Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.8.1-1
Severity: critical
When upgrading libx11 from 2:1.7.5-1 to 2:1.8.1-1 X will fail in a very
strange way immediately when a modal dialog starts (like pinentry).
I use fvwm and have focus follow mouse. When pinentry starts, the focus
still stays on the window
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 03:49:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013363: fixed in glyphslib 6.0.6+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013363,
regarding fonttools breaks glyphslib autopkgtest: AssertionError: *.designspace
file is different from expected
to be marked
Source: ncbi-igblast
Version: 1.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: uploaders
ncbi-igblast 1.18.0-1 introduced an invalid Uploaders field, that is
missing a comma between David Miguel Susano Pinto and Steffen Moeller.
$ apt-cache showsrc ncbi-igblast | grep -E '^$|^Version|^Uploaders'
I managed to get 2.1.15 from the package working for now for putting
int(round()) around numbers in preferences.py and deckconf.py when they
were returning the unexpected float type error. For some reason, even
though it says the package is removed from testing, I am still able to
install the
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:38:21 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013457,
regarding haskell-network-uri: FTBFS with ghc 9.0.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1016210 serious
Bug #1016210 [qtcreator] qtcreator: segmentation error
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1016210:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1016351 [src:dovecot] dovecot: CVE-2022-30550
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1016351: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Aloïs,
On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 13:47 +0200, Aloïs Micard wrote:
> > I've been unable to reproduce this locally, but have also seen
> > instances in the past where the buildds have difficulty running
> tests
> > that utilize IPv6.
> >
> > Maybe there's no "ip6-localhost" defined in
Control: tags -1 + pending
The fix targeting sid is pending review on salsa.
My inclination is that this won't need a DSA and can wait for a bullseye point
release, but I'm open to other opinions.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Package: golang-github-pion-turn.v2
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: Serious
The package fails tests (see log of failing test below) when run on a
machine with limited network (in this case: Can only reach the
relevant APT repository server). This is a policy violation, which
says that package tests
package: unpaper
Version: 6.1-2
Severity: serious
Build log excerpt below. There is a new upstream version, but I'm not
sure if that builds cleanly against the new ffmpeg.
ffmpeg version: 7:5.0.1-3 (lbavformat-dev and friends)
dpkg-buildpackage
-
Command: dpkg-buildpackage
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran/issues/2011
Bug #1016155 [src:pythran] pythran: autopkgtest needs update for gcc-12 as
default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran/issues/2011'.
--
1016155:
Source: pythran
Followup-For: Bug #1016155
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran/issues/2011
ACK. Forwarded upstream.
Trying to inspect manually by running
pytest-3 -v test_rosetta.py
I get a different error equivalent to:
$ x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 21:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016313: fixed in liblexical-accessor-perl 0.014-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016313,
regarding liblexical-accessor-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test
TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1016230 + pending
Bug #1016230 [src:auctex] auctex: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `hypdoc.sty' not
found.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1016230:
tags 1016230 + pending
thanks.
> LN == Lucas Nussbaum [2022-7-29]
[...]
LN> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
LN> on amd64.
Thanks for the report. It should be fixed by adding a
Build-Depends-Indep on texlive-latex-extra. I'll test and upload a
fixed
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Re: Lucas Nussbaum
> Source: thrift
> Version: 0.16.0-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #1015049 [src:thrift] thrift: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j1 check
"TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j1 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
1015049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015049
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 21:19:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1015155: fixed in neatvnc 0.5.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015155,
regarding neatvnc: copyright Joseph Werle for murmurhash missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1016295 + confirmed
Bug #1016295 [src:libconfig-model-openssh-perl] libconfig-model-openssh-perl:
FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit
code 255
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Source: dovecot
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for dovecot.
CVE-2022-30550[0]:
| An issue was discovered in the auth component in Dovecot 2.2 and 2.3
| before 2.3.20. When two passdb configuration entries exist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1016329 libreoffice: FTBFS: dwz:
> debian/libreoffice-core/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libskialo.so: Unknown
> debugging section .debug_addr (when built with clang 14)
Bug #1016329 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice]
libreoffice:
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:35:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016246: fixed in open-iscsi 2.1.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016246,
regarding open-iscsi: FTBFS: auth.c:112:34: error: the comparison will always
evaluate as ‘false’ for the address of
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:35:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#965920: fixed in zemberek 2.1.1-8.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #965920,
regarding zemberek: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:21:42 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014013,
regarding haskell-th-lift-instances FTBFS: error: Couldn't match type
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1016246 + pending
Bug #1016246 [src:open-iscsi] open-iscsi: FTBFS: auth.c:112:34: error: the
comparison will always evaluate as ‘false’ for the address of ‘username_in’
will never be NULL [-Werror=address]
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Source: fonttools
Version: 4.32.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.34.4-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1013363
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Processing control commands:
> close -1 4.34.4-1
Bug #1016348 [src:fonttools] src:fonttools: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: autopkgtest regression
Marked as fixed in versions fonttools/4.34.4-1.
