Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.149-1
Followup-For: Bug #1022051
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Normal kernal package upgrade and reboot.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
5.10
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:30:48 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:19:43 AM CST Michel Le Bihan wrote:
> > The Debian patch for #963548
> > https://salsa.debian.org/mimi8/chromium/-/blob/ece23b4ca107cd968ac9a40
> > 9f
>
ectHost.
> I also think that it might be an upstream bug, but can't confirm unless
> tested and reproducible in Google Chrome.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 is originally
reported against *Chrome* 87.0.4278.0
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/
chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070#c15 (in the other direction)
It's been an Chromium issue for a while with no clear fix on how to handle
cyclic service dependencies in general: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/
issues/detail?id=1135070#c18
--
Boyd Stephen Smi
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 3:49:06 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:38:32 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I got a crash (attached)
>
> Looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 to
> me, whic
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:38:32 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I got a crash (attached)
Looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 to
me, which has a fix, but I haven't yet figured out what release(s) the fix
made it into.
--
Boyd Stephen
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 11:22:21 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I'll have to play around with disabling extensions to see which one(s) cause
> a crash within 30 minutes. Super annoying since I do use every one of them
> literally every day. :(
Looks like maybe Prox
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 10:47:31 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> All my extensions were pulled down during the Google Sync and ran fine on 87
> for roughly an hour -- that's twice as long as my longest browser session
> for version 87 on the old profile.
>
> I sti
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 5:26:04 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:43:23 +0100 Michel Le Bihan
wrote:
> > I was not able to reproduce those crashes.
>
> That's unfortunate. I'm up to 50 just today. I'm probably going to have to
&g
t able to reproduce those crashes.
That's unfortunate. I'm up to 50 just today. I'm probably going to have to
downgrade to 83 at least until there's another update.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net
not, I'd say
apply and fix any potential fallout later. Otherwise, it would be good to
drop it.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
end on
gcj-4.3. So, the quoted diagnosis is surely wrong. I think instead that
default-jdk is missing a Depend on gcj-jdk OR java-gcj-compat-dev is missing
a Depend on gcj-jdk.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
14 matches
Mail list logo
