Bug#1069073: marked as done (lua-mode: FTBFS: failing tests)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 06:49:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069073: fixed in lua-mode 20210802-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069073, regarding lua-mode: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1064374: marked as done (rust-gtk-layer-shell-sys: Depends on obsolete rust-gtk)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 04:31:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069111: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1064374, regarding rust-gtk-layer-shell-sys: Depends on obsolete rust-gtk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1062773: marked as done (python-watchgod: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-anyio)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 04:30:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061967: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1062773, regarding python-watchgod: autopkgtest needs update for new version of python-anyio to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1061026: marked as done (python-watchgod: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_watch.py::test_watch_log[trio] - RuntimeError: Already runn...)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 04:30:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061967: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1061026, regarding python-watchgod: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_watch.py::test_watch_log[trio] - RuntimeError: Already runn... to be mar

Bug#1037699: intel-mediasdk: ftbfs with GCC-13

2024-04-19 Thread Zixing Liu
Package: intel-mediasdk Followup-For: Bug #1037699 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/patches/fix-missing-includes.patch: Add missing

Processed: Re: intel-mediasdk: ftbfs with GCC-13

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1037699 [src:intel-mediasdk] intel-mediasdk: ftbfs with GCC-13 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1037699 to the same tags previously set -- 1037699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1069309: marked as done (xfractint FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:50:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069309: fixed in xfractint 20.4.10-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069309, regarding xfractint FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1068580: marked as done (collected: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error: "Some plugins are missing dependencies - see the summary above for details")

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:04:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068580: fixed in collectd 5.12.0-18 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068580, regarding collected: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure: error: "Some plugins are missing dependencies - see the summary above for de

Bug#1068538: ruby-ffi-libarchive: arch:all package depends on pre-t64 library

2024-04-19 Thread Bastian Germann
This can be fixed with a binNMU.

Bug#1059673: trololio: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12

2024-04-19 Thread me
Hi, I'm the author of Trololio. I've never posted to Debian mailing lists, so apologies if I don't follow proper etiquette. I did take a quick look at the relevant Wiki page and CoC. Trololio was written to make Python 3 async easily back-compatible with Python 2. The context is Trollius was a b

Bug#1069017: marked as done (rtags: FTBFS due to time64_t changes)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:36:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069017: fixed in rtags 2.38-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069017, regarding rtags: FTBFS due to time64_t changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1067209: marked as done (jruby: please update libfixposix4 runtime depency)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:35:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067209: fixed in jruby 9.4.6.0+ds-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067209, regarding jruby: please update libfixposix4 runtime depency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#1067209: jruby: please update libfixposix4 runtime depency

2024-04-19 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru jruby-9.4.6.0+ds/debian/changelog jruby-9.4.6.0+ds/debian/changelog --- jruby-9.4.6.0+ds/debian/changelog 2024-02-29 00:39:52.0 + +++ jruby-9.4.6.0+ds/debian/changelog 2024-04-19 22:06:26.0 + @@ -1,3 +1

Bug#1066938: Fwd: Bug#1066938: libfiu: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /tmp/cc54dEva.s:726: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined

2024-04-19 Thread Santiago Vila
El 25/3/24 a las 20:12, Chris Lamb escribió: Alberto Bertogli wrote: If you know of a functional official image that I can use to try to reproduce the problem, or recently-tested steps I can follow to get a working qemu install, please let me know. Alas, I can't actually be helpful here. Ther

Bug#1066483: scrollz: FTBFS: configure: error: Fatal: You must get working getaddrinfo() function.

