Bug#1057865: reproject ftbfs with Python 3.12

2023-12-12 Thread Ole Streicher
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/astropy/reproject/issues/414 Control: reassign -1 python3-astropy-healpix 1.0.0-1 Control: affects -1 src:reproject Control: tags -1 +pending This bug isn't in reproject, but in astropy-healpix and slided through the CI tests there. A solution was found u

Processed: Re: reproject ftbfs with Python 3.12

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/astropy/reproject/issues/414 Bug #1057865 [src:reproject] reproject ftbfs with Python 3.12 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/astropy/reproject/issues/414'. > reassign -1 python3-astropy-healpix 1.0.0-1 Bug #1057865 [

Processed: your mail

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1058522 + moreinfo Bug #1058522 [src:dired-du] dired-du: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [Makefile:8: test] Error 1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1058522: https://bugs.debian.org

Bug#1058522: (no subject)

2023-12-12 Thread Lev Lamberov
Hi, Hmmm... strange. I cannot reproduce this. I tried to (1) run tests locally with dh_elpa_test, (2) run tests locally as autopkgtest supposed to with dh_elpa_test --autopkgtest, (3) run tests during build from scratch under sbuild, (4) run tests with autopkgtest under sbuild. Tests were su

Bug#1057967: Fixed - Was: Re: Bug#1057967: linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64 renders my physical bookworm/gnome computer largely unusable

2023-12-12 Thread Olivier Berger
Le Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:55:50AM +0100, Kevin Price a écrit : > When booting 6.1.0-15, my physical amd64/bookworm/gnome computer > misbehaves in many ways, rendering it largely unusable. With kernels up > to 6.1.0-13, and even briefly with the otherwise broken 6.1.0-14, all of > this seemed fine.

Bug#1056426: marked as done (mistral-dashboard's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:25:28 +0100 with message-id and subject line Issue was in eventlet has caused the Debian Bug report #1056426, regarding mistral-dashboard's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#1058284: marked as done (wmtv: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libv4l1) were not met)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking for xext... yes > checking for xpm... yes > checking for xxf86d

Bug#1056723: marked as done (rabbitmq-server: CVE-2023-46118)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:04:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056723: fixed in rabbitmq-server 3.8.9-3+deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056723, regarding rabbitmq-server: CVE-2023-46118 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1053769: marked as done (nghttp2: CVE-2023-44487)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:04:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1053769: fixed in nghttp2 1.43.0-1+deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1053769, regarding nghttp2: CVE-2023-44487 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: 1058379 affects compyle

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1058379 + src:compyle Bug #1058379 [src:cython] compyle: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 Added indication that 1058379 affects src:compyle > thanks Stopping

Bug#1056102: marked as done (gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-44429: AV1 codec parser buffer overflow)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:02:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056102: fixed in gst-plugins-bad1.0 1.18.4-3+deb11u3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056102, regarding gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-44429: AV1 codec parser buffer overflow to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1056101: marked as done (gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-44446: MXF demuxer use-after-free)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:02:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056101: fixed in gst-plugins-bad1.0 1.18.4-3+deb11u3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056101, regarding gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-6: MXF demuxer use-after-free to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1055984: marked as done (gimp: CVE-2023-44441 CVE-2023-44442 CVE-2023-44443 CVE-2023-44444)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:02:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1055984: fixed in gimp 2.10.22-4+deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1055984, regarding gimp: CVE-2023-1 CVE-2023-2 CVE-2023-3 CVE-2023-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1055962: marked as done (intel-microcode: CVE-2023-23583: INTEL-SA-00950)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:02:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1055962: fixed in intel-microcode 3.20231114.1~deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1055962, regarding intel-microcode: CVE-2023-23583: INTEL-SA-00950 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1055566: marked as pending in mod-wsgi

2023-12-12 Thread vimerbf
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1055566 in mod-wsgi reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mod-wsgi/-/commit/8e1e89ad1d81447e6

Processed: Bug#1055566 marked as pending in mod-wsgi

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1055566 [src:mod-wsgi] mod-wsgi ftbfs with Python 3.12 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1055566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed (with 1 error): reassign 1058379

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1058379 src:cython Bug #1058379 [src:compyle] compyle: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 Bug reassigned from package 'src:compyle' to 'src:cython'. No longer

Bug#1058575: glogic: Fails to start due AttributeError

2023-12-12 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Package: glogic Version: 2.6-6 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, qlogic isn't usable any more in unstable and testing. It fails to start as a calling of a Python function raises a AttributeError. $ glogic /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/glogic/MainFrame.py:4: PyGIWarning: Gtk was imported with

