In my last commit, I added also a fix for #1060772:
- jupyter-lab uses yarnpkg by default
- in Debian build context, this can be overridden using
YARN_COMMAND=pkgjs-install-minimal
then I reimported your hook executed after dh_install to launch
`jupyter-lab build`. This seems to work but mus
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1060772 [python3-jupyterlab] python3-jupyterlab: Using node-corepack
downloads yarnpkg from Internet
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1060772: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1060772 in node-jupyterlab reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-jupyterlab/-/commit/021de3828efc9052
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 05:11:25PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: notfound -1 sredird/2.1.0-1
> Control: fixed -1 2.2.1-1.1
>
> I see that CVE-2004-2386 and maybe CVE-2004-2387 was addressed with #267098.
> The diff (one change in LogMsg and one in HandleCPCCommand) that is
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jun 2024 05:16:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069474: fixed in spacenavd 1.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069474,
regarding spacenavd: FTBFS on armhf: src/dev_usb_linux.c:293:30: error: ‘struct
input_event’ has no member named ‘time’
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jun 2024 05:16:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071983: fixed in netctl 1.29-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071983,
regarding netctl: puts .service files into /
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jun 2024 05:16:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037908: fixed in yaramod 3.21.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037908,
regarding yaramod: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jun 2024 05:16:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060495: fixed in netctl 1.29-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060495,
regarding netctl: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1072349 + sid trixie
Bug #1072349 {Done: Jan Mojžíš } [src:lua-resty-lrucache]
lua-resty-lrucache: replace luajit2 with luajit
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> reassign 1072381 src:freeciv 3.1.1+ds-1
Bug #1072381 [freeiv] Provide gtk4-client p
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 22:49:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069484: fixed in cowdancer 0.90
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069484,
regarding cowdancer: FTBFS on armhf: ccjNp8Id.s:2361: Error: symbol `open64' is
already defined
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1069484 in cowdancer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pbuilder-team/cowdancer/-/commit/ee7fd54fec3145ce95fb73
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1069484 [src:cowdancer] cowdancer: FTBFS on armhf: ccjNp8Id.s:2361: Error:
symbol `open64' is already defined
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1069484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 19:19:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072052: fixed in djangorestframework 3.15.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072052,
regarding djangorestframework: regression with pytest 8.2 due to invalid config
key
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 19:05:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072351: fixed in love 11.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072351,
regarding love: replace luajit2 with luajit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Source: dropbear
Version: 2024.85-1
Severity: serious
Justification: flaky debci is RC as per RT
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
Dropbear's debci sometimes fails and works on reruns, which is RC
according to the release team. E.g.:
44s _ test_read_pty[41234]
___
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:36:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072357: fixed in pkg-kde-tools 0.17.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072357,
regarding pkg-kde-tools: FTBFS on armhf/mips64el/riscv64: Broken tests due to
0.17.2 changes
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1069474 https://github.com/FreeSpacenav/spacenavd/issues/104
Bug #1069474 [src:spacenavd] spacenavd: FTBFS on armhf:
src/dev_usb_linux.c:293:30: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named
‘time’
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'h
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:05:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072355: fixed in nss-pam-ldapd 0.9.12-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072355,
regarding nss-pam-ldapd: upload with maintainer-built binaries cannot migrate
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
X-Debbugs-CC: vivia.nikolai...@puri.sm p...@debian.org
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:22:23 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 20:06:14 -0400 Boyuan Yang wrote:
>
> > The package you maintain (megadown, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/megadown
> > )
> > has a longstanding release-critical bug
On Sat, 2024-06-01 at 14:59 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> thanks for uploading to unstable. However the upload included
> maintainer-built binaries (for Arch: all and amd64). Migration to
> testing of these is forbidden by release team policy.
> Please upload a new version (no further changes
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 16:36:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072353: fixed in sysbench 1.0.20+ds-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072353,
regarding sysbench: replace luajit2 with luajit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Thanks!
I commit at:
https://salsa.debian.org/atzlinux-guest/psensor/-/commit/46ca316e92b62ef4fdbd54aa690445f3da8d398d
在 2024/6/1 21:07, Gianfranco Costamagna 写道:
Hello, I uploaded the package on git, please for the future commit this change:
diff -Nru psensor-1.2.1/debian/copyright psensor
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072353 [src:sysbench] sysbench: replace luajit2 with luajit
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072353 in sysbench reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/jcfp/sysbench/-/commit/dce75e0f80b8692f9b15864bb2b4a7cc0
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:19:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072350: fixed in libnginx-mod-http-lua 1:0.10.26-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072350,
regarding libnginx-mod-http-lua: replace luajit2 with luajit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:20:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072349: fixed in lua-resty-lrucache 0.13-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072349,
regarding lua-resty-lrucache: replace luajit2 with luajit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:20:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072348: fixed in lua-resty-core 0.1.28-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072348,
regarding lua-resty-core: replace luajit2 with luajit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 sredird/2.1.0-1
Bug #1072340 [src:sredird] sredird: CVE-2004-2386, format string vulnerability
The source sredird and version 2.1.0-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
No longer marked as found in versions sredird/2.1.0-1.
