Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:35:21 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1077355: gretl: FTBFS: ../lib/src/interact.c:2131:19:
error: implicit declaration of function 'try_http'
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077355,
regarding gretl: FTBFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1077351 = moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #1077351 [src:helpful-el] helpful-el: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4:
binary] Error 25
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo; removed tag(s) trixie, ftbfs, and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Thanks, Lucas! I'll check it out.
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, 13:54 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab
> Version: 0.20050817-18
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20
Control: tags 1077351 = moreinfo unreproducible
Hi,
I tried to reproduce this locally in clean sbuild (unstable) environment
with no luck. Let's see what Debian CI will show.
Regards,
Lev
Source: r-cran-backports
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of r-cran-backports the autopkgtest of
r-cran-backports fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the
binary packages of r-cran-ba
Source: python-yamlfix
Version: 1.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-refurb
Version: 1.27.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: sentry-python
Version: 1.40.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-pytest-toolbox
Version: 0.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-itemadapter
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: bioperl-run
Version: 1.7.3-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: deheader
Version: 1.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: aflplusplus
Version: 4.21c-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: cmake
Version: 3.30.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: golang-github-gopacket-gopacket
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: glycin-loaders
Version: 0.1.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: cryfs
Version: 0.11.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libsyntax-infix-smartmatch-perl
Version: 0.005-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: php-dompdf
Version: 2.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-ajv
Version: 8.12.0~ds+~2.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: flask-babel
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: libzen
Version: 0.4.41-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libsys-hostip-perl
Version: 2.120-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: cmtk
Version: 3.3.1p2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076898: fixed in nagios-plugin-check-multi 0.26-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076898,
regarding nagios-plugin-check-multi: FTBFS: Failed test 'output correct'
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab
Version: 0.20050817-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lazygal
Version: 0.10.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: photocollage
Version: 1.4.5-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-autocommand
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: perlnavigator
Version: 0.6.0~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: unittest2
Version: 1.1.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: range-v3
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: mrpt
Version: 1:2.12.0+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>
Source: ruby-gon
Version: 6.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> NoMethodEr
Source: python-emmet-core
Version: 0.57.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: yad
Version: 0.40.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: qt5ct
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -g
Source: persistent-cache-cpp
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: calculix-cgx
Version: 2.21+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: scilab
Version: 2024.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: fortunes-es
Version: 1.36
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -O2 -DFORT
Source: prelude-manager
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: qgnomeplatform
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: ola
Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ./libt
Source: libervia-templates
Version: 0.9.0~hg396+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: simdjson
Version: 3.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: gtk4-layer-shell
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: voikko-fi
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gnucash
Version: 1:5.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/.build/l
Source: pcl
Version: 1.14.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86
Source: sitecopy
Version: 1:0.16.6-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -Wdate-t
Source: ruby-asciidoctor-kroki
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.18.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /
Source: seqmagick
Version: 0.8.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-beartype
Version: 0.18.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: galternatives
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cura-engine
Version: 1:5.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: pysodium
Version: 0.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: mbedtls
Version: 2.28.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86
Source: ruby-mpi
Version: 0.3.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pyfai
Version: 2024.05-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Isrc/pyFAI/
Source: yuzu
Version: 0-1335+ds-1.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: can
Source: graphviz
Version: 2.42.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../libt
Source: xcur2png
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: dict-gcide
Version: 0.48.5+nmu2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> .
