Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1012987 https://github.com/podofo/podofo/pull/5
Bug #1012987 [src:libpodofo] libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/podofo/podofo/pull/5'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1014135 +bookworm
Bug #1014135 [src:gjiten] src:gjiten: invalid maintainer address
Added tag(s) bookworm.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014135: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2022 00:19:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016345: fixed in stealth 4.03.01-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016345,
regarding stealth: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:34:
override_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 21:49:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016821: fixed in libspf2 1.2.10-7.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016821,
regarding libspf2: FTBFS with glibc 2.34
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1014735 src:glibc
Bug #1014735 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [rpcsvc-proto]
rpcsvc-proto: The /usr/include/rpc/* files is not included
Bug reassigned from package 'rpcsvc-proto' to 'src:glibc'.
No longer marked as found in versions rpcsvc-prot
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it
> > built there successfully in the past.
>
> I just checked to see if there would be a c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # same version in found and fixed
> notfound 1006094 1.100263+20170512-2
Bug #1006094 {Done: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" }
[src:fonts-roboto-slab] fonts-roboto-slab: FTBFS:
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'unicodedata2>=14.0.0' distribution w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # with the same version in found and fixed
> notfound 1011793 0.18.0~b1-1
Bug #1011793 {Done: Timo Röhling } [src:python-ecdsa]
python-ecdsa: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i
python{version} -p "3.9 3.10" returned exit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1013218 rails
Bug #1013218 {Done: Pirate Praveen } [ruby-sprockets]
rails: ftbfs SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'export'
Bug reassigned from package 'ruby-sprockets' to 'rails'.
No longer marked as found in versions ruby-sprockets/3.7.2-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1011768 ecmwflibs
Bug #1011768 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [src:cfgrib]
cfgrib: FTBFS: ERROR tests/test_50_xarray_getitem.py - RuntimeError: Cannot
find the ecCodes...
Bug reassigned from package 'src:cfgrib' to 'ecmwflibs'.
No longer m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1011719 ecmwflibs
Bug #1011719 {Done: Alastair McKinstry }
[src:eccodes-python] satpy: FTBFS: E RuntimeError: Cannot find the
ecCodes library
Bug reassigned from package 'src:eccodes-python' to 'ecmwflibs'.
No longer marked as fou
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 929685 ca-certificates-java 20190405
Bug #929685 {Done: Matthias Klose }
[ca-certificates-java,default-jre-headless,openjdk-11-jre-headless]
ca-certificates-java,default-jre-headless,openjdk-11-jre-headless: get rid of
the circular dep
Package: libpmix2
Version: 4.2.0~rc1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
The upload of pmix version 4.2.0~rc1-1 introduced a dangling symlink,
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpmix.so.2 points to
pmix2/lib/libpmix.so.2.5.2 which doesn't exist anymore as it has been
renam
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:04:07 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
bctoolbox (5.0.37-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Cherry-pick upstream patch e142436 (Closes: #1012900)
Can we have this fix in unstable too please? bctoolbox is a key package.
Please fix RC bugs in unstable/bookworm
Source: vkd3d
Version: 1.2-13
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs
Dear maintainer,
Your package currently doesn't get build on ppc64el because it
build-depends on the to-be-build version of libvkd3d-headers, but the
version available on ppc64el is the previously built version.
Your trick seem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1014785 1.15.4+dfsg1-1
Bug #1014785 {Done: Bastien Roucariès } [src:dojo] dojo:
CVE-2021-23450
Marked as found in versions dojo/1.15.4+dfsg1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014785: https
Hi,
On 13-08-2022 21:34, Marc Haber wrote:
running atop from unstable also hangs:
root@elbrus:~# atop
^C
on zelenka, running the atop binary just works fine. Installing atop
2.7.1-2 in a DD chroot on zelenka also works fine, and the binary is ok
as well. However, the chroots dont start the ser
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Your package failed to build from
source on arm64 and armhf while it built there successfully in the past.