2024-04-19 Thread Mike Markley
I've updated this package to a newer upstream release and it seems to build fine on my own amd64 system. However, I haven't had a key in the Debian key ring for quite some time and I'm not able to upload. I'm starting here in the hopes that someone who's also interested in this package will see i

Bug#1069017: rtags: FTBFS due to time64_t changes

2024-04-19 Thread Denis Danilov
Hi Gianfranco, thanks for the patch with the fix. I will upload new version with our patch included. Best regards, Denis On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:00:06AM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Package: rtags > Version: 2.38-9 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > Hello maintainer, I fixed a

Processed: Re: Bug#1061546: srcpd: installs file into aliased location

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1061546 [src:srcpd] srcpd: installs file into aliased location Added tag(s) pending. -- 1061546: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061546 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1061546: srcpd: installs file into aliased location

2024-04-19 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending On 26.01.2024 23:01, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Hi, Please move /lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.rules into /usr/lib before srcpd reaches testing. hille42@hz:~/devel/srcpd$ dpkg-deb -c srcpd_2.1.6-2_amd

Bug#1058200: marked as done (python-pyepics: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'configparser' has no attribute 'SafeConfigParser'. Did you mean: 'RawConfigParser'?)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 21:10:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1058200: fixed in python-pyepics 3.5.2+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1058200, regarding python-pyepics: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'configparser' has no attribute 'SafeConfigParser'. Did you mean:

Bug#1067018: lnav: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: test failures

2024-04-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
FWIW, I will try to work on the new available upstream version in the next days and see if the two RC bugs on lnav can be addressed along. it does not make sense to investigate the testsuite failure right now without rebasing to the new version.

Processed: Re: FTBFS: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1067616 [src:clanlib] FTBFS: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’ Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067616 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1067616: FTBFS: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1067616 Control: tag -1 patch I'm attaching a patch fixing input_event.time usage. Andreas >From 8435c93a70ae65035002d0039a9a511a5974df90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Beckmann Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:12:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fix --link-doc package --- deb

Bug#1069321: FTBFS: [Makefile:163: check] Error 1

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: hypre Version: 2.28.0-8 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hypre&arch=armhf&ver=2.28.0-8%2Bb2&stamp=1713420980&raw=0 I couldn't find the actual failing command. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT

Bug#1069320: FTBFS on mips64el: cannot find -lasan: No such file or directory

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: datatype99 Version: 1.6.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=datatype99&arch=mips64el&ver=1.6.4-1&stamp=1713121986&raw=0 make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/testsbuild' [ 10%] Building C object CMakeFiles/tests.dir/tests.c.o [ 20%] Linking C execut

Bug#1069319: FTBFS on armel: undefined reference to `__atomic_store_8'

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: datatype99 Version: 1.6.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=datatype99&arch=armel&ver=1.6.4-1&stamp=1713120793&raw=0 make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/testsbuild' [ 10%] Building C object CMakeFiles/tests.dir/tests.c.o [ 20%] Linking C executabl

Processed: tagging 1067697

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1067697 + ftbfs Bug #1067697 [src:xca] Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1067697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#1069318: FTBFS: error: unknown type name ‘StdVideoH264LevelIdc’

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: wine-development Version: 8.21~repack-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=wine- development&arch=amd64&ver=8.21%7Erepack-1%2Bb5&stamp=1712016271&raw=0 In file included from dlls/d3d12/d3d12_main.c:27: include/wine/vulkan.h:11804:5: error: unknow

Processed: Re: Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse-dev Bug #1069310 [src:gocryptfs] FTBFS: tests failed Bug reassigned from package 'src:gocryptfs' to 'golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions gocryptfs/2.4.0-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: reassign -1 golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse-dev Control: affects -1 src:gocryptfs On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:54 AM Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > > Source: gocryptfs > Version: 2.4.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gocryptfs&arch=mips64el&

Bug#1069317: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: sonic-visualiser Version: 4.5.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sonic- visualiser&arch=armel&ver=4.5.2-2%2Bb3&stamp=1713251413&raw=0 FAIL! : TestVampRealTime::fromTimeval() Compared values are not the same Loc: [test-svcore-base.p/../../s

Processed: tagging 1069017

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1069017 + ftbfs Bug #1069017 [rtags] rtags: FTBFS due to time64_t changes Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069017

Bug#1069315: Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: openjdk-20 Version: 20.0.2+9-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs The package explicitly Build-Depends: libgtk2.0-0 | libgtk-3-0, these need to be changed to lib*t64 if these deps are needed at all. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (

Bug#1069313: FTBFS: implicit declaration of function ‘jpeg_memio_dest’; did you mean ‘jpeg_mem_dest’?