> checkin
Source: units-cpp
Version: 2.3.3+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: pymecavideo
Version: 8.0~rc10-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: gtk-layer-shell
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: seqan3
Version: 3.3.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: moarvm
Version: 2022.12+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -c -std=gn
Source: csaps
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
&
Source: fort77
Version: 1.15-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: pathological
Version: 1.1.3-17
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -s -o wr
Source: php-yaml
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash /<>/
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1073462 [src:watcher] watcher: FTBFS: sqlalchemy.exc.ArgumentError:
Strings are not accepted for attribute names in loader options; please use
class-bound attributes directly.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1073462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1073462 in watcher reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/watcher/-/commit/ff8c837390047235
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075332: fixed in octomap 1.9.7+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075332,
regarding octomap: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:python-anyio
Bug #1077384 [src:starlette] starlette: autopkgtest needs update for new
version of python-anyio
Added indication that 1077384 affects src:python-anyio
--
1077384: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077384
Debian Bug Tra
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:46 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Bo,
>
> On 16-06-2024 11:47, Bo YU wrote:
> > Okay, thanks for the reporting. I will work on the strace 6.9. As we
> > discussed with emu, Maybe we should rely more on autopkgtest to detect
> > kernel issues. Otherwise, the curre
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1073472 [src:lilypond] lilypond: FTBFS: grep: tcrm1200.log: No such file
or directory
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #1073472 [src:lilypond] lilypond: FTBFS: grep: tcrm1200.log: No such file
or dir
Hi Bo,
On 16-06-2024 11:47, Bo YU wrote:
Okay, thanks for the reporting. I will work on the strace 6.9. As we
discussed with emu, Maybe we should rely more on autopkgtest to detect
kernel issues. Otherwise, the current kernel version and strace
version are the same as whack-a-mole.
Any progres
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
However, I was unable to reproduce this FTBFS building in sid with
sbuild on my local computer.
Perhaps it was a transient issue (e.g. related to LilyPond's build
dependencies) whic
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075446: fixed in sdbus-cpp 1.6.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075446,
regarding ring: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075446: fixed in sdbus-cpp 1.6.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075446,
regarding sdbus-cpp: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:05:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074962: fixed in fort-validator 1.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074962,
regarding fort-validator: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 03:22:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075242: fixed in lwipv6 1.5a-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075242,
regarding lwipv6: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2024 03:20:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075177: fixed in libkkc 0.3.5-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075177,
regarding libkkc: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On 28 July 2024 at 20:52, Cottrell, Allin wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 3:33 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| >
| > On 28 July 2024 at 15:11, Cottrell, Allin wrote:
| > | On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 1:29 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| [...]
| > | > | > ../lib/src/interact.c: In function 'open_ap
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 3:33 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 28 July 2024 at 15:11, Cottrell, Allin wrote:
> | On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 1:29 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[...]
> | > | > ../lib/src/interact.c: In function 'open_append_stage_1':
> | > | > ../lib/src/interact.c:2131:19: error: im
Hi Ben,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for a56 (versioned as 1.3+dfsg-10.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
thanks a lot for that patch. I just uploaded it as version -11.
Thorsten
Hello all,
This issue was fixed by initramfs-tools version 0.143 in experimental.
I have just uploaded version 0.143.1 to unstable, so you should be able
to get the fix through a regular upgrade in a few hours (if using
unstable) or days (if using testing).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly f
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 23:20:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077106: fixed in goto-chg-el 1.7.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077106,
regarding goto-chg-el: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 23:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074798: fixed in a56 1.3+dfsg-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074798,
regarding a56: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 22:49:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077333: fixed in bottlerocket 0.05b3-20
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077333,
regarding bottlerocket FTBFS due to Rules-Requires-Root: no
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 22:20:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010115: fixed in libhtml-tidy5-perl 1.06-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010115,
regarding libhtml-tidy5-perl: FTBFS with tidy-html5 5.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 22:04:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074857: fixed in budgie-control-center 1.4.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074857,
regarding budgie-control-center: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1010115 [src:libhtml-tidy5-perl] libhtml-tidy5-perl: FTBFS with tidy-html5
5.8
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1010115 to the same tags previously set
--
1010115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010115
Debian Bug Track
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1010115 in libhtml-tidy5-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libhtml-tidy5-perl/
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 23:55:07 +0200
with message-id <700b9dc5-b775-40b1-ba5b-8fee8f143...@debian.org>
and subject line fortunes: Symbol Lookup Error for rpl_malloc
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076370,
regarding fortunes: Symbol Lookup Error for rpl_malloc
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2024 21:23:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076304: fixed in mako 1.3.5-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076304,
regarding src:mako: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built
arch:all binaries
to be marked as done.
This means that
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo