What the heck?
Since when the most important distributions are testing and unstable?
Where can I find at least preliminary packages for _stable_ distribution?
Should I start thinking of swiching my servers to squeeze?
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fe...@debian.org |
My bad.
I should ensure that this bug affects Lenny before starting the flame.
The only thing that justifies me a little is fact, that this bug wasn't
makred/tagged correctly.
Frankie please accept my appologies.
Sorry!
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fe...@debian.org |
Seems that new TRE library breaks ABI and somehow API compatibility.
@William are you going to update msort to the newest version of TRE
library?
Msort doesn't build clean with it.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560575
Here is some info wrt the newest TRE library:
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 2.28.0-1
Severity: grave
After todays upgrade I can't start gnome-terminal. All I get is
segmentation fault.
Here goes backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7edb97f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libvte.so.9
#1 0xb7efd953 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libvte.so.9
#2 0xb7efe04e in ?? ()
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:50:12PM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-102
Severity: normal
What system are you running on. Is it a GNU/KfreeBSD by chance? If so,
please check if you have a /etc/cron.pid file in your system.
No it's not KfreeBSD. That's
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:16:44AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Bartosz, is the package still unusable even with Filippo's instructions
below? If it's just a matter of configuring, this doesn't sound like
grave.
If supplied solution fixes my problems then sure feel free to downgrade
severity. I
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:16:44AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Bartosz, is the package still unusable even with Filippo's instructions
below? If it's just a matter of configuring, this doesn't sound like
grave.
Filippo,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:58:33AM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
fuse-utils appears to be uninstallable if /dev/fuse does not exist. If
you use udev, then /dev/fuse will only exist if the fuse kernel module
is available:
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up fuse-utils (2.5.2-3) ...
creating
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:54:18AM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
if [ -c /dev/.static/dev/fuse ]; then chown root:fuse /dev/fuse; fi
So if /dev/fuse file doesn't exist this part of code should be skipped.
The second line is wrong: /dev/.static/dev/fuse exists (because
MAKEDEV
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:00:54PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
ii fuse-utils 2.2.1-4sarge2 Filesystem in USErspace (utilities)
ii libfuse2 2.2.1-4sarge2 Filesystem in USErspace library
ii sshfs 1.1-1 filesystem client based on SSH File
Transfer
Try
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
The latest (x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb) x11-common package is
uninstallable:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~#apt-get upgrade
Reading
Package: lastfm
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I just tried to use lastfm program and unfortunately it segfaults.
That's what I made:
- - run the program
- - switch to 'Search' tab
- - enter
Hello Miklos.
Seems you've changed ABI in 2.5.x version of FUSE, but you left old SONAME
version, which causes many issues when filesystems that still want to work
with such library.
Please take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/352631
Could you please update your SONAME version to reflect ABI
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 03:56:30PM +0100, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
I don't know if he's aware of RC bug... I talk with him several times on
IRC and everytime he promised that upload 'will be this evening or this
weekend'. To be honest I'm tired asking him everytime I see him on IRC.
Feel
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:48:08AM +0100, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
That wouldn't be better. That's policy demand, and mentioned bug is the
reason I didn't upload new version of fuse yet, cause I would violate
policy doing it.
Hello Bartosz,
Thanks for the explanation, I hadn't noticed
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:03:04PM +0100, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
Rather than creating the fuse device by hand, it would be better to use
MAKEDEV (when Bug#344728 is solved) to do it.
That wouldn't be better. That's policy demand, and mentioned bug is the
reason I didn't upload new version of
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hello, as announced I have uploaded a fixed version of fuse. However I
have used the delayed queue (7 days) to give you enough time to react.
Changes attached as diff.
As I tried to tell you on irc I didn't upload new version of
Hello Steve.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:56:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The libparagui1.0c2a package is missing a dependency on libfreetype6,
because libparagui-1.0.so.0 is not properly linked:
$ ldd -d -r /usr/lib/libparagui-1.0.so.0 /dev/null
undefined symbol: FT_Init_FreeType
Package: splashy
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~#apt-get install splashy
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:29:38AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
i just uploaded a NMU to fix that bug into the DELAYED-5 queue on gluck.
the patch is attached.
I doubt it was DELAYED-5 since it's now available in archive.
Anyway thanks for fixing it, cause I'm rather busy now.
regards
fEnIo
--
I can reproduce this bug and removing these lines isn't solution.
Program should send something on stderr if it thinks something's wrong.
Segfault is always a 'Bad Thing(TM)'.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050
Hello.
Falk could you please test new version of asc? According to authors it
supports powerpc, so maybe support for other archs is better too.
If not then I'll ask ftp-masters for removing all not supported archs for
now.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Package: libfuse2
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's quote from upstream's mail:
Here's a new major version of FUSE:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fuse/fuse-2.3.0.tar.gz
It contains an important security fix that
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:35:55PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
could you please fix this by uploading the latest version of asc with
the archs list trimmed down to i386 and amd64, the archs that seem
officially supported by upstream, to t-p-u?
I'm not sure if it is possible to fix it this
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:13:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Here's the (not so useful) backtrace:
[...]
Thanks Steve.
Since I don't have access to alpha desktop it would be quite hard to debug
the problem.
One more question. Does it segfault with `asc -q` switch?
regards
fEnIo
--
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:21:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, the Debian Python Policy is not yet regarded as
having the normative force of policy, and therefore violations of the Python
Policy are not serious bugs. Even if this were not the case normally,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:57:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the libSDL-1.2.so.0 in libsdl1.2debian-all depends on glib 2.0,
which conflicts the glib 1.2 loaded via wxgtk2.4, causing very
erratic behavior, including crashes, buttons not working, text
not drawing, etc. I don't know which
Package: amule
Version: 1.2.6+rc8-3
Severity: serious
Justification: uknown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
Amule seems to be linked with OpenSSL library being at the same time GPLed.
These are not compatible licenses and you should either use some GPLed
crypto library or
Package: msmtp
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: uknown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
msmtp seems to be linked with OpenSSL library being at the same time GPLed.
These are not compatible licenses and you should either use some GPLed
crypto library or ask
Hello.
Sure, feel free to reassign this bugreport to libcurl, but all in all it's
problem in amule right now, cause libcurl can be linked against openssl.
So I suppose the correct way would be to fill another bugreport against
libcurl asking its maintainer to provide new binary package not
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:42:48AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libsdl-mixer1.2 libsdl-net1.2 libsdl1.2debian-all |
grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1 /tmp/sdldeps
zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libwxgtk2.4 | grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f
1
/tmp/wxdeps
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:11:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
Sarge and sid have the same SDL version. You are basically comparing
libsdl1.2debian-all and libsdl1.2debian-oss.
Yes you're right. I didn't notice that I'm using -all on my box.
Any reason for such huge
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:19:54AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hello Frank.
First of all sorry for late answer and many thanks for your effort to
figure out what's wrong.
Here is a full bt with debug libraries installed an code references:
[...]
Hmm, I have an idea what could be the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:52:51AM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hmm, I have an idea what could be the cause for the segfaults:
As you can see, they happen in the glib code, not in scorched3d.
ldd /usr/games/scorched3d shows that it is linked against libglib2.0
and libgtk1.2 while
34 matches
Mail list logo