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: jskeus Version: 1.2.4+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=jskeus&arch=armhf&ver=1.2.4%2Bdfsg-3%2Bb2&stamp=1710976387&raw=0 gcc -g -c -o /<>/irteus/LinuxARM/obj/irtmath.o -DARM -DLinux -Wimplicit -falign-functions=4 -DGCC3 -DGCC -fsigned-cha

Bug#1069312: FTBFS: debian/hlibrary.setup build --builddir=dist-ghc returned exit code 1

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: haskell-gi-gtk Version: 3.0.41-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-gi- gtk&arch=armel&ver=3.0.41-1%2Bb6&stamp=1713045220&raw=0 [707 of 708] Compiling GI.Gtk.Structs ( GI/Gtk/Structs.hs, dist- ghc/build/GI/Gtk/Structs.o, dist-ghc/build/G

Bug#1067296: marked as done (gap-hapcryst: FTBFS: Can't load '/usr/lib/polymake/perlx/5.38.2/x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi/auto/Polymake/Ext/Ext.so' for module Polymake::Ext: libflint.so.18: cannot op

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:51:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067296: fixed in gap-hapcryst 0.1.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067296, regarding gap-hapcryst: FTBFS: Can't load '/usr/lib/polymake/perlx/5.38.2/x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi/auto/Polymake/Ext/Ext.

Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: gocryptfs Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gocryptfs&arch=mips64el&ver=2.4.0-1%2Bb6&stamp=1713405841&raw=0 panic: DIRECT (8000) overlaps with LARGEFILE (8000) goroutine 1 [running]: github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/fuse.(*flagNames).s

Bug#1069309: xfractint FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function

2024-04-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: xfractint Version: 20.4.10-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: Petter Reinholdtsen https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=xfractint&ver=20.4.10-4 ... /usr/bin/gcc -I../headers -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong

Bug#1066938: Fwd: Bug#1066938: libfiu: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /tmp/cc54dEva.s:726: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined

2024-04-19 Thread Alberto Bertogli
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:12:24PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: Alberto Bertogli wrote: If you know of a functional official image that I can use to try to reproduce the problem, or recently-tested steps I can follow to get a working qemu install, please let me know. Alas, I can't actually be hel

Bug#1069308: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: gnome-subtitles Version: 1.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnome- subtitles&arch=amd64&ver=1.8-1%2Bb3&stamp=1712013676&raw=0 @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ "GstDiscovererClass.starting": "144" "GstDiscovererClass.discovered": "152" "GstDiscovererC

Bug#1069307: FTBFS: configure: error: must specify --with-locking-method option

2024-04-19 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: courier Version: 1.0.16-3.2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=courier&arch=armel&ver=1.0.16-3.2%2Bb4&stamp=1712019536&raw=0 checking for locking method... configure: error: must specify --with-locking- method option configure: error: ./configure

Bug#1062558: marked as done (libosmo-netif: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:38:05 + (UTC) with message-id and subject line no longer packages on 32bit architectures has caused the Debian Bug report #1062558, regarding libosmo-netif: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1066005: marked as done (epic4: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gailib.c:95:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strncpy’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:02:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066005: fixed in epic4 1:2.10.10-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066005, regarding epic4: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gailib.c:95:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’; did you mean ‘strncpy’?

Bug#1066005: NMU: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlcpy’

2024-04-19 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. Please find the debdiff attached. epic4_2.10.10-1.1.debdiff Description: Binary data

Processed: Report #1059673 upstream

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1059673 https://github.com/ThinkChaos/Trololio/issues/2 Bug #1059673 [src:trololio] trololio: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/ThinkChaos/Trololio/issues/2'. > End of message, stop

