Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-10 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: Could you try this patch in addition to the previous one? Index: gnubg.c === --- gnubg.c (revision 348) +++ gnubg.c (working copy) @@ -8971,7 +8971,8 @@ #if HAVE_ICONV iconv_t id; - int lIn, lOut, l,

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: Aha. I bet there was never a problem with Guile at all. Would it be possible for you to apply a patch and rebuild the package as a test? I think this patch will fix the segfaults: Index: board3d/misc3d.c ===

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-07 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: tags 350390 = help thanks Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ Allbery wrote: Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build with

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: tags 350390 = pending thanks Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build with Guile support on AMD64. When 0.14.3-4 makes it into the archives for AMD64, could you check to see if thi