> fixed -1 2.2.1-1.1
B
Control: notfound -1 sredird/2.1.0-1
Control: fixed -1 2.2.1-1.1
I see that CVE-2004-2386 and maybe CVE-2004-2387 was addressed with #267098.
The diff (one change in LogMsg and one in HandleCPCCommand) that is in that bug
has survived until now.
But 2.2.2 has many more changes of the HandleCPCCo
Le 30/05/2024 à 22:25, Paul Gevers a écrit :
Currently, shaderc 2023.2-1 is in testing. This version suffers from an
"undefined symbol" bug
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070983). This bug is
fixed in version 2023.8-1 which is now in unstable.
Can you please elaborate ho
Source: libndp
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 1.6-1
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for libndp.
CVE-2024-5564[0]:
| A vulnerability was found in libndp
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.6-1
Bug #1072366 [src:libndp] libndp: CVE-2024-5564
Marked as found in versions libndp/1.6-1.
--
1072366: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072366
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags 1072107 + patch
Bug #1072107 [src:libarchive] libarchive: CVE-2024-26256
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1072107 + pending
Bug #1072107 [src:libarchive] libarchive: CVE-2024-26256
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1
Control: tags 1072107 + patch
Control: tags 1072107 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libarchive (versioned as 3.7.2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru libarchive-3.7.2/debian/changelog libar
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending patch
Bug #1072107 [src:libarchive] libarchive: CVE-2024-26256
Removed tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1072107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072107
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - pending patch
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 09:57:09AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags 1072107 + patch
> Control: tags 1072107 + pending
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for libarchive (versioned as 3.7.2-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Pleas
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 13:37:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069938: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #949942,
regarding backup2swift build depends on the removed pep8 transitional package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 12:41:43PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Source: sredird
> Version: 2.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
> X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> This is affected by CVE-2004-2386, which was marked by the Security Team as
> "NOT-FOR-US: sercd"
Source: pkg-kde-tools
Version: 0.17.2
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: mity...@debian.org
Dear Debian pkg-kde-tools maintainers,
It became clear that the fix in 0.17.2 broke some of the tests related to
time_t on several architectures, and the FTBFS is caused by mixing {time_t}
and {int64_t}. Please
gnupg2 (2.2.43-7) has arrived in unstable and gpg has started working
again, as far as I'm concerned this report can be closed, thanks.
Avoid breakage with epg.el (Closes: #1071552)
Hello, I uploaded the package on git, please for the future commit this change:
diff -Nru psensor-1.2.1/debian/copyright psensor-1.2.1/debian/copyright
--- psensor-1.2.1/debian/copyright 2024-05-31 04:01:47.0 +0200
+++ psensor-1.2.1/debian/copyright 2024-05-31 15:09:53.0 +020
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 13:08:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072183: fixed in fenics-dolfinx 1:0.8.0-7exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072183,
regarding fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Source: nss-pam-ldapd
Version: 0.9.12-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
thanks for uploading to unstable. However the upload included
maintainer-built binaries (for Arch: all and amd64). Migration to
testing of these is forbidden by release team policy.
Please upload a new version (no further changes neede
Source: sysbench
Version: 1.0.20+ds-6
Severity: serious
Control: block 1069780 by -1
luajit2 was requested to be removed, see #1069780. Please switch
your (Build-Depends) over to luajit, which has become the openresty
luajit(2) source.
Processing control commands:
> block 1069780 by -1
Bug #1069780 [ftp.debian.org] RM: luajit2 -- ROM; ROM; duplicate source
1069780 was blocked by: 1072350 1072349 1072348 1072352 1072351
1069780 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069780: 1072353
--
1069780: https://bugs.debian.
Processing control commands:
> block 1069780 by -1
Bug #1069780 [ftp.debian.org] RM: luajit2 -- ROM; ROM; duplicate source
1069780 was blocked by: 1072350 1072348 1072351 1072349
1069780 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069780: 1072352
--
1069780: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Source: lua-vips
Version: 1.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Control: block 1069780 by -1
luajit2 was requested to be removed, see #1069780. Please switch
your (Build-Depends) over to luajit, which has become the openresty
luajit(2) source.
Processing control commands:
> block 1069780 by -1
Bug #1069780 [ftp.debian.org] RM: luajit2 -- ROM; ROM; duplicate source
1069780 was blocked by: 1072348 1072350 1072349
1069780 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069780: 1072351
--
1069780: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Source: love
Version: 11.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: block 1069780 by -1
luajit2 was requested to be removed, see #1069780. Please switch
your (Build-Depends) over to luajit, which has become the openresty
luajit(2) source.