Bug#1068696: marked as done (haskell-hourglass FTBFS on armel and armhf)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:19:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068696: fixed in haskell-hourglass 0.2.12-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068696, regarding haskell-hourglass FTBFS on armel and armhf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1063418: marked as done (mdp ftbfs in unstable)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:04:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063418: fixed in mdp 3.6-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063418, regarding mdp ftbfs in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#1023035: marked as done (gauche: Includes non-free software)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:26:11 +0200 with message-id <87o7a5pe5o@karme.de> and subject line upstream resolved this in 0.9.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023035, regarding gauche: Includes non-free software to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: Bug#1064293 marked as pending in less

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064293 [src:less] less: CVE-2022-48624 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064293 to the same tags previously set -- 1064293: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064293 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: less: diff for NMU version 590-2.1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1064293 + patch Bug #1064293 [src:less] less: CVE-2022-48624 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1064293 + pending Bug #1064293 [src:less] less: CVE-2022-48624 Added tag(s) pending. > tags 1068938 + patch Bug #1068938 [src:less] less: CVE-2024-32487: with LESSOPEN mishan

Processed: Bug#1068938 marked as pending in less

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068938 [src:less] less: CVE-2024-32487: with LESSOPEN mishandles \n in paths Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1068938 to the same tags previously set -- 1068938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068938 Debian Bug Tracki

Processed: less: diff for NMU version 590-2.1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1064293 + patch Bug #1064293 [src:less] less: CVE-2022-48624 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064293 to the same tags previously set > tags 1064293 + pending Bug #1064293 [src:less] less: CVE-2022-48624 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064293 to th

Bug#1068938: marked as pending in less

2024-04-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068938 in less reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/less/-/commit/e353d9a5cf7f29570e0ae4e0431b5254feaebbd

Bug#1064293: marked as pending in less

2024-04-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064293 in less reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/less/-/commit/e61c8283fbf69a8262d3cec653090fab6e83042

Bug#1064293: less: diff for NMU version 590-2.1

2024-04-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 1064293 + patch Control: tags 1064293 + pending Control: tags 1068938 + patch Control: tags 1068938 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for less (versioned as 590-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. As well pushed

Bug#1069299: kodi-visualization-waveform FTBFS on arm*: does not agree on gl vs gles

2024-04-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: kodi-visualization-waveform Version: 20.2.1+ds1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs kodi-visualization-waveform fails to build from source on arm architectures. A build fails like this: | CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.28/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:230 (message): | Coul

Bug#1067561: marked as done (FTBFS: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:35:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067561: fixed in lightdm 1.32.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067561, regarding FTBFS: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#1052855: marked as done (firmware-microbit-micropython: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-dev (= 15:12.2.rel1-1+23), gcc-arm-none-eabi (= 15:12.2.rel1-1))

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:30:04 +0100 with message-id <2ed1514f-5951-4963-a261-31534b095...@morrott.co.uk> and subject line Re: Build deps are now satisfied has caused the Debian Bug report #1052855, regarding firmware-microbit-micropython: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: lib

Bug#1064293: less: CVE-2022-48624

2024-04-19 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, FWIW, I'm actually preparing a security update for the two CVEs and for bookworm I was first planning to do a 590-2.1 reaching unstable, and so then 590-2.1~deb12u1 for bookworm. But if you want to override it with a NMU and proposing to salvage the package this is equally fine. Regards, Sal

Processed: bookworm-pu: package python-asdf/2.14.3-1+deb12u1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1054581 with -1 Bug #1054581 {Done: Ole Streicher } [python3-asdf] asdf: Missing dependency on asdf-unit-schemas (breaks pkg_resources) 1054581 was not blocked by any bugs. 1054581 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1054581: 1069295 > affects

Bug#1068537: marked as pending in ruby-ethon

2024-04-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068537 in ruby-ethon reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-ethon/-/commit/c66b1a1db60d982a2648f449

Processed: Bug#1068537 marked as pending in ruby-ethon

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068537 [src:ruby-ethon] ruby-ethon: arch:all package depends on pre-t64 library Added tag(s) pending. -- 1068537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: block 1068537 with 1069292

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1068537 with 1069292 Bug #1068537 [src:ruby-ethon] ruby-ethon: arch:all package depends on pre-t64 library 1068537 was not blocked by any bugs. 1068537 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1068537: 1069292 > thanks Stopping p