I just checked to see if there would be a commit upstream to fix the
FTBFS, but it seems that upstream is active and is at relea
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1013939 {Done: Alastair McKinstry }
[src:python-xarray] python-xarray: autopkgtest regression: Left and right
DataArray objects are not close
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared,
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:33:53 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
python-xarray (2022.06.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Depend on scipy >= 1.8.1-8 for fixes. Closes: #1004869, #1013939
But the log [1] that was generated by the migration trial run has the
output be
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:02:36PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 12-08-2022 12:23, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > > I tried the (dead simple)d autopkgtest on the s390s and arm64
> > > > porterbo
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1012774 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:git] src:git: fails
to migrate to testing for too long: piuparts reports issue
Bug 1012774 cloned as bug 1017104
> retitle -2 during removal fails to remove /var/log/git-daemon
Bug #1017104 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 during removal fails to remove /var/log/git-daemon
Control: notfound -2 1:2.35.1-1
Control: reopen -2
Control: found -2 1:2.36.1-1
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:22:09 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The excuses pages tells us that
piuparts is reporting an issue w
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:00:39 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: gcc-11-cross-ports
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Ping. gcc-11-cross-ports hasn't built since 1 February 2022.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending patch
Bug #1010814 [src:faketime] src:faketime: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1010814: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tag -1 pending patch
Hi,
I have submitted a MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/faketime/-/merge_requests/2
I'll upload that fix shortly to DELAYED/2. Please let me know if I
should cancel or delay longer.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1016453 src:python-bonsai 1.3.0+ds-3
Bug #1016453 {Done: Robin Jarry } [src:python-tornado,
src:python-bonsai] python-tornado breaks python-bonsai autopkgtest:
'TornadoLDAPConnectionTest' object has no attribute 'should_close_asyncio_lo
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 20:27:59 +0200
with message-id <166041527912.5261.6325723291520590...@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1011783: pandoc: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011783,
regard
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:17:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016449: fixed in samba 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016449,
regarding samba: CVE-2022-2031 CVE-2022-32742 CVE-2022-32744 CVE-2022-32745
CVE-2022-32746
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1015873: fixed in libtirpc 1.3.1-1+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015873,
regarding libtirpc: CVE-2021-46828
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:18:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010355: fixed in unzip 6.0-26+deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010355,
regarding unzip: CVE-2022-0529 CVE-2022-0530
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:10:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013493,
regarding python-django-jsonfield: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name
'ugettext_lazy' from 'django.utils.translation'
(
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:06:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016665: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967915,
regarding Depends on geda-gaf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:07:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008700: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #966736,
regarding geda-gaf: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:07:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008700: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936593,
regarding geda-gaf: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:07:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008700: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #885195,
regarding geda-gaf: please upload latest version which uses guile-2.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:04:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016664: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967916,
regarding Depends on geda-gaf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:03:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#101: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012951,
regarding iotjs: ftbfs with GCC-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:03:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#101: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011124,
regarding iotjs: is this package maintained?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1014135 2.6-3.1
Bug #1014135 [src:gjiten] src:gjiten: invalid maintainer address
Marked as found in versions gjiten/2.6-3.1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014135: https://bugs.deb
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:59:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016712: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016550,
regarding gfbgraph: unmaintained, depends on old libsoup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
On 2022-08-02 13:46:44, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Antoine Beaupre :
>> After a somewhat long period of uncertainty, Charybdis has been
>> finally abandoned upstream. The official git repository here:
>>
>> https://github.com/charybdis-ircd/charybdis
>>
>> .. is marked as "archived by the owne
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:53:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016909: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016743,
regarding zalign: autopkgtest failure on 32 bit architectures: Segmentation
fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:54:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016899: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016241,
regarding xprobe: FTBFS: tcp.cc:31:15: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this
scope
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:48:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016964: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999277,
regarding hawknl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:48:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016964: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965579,
regarding hawknl: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:46:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016984: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936812,
regarding ladish: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:47:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016983: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #946228,
regarding FTBFS with CGAL 5.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:47:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016983: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936777,
regarding k3d: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#985173: fixed in pacemaker 2.0.1-5+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #985173,
regarding pacemaker-resource-agents: missing Breaks+Replaces: pacemaker (<< 2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002687: fixed in gif2apng 1.9+srconly-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002687,
regarding gif2apng: CVE-2021-45911: Heap based buffer overflow in processing of
delays in the main function
to be mar
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002667: fixed in gif2apng 1.9+srconly-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002667,
regarding gif2apng: CVE-2021-45910: Heap based buffer overflow in the main
function
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002668: fixed in gif2apng 1.9+srconly-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002668,
regarding gif2apng: CVE-2021-45909: Heap based buffer overflow in the DecodeLZW
function
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:18:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016453: fixed in python-bonsai 1.3.0+ds-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016453,
regarding python-tornado breaks python-bonsai autopkgtest:
'TornadoLDAPConnectionTest' object has no attribute 'should_clos
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:05:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014785: fixed in dojo 1.17.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014785,
regarding dojo: CVE-2021-23450
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:34:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016898: fixed in dolfin
2019.2.0~git20220407.d29e24d-5+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016898,
regarding dolfin needs a rebuild against glibc 2.34
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:36:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016560: fixed in scalpel 1.60-9+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016560,
regarding glibc 2.34 breaks scalpel autopkgtest on amd64: bash: line 1: 1961
Segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 13:34:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979095: fixed in multipath-tools 0.9.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #979095,
regarding Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1014254 [lintian] lintian: Complex regular subexpression recursion limit
(65534) exceeded at /usr/share/lintian/lib/Lintian/Check/Cruft.pm line 449.
