Bug#1078417: symfit: FTBFS: with pytest.raises(NameError):

Source: symfit Version: 0.5.6-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078418: upstream-ontologist: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:17: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25

Source: upstream-ontologist Version: 0.1.37-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078414: kotlinx-coroutines: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:10: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25

Source: kotlinx-coroutines Version: 1.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078412: commons-jci: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/compilers/eclipse/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/EclipseJavaCompilerSettings.java:[82,17] cannot find symbol

Source: commons-jci Version: 1.1-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bu

Bug#1078411: python-tornado: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.12 returned exit code 13

Source: python-tornado Version: 6.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078413: pdns: FTBFS: make[6]: *** [Makefile:3871: test-suite.log] Error 1

Source: pdns Version: 4.9.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[6]: Entering direct

Bug#1078410: findbugs: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:10: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1

Source: findbugs Version: 3.1.0~preview2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078409: camlimages: FTBFS: gifread.c:46:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘alloc_small’; did you mean ‘caml_alloc_small’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

Source: camlimages Version: 1:5.0.4-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bin

Bug#1078406: hkl: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [Makefile:833: binoculars-ng] Error 1

Source: hkl Version: 5.0.0.3462-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[4]: Enter

Bug#1078408: autofs: FTBFS: cyrus-sasl.c:112:25: error: initialization of ‘int (*)(void)’ from incompatible pointer type ‘int (*)(void *, int, const char **, unsigned int *)’ [-Wincompatible-pointer-

Source: autofs Version: 5.1.9-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -g -O2 -Wer

Bug#1078405: libhibernate3-java: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:23: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25

Source: libhibernate3-java Version: 3.6.10.Final-12 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078404: sdcv: FTBFS: gunicode.h:809:34: error: invalid conversion from ‘const gchar*’ {aka ‘const char*’} to ‘gchar*’ {aka ‘char*’} [-fpermissive]

Source: sdcv Version: 0.5.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/c++ -DHAVE_CONFI

Bug#1078403: python-orjson: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25

Source: python-orjson Version: 3.9.15-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078402: gimp: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: gimp Version: 2.10.38-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078401: r-cran-psychtools: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: r-cran-rtf

Source: r-cran-psychtools Version: 2.4.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1078400: python-bcrypt: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:14: binary] Error 25

Source: python-bcrypt Version: 4.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078399: plexus-compiler: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/plexus-compilers/plexus-compiler-eclipse/src/main/java/org/codehaus/plexus/compiler/eclipse/EclipseJavaCompiler.java:[55,37] cannot find s

Source: plexus-compiler Version: 2.12.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1078398: cubemap: FTBFS: ffmpeg_metacube_hack.c:259:33: error: assignment to ‘int (*)(void *, uint8_t *, int, enum AVIODataMarkerType, int64_t)’ {aka ‘int (*)(void *, unsigned char *, int, enum

Source: cubemap Version: 1.5.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -MMD -MP -Wdate-t

Bug#1078395: kotlinx-atomicfu: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25

Source: kotlinx-atomicfu Version: 0.11.12-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078396: stardict: FTBFS: gunicode.h:809:34: error: invalid conversion from 'const gchar*' {aka 'const char*'} to 'gchar*' {aka 'char*'} [-fpermissive]

Source: stardict Version: 3.0.7+git20220909+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /

Bug#1078392: rpds-py: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 25

Source: rpds-py Version: 0.12.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078389: tomcat9: FTBFS: [javac] /<>/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JDTCompiler.java:40: error: cannot find symbol

Source: tomcat9 Version: 9.0.70-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078390: keyrings.alt: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.12 returned exit code 13

Source: keyrings.alt Version: 5.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules bin

Bug#1078391: checkpolicy: FTBFS: checkpolicy.c:316:67: error: ‘cond_expr_t’ {aka ‘const struct cond_expr’} has no member named ‘bool’; did you mean ‘boolean’?