Bug#1066315: marked as done (kraptor: FTBFS: src/main.c:57:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:20:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066315: fixed in kraptor 0.0.20040403+ds-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066315, regarding kraptor: FTBFS: src/main.c:57:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decl

Processed (with 1 error): bookworm-pu: package comitup/1.38-2~deb12u1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1041447 with -1 Bug #1041447 {Done: David Steele } [comitup] comitup: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again 1041447 was not blocked by any bugs. 1041447 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1041447: 1069291 > tag -1 + src:comi

Bug#1067923: marked as done (alsa-ucm-conf: should depend on libasound2t64 instead of libasound2)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:34:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067923: fixed in alsa-ucm-conf 1.2.11-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067923, regarding alsa-ucm-conf: should depend on libasound2t64 instead of libasound2 to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#1067923: alsa-ucm-conf: should depend on libasound2t64 instead of libasound2

2024-04-19 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached. alsa-ucm-conf_1.2.11-1.1.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1069163: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Patrick Franz ) (Bug#1069163: fixed in libkf5ksieve 4:22.12.3-2)

2024-04-19 Thread Jonas Schäfer
Hi there, With a test build provided by Patrick, I was able to confirm that this fixes the issue on my system. Thank you for the swift response! kind regards, -- Jonas Schäfer Team Lead Cloud Infrastructure Development Cloud&Heat Technologies GmbH Königsbrücker Straße 96 | 01099 Dresden +49 3

Processed: Re: python3-h5sparse incomplete Depends: python3-h5py-serial

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 sid trixie Bug #1053266 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [python3-h5sparse] python3-h5sparse incomplete Depends: python3-h5py-serial Added tag(s) trixie and sid. -- 1053266: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053266 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact o

Bug#1053266: python3-h5sparse incomplete Depends: python3-h5py-serial

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 sid trixie On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 12:34:07 +0200 Drew Parsons wrote: Package: python3-h5sparse Version: 0.1.0-6 doing 'import h5sparse' with this package version installed in bookworm works fine without python3-h5py while it fails in sid without python3-h5py: import h5sparse T

Bug#1067561: FTBFS: Error: symbol `open64' is already defined

2024-04-19 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 00:01 +0100, Peter Green wrote: > Thanks, upstream has now accepted a patch that takes a slightly different > approach to fixing the issue. > > https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/352 Yes I saw. That's why I think this

Processed: Re: pagetools: FTBFS with netpbm11

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1012690 + patch Bug #1012690 [src:pagetools] pagetools: FTBFS with netpbm11 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012690: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10126

Bug#1012690: pagetools: FTBFS with netpbm11

2024-04-19 Thread Santiago Vila
tags 1012690 + patch thanks Hello Víctor. I believe the attached patch will be enough to fix the build failure (but you might want to update other things as well). I would gladly be your sponsor if you still need it. Thanks.diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 0e9a667..9b33160 10

Bug#1064293: less: CVE-2022-48624

2024-04-19 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2024-04-12 at 16:10, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hey. > > There seems to be a somewhat similar issue reported by Jakub Wilk on > oss-security: > https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/5 > > where quoting causes troubles (though I couldn't replay the demo). That was since

Bug#1064531: marked as done (src:amberol: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: librust-lofty-0.17-dev)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:04:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064531: fixed in amberol 0.10.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064531, regarding src:amberol: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: librust-lofty-0.17-dev to be marked as done. This means that you c

Processed: bookworm-pu: package libmail-dkim-perl/1.20230212-2~deb12u1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1040438 with -1 Bug #1040438 {Done: gregor herrmann } [libmail-dkim-perl] libmail-dkim-perl: missing dependency on libgetopt-long-descriptive-perl 1040438 was not blocked by any bugs. 1040438 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1040438: 1069284

Bug#1066224:

2024-04-19 Thread Miriam Espana Acebal
Hi, In ubuntu we applied the upstream's fix at https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/pull/196. I adapted it to a pair of patches that I attach here for fixing this FTBFS. I am sending this for your consideration, and I hope it helps. Best, Miriam -- [image: Canonical-20th-anniversary] Miria

