Bug#1064738: marked as pending in golang-gocloud

2024-02-27 Thread Anthony Fok
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064738 in golang-gocloud reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-gocloud/-/commit/98cc39213

Processed: Bug#1064738 marked as pending in golang-gocloud

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064738 [src:golang-gocloud] golang-gocloud: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd _build && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 gocloud.dev gocloud.dev/aws gocloud.dev/aws/rds gocloud.dev/blob gocloud.dev/blob/azureblob gocloud.dev/blob/driver gocloud.dev/blob/

Bug#611634: marked as done (freedict-swa-eng: FTBFS: dictd2dic: command not found)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:38:37 +0100 with message-id <8086f0d0-44d2-6b12-17dd-c616e1eee...@debian.org> and subject line Re: freedict-swa-eng: FTBFS: dictd2dic: command not found has caused the Debian Bug report #611634, regarding freedict-swa-eng: FTBFS: dictd2dic: command not found t

Bug#1053111: Fwd:

2024-02-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
(this was orignally sent to 106 by mistake) It seems that changes are needed to account for the change in `pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev` as well. Attaching an updated diff that does that too. We are going to need e2fsprogs building very soon for the time_t transition. I wonder if I shou

Bug#1064738: marked as done (golang-gocloud: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd _build && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 gocloud.dev gocloud.dev/aws gocloud.dev/aws/rds gocloud.dev/blob gocloud.dev/blob/azurebl

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:56:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064738: fixed in golang-gocloud 0.24.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064738, regarding golang-gocloud: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd _build && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 gocloud.dev gocloud.dev/aws gocl

Bug#1064561: 1064561 dune-grid: FTBFS on i386: 98% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 66

2024-02-27 Thread Markus Blatt
Hi, I did look into this shortly. I must admit that I problems seeing what could fail in this code. The code reads the second line of a file using using scanf and checks that the first number read is larger or equal 2.0 and less than or equal 2.2. Strangely this works for all the other files re

Bug#1064682: marked as done (expeyes: FTBFS: make[3]: pylupdate6: No such file or directory)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:46:05 +0100 (CET) with message-id <69649458.517347.1709023566001.javamail.open-xcha...@opme11oxm27aub.bagnolet.francetelecom.fr> and subject line Close 1064682 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064682, regarding expeyes: FTBFS: make[3]: pylupdate6: No such f

Processed: block 1064681 with 1062799

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1064681 with 1062799 Bug #1064681 [src:retroarch] retroarch: FTBFS: glslang is disabled and forced to build with SPIRV-Cross support. 1064681 was not blocked by any bugs. 1064681 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1064681:

Bug#1064886: sqlite-utils: Fails with "ModuleNotFoundError"

2024-02-27 Thread Sebastian Scheurer
Package: sqlite-utils Version: 3.30-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, sqlite-utils fails with "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'click_default_group'" no matter how it is invoked (options, commands, etc.). Invoking it via "python -m sqlite_utils" or "

Bug#1064736: urlwatch: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-02-27 Thread Maxime Werlen
Hi, A new version has been uploaded to mentors : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064884. Maxime Le dim. 25 févr. 2024 à 21:33, Maxime Werlen a écrit : > Owner: max...@werlen.fr > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/thp/urlwatch/pull/786 > > Hi, > > The bug is linked to

Bug#1064889: libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins

2024-02-27 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: libproxy Version: 0.5.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: breaks debian-edu-config dependencies It looks as though the new libproxy1v5 has absorbed all of the functionality of the older libproxy plugins: - libproxy1-plugin-gsettings replaced by config-gnome internal to the library - -kco

Bug#1061208: marked as done (Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:35:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061208: fixed in rocm-hipamd 5.6.1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061208, regarding Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1064721: marked as done (rocm-hipamd: FTBFS: group__Driver.dot:1: error: Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"/<>/hip/docs/../../html/group__Driver.dot" -Tp

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:35:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064721: fixed in rocm-hipamd 5.6.1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064721, regarding rocm-hipamd: FTBFS: group__Driver.dot:1: error: Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"

Bug#1064890: libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/*

2024-02-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc Version: 1.2.39-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom

Bug#1062373: marked as done (libproxy: autopkgtest regression: test depends on no longer built python3-libproxy)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:44:51 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1062373: libproxy: autopkgtest regression: test depends on no longer built python3-libproxy has caused the Debian Bug report #1062373, regarding libproxy: autopkgtest regression: test depends on no longer