Source: checkpolicy Version: 3.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -g -O2 -Wer

Bug#1078388: python-cotengrust: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1

Source: python-cotengrust Version: 0.1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078386: gnome-chemistry-utils: FTBFS: gunicode.h:809:34: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive]

Source: gnome-chemistry-utils Version: 0.14.17-6.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /

Bug#1078385: qstardict: FTBFS: gunicode.h:809:34: error: invalid conversion from ‘const gchar*’ {aka ‘const char*’} to ‘gchar*’ {aka ‘char*’} [-fpermissive]

Source: qstardict Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -c -pipe -g

Bug#1078384: python-watchfiles: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:23: binary] Error 25

Source: python-watchfiles Version: 0.21.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078382: apache-directory-api: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25

Source: apache-directory-api Version: 2.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > deb

Bug#1078383: ppx-tools: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 25

Source: ppx-tools Version: 6.6-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary &

Bug#1078380: gradle-kotlin-dsl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:10: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2

Source: gradle-kotlin-dsl Version: 0.13.2-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078381: php-amqplib: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:20: override_dh_auto_test] Error 141

Source: php-amqplib Version: 3.7.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078379: lombok-patcher: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25

Source: lombok-patcher Version: 0.50-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078377: lombok-ast: FTBFS: [ivy:compile] /<>/src/main/lombok/ast/app/Main.java:54: error: cannot find symbol

Source: lombok-ast Version: 0.2+ds-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078378: silkaj: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.12 returned exit code 13

Source: silkaj Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules binary &

Bug#1078375: python-jellyfish: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:24: binary] Error 25

Source: python-jellyfish Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078376: rustc: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: gdb (>= 7.12)

Source: rustc Version: 1.79.0+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1078374: pinot: FTBFS: ../IndexSearch/cjkv/CJKVTokenizer.cc:31:42: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive]

Source: pinot Version: 1.21-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ../libtool --

Bug#1078372: tomcat10: FTBFS: [javac] /<>/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JDTCompiler.java:40: error: cannot find symbol

Source: tomcat10 Version: 10.1.25-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078373: ruby-concurrent: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: execute_after_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 123

Source: ruby-concurrent Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078369: dogtail: FTBFS: AssertionError: False is not true

Source: dogtail Version: 0.9.11-12 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078370: checkstyle: FTBFS: [WARNING] Failed to retrieve plugin descriptor for org.pitest:pitest-maven:1.4.9

Source: checkstyle Version: 8.36.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078367: python-jenkins: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'

Source: python-jenkins Version: 1.4.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078368: schleuder-gitlab-ticketing: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1477:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'sq

Source: schleuder-gitlab-ticketing Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /

Bug#1078365: geophar: FTBFS: TypeError: Fonction(variable = x, expression = x^2+3x-1, ensemble = ]-oo;+oo[) should be of type (, , ,

Source: geophar Version: 18.10+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enter

Bug#1078366: hdf-eos5: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgctp: No such file or directory

Source: hdf-eos5 Version: 2:2.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ../libt

Bug#1078363: systemfixtures: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'

Source: systemfixtures Version: 0.6.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/ru

Bug#1078362: python-measurement: FTBFS: AssertionError: 294.261111111111 != 294.261111100000 within 7 places (1.11110693978844e-8 difference)

Source: python-measurement Version: 3.2.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078361: glib-networking: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test --timeout-multiplier 3 returned exit co

Source: glib-networking Version: 2.80.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1078359: mutter: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test -C /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu --no-re

Source: mutter Version: 46.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1078358: thin: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: expect{sleep 0.1 until File.exist?(subject.pid_file)}.to take_less_then(10)

Source: thin Version: 1.8.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > Failure/Error: exp

Bug#1076827: python-scrapy: FTBFS: Tries to access Internet during build

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 10:25:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 9/8/24 a las 21:58, Andrey Rakhmatullin escribió: > > I wonder why this failure doesn't happen in plain sbuild builds. > > Good question. Because those builds allow Internet access during build, > but the unshare sbuild backend I'

Processed: Bug#1060772 marked as pending in node-jupyterlab

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1060772 [python3-jupyterlab] python3-jupyterlab: Using node-corepack downloads yarnpkg from Internet Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1060772 to the same tags previously set -- 1060772: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10

Bug#1060772: marked as pending in node-jupyterlab

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1060772 in node-jupyterlab reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-jupyterlab/-/commit/021de3828efc9052

Bug#1073888: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Missing dependency on camlp-streams))

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 04:24:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073888: fixed in nproc 0.5.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073888, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Missing dependency on camlp-streams) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1078356: FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0

Source: botch Version: 0.24-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ocaml-5.2.0-transition Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=botch I've committed a fix to git. Cheers, -- S

