Andreas B. Mundt a...@debian.org (2015-02-05):
Thanks for adding me to the group! I thought a bit about taking
caring about d-i-n-a, and I think I will do that indeed. :-)
Great news!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andreas B. Mundt a...@debian.org (2015-02-03):
OK, I'll keep that in mind. (Perhaps I should/could take care of
di-netboot-assistant ...).
Having an active maintainer for it would be super nice, yes.
I've taken the liberty of adding you to the alioth d-i group; that
doesn't mean that you
Hi,
Andreas B. Mundt a...@debian.org (2015-02-02):
I have prepared a nmu which I plan to upload tomorrow after having
tested the modification once more.
(1-day notice is a short timeframe.)
Please find the debdiff attached, it consists of Jonas' patch with my
modification as well as the
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2015-01-29):
also sprach Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2015-01-29 16:44 +0100]:
Latest news (hrm) are:
[2013-07-17] Accepted 0.38a in unstable (low) (Christian Perrier)
[2013-07-28] di-netboot-assistant 0.38a MIGRATED to testing (Britney
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2015-01-29):
Package: di-netboot-assistant
Version: 0.38a
Severity: serious
[…]
So far I have been unable to find *anything* to make
di-netboot-assistant produce a usable TFTP directory layout, even
for a single architecture, without having to hand-edit
dann frazier da...@dannf.org (2015-01-28):
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I was about to push it but you apparently already did; adjusting tags
accordingly.
Cool, thanks :) Do you +1 me uploading this? If so, should I request an
unblock or does that need
Control: tag -1 - d-i + pending
dann frazier da...@debian.org (2015-01-28):
Package: libdebian-installer4
Version: 0.98
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i patch
The map_hardware[] table in src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c is no longer NULL
terminated. I believe this could lead to a segfault on
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-01-17):
I'm thinking the best way to go with this is to simply drop this misc
USB device support altogether from partman-target. Any objections?
Not from me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
and sorry for the lag, been busy with some offline things.
Romain Bignon rom...@symlink.me (2015-01-08):
On 08/Jan - 11:11, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I would expect the Debian packages to contain some kind of trust chain
to bootstrap the keyring handling, and weboob to abort instead
Package: weboob
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: security hole
Hi,
the keyring handling when adding a remote repository is… scary. Quoting
weboob/core/repositories.py:
| if not keyring.exists() or self.key_update keyring.version:
| # This is a
Bernhard Übelacker bernha...@vr-web.de (2014-12-12):
Hello,
probably I have found something more.
I tested in a VM with a more recent windows version, therefore I cannot
sure that this is the reason you saw (having to run win32-loader with
compatibility set to windows 7 on a windows 8.1
Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09):
Source: ttf-cjk-compact
Version: 1.20
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Hi,
ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie.
In fact, ruby1.8 was
Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09):
Source: kfreebsd-8
Version: 8.3-6+deb7u1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Hi, kfreebsd-8 build-depends on gcc-4.6, which does not exist in jessie.
kfreebsd-9 went away during
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-12-01):
Control: severity 767037 serious
Control: tag 767037 +patch
[ Raising severity to serious as I've heard more and more reports of
the problems here recently. ]
Hi folks,
i have two patches attached here, one for grub and one for
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-12-01):
Hmmm, you're right. There's some existing inconsistencies already,
which don't help. In various places we already use EFI (e.g. in the
GRUB package names, EFI System Partition etc.) but in others it's
UEFI. Maybe we'd be better with just EFI
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-12-01):
So, can someone please tell me what's wrong with this unblock request?
I did write in my first reply:
“At this stage, I'd rather see the security fix only.”
I can try to fix built-using generation adding gcc to the mix but I'm
afraid to do that
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-11-24):
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 14:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 RM: debian-installer [sparc] -- out of date, doesn't
build
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0800, Daniel Schepler
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-11-23):
Control: notfound -1 1.0.51
Probably a good idea to make BTS aware of when this issue was fixed.
notfound != fixed.
Not sure if it should be closed or if an stable update is needed, so I
leave it open.
