Processed: Re: dwz: fails while building assaultcube

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27375 Bug #1016936 [dwz] dwz: Unknown debugging section .debug_addr causes some builds to fail Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27375'. -- 1016936:

Bug#1016936: dwz: fails while building assaultcube

2022-09-08 Thread Ben Westover
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27375 OK, so it turns out this error is due to Clang's adoption of DWARFv5 [1] which dwz doesn't fully support yet [2]. Until that is fixed, the issue can be worked around by using DWARFv4 by adding `-gdwarf-4` to flags. --

Bug#984256: marked as done (nextepc: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:24:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984256: fixed in nextepc 0.3.10+nods-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #984256, regarding nextepc: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1007962: sslsplit NMU: Bug #1007962: sslsplit FTBFS when only loopback interface is configured

2022-09-08 Thread Hilko Bengen
* Timo Lindfors: > I hope it is ok to NMU this to get sslsplit back to Debian. If not, > please let me know! I'll wait wait for 10 days in case there are > comments from you, others in Debian or upstream. I also hope it is ok > to push these patches to salsa after the package has been uploaded.

Bug#1016506: marked as done (libghc-shake-{doc,dev,data}: all ship /usr/lib/haskell-packages/extra-packages/shake-0.19.6)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 21:50:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1016506: fixed in haskell-shake 0.19.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1016506, regarding libghc-shake-{doc,dev,data}: all ship /usr/lib/haskell-packages/extra-packages/shake-0.19.6 to be marked as done.

Processed: forcibly merging 1017425 1019399

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1017425 1019399 Bug #1017425 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux] [i386] Unconditional LFENCE instructions in FILL_RETURN_BUFFER Bug #1017494 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux] [i386] Unconditional LFENCE instructions in

Bug#1018867: marked as done (luajit2: stop building on ppc64el)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:44:51 +0200 with message-id <8648d772-5f7c-897b-7957-54f539ae9...@debian.org> and subject line Re: luajit2: stop building on ppc64el has caused the Debian Bug report #1018867, regarding luajit2: stop building on ppc64el to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Re: dwz: fails while building assaultcube

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle 1016936 dwz: Unknown debugging section .debug_addr causes some builds > to fail Bug #1016936 [dwz] dwz: fails while building assaultcube Changed Bug title to 'dwz: Unknown debugging section .debug_addr causes some builds to fail' from 'dwz: fails while

Bug#1016936: dwz: fails while building assaultcube

2022-09-08 Thread Ben Westover
Control: retitle 1016936 dwz: Unknown debugging section .debug_addr causes some builds to fail Control: tags 1016936 + upstream Hello, This error also occurred for me when building PolyMC under Clang, but not GCC. It seems this problem is common for many Clang builds [1]. Fedora also seems to

Bug#1003463: marked as done (Functionally broken with current PHP)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:20:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1003463: fixed in phabricator 0~git20220903-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1003463, regarding Functionally broken with current PHP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1017188: marked as done (python-exchangelib: FTBFS: AssertionError: Items in the first set but not the second:)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:20:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1017188: fixed in python-exchangelib 4.7.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1017188, regarding python-exchangelib: FTBFS: AssertionError: Items in the first set but not the second: to be marked as done.

Bug#930722: marked as done (arc, arcanist: Both ship arc binary)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:20:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919697: fixed in phabricator 0~git20220903-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #919697, regarding arc, arcanist: Both ship arc binary to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#919697: marked as done (arcanist: file conflict with arc)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 17:20:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919697: fixed in phabricator 0~git20220903-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #919697, regarding arcanist: file conflict with arc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1019388: Acknowledgement (apt-clone: Fails to run - no /usr/bin/dpkg-repack found)

2022-09-08 Thread Rann Bar-On
Fixed by installing dpkg-repack. So maybe this is just a dependency issue? On 9/8/22 07:39, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1019388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019388. This

Bug#1018971: marked as done (poppler: CVE-2022-38784)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:49:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1018971: fixed in poppler 22.08.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1018971, regarding poppler: CVE-2022-38784 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1019394: rails breaks ruby-arbre autopkgtest: different output

2022-09-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rails, ruby-arbre Control: found -1 rails/2:6.1.6.1+dfsg-4 Control: found -1 ruby-arbre/1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of rails the autopkgtest of ruby-arbre fails in

Processed: rails breaks ruby-arbre autopkgtest: different output

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 rails/2:6.1.6.1+dfsg-4 Bug #1019394 [src:rails, src:ruby-arbre] rails breaks ruby-arbre autopkgtest: different output Marked as found in versions rails/2:6.1.6.1+dfsg-4. > found -1 ruby-arbre/1.4.0-1 Bug #1019394 [src:rails, src:ruby-arbre] rails breaks

Processed: hdf5 breaks libsis-jhdf5-java autopkgtest: Could not initialize class

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 hdf5/1.10.8+repack-1 Bug #1019393 [src:hdf5, src:libsis-jhdf5-java] hdf5 breaks libsis-jhdf5-java autopkgtest: Could not initialize class Marked as found in versions hdf5/1.10.8+repack-1. > found -1 libsis-jhdf5-java/19.04.1+dfsg-1 Bug #1019393 [src:hdf5,

