Bug#725690: gocr-tk: depends on tk8.5 and calls /usr/bin/wish

2014-09-04 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On 3 Sep 2014, at 23:06, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: Hi. Any hope to have this tcl/tk issue fixed in gocr soon? It has caused gocr to be removed from Debian testing, and seen no reply from the package maintainer since it was submitted 2013-10-07 I have a fix, testing it now,

Bug#574870: gocr-gtk: libglib1.2 dependency

2010-03-31 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 20:55 +0400, DimAnt10 wrote: Cosimo Alfarano пишет: [... cutting my msg quote] Thank you for your reply and time, Cosimo. My English is very poor, so I feel some shame for each word of my English suggestions... It's much better to try to write in English, which

Bug#574870: gocr-gtk: libglib1.2 dependency

2010-03-21 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 23:13 +0300, dimant10 wrote: Package: gocr-gtk Version: 0.41-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable gocr-gtk: Зависит: libglib1.2 но пакет не будет установлен Hi, I'm sorry , I cannot understand what you wrote. Might you write in

Bug#527161: temporary fix

2009-05-09 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On May 9, 2009, at 0:23, Kevin Petracek wrote: Wondering if you could give me a few tips on how you downgraded these two packages? Would really appreciate it. I have not any link to give you, sorry if something might be imprecise (sending to the bug ticket as well): The quicker way

Bug#527161: temporary fix

2009-05-07 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
Hi, just for the chronicle: downgrading to 2.1.22.dfsg1-23 both sasl2- bin and libsasl2-2 worked for me. cheers, C. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#488899: libgocr: should this package be removed?

2008-07-15 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Jul 11, 2008, at 20:16, Raphael Geissert wrote: yes, it has been abbandoned. The project's dead. Is that a yes, it's dead, let's remove it? Well, the point is that there is not other replacement for this package. It exists a new upstream with a better, modularized, etc..., library

Bug#488899: libgocr: should this package be removed?

2008-07-09 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Jul 1, 2008, at 20:46, Raphael Geissert wrote: Source: libgocr Version: 0.7.2-7 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * last maintainer upload

Bug#476160: pyg: diff for NMU version 0.9.6-4.2

2008-04-20 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Apr 20, 2008, at 11:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned with the initial patch, I'll upload pyg any minute now. During testing, I noticed a missing shlibs:Depends, which I think is warrants fixing with this upload. The following is the updated diff for my pyg 0.9.6-4.2 NMU.

Bug#377813: NMU patch

2006-07-12 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: tag 377813 patch thanks I'm going to NMU this with the attached patch. Go on with NMU, thanks, but keep present that I exist. If you want to help/co-maintaing package, feel free to tell me it. I'm in a tmp-limbo, thus I gladly

Bug#326851: move beagle-build-index and beagle-manage-index in /usr/lib

2005-09-06 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
Package: beagle Version: 0.0.12-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1, FHS 4.4 Co. As manual pages (from CVS) of beagle-build-index and beagle-manage-index, and maybe others cmds, are not intended to be invoked by the standard user. They potentially purge a directories and they

Bug#259380: libgocr: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement

2005-07-31 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:06:49PM +0200, Cosimo Alfarano wrote: Indeed, you are of big help, thanks for your patch! JFYI (and NMU-prevention) I'm working on it, src/hash.c has another problem, probably now fixed. Upload will follow soon, after tests done c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#305068: [Jocr-devels] [FWD] Bug#305068: Integer and heap overflow in gocr

2005-04-18 Thread Cosimo Alfarano
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:28:18PM +0200, Joerg wrote: Security holes are fixed. Patch is attached and SF is updated. Thanks for the report. Thank you to you, Joerg. I'm going to upload fixed packages. c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.