Bug#1061907: cppad: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread mwhudson
Source: cppad Followup-For: Bug #1061907 Apologies, thanks to operator error (i.e. I messed up) the diff attached to this bug is not the one that was uploaded to experimental. Please see the patch attached to this message. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable

Bug#1062300: libfsext: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfsext Version: 20201107-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062298: libfreenect: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfreenect Version: 1:0.5.3-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1061904: cpdb-libs: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread mwhudson
Source: cpdb-libs Followup-For: Bug #1061904 Apologies, thanks to operator error (i.e. I messed up) the diff attached to this bug is not the one that was uploaded to experimental. Please see the patch attached to this message. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers

Bug#1062297: libforms: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libforms Version: 1.2.3-1.6 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062296: libfm: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfm Version: 1.3.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1058752: bug#62572: Bug#1058752: bug#62572: cp --no-clobber behavior has changed

2024-01-31 Thread Paul Eggert
On 1/31/24 06:06, Pádraig Brady wrote: To my mind the most protective option takes precedence. That's not how POSIX works with mv -i and mv -f. The last flag wins. I assume this is so that people can have aliases or shell scripts that make -i the default, but you can override by specifying

Bug#1062295: libfixposix: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfixposix Version: 1:0.5.1-1+nmu1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062294: libfixbuf: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfixbuf Version: 2.4.1+ds-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062292: libfilezilla: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfilezilla Version: 0.45.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062293: libfishcamp: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfishcamp Version: 1.2+20220607003151-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and

Bug#1062291: libfido2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfido2 Version: 1.14.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1061692: marked as done (chirp fails to start with 'No module named 'chirp.stock_configs')

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:22:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061692: fixed in chirp 1:20240122-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061692, regarding chirp fails to start with 'No module named 'chirp.stock_configs' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1062290: libfcgi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libfcgi Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062289: libexplain: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libexplain Version: 1.4.D001-12 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062288: libevtx: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libevtx Version: 20181227-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062287: libevt: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libevt Version: 20200926-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062286: libevhtp: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libevhtp Version: 1.2.18-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062285: libevent: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libevent Version: 2.1.12-stable-8 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062283: libetpan: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libetpan Version: 1.9.4-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062284: libev: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libev Version: 1:4.33-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062282: libesedb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libesedb Version: 20181229-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062280: libept: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libept Version: 1.2.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062279: libelfin: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libelfin Version: 0.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062255: libcmtspeechdata: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:27:14 + Steve Langasek wrote: > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a > period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information

Bug#1062278: libee: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libee Version: 0.4.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062277: libdvbpsi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdvbpsi Version: 1.3.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062276: libdv: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdv Version: 1.0.0-17 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062275: libdumb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdumb Version: 1.2.1-5.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1060802: stellarium: FTBFS on armel, ppc64el, s390x: unsatisfiable Build-Depends: qtwebengine5-dev (>= 5.15)

2024-01-31 Thread James Addison
Source: stellarium Followup-For: Bug #1060802 X-Debbugs-Cc: tom...@debian.org, mity...@debian.org > stellarium 23.4-1 added a new build-dependency on qtwebengine5-dev, which > prevents it from building on some release architectures (and all non-release > ones). Would 'qtwebengine5-dev |

Bug#1058235: mmllib: FTBFS: AssertionError: {'title': 'Loreley', 'composer': 'Ph. Fried[721 chars]0527} != {'arranger': 'Klavier: August Linder; MML: [721 chars]': 4}

2024-01-31 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
Hi, I have created a patch to resolve AssertionError with Python 3.12 [0], along with the new upstream version update. [0] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mmllib Cheers!

