On 08/29/2010 05:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Package: xconq
Version: 7.4.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid squeeze
xconq seems dead upstream, and requires an obsolete Tcl/Tk version, so it seems
a good candidate for removal.
If you don't think so, please close this bug report, otherwise I'll c
't inflate bug severities.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Julien Cristau wrote:
> reopen 515976
> kthxbye
>
> On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 04:09 +, David Nusinow wrote:
>> commit b73bd774ce52c946b2ace622d98f3df584258ec9
>> Author: David Nusinow
>> Date: Thu Feb 19 23:06:59 2009 -0500
>>
>> Bump x11pr
Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:34 -0500
> David Nusinow wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> I think I've figured out this bug. It looks like the new libxi was built
>> against the new input protocol headers, while the server was built
>> against the old heade
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:34 -0500
David Nusinow wrote:
...
> I think I've figured out this bug. It looks like the new libxi was built
> against the new input protocol headers, while the server was built
> against the old headers. The mismatch in the proto
rver to
alioth. Could you add the following to your sources.list and upgrade
your server to see if that fixes the bug?
deb http://pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org/libxi-fix ./
If it does, I'll sign the packages and make an upload of this build to
unstable.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:42:53AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
> > Oops, I mean Python 2.5.
>
> Ok, I'll try it at work little later (where topshelf is broken), but
> topshelf works fine on my home system
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
> Oops, I mean Python 2.5.
Ok, I'll try it at work little later (where topshelf is broken), but
topshelf works fine on my home system which does not have 2.5 installed.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
was using python 2.4. Interestingly, this program works on one of
my systems but not the other. I don't have any idea why this would be.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s_key=/apps/panel/applets/applet_11/prefs;background=none:;orient=up;size=x-small;locked_down=false
- David Nusinow
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1
with xserver-xorg instead. To
be honest, I'm not sure why this ended up in x11-common instead of here.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
really interested in working on it.
- David Nusinow
[0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with misterious errors like "server error" or "connection timed out".
>
> Calling Xorg directly on the console works fine. The problem can be
> fixed by linking /etc/X11/X to /usr/bin/Xorg.
Thanks for catching this, I missed it on my clean install tests. I'll be
pus
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:08:19AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> David Nusinow schrieb:
> > Ok, I missed that somehow. So it should probably be hal that generates this
> > and not the xserver?
>
> The problem with hal generating the fdi file, would be that it could get
> o
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:17:10PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:02:35PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
t_property_string to dynamically set the keyboard
layout at runtime in hal's database, and the server can just draw that
information from xorg.conf initially.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:50:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > The nouveau project is deobfuscating the code as they go. Even if their DRI
> > work isn't ready for Lenny, we'
run to make the
change. The user could re-install the package with dpkg -i, but that'd be
annoying. Maybe we could ship a script to make the change that the postinst
runs, and that the user could run manually if they need to?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le is set. If the variable is not set,
the error in this bug report will still cause problems. We'll be uploading
this patch in the next few days to either experimental or unstable. If you
have any additional questions, please cc debian-x@lists.debian.org so we
can respond.
- David Nusinow
[0
ade on a etch/sid mixed
> machine.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've fixed this in git, and I'll
be uploading it shortly.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
en
> right now (like upgrading from xfree86 to xorg using etch's aptitude,
> although I haven't tested that yet).
Looks good to me. Upload away. Hopefully we can get more testing with that
configuration before the release is out.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:47:40AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:40:26PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Ouch. This is a bug in aptitude, aiui. It should be choosing the first
> > option if nothing is currently installed, and allowing the second to
but I guess that's for
> another bug, which will be far harder to track down... :-)
Gyah... did xserver-xorg error out during postinst? I'll have to look for a
codepath that can cause that beyond errors.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey go. Even if their DRI
work isn't ready for Lenny, we'll definitely be pulling their deobfuscated
code.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is up tomorrow, so if he
doesn't reply I'll close the bug then.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:34:16PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> tags 385078 unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:59:29PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > package xserver-xorg
> > reopen 385078
> > thanks
> >
> >
impossible mouse configuration other than
> > /dev/input/mice,
> > It has been closed by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> >* Make /dev/input/mice the default mouse port in the
> > xserver-xorg.templates
> > file. Also provide the devices in thi
/X11/fonts/misc
> xfonts-base.alias
>
> This absence seems to be the source of my problems. What can I do to solve
> them?
>
> Is this a bug in xfonts-base?
I've just uploaded a new set of xfonts* packages with fixes from Eugene
Konev to unstable. They're in incomi
ver as well. I believe this
contains an upstream fix for your problem. Thank you!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ian warnings that my
> build system reports. I will be glad to fix this if the patch works.