Bug #1016348 [src:fonttools] src:fonttools: fails to migrate to testing for too
long:
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 15:53:44 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011860,
regarding haskell-gio: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:mesa 22.1.3-1
Bug #1016307 [src:gtk4] gtk4: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:264:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gtk4' to 'src:mesa'.
No longer marked as found in versions gtk4/4.6.6+ds-1.
Ignoring request to alter
Control: reassign -1 src:mesa 22.1.3-1
Control: affects -1 + src:gtk4
Control: forcemerge 1015039 -1
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 20:21:09 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
> > ▶ 11/681
> >
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:48:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938492: fixed in six 1.16.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #938492,
regarding six: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016301: fixed in reprotest 0.7.21
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016301,
regarding reprotest: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:35:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1011910: fixed in haskell-warp 3.3.21-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011910,
regarding haskell-warp: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 15:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015777,
regarding haskell-shake FTBFS: error: Ambiguous occurrence ‘readFile'’
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #938492 in six reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #938492 [src:six] six: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #938492 to the same tags previously set
--
938492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #938492 [src:six] six: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #938492 to the same tags previously set
--
938492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #938492 in six reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 20:57:56 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1016329: libreoffice: FTBFS: dwz:
debian/libreoffice-core/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libskialo.so: Unknown
debugging section .debug_addr
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016329,
regarding libreoffice:
Le ven. 29 juil. 2022 à 20:27, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: nodejs
> Version: 18.6.0+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:48:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016275: fixed in ccls 0.20220729-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016275,
regarding ccls: FTBFS with llvm-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Source: siscone
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: pycorrfit
Version: 1.1.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: stealth
Version: 4.03.01-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: pgloader
Version: 3.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: pyscanfcs
Version: 0.3.6+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libncursesada
Version: 6.3.20211021-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: openssh
Version: 1:9.0p1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-promise
Version: 8.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-fra-frp
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: libgnatcoll-bindings
Version: 22.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-mlt-ara
Version: 0.2.0~r62623-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: dvdisaster
Version: 0.79.5-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: gap
Version: 4.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: muse-el
Version: 3.20+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: gdcm
Version: 3.0.13-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: generate-ninja
Version: 0.0~git20220314.bd99dbf-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.3.5~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: mandelbulber2
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-oci-fra
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: node-bluebird
Version: 3.7.2+dfsg1+~3.5.36-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-jest
Version: 28.1.3~ds+~cs70.48.28-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-undici
Version: 5.8.0+dfsg1+~cs18.9.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gnuplot
Version: 5.4.2+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: cctbx
Version: 2021.12+ds1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: boost1.74
Version: 1.74.0-16.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> xslt-xsltproc
Source: apertium-crh-tur
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: libtexttools
Version: 2.1.0-21
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: apertium-cy-en
Version: 0.1.1~r57554-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:34:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016076: fixed in haskell-genvalidity-property 1.0.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016076,
regarding haskell-genvalidity-property FTBFS: unknown RTS option: -N
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1016290 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18912
Bug #1016290 [openssl] openssl: EC code appears to be broken on s390x
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18912'.
>
End of message, stopping
Source: twisted
Version: 22.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: asn1c
Version: 0.9.28+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> PASS:
Source: liblexical-accessor-perl
Version: 0.013-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-espree
Version: 9.3.1~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> not ok 691
Source: raft
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: riseup-vpn
Version: 0.21.11+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: node-astw
Version: 2.2.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.17.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering
Source: gtk4
Version: 4.6.6+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: nodejs
Version: 18.6.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> not ok 1778
Source: ruby-text-format
Version: 1.0.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyraf
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: coq-hierarchy-builder
Version: 1.2.1-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: stompserver
Version: 0.9.9gem-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: reprotest
Version: 0.7.20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-immutable-tuple
Version: 0.4.10-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mkautodoc
Version: 0.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: clapper
Version: 0.5.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libstatgen
Version: 1.0.15-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: flint
Version: 2.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: libconfig-model-openssh-perl
Version: 2.9.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: pocl
Version: 3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Processing control commands:
> forward -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18912
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> affects -1 libnet-dns-sec-perl
Bug #1016290 [openssl] openssl: EC code appears to be broken on s390x
Added indication that 1016290 affects
Package: openssl
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: forward -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18912
Control: affects -1 libnet-dns-sec-perl
It appears the EC code is broken for ed25519/ed448 on s390x.
Sebastian
Source: spoa
Version: 4.0.7+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-metaid
Version: 1.0-8.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: python-inotify
Version: 0.2.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 14:03:44 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011915,
regarding haskell-pango: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means that you
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