Bug#1026584: marked as pending in python-morris

2024-02-27 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1026584 in python-morris reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-morris/-/commit/f2d9915

Processed: Bug#1026584 marked as pending in python-morris

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1026584 [src:python-morris] python-morris: FTBFS: AssertionError: Failed doctest test for morris Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1026584 to the same tags previously set -- 1026584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=102658

Processed: Reopen packages incorrectly marked as closed

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1064721 Bug #1064721 {Done: Cordell Bloor } [src:rocm-hipamd] rocm-hipamd: FTBFS: group__Driver.dot:1: error: Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"/<>/hip/docs/../../html/group__Driver.dot" -Tpng -o "/<>/hip/d

Processed: tagging 1064889

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1064889 + pending Bug #1064889 [src:libproxy] libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1064889: https://bugs.debian.or

Bug#1064893: python3-pcpp: /usr/bin/pcpp is already provided by the pcc package

2024-02-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python3-pcpp Version: 1.30-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Unpacking

Bug#1026584: marked as done (python-morris: FTBFS: AssertionError: Failed doctest test for morris)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:21:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026584: fixed in python-morris 1.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026584, regarding python-morris: FTBFS: AssertionError: Failed doctest test for morris to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1064900: debian-edu-config: Depends on libproxy plugins which are NBS

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: debian-edu-config Version: 2.12.44 Severity: serious Affects: src:libproxy Forwarded: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-edu/debian-edu-config/-/merge_requests/35 debian-edu-config has Depends for several libproxy plugins. libproxy 0.5 was rewritten and no longer has a plugin architecture. P

Bug#1064889: libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:33 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > If that's the case, then we should have transitional packages with those > names that just depend on libproxy1v5 (>= 0.5.3). This serves two purposes: What do you think about adding versioned Breaks/Replaces/Provides instead? That seemed to

Bug#1064893: marked as done (python3-pcpp: /usr/bin/pcpp is already provided by the pcc package)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:49:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064893: fixed in pcpp 1.30-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064893, regarding python3-pcpp: /usr/bin/pcpp is already provided by the pcc package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processed: Bug#1064889 marked as pending in libproxy

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064889 [src:libproxy] libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064889 to the same tags previously set -- 1064889: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064889 Debian Bug T

Bug#1064889: marked as pending in libproxy

2024-02-27 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064889 in libproxy reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/libproxy/-/commit/302ee018ae76b179b7a9d3ea7ac

Bug#1064889: marked as done (libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:41:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064889: fixed in libproxy 0.5.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064889, regarding libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1064900: debian-edu-config: Depends on libproxy plugins which are NBS

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important I'm lowering the severity since the latest libproxy upload added transitional packages. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Processed: Re: debian-edu-config: Depends on libproxy plugins which are NBS

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1064900 [src:debian-edu-config] debian-edu-config: Depends on libproxy plugins which are NBS Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1064900: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064900 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Bug#1058317: Bug#1063345: python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cls at ../Modules/itertoolsmodule.c

2024-02-27 Thread Colin Watson
Control: unmerge 1058317 1063345 Control: reassign 1063345 python3.12 Control: affects 1063345 celery Control: forwarded 1063345 https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/115874 Control: block 1058317 by 1063345 Control: tag 1063345 patch On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 02:26:55PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#1063345: python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cls at ../Modules/itertoolsmodule.c

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > unmerge 1058317 1063345 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 1063345 python3.12 Bug #1063345 [python3.12] python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cls at ../Modules/itertoolsmodule.c Bug #1058317 [python3.12] celery: FTBFS: dh_

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#1063345: python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cls at ../Modules/itertoolsmodule.c

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > unmerge 1058317 1063345 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 1063345 python3.12 Bug #1063345 [src:celery] python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cls at ../Modules/itertoolsmodule.c Bug #1058317 [src:celery] celery: FTBFS: dh_

Processed: unmerging 1058317, affects 1058317, reassign 1058317 to celery, bug 1058317 is not forwarded

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 1058317 Bug #1058317 [python3.12] celery: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 Bug #1063345 [python3.12] python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cl

Processed: block 1058317 with 1063345, tagging 1058317

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1058317 with 1063345 Bug #1058317 [celery] celery: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 1058317 was not blocked by any bugs. 1058317 was not blocking any bugs. Adde

