Source: cppad
Followup-For: Bug #1061907
Apologies, thanks to operator error (i.e. I messed up) the diff attached to
this bug is not the one that was uploaded to experimental. Please see the patch
attached to this message.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
Source: libfsext
Version: 20201107-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libfreenect
Version: 1:0.5.3-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: cpdb-libs
Followup-For: Bug #1061904
Apologies, thanks to operator error (i.e. I messed up) the diff attached to
this bug is not the one that was uploaded to experimental. Please see the patch
attached to this message.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers
Source: libforms
Version: 1.2.3-1.6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libfm
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
On 1/31/24 06:06, Pádraig Brady wrote:
To my mind the most protective option takes precedence.
That's not how POSIX works with mv -i and mv -f. The last flag wins. I
assume this is so that people can have aliases or shell scripts that
make -i the default, but you can override by specifying
Source: libfixposix
Version: 1:0.5.1-1+nmu1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libfixbuf
Version: 2.4.1+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libfilezilla
Version: 0.45.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libfishcamp
Version: 1.2+20220607003151-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and
Source: libfido2
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:22:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061692: fixed in chirp 1:20240122-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061692,
regarding chirp fails to start with 'No module named 'chirp.stock_configs'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Source: libfcgi
Version: 2.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libexplain
Version: 1.4.D001-12
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libevtx
Version: 20181227-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libevt
Version: 20200926-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libevhtp
Version: 1.2.18-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libevent
Version: 2.1.12-stable-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libetpan
Version: 1.9.4-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libev
Version: 1:4.33-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libesedb
Version: 20181229-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libept
Version: 1.2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libelfin
Version: 0.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:27:14 + Steve Langasek wrote:
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
Source: libee
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdvbpsi
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdv
Version: 1.0.0-17
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdumb
Version: 1.2.1-5.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: stellarium
Followup-For: Bug #1060802
X-Debbugs-Cc: tom...@debian.org, mity...@debian.org
> stellarium 23.4-1 added a new build-dependency on qtwebengine5-dev, which
> prevents it from building on some release architectures (and all non-release
> ones).
Would 'qtwebengine5-dev |
Hi,
I have created a patch to resolve AssertionError with Python 3.12 [0],
along with the new upstream version update.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mmllib
Cheers!
Source: libdssialsacompat
Version: 1.0.8a-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdnf
Version: 0.69.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdrumstick
Version: 2.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Looks like android-platform-tools took over this binary package a long time
ago and there hasn't been an upload to the archive since?
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:38:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: android-platform-frameworks-native
> Version: 10.0.0+r36-1.1~exp1
> Severity: serious
>
Source: libdmapsharing
Version: 3.9.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdigidoc
Version: 3.10.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdbi
Version: 0.9.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libdap
Version: 3.21.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Il 31/01/2024 22:24, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I'm also making some improvements that I know are needed for the cinnamon
packages but slowly so as not to risk coming close to burnout again
(spending less time on the PC, at least in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +fixed-upstream
Bug #1062048 [src:xen] xen: FTBFS with Python 3.12 as default
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
--
1062048: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062048
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream
Hi,
this issue has been fixed upstream by
https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=40be6307ec005539635e7b8fcef67e989dc441f6
and was backported to the upstream stable-4.17 branch in
Source: android-platform-frameworks-native
Version: 10.0.0+r36-1.1~exp1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Steve Langasek
On 2024-01-31 21:27, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Version check failed:
> Your upload included the binary package android-platform-frameworks-native-he=
> aders, version
Source: libcrypto++
Version: 8.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libctl
Version: 4.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:27:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061966: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-2.1~exp3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061966,
regarding file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #1062060 [src:cinnamon-desktop] cinnamon-desktop: NMU diff for 64-bit
time_t transition
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
1062060: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062060
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 - pending
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> I'm also making some improvements that I know are needed for the cinnamon
> packages but slowly so as not to risk coming close to burnout again
> (spending less time on the PC, at least in my free time),
Source: slurm-wlm-contrib
Version: 22.05.8-4+deb12u1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
After latest security update, part of our slurm cluster (GPU nodes)
was unusable. These nodes were configured using the NVML autodetect
feature of slurm.
