Bug#779902: /tmp can be mounted as tmpfs against user's will

2015-03-20 Thread Didier Roche
Le 20/03/2015 09:03, Michael Biebl a écrit : [adding the bug to CC] Am 20.03.2015 um 08:46 schrieb Didier Roche: Le 20/03/2015 08:39, Michael Biebl a écrit : thanks for the patch. I had something like this in mind. We could be extra nice and only add the After=tmp.mount if tmp.mount

Bug#779902: /tmp can be mounted as tmpfs against user's will

2015-03-20 Thread Didier Roche
ensures that it's started at boot, before services having PrivateTmp. Cheers, Didier --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. http://www.avast.com From 624f2a956a93acfd2da9132e991994c4e3218f2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com Date: Thu

Bug#779902: /tmp can be mounted as tmpfs against user's will

2015-03-06 Thread Didier Roche
Le 06/03/2015 16:04, Michael Biebl a écrit : Am 06.03.2015 um 10:10 schrieb Martin Pitt: Control: found -1 215-12 Control: tag -1 confirmed Ça va Didier, Didier Roche [2015-03-06 9:36 +0100]: In debian, tmp.mount is disabled through a distro-patch by default. It means we don't want user's

Bug#779902: /tmp can be mounted as tmpfs against user's will

2015-03-06 Thread Didier Roche
Package: systemd Severity: serious In debian, tmp.mount is disabled through a distro-patch by default. It means we don't want user's system to get /tmp on tmpfs without explicit enablement (either by enabling tmp.mount unit or via fstab). We noticed that starting an unit using PrivateTmp=yes

Bug#771739: could not start nodm with systemd 217-1 or 217-2

2014-12-02 Thread Didier Roche
Le 02/12/2014 12:28, Michael Biebl a écrit : Am 02.12.2014 um 06:48 schrieb Martin Pitt: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [2014-12-02 13:36 +0800]: # cat /etc/X11/default-display-manager cat: /etc/X11/default-display-manager: No such file or directory Indeed, nodm doesn't use this file at all, nor does it

Bug#771739: could not start nodm with systemd 217-1 or 217-2

2014-12-02 Thread Didier Roche
Le 02/12/2014 13:44, Michael Biebl a écrit : Am 02.12.2014 um 13:06 schrieb Didier Roche: This is to fix multiple bug reports where people don't have (or have multiple) dm services starting. Can you provide links to such bug reports so we have a bit of a context? Sure: https

Bug#771739: could not start nodm with systemd 217-1 or 217-2

2014-12-02 Thread Didier Roche
Le 02/12/2014 14:33, Michael Biebl a écrit : Am 02.12.2014 um 14:17 schrieb Didier Roche: Le 02/12/2014 13:44, Michael Biebl a écrit : Am 02.12.2014 um 13:06 schrieb Didier Roche: This is to fix multiple bug reports where people don't have (or have multiple) dm services starting. Can you

Bug#771653: systemd 217 breaks X11 (not more kdm and loggin and using startx gives me no mouse)

2014-12-01 Thread Didier Roche
Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hey, I tried this morning on a vm (with multiple dms installed: lightdm, xdm, gdm and kdm) and when choosing kdm as the alternative to choose in the postinst and checking the status, all seems fine: - all other units are disabled, -

Bug#771287: systemd: Multiple DMs can be started at the same time or none under systemd

2014-11-28 Thread Didier Roche
Package: systemd Version: 215-7 Severity: serious We are starting to see multiple bug reports about several display managers started at boot. In addition, if /etc/X11/default-display-manager if changed manually, we can end up in a situation where no display manager is started at all on

Bug#770404: systemd: breaks lightdm, does not start anymore

2014-11-25 Thread Didier Roche
Actually, I think we can settle it that way (which would help fixing fixing bug #770633: Everytime we have a service which provided an alternative, we declare an Alias=this alternative.service name. Then, we patch systemctl to update the alternative file (if it exists) on this alias name for

Bug#770404: systemd: breaks lightdm, does not start anymore

2014-11-24 Thread Didier Roche
Le 21/11/2014 22:46, Sjoerd Simons a écrit : reassign 770404 lxdm thanks On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:01:50PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: This looks wrong. I think it might be caused by this in lxdm.service: [Install] Alias=display-manager.service Neither gdm3 nor lightdm have that,

Bug#770404: systemd: breaks lightdm, does not start anymore

2014-11-24 Thread Didier Roche
Le 24/11/2014 10:01, Sjoerd Simons a écrit : On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 09:31 +0100, Didier Roche wrote: Le 21/11/2014 22:46, Sjoerd Simons a écrit : reassign 770404 lxdm thanks On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:01:50PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: This looks wrong. I think it might be caused