Bug#1064402: Quick and dirty patch

2024-02-27 Thread Plasson R.
All the errors comes down to the modification of for loop variables inside the loop. I don't know much about lua, but this seems to be forbidden, for loop variables being seen as const. The attached patch is just a quick and dirty correction, that roughly comes down to change this kind of patte

Processed: Re: glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1064744 glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted > certificates Bug #1064744 [src:libgdata] libgdata: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 mes

Bug#1064909: libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available

2024-02-27 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Package: libbsd-dev Version: 0.12.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@kernel.org Dear Guillem, After upgrading to libbsd 0.12 today, several build systems that I use started reporting many failures about libbsd functions. The functions se

Bug#1064909: libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available

2024-02-27 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Guillem! On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 05:33:16PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > I've also seen errc(3bsd) disappear, and possibly many more functions. > If you need some help to reproduce this issue, just let me know. In the case of , the header has disappeared: $ cat bsd.c #in

Processed: Re: glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1064744 src:geary Bug #1064744 [src:glib-networking] glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates Added indication that 1064744 affects src:geary > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: Re: glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1064744 -src: -libsoup2.4 +src:libsoup2.4 Bug #1064744 [src:glib-networking] glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates Removed indication that 1064744 affects src: > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#1064909: libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available

2024-02-27 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi! On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 17:33:16 +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: [...] > The strtoi() function is declared in . I don't think that > has changed in libbsd. Oops! I wrote the reproducer too fast. Actually, the problem I

Bug#1064889: libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins

2024-02-27 Thread Simon McVittie
(Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.) On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 08:39:05 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:33 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > > If that's the case, then we should have transitional packages with those > > names that just depend on libproxy1v5 (>= 0.5.3). This se

Bug#1064915: libkeymancore-dev: Missing dependency: libicu-dev

2024-02-27 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: libkeymancore-dev Version: 17.0.274-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-CC: e...@sil.org Dear Maintainer, Package libkeymancore-dev needs libicu-dev according to the pkg-config file via Requires.private: prefix=/usr includedir=${prefix}/include libdir=${p

Bug#1064909: libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available

2024-02-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 17:33:16 +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Package: libbsd-dev > Version: 0.12.0-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: upstream > Justification: renders package unusable > X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@kernel.org > After upgrading to libbsd 0.12 today, several build systems that I use > star

Processed: Re: glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1064744 [src:glib-networking] glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1064744: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064744 Debian Bug Tracking System Co

Bug#1064744: glib-networking: System trust contains zero trusted certificates

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important I don't know what is causing this issue which is causing build test failures elsewhere. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is not affected although its packaging is identical for glib-networking, ca-certificates, etc. It also appears to not affect the official Debian buildds or Sals

Bug#1064889: libproxy: should have transitional packages for the plugins

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:36 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > (Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.) > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 08:39:05 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:33 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > > > If that's the case, then we should have transitional packages with

Bug#1064920: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures

2024-02-27 Thread dann frazier
Source: rshim-user-space Version: 2.0.12+debian-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The switch to fuse3 appears to have introduced a build issue for 32-bit architectures such as armhf: From https://buildd.debian.org/statu

Bug#1064921: src:r-cran-estimatr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on i386

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: r-cran-estimatr Version: 1.0.0-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.0.2-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 day

Processed: src:r-cran-estimatr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on i386

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.0.2-1 Bug #1064921 [src:r-cran-estimatr] src:r-cran-estimatr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on i386 Marked as fixed in versions r-cran-estimatr/1.0.2-1. Bug #1064921 [src:r-cran-estimatr] src:r-cran-estimatr: fails to mi

Bug#1064922: src:r-cran-gbm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: r-cran-gbm Version: 2.1.8.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.1.9-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days a

Processed: src:r-cran-gbm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2.1.9-1 Bug #1064922 [src:r-cran-gbm] src:r-cran-gbm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression Marked as fixed in versions r-cran-gbm/2.1.9-1. Bug #1064922 [src:r-cran-gbm] src:r-cran-gbm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: a

Bug#1059249: marked as done (designer-qt6: Segmentation fault in /usr/lib/qt6/bin/designer at launch)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:52:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1059249: fixed in qt6-base 6.6.2+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1059249, regarding designer-qt6: Segmentation fault in /usr/lib/qt6/bin/designer at launch to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1057442: onboard ftbfs with Python 3.12