Bug#1062274: libdssialsacompat: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdssialsacompat Version: 1.0.8a-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062272: libdnf: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdnf Version: 0.69.0-2.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062273: libdrumstick: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdrumstick Version: 2.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062267: android-platform-frameworks-native_10.0.0+r36-1.1~exp1_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Looks like android-platform-tools took over this binary package a long time ago and there hasn't been an upload to the archive since? On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:38:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Source: android-platform-frameworks-native > Version: 10.0.0+r36-1.1~exp1 > Severity: serious >

Bug#1062271: libdmapsharing: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdmapsharing Version: 3.9.13-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062270: libdigidoc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdigidoc Version: 3.10.5-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062269: libdbi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdbi Version: 0.9.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062268: libdap: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libdap Version: 3.21.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062060: cinnamon-desktop: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 31/01/2024 22:24, Steve Langasek ha scritto: On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: I'm also making some improvements that I know are needed for the cinnamon packages but slowly so as not to risk coming close to burnout again (spending less time on the PC, at least in

Processed: Re: xen: FTBFS with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +fixed-upstream Bug #1062048 [src:xen] xen: FTBFS with Python 3.12 as default Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. -- 1062048: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062048 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1062048: xen: FTBFS with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-31 Thread Maximilian Engelhardt
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream Hi, this issue has been fixed upstream by https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=40be6307ec005539635e7b8fcef67e989dc441f6 and was backported to the upstream stable-4.17 branch in

Bug#1062267: android-platform-frameworks-native_10.0.0+r36-1.1~exp1_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2024-01-31 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Source: android-platform-frameworks-native Version: 10.0.0+r36-1.1~exp1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Steve Langasek On 2024-01-31 21:27, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Version check failed: > Your upload included the binary package android-platform-frameworks-native-he= > aders, version

Bug#1062265: libcrypto++: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcrypto++ Version: 8.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062266: libctl: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libctl Version: 4.5.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1061966: marked as done (file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:27:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061966: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-2.1~exp3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061966, regarding file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: Bug#1062060: cinnamon-desktop: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - pending Bug #1062060 [src:cinnamon-desktop] cinnamon-desktop: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Removed tag(s) pending. -- 1062060: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062060 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1062060: cinnamon-desktop: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Control: tags -1 - pending On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > I'm also making some improvements that I know are needed for the cinnamon > packages but slowly so as not to risk coming close to burnout again > (spending less time on the PC, at least in my free time),

Bug#1062264: slurm-wlm-contrib: slurm-wlm-nvml-plugin broken with latest security update to slurm-wlm-basic-plugins

2024-01-31 Thread jbazik
Source: slurm-wlm-contrib Version: 22.05.8-4+deb12u1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, After latest security update, part of our slurm cluster (GPU nodes) was unusable. These nodes were configured using the NVML autodetect feature of slurm.

Bug#1062263: libcreg: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcreg Version: 20200725-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062261: libcrcutil: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcrcutil Version: 1.0-5.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062259: libcomps: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcomps Version: 0.1.19-2.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062260: libcpuset: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcpuset Version: 1.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062258: libcommuni: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcommuni Version: 3.7.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062257: libcoap3: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcoap3 Version: 4.3.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062060: cinnamon-desktop: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Fabio Fantoni
I applied NMU diff to git experimental (with the work for 6.0 in progress) and I spotted 2 mistake, one important is missed breaks with libcinnamon-desktop4: https://salsa.debian.org/cinnamon-team/cinnamon-desktop/-/commit/b06e59910a83b2252b866d051ffe7c5ea6f6742f This will cause serious

Bug#1061926: Bug#1061966 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Steve Langasek ) (Bug#1061966: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-2.1~exp2)

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Sorry, and thanks for bearing with me. Uploaded to experimental again; updated full NMU debdiff attached. On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:31:25PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:12:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > #1061966: file loss

Processed: Re: Bug#1061966 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Steve Langasek ) (Bug#1061966: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-2.1~exp2)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1061966 {Done: Steve Langasek } [libaudit1t64,libauparse0t64] file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.

Bug#1061966: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Steve Langasek ) (Bug#1061966: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-2.1~exp2)

2024-01-31 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: reopen -1 On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:12:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > #1061966: file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move > > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters > (reply to Steve Langasek ). I fear this is not fixed. >

Bug#1062255: libcmtspeechdata: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcmtspeechdata Version: 2.1.1+git20160721~8efc468-2.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in

