tags 674358 fixed-upstream
thanks
Thanks, Christophe, for the very quick fix.
I will upload a new version from svn.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
on those platforms cmake cannot find QTWEBKIT:
Qt QTWEBKIT library not found.
Not sure yet, why...
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 672716 + pending
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 672037 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com on Tue, 8 May 2012 18:50:01 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
Fix FTBFS against gcc-4.7. (Closes: #672037
tags 598547 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com on Mon, 7 May 2012 19:40:22 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
Fix stop in batch mode. (Closes: #598547
tags 671459 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com on Fri, 4 May 2012 23:06:42 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
Remove /usr/share/doc/gnuplot symlink before
tags 671459 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com on Fri, 4 May 2012 23:06:42 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
Remove /usr/share/doc/gnuplot symlink before
Hi Ron,
what is the reason of marking this bug as serious?
Thanks.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 664614 ftp.debian.org
severity 664614 normal
retitle 664614 RM: gmsh [hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips
mipsel] -- RoM; FTBFS
thanks
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I cannot confirm the bug.
Both zooming and fonts are working normally.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sylvestre, 1.4.3-3 fails to build with that patch?
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
fixed 653820 4.1.1-9
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forcemerge 665832 665432
thanks
Both bugs are having the same nature.
Anton.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 665832 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com on Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:11:11 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fix
On 03/29/2012 01:58 PM, Agustin Martin wrote:
...
Anton, which are the details of the i386 system where you reproduced
the bug (system info section of reportbug --template -b gnuplot)?
reportbug --template -b gnuplot
...
...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
I have similar problem on liggghts/lammps packages, which are running
under openmpi [1] and [2].
It would be good to try a patch from LP-bug [3].
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liggghts
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lammps
[3]
=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Anton
Am 29. März 2012 19:04 schrieb Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com:
On 03/29/2012 01:58 PM, Agustin Martin wrote:
...
Anton, which are the details of the i386 system where you reproduced
the bug (system info section of reportbug --template
I confirm the bug on i386.
=
gnuplot
G N U P L O T
Version 4.6 patchlevel 0last modified 2012-03-04
Build System: Linux i686
Copyright (C) 1986-1993, 1998, 2004, 2007-2012
Thomas Williams, Colin Kelley and many others
gnuplot
Dear all,
we (Christophe Trophime and I) were trying to fix the bug.
Adding -fPIC to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS partly fixes the problem,
but it still fails to build on linking stage with the following message:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o:
In function `_start':
Hi, Christoph,
this problem appeared after adding auto-tests to debian/rules.
It showed, that gmsh is unusable on kfreebsd* platforms.
If it will not be possible to resolve the bug, I will request removing
gmsh on those platforms.
Thanks.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Source: oce
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
freecad fails to build against oce-0.9.1, but built ok against the
previous version of oce.
There is the end of compile log:
make all-am
make[7]: Entering directory
`/tmp/buildd/freecad-0.12.5284-dfsg/src/Mod/Part/App'
/bin/bash
I think it would be better to maintain it under the team-umbrella.
More chance to keep the package in a better shape.
Anton
2012/2/26 Andres Cimmarusti acimmaru...@gmail.com:
retitle 607289 New upstream version available 4.4.4
severity 607289 grave
thanks
The Gnuplot package has NOT been
severity 641542 wishlist
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 654839 wishlist
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I have fixed paraview-python and python-vtk conflict in paraview_3.12.0-3.
If there are no other comments related to the topic of the bug, I am
going to reduce the severity.
Thank you.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
I'm going to reduce the severity of the bug to the Wishlist.
When (if?) upstream will provide USE_SYSTEM_VTK option, then
we will definitely switch the paraview to the packaged version of VTK.
I do not see any reasons to keep the bug as Serious,
Comments are welcome.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I'm going to reduce the severity of the bug to the Wishlist.
Rewriting the software is not the task of packaging.
The RC-bug will probably remove Paraview from Wheezy [1], [2].
Comments are welcome.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/01/msg00653.html
[2]
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: ...
This was my point when I requested to move VTK to deb-sci umbrella, I
believe those two packages needs the same team of maintainer, and a very
close communication
I think it is a good idea to
Hi Dominique,
We already discussed it some months ago. From my point of view, it is
not so simple...
At least the list of compiled vtk-libraries in vtk and paraview
packages is not the same [1] and [2].
Also VTK and Paraview are not usually releasing at the same time (I
think, Mathieu noticed it
Hi Alastair,
it seems, there are different versions of xdmf (or fork), if I
correctly understood from this thread [1].
Biddiscombe, John A.
...the vtkXdmfReader in paraview would need to be rewritten to use
the new Xdmf API...