2024-02-27 Thread James Addison
Followup-For: Bug #1057442 X-Debbugs-Cc: tsu.y...@gmail.com Hi Bo, On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:31:52 +0800, Bo wrote: > I think it is okay to remove `-Wdeclaration-after-statement` option > which to support Arch linux build from code comment. FYI: I've reported #1064028 against Python3.12 to suggest f

Bug#1064845: marked as done (fcitx5-keyman build depends on cruft libkmnkbp-dev)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:04:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064845: fixed in fcitx5-keyman 1.0.7+git20240227-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064845, regarding fcitx5-keyman build depends on cruft libkmnkbp-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1057562: marked as done (gcr4: FTBFS: failing tests)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:19:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1057562: fixed in gcr4 4.2.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1057562, regarding gcr4: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#1063393: marked as done (systemd FTBFS with nocheck build profile: ../meson.build:1810:33: ERROR: Feature ukify cannot be enabled: Python >= 3.9 and pefile required)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:54:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063393: fixed in systemd 255.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063393, regarding systemd FTBFS with nocheck build profile: ../meson.build:1810:33: ERROR: Feature ukify cannot be enabled: Python >= 3.9 an

Bug#1064928: FTBFS everywhere

2024-02-27 Thread Pierre Gruet
Source: openturns Version: 1.21.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs fixed-in-experimental pending Hi, Since latest swig upstream version was uploaded to unstable, openturns FTBFS on all architectures. This can be fixed by applying https://github.com/openturns/openturns/commit/ff713c2520d5874b9

Processed: fixed 1064928 in 1.22-1

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1064928 1.22-1 Bug #1064928 [src:openturns] FTBFS everywhere Marked as fixed in versions openturns/1.22-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1064928: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#1064890: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#1064890: libxmlsec1-dev, libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/*

2024-02-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 27.02.24 um 11:43 schrieb Andreas Beckmann via debian-xml-sgml-pkgs: Package: libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc Version: 1.2.39-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries t

Bug#1064890: marked as pending in xmlsec1

2024-02-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064890 in xmlsec1 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/xml-sgml-team/xmlsec1/-/commit/7b889d09d445ea288d713da3c3

Processed: Bug#1064890 marked as pending in xmlsec1

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064890 [libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc] libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/* Added tag(s) pending. -- 1064890: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064890 Debian Bug Tracking System Con

Bug#1064890: marked as pending in xmlsec1

2024-02-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064890 in xmlsec1 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/xml-sgml-team/xmlsec1/-/commit/7b889d09d445ea288d713da3c3

Processed: Bug#1064890 marked as pending in xmlsec1

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064890 [libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc] libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/* Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064890 to the same tags previously set -- 1064890: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#1064438: marked as pending in gnome-settings-daemon

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064438 in gnome-settings-daemon reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-settings-daemon/-/commit/5

Processed: Bug#1064438 marked as pending in gnome-settings-daemon

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064438 [gnome-settings-daemon] gnome-settings-daemon: gsd-xsettings crash with older gsettings-desktop-schemas Bug #1064468 [gnome-settings-daemon] Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.a11y.interface' does not contain a key named 'show-status-sh

Processed: your mail

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1064890 1.2.39-1 Bug #1064890 [libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc] libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/* Marked as found in versions xmlsec1/1.2.39-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#1064468: marked as done (Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.a11y.interface' does not contain a key named 'show-status-shapes')

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:04:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064438: fixed in gnome-settings-daemon 46~beta-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064438, regarding Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.a11y.interface' does not contain a key named 'show-status-shapes' to be

Bug#1064438: marked as done (gnome-settings-daemon: gsd-xsettings crash with older gsettings-desktop-schemas)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:04:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064438: fixed in gnome-settings-daemon 46~beta-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064438, regarding gnome-settings-daemon: gsd-xsettings crash with older gsettings-desktop-schemas to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1064890: marked as done (libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/*)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:08:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064890: fixed in xmlsec1 1.2.39-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064890, regarding libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/* to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1064890: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#1064890: libxmlsec1-dev, libxmlsec1-doc: both ship /usr/share/doc/libxmlsec1-dev/examples/*

2024-02-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 27/02/2024 21.22, Rene Engelhard wrote: dh_installexamples examples/* installs into the first package being acted on ... and that differs between -A and -B builds. this is masked by libxmlsec1 vs. libxmlsec1-dev and I guess the t64 rename broke whatever magic is there... Determining the

Processed: your mail

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1064776 4:24.2.0-2 Bug #1064776 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] bogusly redirects Bugs to debian-openoff...@lists.debian.org instead of the BTS Marked as fixed in versions libreoffice/4:24.2.0-2. Bug #1064776 {Done: Rene Engelhard

Processed: your mail

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1062390 -pending Bug #1062390 [src:libkf5libkleo] libkf5libkleo: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Removed tag(s) pending. > tags 1062477 -pending Bug #1062477 [src:k3b] k3b: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Removed tag(s) pending.

