Bug#1066942: Debugging xmrig FTBFS on armhf

2024-04-03 Thread Ben Westover
and the porterbox can't reproduce it but the buildd can. -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1066942: Debugging xmrig FTBFS on armhf

2024-04-03 Thread Ben Westover
l of mine. The build could be fixed by setting ARM_V7 in d/rules on armhf, but I would prefer properly resolving this issue instead of just working around it. -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1066942: xmrig: FTBFS on armhf: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-maes’

2024-04-02 Thread Ben Westover
so doesn't happen on any of my systems but does on buildd and apparently your system. I guess I'll request guest access to an armhf porterbox and hope FTBFS happens there so I can debug this. -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1066942: xmrig: FTBFS on armhf: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-maes’

2024-03-22 Thread Ben Westover
en and now. -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1066942: xmrig: FTBFS on armhf: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-maes’

2024-03-20 Thread Ben Westover
? Thanks, -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1067094: pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh

2024-03-20 Thread Ben Westover
It turned out to just be a test expecting the 32 bit limit. This is patched in the newest version which I have just uploaded. Build fixed! -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1067094: pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh

2024-03-20 Thread Ben Westover
Hello, Arch Linux ARM supports armhf/armel just fine, so I think this can work with little to no patches. I haven't been able to take a look since the t64 transition because I have been busy with other things. I will likely have time tomorrow to fix this. -- Ben Westover

Bug#1014166: Is this still accurate?

2023-01-20 Thread Ben Westover
end version listed in the description. Thanks, -- Ben Westover signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1014166: Is this still accurate?

2023-01-19 Thread Ben Westover
Hello, The CVE description states that versions 0.12.0 - 0.21.1 are vulnerable, but this package is currently version 22.0. Can this bug be closed? Thanks, -- Ben Westover OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1016936: dwz: fails while building assaultcube

2022-09-08 Thread Ben Westover
` to flags. -- Ben Westover [1] https://www.phoronix.com/news/LLVM-Clang-DWARFv5-Default [2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24726 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1016936: dwz: fails while building assaultcube

2022-09-08 Thread Ben Westover
be having issues with this; Thus, I'm retitling this bug to be more generic, and adding an upstream tag. I will create a bug when my Bugzilla account creation request is approved by the admin. Thanks, -- Ben Westover [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9970

Bug#1017499: Upstream bug report

2022-08-23 Thread Ben Westover
tags 1017499 + upstream -- I was about to report the bug upstream, but it looks like Leandro beat me to it. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/7117 -- Ben Westover signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1017499: Mentioned issue is not related

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Westover
Correction: Issue #7071 is *not* related to this issue; it's a similar issue, but specific to Vivante hardware and the etnaviv driver. -- Ben Westover signature.asc Description: PGP signature