Bug#1062254: libcmis: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcmis Version: 0.6.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062251: libclaw: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libclaw Version: 1.7.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062253: libcm256cc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcm256cc Version: 1.1.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062252: libcli: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcli Version: 1.10.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062249: libchipcard: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libchipcard Version: 5.1.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062248: libchardet: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libchardet Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062247: libcds: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcds Version: 2.3.3-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062246: libcdk5: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcdk5 Version: 5.0.20180306-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062245: libcdio: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcdio Version: 2.1.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062244: libccrtp: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libccrtp Version: 2.0.9-2.4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062243: libcapi20-3: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcapi20-3 Version: 1:3.27-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062242: libcanberra: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libcanberra Version: 0.30-11 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062072: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#1062072: clamav: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2024-01-31 09:16:02 [+], Steve Langasek wrote: > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a > period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information > becomes

Bug#1062116: google-perftools: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Aliaksey Kandratsenka
Hi. Upstream maintainer here. Thanks for bringing this up. To my knowledge only cpu profiler bits expose time_t. So libtcmalloc-minimal4 is worth keeping as is. On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:21 AM Graham Inggs wrote: > Source: google-perftools > Version: 2.15-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch

Bug#1062241: libbraiding: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libbraiding Version: 1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062237: libbpp-qt: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libbpp-qt Version: 2.4.1-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062238: libbpp-raa: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libbpp-raa Version: 2.4.1-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1061659: Fwd: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to testing for too long: i386 autopkgtest regression

2024-01-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 02:23:21AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > +Maytha who prepared the upload. > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 05:05:55PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi Nilesh, > > > > You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about > > this bug? > > I've been trying to

Bug#1052165: This bug was never confirmed, but somehow declared as "RC" to remove the package.

2024-01-31 Thread Alex Volkov
What a fucking nice approach. If a maintainer got bored of maintaining — just invent any bullshit, declare it as "release critical", and request the removal. Genius. JFYI, it works flawlessly in my Debian 12, and using "deprecated" gtk2 doesn't stop a shitton of other packages to be shipped.

Bug#1062232: libbpp-phyl-omics: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libbpp-phyl-omics Version: 2.4.1-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062229: libbigwig: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libbigwig Version: 0.4.7+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062228: libbde: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libbde Version: 20190102-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062224: libarchive: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libarchive Version: 3.7.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062227: libavl: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libavl Version: 0.3.5-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062226: libast: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libast Version: 0.7-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062225: libassa: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libassa Version: 3.5.1-8 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062207: marked as done (gcc-defaults-ports_1.212_amd64-buildd.changes REJECTED)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 19:44:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1062207: fixed in gcc-defaults-ports 1.213 has caused the Debian Bug report #1062207, regarding gcc-defaults-ports_1.212_amd64-buildd.changes REJECTED to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1062223: libapreq2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libapreq2 Version: 2.17-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062221: libapr-memcache: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libapr-memcache Version: 0.7.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062220: libapogee3: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libapogee3 Version: 3.2+20221221183454-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and

Bug#1062218: libaio: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libaio Version: 0.3.113-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1062217: libabigail: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libabigail Version: 2.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Bug#1058268: marked as done (ros-wstool: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp')

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:51:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061364: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1058268, regarding ros-wstool: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp' to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1058224: marked as done (ros-rosinstall: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp')

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:51:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061363: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1058224, regarding ros-rosinstall: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp' to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1036879: marked as done (oce: should this package be removed for trixie?)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:50:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061334: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1036879, regarding oce: should this package be removed for trixie? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1017623: marked as done (nautilus-filename-repairer: Fails to build with Nautilus 43)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:42:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061202: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1017623, regarding nautilus-filename-repairer: Fails to build with Nautilus 43 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1062211: android-platform-frameworks-native: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: android-platform-frameworks-native Version: 1:10.0.0+r36-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures

Bug#1062209: android-libbacktrace (et al): identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: android-libbase Version: 1:34.0.4-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Hi Roger, Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies android-libbase (and other libraries from android-platform-tools) as a package shipping a library

Bug#1039689: marked as done (rsh-client: CVE-2023-38336: Command injection in netkit-rcp)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:38:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1041864: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1039689, regarding rsh-client: CVE-2023-38336: Command injection in netkit-rcp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1062024: marked as done (boost1.81: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

2024-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:38:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060454: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1062024, regarding boost1.81: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

<    1   2   3   4   >