Processed: Bug#1073888 marked as pending in nproc

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073888 [src:nproc] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Missing dependency on camlp-streams) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073888 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1073888: marked as pending in nproc

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073888 in nproc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/nproc/-/commit/ba33c7fdfc7b6c9d25b11bd866bc0b90b

Bug#1073902: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses Pervasives))

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 03:49:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073902: fixed in ocamlrss 2.2.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073902, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses Pervasives) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1073909: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses obsolete (&) operator))

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 03:49:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073909: fixed in pxp 1.2.9-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073909, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses obsolete (&) operator) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1073909: marked as pending in pxp

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073909 in pxp reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/pxp/-/commit/b1f518d5465f74e312492b0046f6bafe8a6b3

Processed: Bug#1073909 marked as pending in pxp

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073909 [src:pxp] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses obsolete (&) operator) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073909: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073909 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1073902 marked as pending in ocamlrss

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073902 [src:ocamlrss] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses Pervasives) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073902: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073902 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1073902: marked as pending in ocamlrss

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073902 in ocamlrss reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocamlrss/-/commit/a58b51c5db37fc8ff5020872237

Bug#1075427: marked as done (qdbm: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 02:41:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075427: fixed in qdbm 1.8.78-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075427, regarding qdbm: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#1078355: autopkg tests fail, blocking other packages

Package: command-not-found Version: 23.04.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie autopkg tests fail, blocking other packages (python3-defaults): [...] 37s Reading package lists... 37s Ensure we have results from c-n-f 37s Command 'vim' not found, but there are 16 similar ones. 38s autopkgtes

Bug#1074938: epic4: diff for NMU version 1:2.10.10-1.2

Control: tags 1074938 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for epic4 (versioned as 1:2.10.10-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :'

Processed: epic4: diff for NMU version 1:2.10.10-1.2

Processing control commands: > tags 1074938 + pending Bug #1074938 [src:epic4] epic4: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1074938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074938 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1074972: ftpmirror: diff for NMU version 1.96+dfsg-16.1

Control: tags 1074972 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ftpmirror (versioned as 1.96+dfsg-16.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org

Processed: ftpmirror: diff for NMU version 1.96+dfsg-16.1

Processing control commands: > tags 1074972 + pending Bug #1074972 [src:ftpmirror] ftpmirror: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1074972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074972 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: fungw: diff for NMU version 1.2.1-3.1

Processing control commands: > tags 1074973 + pending Bug #1074973 [src:fungw] fungw: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1074973: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074973 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1074973: fungw: diff for NMU version 1.2.1-3.1

Control: tags 1074973 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for fungw (versioned as 1.2.1-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : O

Bug#1077447: marked as done (libsyntax-infix-smartmatch-perl: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 25)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 01:19:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077447: fixed in libsyntax-infix-smartmatch-perl 0.006-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077447, regarding libsyntax-infix-smartmatch-perl: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 25 to be marked a

Processed (with 1 error): forward 1073882 to upstream

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1073882 https://github.com/jrh13/hol-light/issues/101 Bug #1073882 [src:hol-light] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Needs porting) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/jrh13/hol-light/issues/101'. > thanks, Unknown command or malfo

Bug#1064408: marked as done ([PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2024 00:19:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064408: fixed in live-build 1:20240810 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064408, regarding [PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1064408: marked as pending in live-build

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064408 in live-build reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/commit/0eb97d9c367811f94ce2206a

Processed: Bug#1064408 marked as pending in live-build

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064408 [live-build] [PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064408 to the same tags previously set -- 1064408: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064408 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Processed: Re: [PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #1064408 [live-build] [PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1064408: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064408 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1064408: [PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17

Control: tags -1 pending On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:04:17 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: live-build > Versrion: 1:20230502 > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: dep17p3 > Tags: patch > > /bin/hostname and /sbin/start-stop-daemon are being moved from / to /usr > in trixie. Hence, these divers

Bug#1075529: marked as done (spacearyarya: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 21:54:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075529: fixed in spacearyarya 1.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075529, regarding spacearyarya: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1074983: marked as done (geki3: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 21:49:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1074983: fixed in geki3 1.0.3-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1074983, regarding geki3: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#1077389: marked as done (pathological: FTBFS: write-highscores.c:36:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 20:48:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077389: fixed in pathological 1.1.3-18 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077389, regarding pathological: FTBFS: write-highscores.c:36:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Wimplicit-function-de