Source: libcreg
Version: 20200725-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcrcutil
Version: 1.0-5.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcomps
Version: 0.1.19-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcpuset
Version: 1.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcommuni
Version: 3.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcoap3
Version: 4.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
I applied NMU diff to git experimental (with the work for 6.0 in
progress) and I spotted 2 mistake, one important is missed breaks with
libcinnamon-desktop4:
https://salsa.debian.org/cinnamon-team/cinnamon-desktop/-/commit/b06e59910a83b2252b866d051ffe7c5ea6f6742f
This will cause serious
Sorry, and thanks for bearing with me. Uploaded to experimental again;
updated full NMU debdiff attached.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:31:25PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:12:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > #1061966: file loss
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1061966 {Done: Steve Langasek }
[libaudit1t64,libauparse0t64] file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:12:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #1061966: file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move
>
> It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters
> (reply to Steve Langasek ).
I fear this is not fixed.
>
Source: libcmtspeechdata
Version: 2.1.1+git20160721~8efc468-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in
Source: libcmis
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libclaw
Version: 1.7.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcm256cc
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcli
Version: 1.10.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libchipcard
Version: 5.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libchardet
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcds
Version: 2.3.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcdk5
Version: 5.0.20180306-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcdio
Version: 2.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libccrtp
Version: 2.0.9-2.4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcapi20-3
Version: 1:3.27-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libcanberra
Version: 0.30-11
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
On 2024-01-31 09:16:02 [+], Steve Langasek wrote:
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
> becomes
Hi. Upstream maintainer here. Thanks for bringing this up. To my knowledge
only cpu profiler bits expose time_t. So libtcmalloc-minimal4 is worth
keeping as is.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:21 AM Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: google-perftools
> Version: 2.15-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
Source: libbraiding
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libbpp-qt
Version: 2.4.1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libbpp-raa
Version: 2.4.1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 02:23:21AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> +Maytha who prepared the upload.
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 05:05:55PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Hi Nilesh,
> >
> > You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about
> > this bug?
>
> I've been trying to
What a fucking nice approach. If a maintainer got bored of maintaining — just
invent any bullshit, declare it as "release critical", and request the removal.
Genius.
JFYI, it works flawlessly in my Debian 12, and using "deprecated" gtk2 doesn't
stop a shitton of other packages to be shipped.
Source: libbpp-phyl-omics
Version: 2.4.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libbigwig
Version: 0.4.7+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libbde
Version: 20190102-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libarchive
Version: 3.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libavl
Version: 0.3.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libast
Version: 0.7-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libassa
Version: 3.5.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 19:44:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1062207: fixed in gcc-defaults-ports 1.213
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062207,
regarding gcc-defaults-ports_1.212_amd64-buildd.changes REJECTED
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Source: libapreq2
Version: 2.17-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libapr-memcache
Version: 0.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libapogee3
Version: 3.2+20221221183454-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and
Source: libaio
Version: 0.3.113-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: libabigail
Version: 2.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:51:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061364: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058268,
regarding ros-wstool: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:51:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061363: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058224,
regarding ros-rosinstall: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:50:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061334: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036879,
regarding oce: should this package be removed for trixie?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:42:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061202: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017623,
regarding nautilus-filename-repairer: Fails to build with Nautilus 43
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Source: android-platform-frameworks-native
Version: 1:10.0.0+r36-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures
Package: android-libbase
Version: 1:34.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi Roger,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
android-libbase (and other libraries from android-platform-tools) as a
package shipping a library
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:38:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041864: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039689,
regarding rsh-client: CVE-2023-38336: Command injection in netkit-rcp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:38:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060454: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062024,
regarding boost1.81: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
101 - 200 of 382 matches
Mail list logo