[1]
Hello,
does it mean, that FreeCAD upstream and others (gmsh, for example) has
chosen the wrong license?
Thanks.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Yes, I updated them.
Strange, html-files are generating normally, but PDF - does not build.
Anton
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 11/25/2011 06:52 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Thanks, Julian,
I am testing it now. There are a couple
Thanks, Julian,
I am testing it now. There are a couple of issues with DOC-Sphinx-generation.
Anton
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
ups its not quite fixed in 0.70, but the fix is simple:
--- orig/yade 2011-11-12 16:01:48.0
It seems, there is a slight update of the license dated March 2011 [1].
Can anyone, please, have a look at this license?
Is it still GPL-incompatible?
Thanks,
Anton
[1] http://www.opencascade.org/getocc/license/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:18:01 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
Can we decrease the severity of this bug to return the freecad back to
testing?
Why?
I think the bug is still unfixed and still serious
Francesco,
are your emails to Open CASCADE S.A.S. available somewhere in
ML-archives, or it was private mails?
Anton
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Francesco Poli
invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:40:48 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I think we leave it there pending
Can we decrease the severity of this bug to return the freecad back to testing?
The bug filed on March, but freecad was removed from testing on May
because of FTBFS's (I think).
Now FTBFS's are fixed on all platforms, but freecad cannot return back
to testing.
Anyway, this issue cannot be
Hi Kurt,
I have just installed paraview on fresh system without a problem.
Try to update your system and install paraview again.
Anton
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
Package: paraview
Version: 3.10.1-6
Severity: serious
Setting up paraview (3.10.1-6)
Then I suggest you create a chroot and try to install in a chroot.
Maybe you have older versions of python installed or something.
I installed it in clean pbuilder-environment. Installs without problem.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
severity 640195 normal
thanks
No reasons for this bug to be a serious [1] and not to let
testing-users to get 3.10-version soon.
Please, discuss on the list before changing the severity.
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
I am not agree with that. Why is that bug serious?
It does not break anything. I would keep it normal.
Anton
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
tags 638246 + pending
thanks
Thanks, Moritz, for the patch, it will be applied by next upload.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I see only 2 opportunities to fix it:
1) Disable python-support in paraview;
2) Claim, that paraview conflicts with python-vtk;
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 637397 + pending
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
paraview* package should be cleanup from any vtk binaries.
I think, it should be better another MW-bug, not 637397.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
paraview* package should be cleanup from any vtk binaries.
I think, it should be better another MW-bug, not 637397.
I filled it as serious not minor/wishlist to prevent migration to
testing for that specific purpose.
Why do
Python stuff of Paraview has been moved to paraview-python
binary. And this binary is conflicting with python-vtk.
On 8/18/11, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:09:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your
tags 637397 + pending
thanks
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Werner Mayer werner.wm.ma...@gmx.de wrote:
...
Mehdi Dogguy or others who work on the platform kFreeBSD can you please
upload the file config.log because there we can see what really happened
during configure.
configure:25498: g++ -o conftest -g -O2
Hi Werner,
thanks for suggestion. So, in this case salomemesh will not be
compiled at all? Will we loose some functionality?
But there _is_ a /usr/include/opencascade in the system. It just
cannot be properly detected by configurator.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Could you, please, specify a platform?
Thanks
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
OCC is not found during configuration process:
checking whether OCC libs are available... no
configure: WARNING:
Cannot find OpenCASCADE devel files.
Modules that depend on this library cannot be built.
And then compilation fails, because empty -I parameter is added to
I tried to build the same package on KFreebsd i386 vm, but got another error:
=Start===
chmod u+x autogen.sh
./autogen.sh
./autogen.sh: 14: cannot create /dev/null: Permission denied
./autogen.sh: 14: svn: not found
./autogen.sh: 14: cannot create /dev/null:
This FTBFS is resolved by [1].
but #618241 appears again:
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -g -D_DEBUG
-D_REENTRANT -Wall -I../../src -I../../src -I/usr/include/python2.6
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/share/qt4/include
-I/usr/share/qt4/include/Qt3Support
Yes, thanks,
it is already added in last commit.
Anton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Qt4All.h:163:21: fatal error: QWebFrame: No such file or directory
I have tried already to rebuild gmsh on i386, and it seems, that the
problem is gone.
Will check on amd64 too.
Thanks.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Seems, it is ok for now. Thanks!
2.5.0.dfsg-6 should be reuploaded or 2.5.0.dfsg-7 needs to be produced?
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Adam,
what do you think, can this bug be related to #619935?
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
401 - 459 of 459 matches
Mail list logo