Figuring it out is the plan:
Control: severity -1 important
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org (2014-11-21):
Package: blender
Version: 2.72.b+dfsg0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
A rapid code search shows that blender uses:
ssl_version=ssl.PROTOCOL_SSLv3
in release/scripts/addons/netrender/master.py:1161
However, this
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 librep-dev 0.90.2-1.4
Control: retitle -2 librep-dev points to i486-linux-gnu-gcc instead of
i586-linux-gnu-gcc
Control: block -1 by -2
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
/usr/lib/rep/i486-pc-linux-gnu/libtool --tag CC --mode=link
Control: tag 769642 patch
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-11-15):
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 librep-dev 0.90.2-1.4
Control: retitle -2 librep-dev points to i486-linux-gnu-gcc instead of
i586-linux-gnu-gcc
Control: block -1 by -2
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 android-libutils 21-1
Control: retitle -2 android-libutils: undefined references in
/usr/lib/android/libutils.so
Control: block -1 by -2
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: android-platform-build
Version: 21-2
Severity:
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libcatmandu-perl 0.9206-1
Control: retitle -2 libcatmandu-perl is not installable on jessie/i386: missing
libmarpa-r2-perl
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: libcatmandu-perl
Version: 0.9206-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie
Control: block -1 by 769649
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: libcatmandu-atom-perl
Version: 0.02-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a
Control: block -1 by 769649
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: libcatmandu-sru-perl
Version: 0.037-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libcatmandu-importer-getjson-perl 0.40-1
Control: retitle -2 libcatmandu-importer-getjson-perl is not installable on
jessie/i386: missing libcatmandu-perl
Control: block -2 by #769649
Control: block #769254 by -2
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
Control: block -1 by 769649
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: libcatmandu-rdf-perl
Version: 0.18-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a
Control: block -1 by 769649
Control: block -1 by 769253
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: libcatmandu-mab2-perl
Version: 0.07-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in
Control: block -1 by 769649
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: libcatmandu-store-lucy-perl
Version: 0.0101-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
Control: block -1 by 769646
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: android-platform-frameworks-base
Version: 21-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
Control: severity -1 important
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-14):
While testing the installation of all packages in sid, I ran
into the following problem:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Starting pkgProblemResolver
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: metamonger
Version: 0.20141008-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (2014-11-12):
Source: openturns
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a
+(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS and DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU) from dpkg and setuptools
+for the 2.7 build directory; use a wildcard instead. This fixes
+the FTBFS on i386 (Closes: #769262).
+
+ -- Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:32:16 +
+
shortuuid (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es (2014-11-07):
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
To stick with Santiago's earlier wording, we are now shooting the next
messenger (this time dpkg, after first working hard against base-files).
Indeed. I would not like to see dpkg as the next
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-09-06):
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05):
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true
Daniel Reichelt deb...@nachtgeist.net (2014-07-02):
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.48+deb7u1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
after running debootstrap the host's /run/shm tmpfs mount gets unmounted.
Since
the mount point /run/shm itself is set to
Control: severity -1 important
marv mar...@ctech.ca (2014-10-08):
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.113
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
Installing Debian Wheezy or Jessie with a net install iso on my EEEPC 1005HA
just won't work.
Control: tag -1 -patch
Control: reassign -1 dpkg 1.17.21
Control: affects -1 debootstrap
[ Context: debootstrap/wheezy is now unable to debootstrap either jessie
or sid. ]
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-11-05):
I'm not calling Adam's proposal insane. His proposal is just wrong.
What I
Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es (2014-11-05):
Yes, I am upset, because I've explained too many times already why it
is not a bug in base-files, and why trying to fix it in base-files
would be a complete and ugly hack, and yet people keep filing bugs
about base-files, killing the messenger, so to
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (2014-10-30):
Control: severity 767230 serious
Anyway: it seems that I've actually started a transition after the
transition freeze :/
Looking through the diff between the version of libotr in testing vs.
the version in sid. I saw no obvious ABI /
Armin Novak armin.no...@gmail.com (2014-10-28):
Package: libunbound2
Version: 1.4.22-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I've encountered the following issue:
I installed jitsi and enabled the DNSSEC resolver.
After that jitsi was no longer able
Armin Novak armin.no...@gmail.com (2014-10-28):
Strange,
Mine did not show the libssl.so
Fyi I'm using the version from testing, if that makes a difference.