Bug #993613 [lintian] lintian: Complex regular subexpression recursion limit
exceeded in cr
Package: meson
Version: 0.63.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: jpakk...@gmail.com
Hi,
On building any d-lang package (which uses ldc in build) with new meson, it
goes FTBFS with errors similar to the one pasted below.
This was working fine just minutes before (with meson 0.63.0)
Tried with pac
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016974: fixed in sofia-sip
1.12.11+20110422.1+1e14eea~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016974,
regarding sofia-sip: CVE-2022-31001 CVE-2022-31002 CVE-2022-31003
to be marked as done.
This means that
control -1 tags patch
Hi,
I'm not quite sure which is the preferred form to supply a patch,
so I'll attach a `git format-patch` based on my `wip/cve` branch on salsa [0].
If for further discussions should be needed before this can be uploaded
or the patch in a different form is preffered, pleas
Source: bibledit
Version: 5.0.983-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs security
Justification: DFSG #2
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team ,
debian...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Your package includes some files that seem to lack sources
in preferred forms of modification:
# Several m
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 11:03:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1012914: fixed in dub 1.27.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012914,
regarding dub: ftbfs with GCC-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Well,
Am 13.08.22 um 10:56 schrieb Bastian Blank:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
| Action: failed
| Final-Recipient: rfc822;c.schoen...@t-online.de
| Status: 5.0.0
| Remote-MTA: dns; mx02.t-online.de
| Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 IP=194.177.211.212 - A problem
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:19:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014417: fixed in meson 0.63.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014417,
regarding meson: test changes causes FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:19:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1015132: fixed in meson 0.63.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015132,
regarding meson: FTBFS: test_junit_valid_gtest: Element 'testcase', attribute
'file': The attribute 'file' is not allowed
to be marke
Complementing my message below, the unit test in inst/VideWriter.m passed
successfully when the sources were compiled against ffmpeg 4, for
instance in this build:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-video&arch=amd64&ver=2.0.2-1%2Bb2&stamp=1650535691&raw=0
* Rafael Laboissièr
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > | Action: failed
> > | Final-Recipient: rfc822;c.schoen...@t-online.de
> > | Status: 5.0.0
> > | Remote-MTA: dns; mx02.t-online.de
> > | Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 IP=194.177.211.212 - A problem occurred. (Ask
> > your postmast
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:41:09 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1016668: kicad-packages3d - Unreachable maintainer
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016668,
regarding kicad-packages3d - Unreachable maintainer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
* William 'jawn-smith' Wilson [2022-08-02 17:35]:
Package: octave-video
Followup-For: Bug #1004770
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
The first patch I submitted was a bit messy and failed to build
with old
On 8/13/22 13:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
The drawback of this solution is that we will not get any warning for
new *potentially more important* issues since all test failures will be
ignored now. For me this is outweighted by the advantage that we can
present upstream a full log of all issues in c
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:23:37 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1016195:
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016195,
regarding podman: fails to run any container
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Hi again,
Am Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:25:42PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Am Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:09:26AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Before we fall into another "do nothing" period: I will upload
> scikit-learn restricted to those architectures only which have all tests
> passing and wil
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 07:34:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1012974: fixed in libcrypto++ 8.7.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012974,
regarding libcrypto++: ftbfs with GCC-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 07:04:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017059: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #985891,
regarding dicompyler doesn't start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:59:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#575848: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999276,
regarding dh-kpatches: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:59:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#575848: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #876892,
regarding dh-kpatches FTBFS with gtk-doc-tools 1.26: docbook-2-html: unknown
style `gtk'
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:59:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#575848: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #809599,
regarding dh-kpatches: Please change dependency from obsolete openjade1.3 to
openjade
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:59:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#575848: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #359095,
regarding dh-kpatches: bugs in apply perl script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:57:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#876908: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965438,
regarding blcr: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:57:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#876908: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #877238,
regarding blcr: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to
debian/blcr-source/usr/src/modules/blcr
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:57:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#876908: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #876908,
regarding RM: blcr -- RoQA; unmaintained; broken for several releases
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2022 06:57:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#876908: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #776920,
regarding blcr-dkms: fails to build kernel module for 3.16.0-4-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
84 matches
Mail list logo