Bug#1073604: marked as done (nix-setup-systemd: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 20:45:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073604: fixed in nix 2.23.3+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073604, regarding nix-setup-systemd: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1077520: marked as done (nix: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lunistring: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 20:45:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077520: fixed in nix 2.23.3+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077520, regarding nix: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lunistring: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Bug#1073710 marked as pending in guix

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073710 [guix] guix: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073710 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1073710: marked as pending in guix

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073710 in guix reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/guix/-/commit/1cf003a48bcb2fa4d09776dd536e7425fe84660

Bug#1078274: clamav: FTBFS: clamscan/assorted_test.py::TC::test_pe_cert_trust FAILED

On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:15:40 +0200 Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:clamav > Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear maintainer: > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: > > --

Bug#1076827: python-scrapy: FTBFS: Tries to access Internet during build

El 9/8/24 a las 21:58, Andrey Rakhmatullin escribió: I wonder why this failure doesn't happen in plain sbuild builds. Good question. Because those builds allow Internet access during build, but the unshare sbuild backend I'm using for my tests does not. Currently, official autobuilders come in

Bug#1075452: rplay: ftbfs with GCC-14

Hi Ian, On 09.08.24 06:35, Ian Jackson wrote: I've just noticed this bug (my scripting was broken). It's affecting one of my packages too. I'm not in a position to fix it right now but I iintend to look at it in a week or so. If the fix, is straightforard, I will NMU it. I hope that's OK wit

Bug#1076827: python-scrapy: FTBFS: Tries to access Internet during build

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:13:55PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > KeyError: "namespace: urls key: {'url': > 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/publicsuffix/list/master/public_suffix_list.dat'}" > > During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: > > Traceback (most recent call

Bug#1075060: hasciicam: ftbfs with GCC-14

Hi all, I prepared a patch to fix this bug. And I plan to NMU the package. Please review the patches. I'll start NMU after 10 days if no one complains. And I'll upload to DELAY/10 queue. Yours, Paul diff -Nru hasciicam-1.1.2/debian/changelog hasciicam-1.1.2/debian/changelog --- hasciicam-1.1.2/

Processed: reopening 1052763

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1052763 philip.wy...@kathenas.org Bug #1052763 {Done: Phil Wyett } [src:gnuastro] libgnuastro18 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuastro_make.so 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with

Processed: unarchiving 1052763

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 1052763 Bug #1052763 {Done: Phil Wyett } [src:gnuastro] libgnuastro18 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuastro_make.so Unarchived Bug 1052763 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#1075509: marked as done (silo-llnl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 18:20:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075509: fixed in silo-llnl 4.11-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075509, regarding silo-llnl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: Re: FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses C functions without caml_ prefix)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1073911 [src:sks] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses C functions without caml_ prefix) Added tag(s) patch. -- 1073911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073911 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1073911: FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses C functions without caml_ prefix)

Control: tags -1 + patch On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 06:36:04 + Stephane Glondu wrote: Your package FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 for the following reason: Uses C functions without caml_ prefix Attached is a patch that fixes the build. Cheers, -- StéphaneFrom: Stéphane Glondu Date: Fri, 9 Aug 20

Processed: notfound 1078197 in netcdf/4.9.2-6, found 1078197 in netcdf/1:4.9.2-6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1078197 netcdf/4.9.2-6 Bug #1078197 [src:netcdf] netcdf: ftbfs on armhf The source netcdf and version 4.9.2-6 do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in versions netcdf/4.9.2-6. > found 1078197 netcdf/1:4.9.2-

Bug#1075664: marked as done (xgks: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 17:35:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075664: fixed in xgks 2.6.1+dfsg.2-16 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075664, regarding xgks: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1072806: marked as done (packagesearch:FTBFS:build failed（configure failed）)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 17:19:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1072806: fixed in packagesearch 2.8.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072806, regarding packagesearch:FTBFS:build failed（configure failed） to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#1078338: cuneiform: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'broken_ii'

Source: cuneiform Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-10 Severity: serious cuneiform started to FTBFS when GCC 14 was made the default compiler: cd /build/cuneiform-1.1.0+dfsg/obj/cuneiform_src/Kern/cfcompat && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/cfcompat.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 /usr/bin/cc -fPIC -W

  1   2   3   >