Bug#1057165: libitext-java: FTBFS with bouncycastle 1.77

2023-12-12 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:47:18PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Source: libitext-java > Version: 2.1.7-14 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs sid > User: a...@debian.org > Usertags: bouncycastle-1.77 > X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org > > Dear maintainer, > > libitext-java fails to build from sourc

Bug#1057165: marked as pending in libitext-java

2023-12-12 Thread Tony Mancill
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057165 in libitext-java reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libitext-java/-/commit/82e6f29bde6ce5dc53

Processed: Bug#1057165 marked as pending in libitext-java

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1057165 [src:libitext-java] libitext-java: FTBFS with bouncycastle 1.77 Bug #1058346 [src:libitext-java] libitext-java: FTBFS: [javac] /<>/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/PdfPKCS7.java:88: error: cannot find symbol Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(

Processed: closing 1058515

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1058515 Bug #1058515 [src:node-rollup] node-rollup: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1058515: https://b

Processed: closing 1058523

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1058523 Bug #1058523 [src:node-babel7] node-babel7: FTBFS: ln: failed to create symbolic link 'node_modules/@babel/helper-string-parser/babel-helper-string-parser': Permission denied Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#1057843: (no subject)

2023-12-12 Thread Miguel Jacq
If it helps people, this is what I did on systems that automatically had rebooted into the problematic kernel. First, I uninstalled the 6.1.0-14 kernel and rebooted back into 6.1.0-13. Then I used `last` to identify the time between the problematic reboot into 6.1.0-14 and the deliberate reboot

Bug#1058535: libhinawa: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25

2023-12-12 Thread Kentaro HAYASHI
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:51:47 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: libhinawa > Version: 4.0.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of

Processed: notfixed 1052974 in gap-polymaking/0.8.7-1

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 1052974 gap-polymaking/0.8.7-1 Bug #1052974 {Done: Joachim Zobel } [src:gap-hapcryst] gap-hapcryst: FTBFS: polymake: ERROR: "/usr/share/polymake/perllib/Polymake/Core/CPlusPlus.pm", line 1785: Can't load shared module /usr/lib/polymak

Bug#1058537: marked as done (node-node-pty: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Version: 1.0.0+~6.3.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary > dh

Bug#1058542: marked as done (node-ytdl-core: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
+dfsg+~cs4.10.8-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary > dh

Bug#1058541: marked as done (node-redis: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
+~1.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' &

Bug#1058534: marked as done (node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
 --- Source: node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills Version: 0.2.1+dfsg+~0.11.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#1058518: marked as done (node-es-module-lexer: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: src/lexer.js] Error 2)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#1058507: marked as done (node-regexpp: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:30: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' &g

Processed: fixed 1052974 in gap-hapcryst/0.1.15-3

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1052974 gap-hapcryst/0.1.15-3 Bug #1052974 {Done: Joachim Zobel } [src:gap-hapcryst] gap-hapcryst: FTBFS: polymake: ERROR: "/usr/share/polymake/perllib/Polymake/Core/CPlusPlus.pm", line 1785: Can't load shared module /usr/lib/polymake/li

Bug#1042625: marked as done (pympress: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/sbuild-nonexistent')

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:04:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1042625: fixed in pympress 1.8.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1042625, regarding pympress: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/sbuild-nonexistent' to b

Bug#1058144: marked as done (libiio: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:31: override_dh_auto_install] Error 1)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/build' > make[3]:

Processed: tagging 1058547

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1058547 - pending Bug #1058547 [src:node-globby] node-globby: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25 Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1058547: https://bugs.

Bug#1058547: marked as pending in node-globby

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058547 in node-globby reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-globby/-/commit/579c4942c926587b6c703f20

Processed: Bug#1058547 marked as pending in node-globby

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058547 [src:node-globby] node-globby: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058547: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058547 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1058529: marked as pending in node-csstype

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058529 in node-csstype reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-csstype/-/commit/9a6c0a75f3ea271fe7c40a

Processed: Bug#1058529 marked as pending in node-csstype

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058529 [src:node-csstype] node-csstype: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058529 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@b

Processed: Bug#1058507 marked as pending in node-regexpp

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058507 [src:node-regexpp] node-regexpp: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:30: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058507: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058507 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@

Bug#1058507: marked as pending in node-regexpp

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058507 in node-regexpp reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-regexpp/-/commit/7f74a551ad90394228e905

Processed: Bug#1058518 marked as pending in node-es-module-lexer

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058518 [src:node-es-module-lexer] node-es-module-lexer: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: src/lexer.js] Error 2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058518 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1058518: marked as pending in node-es-module-lexer

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058518 in node-es-module-lexer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-es-module-lexer/-/commit/e99127

Processed: Bug#1058537 marked as pending in node-node-pty

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058537 [src:node-node-pty] node-node-pty: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow..

Bug#1058537: marked as pending in node-node-pty

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058537 in node-node-pty reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-node-pty/-/commit/4ad978b488ae4201ecc1

Processed: Bug#1058541 marked as pending in node-redis

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058541 [src:node-redis] node-redis: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs

Bug#1058541: marked as pending in node-redis

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058541 in node-redis reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-redis/-/commit/95175b798368daf1c57690a4d3

Bug#1054823: starlette: FTBFS: tests failed

2023-12-12 Thread Arnaud Rebillout
The build failure is due to the library python3-httpx. This library uses python3-rfc3986, it's been upgraded lately [1], and it's now causing the breakage. There's a discussion about this issue upstream [2]. If we bump src:httpx to version 0.24.0, the dependency on python3-rfc3986 goes away, a

Processed: Bug#1058534 marked as pending in node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058534 [src:node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills] node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058534: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058534 Debian Bug Tracki

Bug#1058534: marked as pending in node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058534 in node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-rollup-plugin-nod

Processed: Bug#1058542 marked as pending in node-ytdl-core

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058542 [src:node-ytdl-core] node-ytdl-core: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1058542: marked as pending in node-ytdl-core

2023-12-12 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058542 in node-ytdl-core reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-ytdl-core/-/commit/737662559833d74271

Bug#1058330: marked as done (pycurl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:37: override_dh_auto_test] Error 2)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/tests/fake-curl/libcurl'

Processed: Bug#1058330 marked as pending in pycurl

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058330 [src:pycurl] pycurl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:37: override_dh_auto_test] Error 2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058330 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o

Bug#1058330: marked as pending in pycurl

2023-12-12 Thread Scott Talbert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058330 in pycurl reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pycurl/-/commit/a9b7081be4e4951ffccc0

Bug#1058273: gpredict: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

2023-12-12 Thread Bdale Garbee
tony mancill writes: > So this is very possibly a bug in libreoffice-writer-nogui. Sure seems like it. My guess would be that what files go in what libreoffice binary packages got refactored somehow? Not sure what the point of the nogui package is if it can't be used here any more. [shrug] I

Bug#1057613: shed: FTBFS: error: invalid use of incomplete typedef ‘WINDOW’ {aka ‘struct _win_st’}

2023-12-12 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. This is from Alex Sisson, the upstream author: Hi,  there's a version to test from https://codeberg.org/alexs/shed   ,  dev branch,   please give that a quick test and if you're happy  with that and I'll make a 1.16 release. Thanks.

Processed: forcibly merging 1057171 1058533

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1057171 1058533 Bug #1057171 {Done: tony mancill } [src:libitext5-java] libitext5-java: FTBFS with bouncycastle 1.77 Bug #1058533 [src:libitext5-java] libitext5-java: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/itext/src/main/java/com/itextpdf/text/pdf/securi

Bug#1058313: marked as done (openpyxl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:26: python-test3.11] Error 1)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > cp

Bug#1055844: marked as done (pandas: Build-Depends on python3-xarray which is not in testing)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:21:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1055844: fixed in pandas 1.5.3+dfsg-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1055844, regarding pandas: Build-Depends on python3-xarray which is not in testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1058284: marked as done (wmtv: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libv4l1) were not met)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > checking for xext... yes > checking for xpm... yes > checking for xxf86d

Bug#1058272: marked as done (omemo-dr: FTBFS: curve25519/curve25519module.c:3:10: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-strict-overflow -Ws

Processed: fixed 1058523 in 7.20.15+ds1+~cs214.269.168-6

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1058523 7.20.15+ds1+~cs214.269.168-6 Bug #1058523 [src:node-babel7] node-babel7: FTBFS: ln: failed to create symbolic link 'node_modules/@babel/helper-string-parser/babel-helper-string-parser': Permission denied Marked as fixed in version

Bug#1056233: marked as done (cinder's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:49:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056233: fixed in cinder 2:23.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056233, regarding cinder's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Processed: fixed 1058515 in 3.29.4-3

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1058515 3.29.4-3 Bug #1058515 [src:node-rollup] node-rollup: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:9: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 Marked as fixed in versions node-rollup/3.29.4-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#1058273: gpredict: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

2023-12-12 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: gpredict > Version: 2.3-115-g0f3beb6-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie It feels slightly icky becau

Processed: Bug#1058273 marked as pending in gpredict

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058273 [src:gpredict] gpredict: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058273: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058273 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#1058273: marked as pending in gpredict

2023-12-12 Thread Tony Mancill
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058273 in gpredict reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-hamradio-team/gpredict/-/commit/d328dfc309849afad

