82%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-difflet Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009582: node-follow-redirects: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-follow-redirects Version: 1.14.9+~1.14.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009581: node-zrender: FTBFS: @rollup/plugin-typescript TS2322: Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'GlobalCompositeOperation'.

Source: node-zrender Version: 5.3.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009580: node-inline-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.18%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-inline-source-map Version: 0.6.2~git-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009579: node-qs: FTBFS: Error: module util in /<>/node_modules/object-inspect not found

Source: node-qs Version: 6.10.3+ds+~6.9.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1009578: node-uvu: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-uvu Version: 0.5.3+~cs4.10.3-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1009577: node-browser-unpack: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (80.32%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-browser-unpack Version: 1.4.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009576: node-chownr: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-chownr Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009575: node-configstore: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-configstore Version: 6.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1009574: node-transformers: FTBFS: TypeError: Cannot read property 'indexOf' of null

Source: node-transformers Version: 3.1.0+~1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009573: node-performance-now: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 77

Source: node-performance-now Version: 2.1.0+debian-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009572: node-cache-loader: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-cache-loader Version: 4.1.0+~cs2.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009571: node-call-limit: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (83.58%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-call-limit Version: 1.1.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009570: node-dashdash: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (81.9%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-dashdash Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009569: node-stack-utils: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (84.61%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-stack-utils Version: 2.0.5+~2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009568: node-proper-lockfile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-proper-lockfile Version: 4.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009567: node-aproba: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-aproba Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009566: node-findit2: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (87.2%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-findit2 Version: 2.2.3-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009565: node-module-deps: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (86.71%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-module-deps Version: 6.2.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1009564: node-stream-splicer: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (92.36%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-stream-splicer Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009563: node-mkdirp: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (83.92%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-mkdirp Version: 1.0.4+~1.0.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009562: node-fs.realpath: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (21.46%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-fs.realpath Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009561: node-parse-base64vlq-mappings: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (79.31%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-parse-base64vlq-mappings Version: 0.1.4-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009560: node-mute-stream: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (75.36%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-mute-stream Version: 0.0.8+~0.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009559: node-falafel: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.11%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-falafel Version: 2.2.4-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009558: node-convert-source-map: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (98.55%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-convert-source-map Version: 1.8.0+~1.5.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009557: node-lynx: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (86.25%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-lynx Version: 0.2.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009556: node-invariant: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (81.25%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-invariant Version: 2.2.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009554: node-json-parse-better-errors: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-json-parse-better-errors Version: 1.0.2+~cs3.3.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#1009555: node-ini: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (88.98%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-ini Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bin

Bug#1009553: node-isexe: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-isexe Version: 2.0.0+~2.0.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009552: node-asn1: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-asn1 Version: 0.2.6+~0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1009551: node-csstype: FTBFS: src/utils/logger.ts(6,53): error TS2339: Property 'magenta' does not exist on type 'typeof import("/usr/share/nodejs/chalk/source/index")'.

Source: node-csstype Version: 3.0.11-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1009550: node-stable: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:8: override_dh_auto_build] Error 243

Source: node-stable Version: 0.1.8-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1009548: node-are-we-there-yet: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1

Source: node-are-we-there-yet Version: 3.0.0+~1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1009547: node-stream-browserify: FTBFS: ERROR: Coverage for statements (24.07%) does not meet global threshold (100%)

Source: node-stream-browserify Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

  1   2   3   >