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 23.02.24 22:10, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Matthias, Since glib and gobject-introspection have migrated out of noble-proposed, is there still a need to keep this bug open? I'm unsure how many packages are affected by this. I need to trust your assessment for that. Suppose you would start again

Bug#1064938: isospec - maintainer does not access email from ftp-master

2024-02-27 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: isospec Severity: serious - Forwarded message from debichem-devel-ow...@alioth-lists.debian.net - From: debichem-devel-ow...@alioth-lists.debian.net To: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org Subject: Processing of isospec_2.2.1-4.1~exp2_source.changes You are not allowed to post to th

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-27 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 23:07:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.02.24 22:10, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > > Since glib and gobject-introspection have migrated out of > > noble-proposed, is there still a need to keep this bug open? > > Suppose you would start again building glib2.0 (and depending pac

Processed: tagging 1063345

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1063345 + pending Bug #1063345 [python3.12] python3.12: Segmentation fault in get_module_state_by_cls at ../Modules/itertoolsmodule.c Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 106

Bug#1064945: grub-efi-amd64: Sudden boot failures on ZFS systems

2024-02-27 Thread John Goerzen
Package: grub-efi-amd64 Version: 2.06-13+deb12u1 Severity: critical Tags: upstream patch Justification: breaks the whole system My system suddenly refused to start up grub. An error message flashed by, but too quickly for me to be able to see. Then I got the grub emergency prompt. Upon booting

Bug#1064909: in package libbsd marked as pending

2024-02-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: tag 1064909 pending Hi! Bug #1064909 that you reported in package libbsd has been fixed in the debian/pkgs/libbsd.git git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://git.hadrons.org/cgit/debian/pkgs/libbsd.git/diff/?id=864f359 ---

Processed: Bug#1064909 in package libbsd marked as pending

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag 1064909 pending Bug #1064909 [libbsd-dev] libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available Added tag(s) pending. -- 1064909: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064909 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Bug#1062802: marked as done (libpam0t64: file loss during upgrade due to /usr-move DEP17)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:31:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1062802: fixed in pam 1.5.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1062802, regarding libpam0t64: file loss during upgrade due to /usr-move DEP17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1064909: marked as done (libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:05:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064909: fixed in libbsd 0.12.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064909, regarding libbsd-dev: Many functions (possibly all?) aren't available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1060940: marked as pending in libfreemarker-java

2024-02-27 Thread Tony Mancill
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1060940 in libfreemarker-java reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libfreemarker-java/-/commit/03791e28

Processed: Bug#1060940 marked as pending in libfreemarker-java

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1060940 [src:libfreemarker-java] libfreemarker-java: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1060940: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060940 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Bug#1064949: FTBFS: python3-attr

2024-02-27 Thread Salvo "LtWorf" Tomaselli
Package: python3-attr Version: 23.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: ltw...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, It seems that python3-attr cannot be built at the present moment. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (

Bug#1060940: marked as done (libfreemarker-java: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:10:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060940: fixed in libfreemarker-java 2.3.32-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060940, regarding libfreemarker-java: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25 to be marked as don

Bug#1064950: apache2: (Legacy?) "Depends: apache2-data (= ${source:Version})," in debian/control breaks binNMU builds.

2024-02-27 Thread Warlich, Christof
Subject: apache2: (Legacy?) "Depends: apache2-data (= ${source:Version})," in debian/control breaks binNMU builds. Source: apache2 X-Debbugs-Cc: christof.warl...@siemens.com Version: 2.4.57-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: pat

Bug#1063252: marked as done (pristine-tar: Always set the -T parameter for xz)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:51:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063252: fixed in pristine-tar 1.50+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063252, regarding pristine-tar: Always set the -T parameter for xz to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h