PM Bill Deegan
> wrote:
> > SCons 4.0.1 is fairly old and doesn't seem to be compatible with Python
> 3.10.
> > The latest SCons 4.4.0 is available and works fine with Python 3.10
> Actually it's not a compatibility issue, but a behaviour change with
> Python 3.
SCons 4.0.1 is fairly old and doesn't seem to be compatible with Python
3.10.
The latest SCons 4.4.0 is available and works fine with Python 3.10
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:45 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: scons
> Version: 4.0.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: book
Ok
Can you check the 4.0.1 tarballs and see if they provide in each what you
need?
We completely reimplemented packaging in 4.0.0
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 5:39 AM Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 16:26 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> > So what is this issue?
> > Which
So what is this issue?
Which tarball debian packages are using as their source?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:23 PM Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 16:11 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> > Note there's a bug for this on SCons tracker.
> > https://github.com/SCo
Note there's a bug for this on SCons tracker.
https://github.com/SCons/scons/issues/3759
Please add any comments there.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:06 PM Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> Source: scons
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The current source package uses the 'produ
5 matches
Mail list logo