> Thank you very much for your time and attention to details.
Thank you for the patch but I think this is not exactly the right solution.
I'll work up a proper fix for this over the coming couple
used by a botched upload that was meant for experimental.
I'm uploading the fixed 1.0.2-10 to unstable right now, so I'm closing this
report. Thank you!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> reassign 382988 kdebase
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:58:39PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >Could someone give me some clue as to what programs in xbase-config are
>
Hi all,
Could someone give me some clue as to what programs in xbase-config are
segfaulting in this case? I'm digging in to the libxkb* code now, but my
guess is that this is a server configuration issue, in which case I need
your xorg.conf. Thanks!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBS
es seem to appear on all architectures.
This is due to me not remembering to bump the required version of the mesa
packages in the build-depends. It's fixed in svn by Drew and I'll be
uploading a fixed version shortly. Thanks for the report!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> > Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst
> > gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11
> > switch.
>
&g
gin with, because in
my own tests with upgrading x11-common with the /usr/bin/X11 error
condition, I didn't hit this bug, so I'm not 100% sure I understand it
fully.
Now, the way around this that I can see is that the new postinst needs to
manually re-create the symlinks prior to exiting du
r the next week but I also want to push
forward with getting 7.1 in to experimental, as that's been lagging far too
much.
> Drew,
> hoping you know something he doesn't know
I wish...
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; this issue:
Yes, a new upstream version of the library was just released dealing with
this issue. I'll be uploading it to unstable within a day or two hopefully.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oesn't start is pretty
extreme.
> Either way, there is still a bug in gnupg-agent here; at most, the
> x11-common workaround affects the severity of the gnupg-agent bug, but it's
> still a gnupg-agent bug. And it's still a bug that would manifest when
> installing gnu
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:12:08AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> David,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:32:09PM -0700, David Nusinow wrote:
> >* Conflict with old versions of xfonts-base. Thanks Toni Mueller.
> > (closes: #367339)
>
> Why is this file in t
this upgrade transparent,
but I'd rather not break things out from under their noses if possible.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r seems to have font files in it which are symlinks to
> > /usr/share/fonts/type1.
>
> OK. I don't know if the Type1 fonts are the ones that your system is
> looking for, but we should be able to figure that out as soon as
> xserver-xorg 1:7.0.18 is available in un
hat it needs.
Second, the xdm bug is an actual bug in the dependencies that will only
affect testing until the rest of X11R7 migrates. For that you'll just have
to be patient. Use an alternate *dm or just use startx for the time being.
We're working hard on getting all the pieces in to test
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > &
t really sure why Daniel removed the template in the ubuntu
stuff. I'll look in to it and possibly add it back. Removing it will go
well with my ultimate plan to dismember dexconf though, so that'll be my
preference if it's something sensible.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what's actualy going
on, because this is incredibly bizarre.
Finally, could you send us your /var/log/Xorg.0.log from when the server
tries to start?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 363169 xserver-xorg gets removed by x11-common rather than upgraded
thanks
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 10:36:30PM -0400, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:39:50PM -0400, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
> >>Package: xserver-xorg
>
t; this could mean, except for the possibility that an older version has
> been uploaded since I installed it (mere minutes ago).
What version was installed before?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er the old discover_video function
from the 6.9 branch. I didn't realize that it has been altered to remove
support for discover2 in Ubuntu, and since I had only discover1 installed
on my own system I never saw this error. I'll be uploading this fix
shortly. Thanks again everyone.
- Da
greatly appreciated,
> nonetheless.
Thank you, I really appreciate that.
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:47:43PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > The x11-common package provides a symlink from /usr/X11R6/bin to /usr/bin.
> > This should handle your kdm problem. The package probably isn
11-common package provides a symlink from /usr/X11R6/bin to /usr/bin.
This should handle your kdm problem. The package probably isn't fully
installed on your system due to a bug or two that will be fixed pending
another upload. Thanks for your report and your patience.
- David Nusinow
--
T
7;t actually seem
to be getting patched, due to not having quilt in the build-depends. I'm
making our patch system error out if this build-depends isn't in place and
the patch target is called. That, and adding the build-depends to this
package should fix the problem.
- David Nusi
kind of came on too fast
for me. Actually, binNMU's for all the packages should, in theory, be
sufficient for a fix. We'll be installing a compatibility symlink in place
of /usr/X11R6/bin (to /usr/bin) and packages should be able to install
cleanly. We just need to make sure they do so afte
re Xorg from experimental.
Hi, could you try this again after the next dinstall? libxrender version
0.9.0.2-3 was uploaded and it should fix the problem. If so, I'd like
confirmation so I can close this bug.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where inside X.