Processed: bookworm-pu: package what-is-python/13+deb12u1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1034995 with -1 Bug #1034995 {Done: Matthias Klose } [python-is-python3] python-is-python3: missing Breaks+Replaces for python-dev-is-python2 when upgrading from bullseye 1034995 was not blocked by any bugs. 1034995 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking b

Bug#1012893: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, thank you for your work on t64 transition. Am Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:02PM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: I've spotted these Debian Med packages. > gentle > jellyfish > quorum > sbmltoolbox No idea how we can help here. Please let us know if we can do something. > anfo W

Bug#1064702: marked as done (libxcb: FTBFS: KeyError: 'xcb_report_level_t')

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:05:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064702: fixed in libxcb 1.17.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064702, regarding libxcb: FTBFS: KeyError: 'xcb_report_level_t' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#1063631: marked as done (hkl FTBFS with libcglm-dev 0.9.2-1)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:05:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063631: fixed in hkl 5.0.0.3434-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063631, regarding hkl FTBFS with libcglm-dev 0.9.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1068963: marked as done (python-falcon: FTBFS: testsuite failure: 3084 passed, 313 skipped, 170 warnings, 35 errors)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:40:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068963: fixed in python-falcon 3.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068963, regarding python-falcon: FTBFS: testsuite failure: 3084 passed, 313 skipped, 170 warnings, 35 errors to be marked as done. Th

Processed: Re: ruby-aws-partitions: Package missing partitions.json

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1.653.0-2 Bug #1042415 {Done: Cédric Boutillier } [ruby-aws-partitions] ruby-aws-partitions: Package missing partitions.json Marked as found in versions ruby-aws-partitions/1.653.0-2; no longer marked as fixed in versions ruby-aws-partitions/1.653.0-2 and

Bug#1042415: ruby-aws-partitions: Package missing partitions.json

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1042415 Control: found -1 1.653.0-2 I was looking into backporting the trivial fix to stable, but upon verification I ran into another missing file (partitions-metadata.json), which is also reproducible on sid: # irb irb(main):001:0> require 'aws-partitions' irb(main):002:1* Aw

Bug#1068963: marked as pending in python-falcon

2024-04-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068963 in python-falcon reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-falcon/-/commit/608aa7

Processed: Bug#1068963 marked as pending in python-falcon

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068963 [src:python-falcon] python-falcon: FTBFS: testsuite failure: 3084 passed, 313 skipped, 170 warnings, 35 errors Added tag(s) pending. -- 1068963: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068963 Debian Bug Tracking System Contac

Processed: Bug#1068963 marked as pending in python-falcon

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068963 [src:python-falcon] python-falcon: FTBFS: testsuite failure: 3084 passed, 313 skipped, 170 warnings, 35 errors Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1068963 to the same tags previously set -- 1068963: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#1068963: marked as pending in python-falcon

2024-04-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068963 in python-falcon reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-falcon/-/commit/608aa7

Bug#1068116: marked as done (python-pylibdmtx: depends on pre-t64 packages)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:34:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068116: fixed in python-pylibdmtx 0.1.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068116, regarding python-pylibdmtx: depends on pre-t64 packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processed: bookworm-pu: package pdudaemon/0.0.8.58.g597052b-1+deb12u1

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1060768 with -1 Bug #1060768 {Done: Sjoerd Simons } [pdudaemon] pdudaemon: Missing dependency on python3-aiohttp 1060768 was not blocked by any bugs. 1060768 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1060768: 1069274 > affects -1 + src:pdudaemon Bug

Bug#1069202: marked as done (gpg-sq: gpg-from-sq diverts /usr/bin/gpg but doesn't place a symlink pointing to gpg-sq)

2024-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:05:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069202: fixed in rust-sequoia-chameleon-gnupg 0.8.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069202, regarding gpg-sq: gpg-from-sq diverts /usr/bin/gpg but doesn't place a symlink pointing to gpg-sq to be marked