Processing control commands:
> block 1069780 by -1
Bug #1069780 [ftp.debian.org] RM: luajit2 -- ROM; ROM; duplicate source
1069780 was blocked by: 1072349 1072348
1069780 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069780: 1072350
--
1069780: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Source: libnginx-mod-http-lua
Version: 1:0.10.26-2
Severity: serious
Control: block 1069780 by -1
luajit2 was requested to be removed, see #1069780. Please switch
your (Build-Depends) over to luajit, which has become the openresty
luajit(2) source.
Processing control commands:
> block 1069780 by -1
Bug #1069780 [ftp.debian.org] RM: luajit2 -- ROM; ROM; duplicate source
1069780 was blocked by: 1072348
1069780 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069780: 1072349
--
1069780: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10
Source: lua-resty-lrucache
Version: 0.13-10
Severity: serious
Control: block 1069780 by -1
luajit2 was requested to be removed, see #1069780. Please switch
your (Build-Depends) over to luajit, which has become the openresty
luajit(2) source.
Processing control commands:
> block 1069780 by -1
Bug #1069780 [ftp.debian.org] RM: luajit2 -- ROM; ROM; duplicate source
1069780 was not blocked by any bugs.
1069780 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1069780: 1072348
--
1069780: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Source: lua-resty-core
Version: 0.1.28-2
Severity: serious
Control: block 1069780 by -1
luajit2 was requested to be removed, see #1069780. Please switch
your (Build-Depends) over to luajit, which has become the openresty
luajit(2) source.
Source: luajit2
Version: 2.1-20230410-1
Severity: serious
src:luajit2 now duplicates src:luajit, see #1069780. As such it
should not be part of trixie.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # crashing immediately on start seems to buggy to be shipped
> severity 1055607 serious
Bug #1055607 [gmemusage] gmemusage crashes immediately
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 11:40:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072057: fixed in python-pytest-asyncio 0.20.3-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072057,
regarding python3-pytest-asyncio: AttributeError: 'FixtureDef' object has no
attribute 'unittest'
to be marked as d
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/yhirose/cpp-httplib/issues/1798
Bug #1069357 [src:cpp-httplib] cpp-httplib: FTBFS: Test
SSLClientServerTest.ClientCertPresent fails with timeout
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/yhirose/cpp-httplib/issues/1798'.
-
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/yhirose/cpp-httplib/issues/1798
Hi all, a Gentoo developer has confirmed that this issue has been
caused by the OpenSSL 3.2 update, as I suspected. In almost two months,
nobody has been able to provide a fix. What should I do?
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 11:04:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072130: fixed in geary 46.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072130,
regarding geary: FTBFS: MESA: error: ZINK: vkCreateInstance failed
(VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072130 [src:geary] geary: FTBFS: MESA: error: ZINK: vkCreateInstance
failed (VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072130
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 6:39 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
> --- stderr ---
> MESA: error: ZINK: vkCreateInstance failed (VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER)
> glx: failed to create drisw screen
>
> (test-client:335985): GLib-Net-WARNING **: 16:0
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072130 in geary reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/geary/-/commit/f8a5b299dd07d1a59c39d4fa867f86825
Source: sredird
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
Hi,
This is affected by CVE-2004-2386, which was marked by the Security Team as "NOT-FOR-US: sercd" but applies to sredird.
There is a fixed version 2.2.2 available, which I did not find in the K
Hi Paul!
Just clarifying!
My goal with this patch was to just solve a conflict problem by trying, not
changing your code through a patch.
But unfortunately, both attempts were not accepted by Samuel, as they did not
solve the problem itself.
This led to the bug being reopened twice as RC, le
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 10:04:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060602: fixed in efl 1.27.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060602,
regarding efl: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1071552 2.4.3-2
Bug #1071552 {Done: Daniel Kahn Gillmor } [gnupg] GnuPG
2.2.42+ breaks emacs' EasyPG
Marked as found in versions gnupg2/2.4.3-2 and reopened.
> # applies to 2.4.0 to 2.4.3
> fixed 1071552 2.4.4-1
Bug #1071552 [gnupg] GnuPG 2
Your message dated Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:34:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069859: fixed in atop 2.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069859,
regarding atop: Fix atop for 64-bit time_t on arm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1063735 [python-maturin] python-maturin - upcoming rust-indexmap update.
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1063735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags 1072107 + patch
Control: tags 1072107 + pending
Hi Peter,
I've prepared an NMU for libarchive (versioned as 3.7.2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Made as well a MR in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libarchive/-/merge_requ
Processing control commands:
> tags 1072107 + patch
Bug #1072107 [src:libarchive] libarchive: CVE-2024-26256
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1072107 + pending
Bug #1072107 [src:libarchive] libarchive: CVE-2024-26256
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1
Source: fenics-dolfinx
Version: 1:0.8.0-6
Followup-For: Bug #1072183
X-Debbugs-Cc: francesco.balla...@unicatt.it, locutusofb...@debian.org
Thanks Gianfranco for the patch. I confirm I will apply it in fenics-dolfinx
0.8.0 to experimental (and later to unstable).
For your ubuntu build, please keep
73 matches
Mail list logo