It doesn't make any difference, packages migrate from unstable to testing
w/o modifications.
Try this:
$ ls -l
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2014-10-27):
Hi,
On Montag, 27. Oktober 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
I've heard that the version in wheezy-backports does not have this problem.
yes.
Maybe it could be just a matter of making an upload for the next point
release. I don't know.
Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es (2014-10-23):
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:08:50PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
for the avoidance of doubt: I have used debootstrap 1.0.48+deb7u1...
Ok, so the problem is that in wheezy, deboostrap is no longer able to
create a chroot of jessie or sid.
jessie is
Control: found -1 1.0.48
Control: fixed -1 1.0.56
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2014-10-23):
control: found -1 1.0.48+deb7u1
control: notfound -1 1.0.60~bpo70+1
control: notfound -1 1.0.56
Doesn't work with a mail to -done@…
I can confirm that the problem is gone with debootstrap
Package: libjpeg-dev
Version: 1:1.3.1-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[ odyx@ and debian-wb-team@ x-d-cc, please keep them in the loop? ]
Hi,
spotted by Didier, looking at cups build attempts:
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
|
Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org (2014-10-21):
I too see dpkg hang in the configure phase and consuming all the
memory it can get.
strace didn't yield anything useful apart from repeated brk() calls.
In these situations, something like gdb would probably more helpful than
strace. (At
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-10-16):
I've tweaked bits and pieces locally to use apt 1.0.9.3 at the
appropriate time and I can confirm that the easy/usual one-CD case is
fixed, thanks! It'd be nice to see what happens with several CDs but
that's not going to be me today.
Some
Hi,
David Kalnischkies da...@kalnischkies.de (2014-10-15):
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ X-D-Cc: debian-boot@, please keep it in the loop when replying. ]
[Done, although I don't see the header… (bad mutt, bad).]
IIRC it's munged when the submitted
Control: retitle -1 (re)implement missing firmware support through kernel log
grepping
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-10-15):
I've tested the patch just now, and it seem to be working as it
should
It appears loading firmware seems to work but I can't
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks d-i
[ X-D-Cc: debian-boot@, please keep it in the loop when replying. ]
Hi,
we received several bug reports about weekly installation images being
unable to find a kernel package to install on the freshly
Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (2014-10-15):
(The following is just a comment about the state of cdrom support, it
does not help with this specific issue)
No worries, that's appreciated, even if I had already gathered that from
other issues earlier this {year,release cycle}.
Bugs with
Mathieu Parent math.par...@gmail.com (2014-10-13):
Hello,
For reference:
See also #607536, for a similar fix in partman-auto.
Last I checked, there's no /cdrom.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-10-06):
I noticed this bug was mentioned as a regression in the Jessie
installer, and thought I should have a look at how this could be
improved from the hw-detect side.
The following patch replaces the code looking in
/dev/.udev/firmware-missing
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-10-06):
[Cyril Brulebois]
The idea is to parse kernel logs.
OK, that might work too.
No, it does.
Is the idea to use the output from 'dmesg'? Who is implementing it?
Is there a draft patch somewhere?
I am working on it, when I'm not busy fixing
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-10-06):
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 15:37 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I noticed this bug was mentioned as a regression in the Jessie
installer, and thought I should have a look at how this could be
improved from the hw-detect side.
The following
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-07):
I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because
it should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks?
I'm not sure how moving from an embedded code copy to shared libraries
across several udebs but used
Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (2014-10-05):
The whole discussion we are having currently is about letting FFmpeg
migrate to jessie!
So this is no 'unavoidable issue'.
But as you seem to be willing to consider this in principle, I think
now the time has come for the
Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com (2014-10-05):
On 05.10.2014 21:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'm not sure why one would think the decision still needs to be made.
That's because the last message from a release team member in this
bug said [1].
1: https://bugs.debian.org
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05):
Dear hurd and kfreebsd porters. I plan to upload the attached patch,
which along with the previous upload introduces a bind udeb, which
will be dynamically linked by the dhcp udeb. Please let me know if
this looks ok.
NAK.
+bind9
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05):
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If parallel building worked before you changed things, you get to fix
the issues rather than working around them. bind9 is a pain to build,
so having to deal with a forced -j1 is a nasty
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05):
Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat
easy for porters to test?
Since D-I Jessie Beta 2 is out I can't think of a reason why that
wouldn't be a good idea.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-02):
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I've uploaded an nmu fixing the issues revealed by the previous nmu to
delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached
patch.
The udeb handling is crazy
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-01):
On 05:46, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
We're now back with /dev/sda being selected by default even if the
installation
image is on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb is the hard drive being installed on.
(I think I see why the fix wasn't correct
Package: grub-installer
Version: 1.98
Severity: serious
Justification: sssh
[ Philip x-d-cc'd ]
We're now back with /dev/sda being selected by default even if the installation
image is on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb is the hard drive being installed on. Of
course, it's nicer than in wheezy since users
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-10-01):
Package: grub-installer
Version: 1.98
Severity: serious
Justification: sssh
[ Philip x-d-cc'd ]
We're now back with /dev/sda being selected by default even if the
installation
image is on /dev/sda and /dev
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-09-28):
control: tag -1 patch, pending
Hi,
I've uploaded an nmu fixing the issues revealed by the previous nmu to
delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached
patch.
The udeb handling is crazy.
Also, please explain why
David Suárez david.sephi...@gmail.com (2014-09-28):
Package: libclang1-3.5
Version: 1:3.5-3
New version, 1:3.5-3, have this bug too. I see 311 FTBFS on last archive
rebuild.
Logs at: http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/09/26/
Example pkgs:
alsa-lib alsaplayer apr-util
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2014-09-28):
Hello,
Ross Boylan, le Fri 26 Sep 2014 18:23:19 -0700, a écrit :
On http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual I selected the
link for amd64 pdf,
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/install.pdf.en. When I
view this it
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-09-28):
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.85.13
Severity: serious
apt-listchanges now depends on dpkg-dev. As dpkg-dev has lower
priority, that's a technical violation of policy but not one we need
to care *that*
David Prévot taf...@debian.org (2014-09-28):
Right. There is currently nothing magic to handle what release the
installation-guide is targeted to, so webmaster@d.o has to update one
cron script to install it where it belongs when the release changes. If
there is an in-advance notice before the
Source: nvidia-graphics-modules
Version: 340.32+3.14+2
Severity: serious
Justification: uninstallable binaries
Hi,
a new major linux version is ready to migrate to testing; please update
your package to deal with the new ABI (3.16-2-* instead of 3.14-2-* you
currently support).
In the meanwhile
[ Sorry for the lag. ]
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org (2014-09-02):
Am 02.09.2014 10:03, schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
And by the way, can someone please shed some more light on Debian bug:
760182
Per the bug report, there is no systemd support in d-i. Which then means
that I need to
Package: libbind-export-udeb
Version: 1:9.9.5.dfsg-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your NMU added a libbind-export-udeb udeb in the last bind9 upload but
it's nowhere installable.
| Depends: libc6-udeb (= 2.19), libdns-export100, libisc-export95,
Source: gtk+3.0
Version: 3.13.9-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
sorry I'm a bit lazy so I won't be investigating the reasons for each
architecture. Anyway, just to let you know: your package FTBFS on
arm64, armel, mips*.
Build log summary:
Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2014-09-20):
Control: tags -1 patch
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 08:22:31AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
the upload of tasksel 3.25 has broken tasksel in d-i:
Sep 20 06:04:28 pkgsel: starting tasksel
Sep 20 06:04:56 in-target: E
Sep 20 06:04:56
Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2014-09-20):
I have just tried to push the patch to the tasksel git repository,
but I seems that I do not have write permission there. Could you push
and upload the fix?
On the git side:
| kibi@wodi:~/hack/tasksel.git$ git push origin HEAD $(git describe)
|
Control: severity -1 serious
Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de (2014-09-19):
Maybe I am missing something, but I fail to see why this is grave and
not serious?
Yeah, adjusting severity.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: severity -1 important
Askar Safin safinas...@mail.ru (2014-09-21):
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.48+deb7u1
Severity: grave
debootstrap doesn't unmount /proc and /sys (on my Debian GNU/Linux)
if caught Ctrl-C in unpacking stage.
I started debootstrap, then I changed my mind,
Source: grub2
Version: 2.02~beta2-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package started FTBFSing on mipsel with 2.02~beta2-12, confirmed on
2.02~beta2-13. Hopefully pasting the right lines, sorry if the parallel
build makes that inaccurate:
| gcc-4.9 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Control: found -1 2.11.0-6
Vedran Furač vedran.fu...@gmail.com (2014-08-23):
Package: fontconfig-config
Version: 2.11.0-6.1
Severity: serious
Every time I change fontconfig configuration by removing symlinks in
/etc/fonts/conf.d/ you return it back after upgrade. This is /etc and
you
Package: kicad
Version: 0.20140622+bzr4027-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer installable
Hi,
zlib-bin has been dropped from src:zlib[1]. The cruft report[2] says:
| * source package zlib version 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2 no longer builds
| binary package(s): zlib-bin
| on
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-09-11):
[Cyril Brulebois]
Of course a failing d-i build means src:debian-installer FTBFS. What
else would that be?
Thanks for asking. To me, it could also mean a failing to build a ISO
with d-i udebs on it. But I had already tested ISO builds
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-09-11):
Given that udebs and debs have different name spaces, I do not see any
problem myself with dropping a name from one namespace and introducing
it in another, which is what I did when I renamed archdetect to
archdetect-udeb in the udeb namespace
Package: archdetect
Version: 1.100.0.exp.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Petter,
I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix renaming
and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is pretty clear: you
never tested a d-i build using those udebs. You
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-09-11):
Package: archdetect
Version: 1.100.0.exp.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Petter,
I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix renaming
and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is pretty clear
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-09-11):
[Cyril Brulebois]
I'm not sure why you thought it would be a good idea to mix
renaming and reusing udeb/deb package name, but one thing is
pretty clear: you never tested a d-i build using those udebs. You
would have otherwise noticed
Florian Ernst florian_er...@gmx.net (2014-09-09):
Hello there,
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 03:07:36AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 15:05 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
This is the commit which is reverted in 3.2.58, which fixes these
issue:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-08):
On 04/09/14 20:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
this package is no longer installable on kfreebsd-* since it depends on
ntfs-3g-udeb; this totally breaks d-i on kfreebsd-* since partman-base
depends on partman-partitioning, and many other
Source: qtwebkit
Version: 2.3.2.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-* since the above version
(last success: 2.2.1-7.1), due the following linking error:
| g++ -c -Wall -Wextra
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part;
Philipp, should I upload that and we'll figure out the rdnssd part
another
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05):
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed
Package: partman-partitioning
Version: 104
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
this package is no longer installable on kfreebsd-* since it depends on
ntfs-3g-udeb; this totally breaks d-i on kfreebsd-* since
Hi Steven!
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-05):
But it seems I can still build d-i from unstable udebs, and anna
fetches all the needed udebs, not caring that partman-partitioning/104
and partman-basicfilesystems/98 are uninstallable. In partman itself
I don't notice any
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (2014-09-02):
On Monday 01 September 2014 10:40 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[debian-b...@lists.debian.org in X-d-cc, please keep it in the loop. ]
Hi,
this udeb now depends on a non-udeb package: libsystemd-daemon0, making
it uninstallable. This in turn
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org (2014-08-11):
tag 745521 pending
thanks
Date: Mon Aug 11 10:42:05 2014 +0200
Author: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Commit ID: d3fa3559a560c6d90840db6372c8ba0f19c7bda7
Commit URL:
Source: multipath-tools
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package FTBFS on all buildds so far, with:
| dh_installdirs
| mkdir -p /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/sbin
| /usr/bin/make install INSTALL_PROGRAM=install -s
DESTDIR=/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp LIB=lib
| install
Package: multipath-udeb
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[ debian-b...@lists.debian.org in X-d-cc, please keep it in the loop. ]
Hi,
this udeb now depends on a non-udeb package: libsystemd-daemon0, making
it uninstallable. This in turn makes
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-09-01):
your package FTBFS on all buildds so far, with:
| dh_installdirs
| mkdir -p /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/sbin
| /usr/bin/make install INSTALL_PROGRAM=install -s
DESTDIR=/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp LIB=lib
| install -m 755 debian/dmsetup_env
501 - 600 of 2909 matches
Mail list logo