Agreed. I'll close this when I upload my fix. Sorry about the noise.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Florian Cramer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. April 2006 um 23:10:34 Uhr (-0400) schrieb David Nusinow:
>
> > This sounds like your /etc/init.d/x11-common script isn't correctly
> > creating the necessary files to allow clients to con
; [xdm was not used to start the X session.]
This sounds like your /etc/init.d/x11-common script isn't correctly
creating the necessary files to allow clients to connect to the server. Can
you run "/etc/init.d/x11-common restart" and get no errors?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gtk-engines-industrial. He says that the strace shows the
apps are all looking for the Inustrial cursor theme. Reassigning the bug
there. Thanks!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eeds them is failing to
> > build.
> >
> > It should be:
> > /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft
>
> I've just NMU'd this, patch is attached.
Great, thanks a ton for handling this!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;ve posted my
plan for uploading already, and as soon as testing is more or less secure,
I'm going to put the modular packages in unstable.
- David Nusinow
's got a versioned dep on >= 1:1.0
> libxdmcp-dev
Fix uploaded. Thanks!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:42:25PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 04:59:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > tags 350458 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Attached is a patch to add the freetype cflags back into the xft.pc file.
> > The previous pat
ig.in, but other than that it's the same fix (courtesy
of Russ Albery). Will that be sufficient or do I need to put the variables
in xft.pc.in as well?
I put preliminary packages up on people.debian.org/~dnusinow and I'm
waiting for Eric Dorland to confirm that it fixes the build issue wit
rs to be
> the only thing preventing the transition of X.org 6.9 into Testing.
None that I'm aware of but I haven't followed up on it myself. I'll see
what I can find. fwiw, it'll be *very* unfortunate to not ship a GLX with
etch.
- David Nusinow
d, then just requeue kdepim for rebuilding.
>From what I understand, the .pc files are superior to .la files, although
if I'm wrong someone should feel free to correct me.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hunderbird, firefox...).
Ok, fixed in svn. I'll upload a new version soon. Thanks!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:58:11PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Cool, same fix. I'll apply and also restore DH_OPTIONS afterwards for
> > cleanliness sake. Thank you!
>
> Restoring DH_OPTIONS afterwards is some
ither way, unsetting the -s and then re-setting it after we do
dh_shlibdeps for libx11 can't hurt. If you're correct than I've already
fixed the bug inadvertently :-) If Eugene is right, then we'll have that
fix too.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-VF:XWSD-Special-Depends=$(XWSD_SPECIAL_DEPENDS)
> dh_md5sums
Cool, same fix. I'll apply and also restore DH_OPTIONS afterwards for
cleanliness sake. Thank you!
- David Nusinow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
his by re-defining DH_OPTIONS to null
prior to calling dh_shlibdeps for libx11, and then re-instating it back to
-s after? Note that I can't find where the -a is explicitly set for us, so
I'm assuming that -s has essentially the same bug.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
checks still fail for mips and mipsel. This causes xbase-clients to
> be
> uninstallable, so is holding up the KDE 3.5 transition, as kdelibs depends
> on xbase-clients...
Right, this is already fixed in svn. I'm polishing off the last bits for -3
and planning to upload it tomorrow. Basically #347228 is a last-minute
surprise that's causing the holdup.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
udio will
> fail due to this problem.)
Ok, and why would the dependencies not be recursively expanded? Is this a
new change?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
esn't ${shlibs:Depends} add this automatically like it
should? All these other deps are added correctly. Any clues from anyone?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work.
So, X *does* work? If not, how does it fail to work?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:15:43PM +0100, January Weiner wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for the fix. This is pending in svn and will go in to unstable later
this weekend.
ll fail to start for them. Simply conflicting will
allow them to keep a working server until nvidia-glx is fixed.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but I
have no idea why.
Did you hold back any of the X libs or simply never upgrade them when going
to sid? Do you still have sarge sources in your sources.list? Are you
pinned incorrectly? There's a number of things that could have gone wrong
here and I'm at a loss to figure them out, since this should have worked
transparently.
- David Nusinow
ght into the patches directory at #305; if you want to move it down to
> #203 next to the other alpha reloc fix that it depends on, you'll have
> to fix up the offsets in patch 303_arm_cache_flush.diff as well.
Thanks, I will slip it in at #203 as soon as I can get all the patches f
is never accessed.)
>
> So a consistent replacement along these lines should do the trick.
> Shall I whip up a patch?
To be honest, I'd rather not mess with this file unless we have to. The
simple fix in Redhat's bugzilla looks a lot less invasive, and it seems to
fix all the repor
ommitted. You are now attributed in the administrivia section.
Thanks for the great doc.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
80 matches
Mail list logo