Bug#1019393: hdf5 breaks libsis-jhdf5-java autopkgtest: Could not initialize class

2022-09-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: hdf5, libsis-jhdf5-java Control: found -1 hdf5/1.10.8+repack-1 Control: found -1 libsis-jhdf5-java/19.04.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of hdf5 the autopkgtest of

Bug#1019392: toybox: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el: exited with signal (or returned 255)

2022-09-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: toybox Version: 0.8.8+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of toybox the autopkgtest of toybox fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of toybox from unstable. It passes

Bug#1019391: python-typing-inspect breaks python-marshmallow-dataclass autopkgtest: TypeError: CustomTypeNoneValidator is not a dataclass

2022-09-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-typing-inspect, python-marshmallow-dataclass Control: found -1 python-typing-inspect/0.8.0-1 Control: found -1 python-marshmallow-dataclass/8.5.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a

Processed: your mail

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1017499 + fixed-upstream Bug #1017499 [src:mesa] mesa: Updates to 22.2 RCs cause artifacts on nouveau and blank screen on VirtIO Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: python-typing-inspect breaks python-marshmallow-dataclass autopkgtest: TypeError: CustomTypeNoneValidator is not a dataclass

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 python-typing-inspect/0.8.0-1 Bug #1019391 [src:python-typing-inspect, src:python-marshmallow-dataclass] python-typing-inspect breaks python-marshmallow-dataclass autopkgtest: TypeError: CustomTypeNoneValidator is not a dataclass Marked as found in

Bug#1019390: o2: autopkgtest regression on i386 and s390x: Assertion `arg->v.vf[i] == 123.456F + i' failed.

2022-09-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: o2 Version: 1.1~ds-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of o2 the autopkgtest of o2 fails in testing on i386 and s390x when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of o2 from unstable. It passes

Bug#1017232: marked as done (gcc-11-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (>= 2.32))

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:40:53 +0200 with message-id and subject line buildable again has caused the Debian Bug report #1017232, regarding gcc-11-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1),

Bug#1017192: marked as done (gcc-10-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (>= 2.31))

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:40:53 +0200 with message-id and subject line buildable again has caused the Debian Bug report #1017192, regarding gcc-10-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1),

Bug#1008326: marked as done (gcc-10-cross-ports: FTBFS: checking for suffix of executables... collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:40:53 +0200 with message-id and subject line buildable again has caused the Debian Bug report #1008326, regarding gcc-10-cross-ports: FTBFS: checking for suffix of executables... collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1005473: marked as done (gcc-11-cross-ports: FTBFS: s-tsmona.adb:160: undefined reference to `dladdr')

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:40:53 +0200 with message-id and subject line buildable again has caused the Debian Bug report #1005473, regarding gcc-11-cross-ports: FTBFS: s-tsmona.adb:160: undefined reference to `dladdr' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1000927: marked as done (creduce: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:20:23 +0200 with message-id and subject line fixed in unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1000927, regarding creduce: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1015995: gpgme1.0 FTBFS with 3.10 as only supported Python3 version

2022-09-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, indeed! thanks for fixing it up! G. Il martedì 6 settembre 2022 21:18:09 CEST, Paul Gevers ha scritto: Hi Alexandre, On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:03:04 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, looks like Ubuntu already has a patch for this: >

Processed: Bug#1016227 marked as pending in openbabel

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1016227 {Done: Andrius Merkys } [src:openbabel] openbabel: FTBFS: obutil.h:65:14: error: ‘clock’ was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) pending. -- 1016227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016227 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1016227: marked as pending in openbabel

2022-09-08 Thread Andrius Merkys
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1016227 in openbabel reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1016227: marked as done (openbabel: FTBFS: obutil.h:65:14: error: ‘clock’ was not declared in this scope)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:56:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1016227: fixed in openbabel 3.1.1+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1016227, regarding openbabel: FTBFS: obutil.h:65:14: error: ‘clock’ was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1019388: apt-clone: Fails to run - no /usr/bin/dpkg-repack found

2022-09-08 Thread Rann Bar-On
Package: apt-clone Version: 0.4.3+nmu1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: baronr...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apt-clone", line 107, in clone.save_state(args.source, args.destination, File

Bug#1019345: marked as done (flake8-class-newline: autopkgtest failure)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 10:03:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1019345: fixed in flake8-class-newline 1.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1019345, regarding flake8-class-newline: autopkgtest failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1017609: ruby-terser: Test fails with node-terser >= 5

2022-09-08 Thread Yadd
On 07/09/2022 19:49, Mohd Bilal wrote: On 9/7/22 14:11, Yadd wrote: Can I push an NMU upload to unblock node-terser migration or can a Ruby-Team member push that ? Hi, Thanks for the patch :) . I've uploaded ruby-terser 1.1.12+dfsg-1 (the patch works with the latest version only) to

Bug#1019352: marked as done (python-pytest-flake8: FTBFS with flake8 5.0.4)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:04:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1019352: fixed in python-pytest-flake8 1.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1019352, regarding python-pytest-flake8: FTBFS with flake8 5.0.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1013591: marked as done (oscar4: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:3.1.0:resources)

2022-09-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2022 07:49:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013591: fixed in oscar4 5.2.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013591, regarding oscar4: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:3.1.0:resources to be