Processed: Bug#1056233 marked as pending in cinder

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1056233 [src:cinder] cinder's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1056233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056233 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1057587 marked as pending in obs-studio

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1057587 [src:obs-studio] obs-studio: FTBFS: error: ‘av_stream_get_side_data’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1057587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057587 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1057587: marked as pending in obs-studio

2023-12-12 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057587 in obs-studio reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/obs-studio/-/commit/27325f6dbe9683ea3a

Bug#1056233: marked as pending in cinder

2023-12-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1056233 in cinder reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/cinder/-/commit/9b7f398b1d03a0696a

Processed: Bug#1058284 marked as pending in libv4l

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058284 [v4l-utils] wmtv: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (libv4l1) were not met Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1058284: marked as pending in libv4l

2023-12-12 Thread Gregor Jasny
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058284 in libv4l reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libv4l/-/commit/3fb81cc29850441028d86d7904e144a90bb

Bug#1056236: marked as done (cloudkitty's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:59:10 +0100 with message-id <1107e43a-861e-429e-93d2-4a3ba234e...@debian.org> and subject line Issue was in Eventlet has caused the Debian Bug report #1056236, regarding cloudkitty's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#1056233: Issue isn't what's described

2023-12-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, The issue described in this bug report is invalid, however, there was another one which I just fixed (adding Fix_invalid_assert_calls.patch). I'll use the same bug report then. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Bug#1058306: marked as done (python-yappi: FTBFS: yappi/_yappi.c:240:18: error: invalid use of incomplete typedef ‘PyFrameObject’ {aka ‘struct _frame’})

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
: 1.4.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-strict-overflow -Ws

Bug#1058210: marked as done (python-scciclient: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore')

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ssage --- Source: python-scciclient Version: 0.15.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1058117: marked as done (python-oslo.log: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore')

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' &

Bug#1058145: marked as done (python-proliantutils: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore')

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ls Version: 2.16.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory &

Bug#1058184: marked as done (python-taskflow: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore')

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' &

Processed: Bug#1058145 marked as pending in python-proliantutils

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058145 [src:python-proliantutils] python-proliantutils: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058145: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058145 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#1058145: marked as pending in python-proliantutils

2023-12-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058145 in python-proliantutils reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/libs/python-proliantutils/-/c

Processed: Bug#1058117 marked as pending in python-oslo.log

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1058117 [src:python-oslo.log] python-oslo.log: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1058117: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058117 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debi

Bug#1058117: marked as pending in python-oslo.log

2023-12-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058117 in python-oslo.log reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/oslo/python-oslo.log/-/commit/f7a7

Processed: tagging 1058514

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1058514 + upstream Bug #1058514 [src:liblouisutdml] liblouisutdml: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Processed: bug 1058514 is forwarded to https://github.com/liblouis/liblouisutdml/issues/103

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1058514 https://github.com/liblouis/liblouisutdml/issues/103 Bug #1058514 [src:liblouisutdml] liblouisutdml: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Set Bug forwarded-to-a

Bug#1058409: marked as done (python-pytest-benchmark: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
n.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: python-pytest-benchmark Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Rel

Bug#1058356: marked as done (python-testfixtures: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
in Message --- Source: python-testfixtures Version: 7.2.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully)

Bug#1056507: marked as done (python-testfixtures autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12)

2023-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:55:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056507: fixed in python-testfixtures 7.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056507, regarding python-testfixtures autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1058554: skimage: FTBFS: intersphinx inventory './_intersphinx/sklearn-objects.inv' not fetchable due to : [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/<>/doc/sou

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: skimage Version: 0.22.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Enter

Bug#1058558: seqkit: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 25

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: seqkit Version: 2.3.1+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bin

Bug#1058557: msolve: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: Unknown option 'hyperef' for package xcolor.

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: msolve Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1058556: binutils-or1k-elf: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: src] Error 1

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: binutils-or1k-elf Version: 1.0.9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1058555: parallel: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat './parallel_cheat_bw.pdf': No such file or directory

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: parallel Version: 20221122+ds-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[4]: Enter

Bug#1058553: node-js-sdsl: FTBFS: TypeError: Cannot set property constructor of [object Object] which has only a getter

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: node-js-sdsl Version: 4.1.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1058552: science.js: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Error parsing /<>/package.json: Unexpected end of JSON input

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: science.js Version: 1.9.3+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Enter

Bug#1058551: git-buildpackage: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:22: syntax-check] Error 1

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: git-buildpackage Version: 0.9.32 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1058550: autopkgtest: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:38: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

2023-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: autopkgtest Version: 5.31.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20231212 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >