I've
also tested it by running geoiplookup against the database for several
addresses.
The patch also fixes the area code and metro code for US addresses,
which I noticed were backwards (switched with one another).
Hope this helps, let me know if you see any issues.
-Andrew
On Fri, Jan 23, 20
and fix
it.
-Andrew
On Jan 23, 2015 9:43 AM, "Patrick Matthäi" wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> do you have got any news? :)
>
> Am 20.01.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Andrew Moise:
>
> Thanks Patrick. One note - just like the v6 issue, the gdnsd test suite is
> detectin
Thanks Patrick. One note - just like the v6 issue, the gdnsd test suite
is detecting a genuine problem in the city DB. It is something wrong with
the city DB creation tools that's causing it (i.e. not just an issue with
the gdnsd tests). I just haven't finished tracking down exactly what the
issu
This seems to still be a problem for me:
Preparing to replace iscsitarget 0.4.15+svn148-2 (using
.../iscsitarget_0.4.16+svn162-3_i386.deb) ...
Removing iSCSI enterprise target devices: failed with reason
:Connection refused.
invoke-rc.d: initscript iscsitarget, action "stop" failed.
dpkg: warning
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:2.5.2p1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.5.1
When I attempt to upgrade amanda from version 2.5.2pl-2 to version
2.5.2pl-3, I get:
Preparing to replace amanda-server 1:2.5.2p1-2 (using
.../amanda-server_1%3a2.5.2p1-3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replaceme
On 3/22/07, peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
someone familiar with getopt will be required to provide a patch for nbsmtp
that provides similar functionality.
Surely it can't take that much complexity to get nbsmtp to throw
away any -o options that are passed in on the command line? Thi
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 08:13:50AM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 11:48 -0400, Andrew Moise wrote:
> > Bruno, would you object if I NMUed a new version of this package, with
> > the copyright file I attached earlier in this bug report?
>
> I w
Bruno, would you object if I NMUed a new version of this package, with
the copyright file I attached earlier in this bug report?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Since you already got in touch with the relevant copyright holders,
> could you please clarify which images are currently shipped in
> blackbox-themes without source?
Sure. I actually didn't ask about source image redistribution
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:01:49 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:
> > The image files don't include anything that
> > resembles source, but I'm choosing to assume that DFSG #2 doesn't
> > apply to images a
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Is source available (and included in the .orig.tar.gz archive) for every
> part of the package? If this is the case, then the package is OK for
> main.
The style files are really all "source"; they're just text
configuration files
Okay, here's a copyright file which I believe to be correct for
blackbox-themes 0.3. It would be a little nicer if it included real
names for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] It also carries the
added bonus that, thanks to Bruno's repackaging, all the styles with
images are licensed unde
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> There's a misconception here.
> The source code for a work is defined (in GPLv2, section 3) as
> "the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it".
>
> If the author discards a form of his/her work, this form is appare
On Sun, 21 May 2006 00:43:11 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I don't agree.
> The GPL is *not* a bad license for images: forcing source distribution
> is a feature, not a bug.
I was unclear: It's a bad license for images because it seems to be
extremely rare, for some reason, for people to keep t
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:34:17PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Barrera C.) by replying
> to this e
mentioned earlier in this bug. In any case, I'm switching away from
evolution now.
Thanks for the followup.
--
Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
first had this problem, and had no
success.
--
Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; I have also to tell that I'm not using Gnome as my DM, but I'm using
> Enlightenment DR17 (cvs) with gnome-settings-daemon running under it. Maybe it
> can help.
I am also not running gnome as a DM. I run evolution under blackbox.
--
Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
lient libra
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages evolution recommends:
pn evolution-plugins (no description available)
ii gnome-desktop-data2.12.2-2 Common files for GNOME 2 desktop a
pn gnome-pilot-c
e done for Debian and I don't want to make more work for you.
--
Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would it be possible to downgrade this bug to normal? Even if it is a
real bug (I cannot reproduce it, though I didn't try very hard), it
certainly should not be grave, and it is currently preventing twiki from
entering testing.
--
Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of this that you
are too busy to or don't want to do -- I don't want to make work for
you. :-)
> Thanks for your report,
No problem. Thanks for your work on the blackbox packages.
--
Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: blackbox-themes
Version: 0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright statement in debian/copyright has been "fixed" to
declare that the whole package is copyright Bruno Barrera; that's
not right. While a lot of the upstreams don't seem to take copyright
and licensing
23 matches
Mail list logo
